Module 5 - Political Structures in The Philippines I
Module 5 - Political Structures in The Philippines I
Module 5 - Political Structures in The Philippines I
What are ‘political structures’? What exactly do people refer to when they speak of ‘political structures’? In
general, the term ‘political structures’ is often used to refer to political organizations and their interactions and
relationships with one another. At times, political structures also refer to the ways in which the government is
run. Presently, however, students of politics often use the term political institutions instead of political
structures. Political institutions do not only refer to political organizations, but, more broadly, to a “stable,
recurring pattern of behaviour” (Goodin 1996:22 cited in Lowndes, Marsh and Stoker, 2018 :55). This means
that when talking about political institutions, we do not only refer to the formal organizations of government.
Attention is also given to “informal conventions of political life” (Ibid). It is believed that knowledge of the latter
would enable us to better understand how political structures work. Thus, in this module, the ideas of social
contract and constitution are discussed. These ideas cover the concepts of power, authority, legitimacy, and
rights. Focusing on these ideas will help us determine the bases of the existence and functions of political
structures in our society today and will hopefully deepen our understanding of how political structures work.
Indeed, it is very important for all of us to understand the bases of the exercise of power in our society. What
right do people have to make us do something we do not like? Do we have the right to resist? Where did that
power come from in the first place? Why do we comply with laws, rules, and regulations? These are only some
of the questions that are very important for all citizens to understand.
By the end of this module, learners are expected to By the end of this module, learners are expected to:
demonstrate an understanding of:
● Analyze aspects of social organization; and
● Cultural, social, and political institutions as sets ● Identify one's role in social groups and
of norms and patterns of behavior that relate to institutions.
major social interests.
_____________________
Instructional Guide for Teachers
Module 5: Political Structures (Part I)
Do you agree that man is naturally good and free? Why or why not?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
| Lesson Objectives
| Key Concepts
| Study Guide
A. To have an idea about who Thomas Hobbes was and what England was like during his lifetime:
_____________________
2|
Instructional Guide for Teachers
Module 5: Political Structures (Part I)
● Read this short article on the Life and Works of Thomas Hobbes by Duncan, Stewart, "Thomas
Hobbes", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.),
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hobbes/#1
● Watch this short video on Thomas Hobbes and England in the 17th century,
https://youtu.be/9i4jb5XBX5s.
● Read the excerpts from the Leviathan in Curtis, ed. Great Political Theories, Vol. 1, pp. 296-315.
● Read about the life and works of John Locke from this article from the International Encyclopedia of
Philosophy, https://iep.utm.edu/locke/#H1
● Watch this video clip on the life and legacy of John Locke, https://youtu.be/b2NnEfhQ15M.
● Read the excerpts from the Second Treatise of Civil Government (Curtis, ed. Great Political Theories,
Vol. 1, pp. 337-354).
● Read about his life and works from this article, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rousseau/#Life;
● Watch this video, Jean Jacques Rousseau Biography https://youtu.be/VqOaG24aPSc; and
● Read the excerpts from the Social Contract (Ebenstein and Ebenstein, Great Political Thinkers, pp.
505-506, 508-520).
As we know, power is found in different types of social and political structures. In its broadest meaning, power
refers to the ability to do something in order to achieve a desired outcome. Legitimate power – or one that is
recognized to be rightful – is called authority. Thus, a person is obeyed by others because he or she is
recognized as a rightful or legitimate leader. The sociologist, Max Weber (1864-1920) studied the
transformation of societies and observed that the bases of the legitimacy of rule vary in different types of
societies. Weber identified three pure types of authority: traditional, charismatic, and legal-rational. In certain
cases, the type of authority may be a mix of these types.
Political structures in different societies have evolved over time. Historical experiences (such as having been
colonized) and cultural practices are some of the factors that have influenced the development and functioning
of political structures in various societies. The so-called Social Contract Theory from the ideas of three
political thinkers who lived from the 16th to the 18th centuries, namely, Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), John
Locke (1632 to 1704) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1788), offer some explanations about the nature of
the state and its institutions, the power that the rulers of the state exercise, and the rights of the citizens. In a
nutshell, these ideas provide explanations about why societies and governments were formed.
Oftentimes, a state is thought of to be synonymous with government. Many Filipinos, in fact, may tend to think
of the state in this way. This is understandable because the state exercises its power through the government
_____________________
3|
Instructional Guide for Teachers
Module 5: Political Structures (Part I)
and its various institutions. However, the state, as defined above, is much more than the government.
There are many views regarding the origin and nature of the state. From the Greek philosophers Plato and
Aristotle, we learn that the state is a natural institution. It is natural because it emerges from the necessity to
work together so that certain needs can be met and goals can be achieved. Thus, the state exists because
people need to live together.
Human beings are by nature social beings. Aristotle, for instance, believed that a person who does not live in a
society is either a beast (animal) or a god (does not need another being to provide for their needs). Based on
this perspective, a state exists not for the sake of itself but to achieve a higher good, such as the happiness of
the entire community—what we call the common good. For his part, the Italian thinker, Niccolo Machiavelli
(1469-1527), argued that the state exists for the sake of itself, i.e., to get, collect, and expand power.
The Social Contract Theory presents another view: the state and the institutions of society are seen as
products of a social contract – an agreement made by the members of society that defines and influences their
interactions, particularly with those in authority. As mentioned above, there are three major ideas regarding the
nature of the social contract. The English philosopher, Thomas Hobbes, thought that the agreement came
about because of the need to guarantee the security of the people. The main role of the political ruler was to
maintain order and security within society. Another English philosopher, John Locke, thought that the social
contract was needed to guarantee the fair and impartial enforcement of the law. For Locke, human beings lived
in a state of nature governed by rationality and natural law. The primary function of the state, as defined by the
social contract, is to guarantee that individuals exercise their natural rights to life, liberty, and property. A third
view on the social contract, articulated by the French philosopher, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, emphasizes the
idea of the natural equality of human beings. Therefore, the only justified authority is one that emerges from an
agreement among all in which each particular will has been submitted to the general will. What this means is
that no person or entity possesses the right to rule over people unless everyone has agreed to such rule. The
power exercised by the state is only made possible because the citizens have given their consent and have
expressed their will to be governed. The ideas of the social contract are elaborated below.
Thomas Hobbes’ masterpiece was the Leviathan, published in 1651. In this work, Hobbes wrote about his idea
of a social contract and argued that it (the social contract) was necessary for men to live peacefully and
securely under the absolute rule of the Leviathan (the ruler). Some scholars have commented that Hobbes’
social contract theory rests on his theory of human nature.
● Nature of the human being: for Hobbes, all human beings enjoy absolute equality; they desire the same
thing: power. The “right of nature” is the liberty each man has “to use his own power, as he will himself,
for the preservation of his own nature; that is to say, of his own life”.
● State of nature: a state of war where there is no guarantee for one’s life; life in the state of nature is
“nasty, poor, brutish, and short”.
● Reason for the establishment of the social contract: self-preservation; people gave up their rights to
protect their lives: they have transferred their natural rights to the ruler for the preservation of their lives;
sovereign power has been transferred by the people to the ruler
● Role of the Leviathan: to protect people from themselves; without the social contract (therefore, without
the Leviathan), there can be no order
_____________________
4|
Instructional Guide for Teachers
Module 5: Political Structures (Part I)
● Obligation of subjects: preserve the social contract by following the ruler; disobedience or rebellion
against the government is tantamount to going back to the state of nature, which is a state of war.
Political Obligation refers to the duty of citizens to obey a government that has the right to rule or is
legitimate. The agreement that people have made for themselves (social contract) is a basis of political
obligation. People obey their rulers because they have given political rulers the right to rule. Basically, this is
used to justify absolutism and authoritarianism. Under such systems, citizens are viewed merely as subjects
who have given up their rights and therefore have no right to resist or even question their rulers. For example, if
one lives under this government described by Hobbes (i.e., an authoritarian or absolutist government), a citizen
who is accused of rebellion or any crime would have no right to defend himself or herself. It would not matter
whether the citizen is guilty or not.
The second version of the Social Contract Theory comes from another English philosopher, John Locke.
Locke’s version of the social contract theory differs from that of Hobbes. Both Hobbes and Locke lived during
the 17th century, which was a period of chaos in England. If Hobbes argued for absolutism in the Leviathan,
Locke’s social contract theory justified the right of the people to resist tyrannical rule. Below are some of the
important ideas from the work of Locke:
● State of nature: a state of “perfect freedom”; but inconveniences arise from the practice of equality of all,
i.e., in terms of their life, liberty, and possessions
● Nature of man: equal with other men; rational: man has reason that enables him to determine what is
right from wrong and recognize the rights of other men
● Civil society: established by the social contract; to address the inconveniences that arise from the state
of nature so that each man does not become the judge of his own case
● Social contract: does not mean that people have given up their rights, but the goal of the institution of
civil society is the enhancement of one’s rights to life, liberty, and property.
● Role of government: not to rule absolutely but to rule over people as their trustee; sovereignty has not
been given up by the people but has been entrusted to the government; people have the right to resist
when the ruler has become abusive.
Comparing the ideas of the two English philosophers, we can clearly see the differences in their perspectives.
In the Hobbesian version of the social contract, the citizens’ rights have already been lost, since they gave it up
for the sake of securing their lives. What this means in practical terms is that the citizens’ right to express their
views and be heard by the Leviathan has been lost. The Leviathan governs and all the people need to do is to
follow. In contrast, for Locke, while the government exercises power on behalf of the people, they (the citizens)
have not lost their rights to express their views and even to resist a bad government. As noted above, the
people have not given up their rights but have only entrusted their rights to the government. Therefore, the
citizens have every right to take back what they have entrusted to the government. Finally, as the trustee, the
role of the government is to make sure that the people’s right to life, liberty, and property is enhanced. The role
of government therefore is to make people’s lives better.
_____________________
5|
Instructional Guide for Teachers
Module 5: Political Structures (Part I)
A third version of the Social Contract Theory emerged from one of the works of the French philosopher,
Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Of the three social contract theorists, Rousseau was the only one who did not have
close contacts with people in the aristocracy or work with people in power. The French writer had an interesting
background, and unlike Hobbes and Locke, he did not attend prestigious schools or universities. The third
version of the theory from Rousseau will, hopefully, enrich your assessment of views on the relationship
between the state (particularly those who are in power) and society. The following are excerpts from
Rousseau’s The Social Contract (1762).
● “Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains”. This was Rousseau’s way of expressing how the
society of his time did not recognize the natural freedom of individuals.
● In the state of nature, man is free but ruled by his instincts or appetite. Therefore, he is not truly free.
● For Rousseau, the purpose of the social contract is “…to form an association which will defend and
protect with the whole common force the person and goods of each associate, and in which each, while
uniting himself with all, may still obey himself alone, and remain as free as before”. What this means is
that, for Rousseau, the purpose of the social contract is the enhancement of one’s liberty. Like Hobbes
and Locke, Rousseau believed that a person is naturally free. However, in the state of nature, such
freedom possessed by a person cannot be considered real or true freedom. Why is this so? It is
because such natural freedom is exercised by a person who is governed simply by his or her natural
instincts. To become a better human being exercising true freedom, Rousseau believed that a person
must live in a society. This is what it means when Rousseau wrote that, “Man can be forced to be free.”
A person learns about true freedom – first, civil liberty, and then moral liberty – only when they live in a
society. The product of the social contract, therefore, is a community that defends and protects the
rights of each person. The citizen is thus both sovereign and subject. They are sovereign because they
are part of the community. They are also a subject because they must follow what the sovereign wills.
Concretely, what this means is that the people exercise sovereign power (for example, in choosing or
electing the leaders of their country) and at the same time, follow the laws that are made by their
government. To do these dual functions (sovereign and subject), Rousseau believed that citizens need
to be developed and educated. They must know how to exercise the freedom they possess and not be
ruled simply by their instincts. When citizens follow rules that their rulers make, they exercise civil
liberty. When citizens follow laws that they made themselves, they exercise moral liberty. For
Rousseau, the highest form of freedom is moral liberty. This is achieved when a citizen can identify their
own will as that of the common good or the General Will.
● The purpose of the social contract according to Rousseau is to express the “General Will”, which is
aimed at the good of all. It is different from the “will of all” which is the sum of particular wills. Rousseau
also considered that people may identify the will of the majority (“will of all”) as the General Will. It is not
necessarily so. What Rousseau meant by the General Will is not simply counting of votes, or
determining how many are in favor of a certain position. Knowing the General Will requires the active
participation of the citizens. What this implies is that the citizens are knowledgeable of the issue being
discussed and can make an informed decision (not being ruled simply by their instincts). When citizens
are active, they are sovereign, according to Rousseau.
● For Rousseau, the people remain sovereign. This means that they are the highest power. Once they
enter a social contract, they do not lose this power. They do not give it up (“sovereignty is inalienable”).
They also do not divide sovereign power and delegate the power to another body such as a small group
of men and women (“sovereignty is indivisible”).
_____________________
6|
Instructional Guide for Teachers
Module 5: Political Structures (Part I)
Overall, the Social Contract Theory presents the idea that society was formed as a result of an agreement
among men. There may be different justifications from the different writers regarding the existence of the
government and the extent of its power over its citizens. But the idea that sovereign power rests on the people
who have made the social contract is common among the three thinkers. Moreover, many scholars
acknowledge the influence of the ideas from the social contract theory, particularly from Locke and Rousseau,
on the establishment of democratic societies that uphold the ideals of liberty and equality among citizens. To
some extent, the idea of a social contract has also been associated with the existence of a constitution.
| Synchronous Activities
_____________________
7|
Instructional Guide for Teachers
Module 5: Political Structures (Part I)
| Asynchronous Activities
Part 1. Imagine yourself to be in a state of nature. Think of yourself as being in a situation wherein there
are no rules that you must follow and that you are perfectly free to do whatever you want.
● How would you imagine the situation would be? Would you want to be in such a situation?
● Do you think that such an environment would be conducive for you to achieve your goals? Why
or why not?
● Imagine further the situation above to be the same situation of everyone else in your community.
Do you think that such an environment where everyone can do as he or she pleases is
desirable? Why or why not?
Part 2. After a careful reflection of the ideas of the social contract thinkers, write a short essay on the
significance of the social contract for a community. Consider the following questions in writing your
essay:
● Who do you think should be the source of rules or order in your community?
● Why do you think that person(s) be the source of rules or order in your community?
● What should be the role of the rest of the people in your community?
● What should be the relationship between the source of rules (leader) and the people in your
community
| Learning Material
Ebenstein, W. and Ebenstein, A. (2000). Great Political Thinkers: Plato to the present. New York:
Rinehart. pp. 397-406; 425-434; 493-504.
Glorious Revolution in England. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/dyk3bI_Y68Y
Political Obligation and Legitimacy: Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau (Parts 1, 2, & 3). Retrieved from
www.ilc.upd.edu.ph (click Learning Materials >Vodcast >Social Science).
| References
Heywood, A. (2019). Politics, 5th ed. L.I. London : Macmillan International Higher Education/Red Globe
Press.
Lowndes, V., Marsh, D. and Stoker, G. A. (2018). Theory and Methods in Political Science: Political
Analysis (4th ed.). Red Globe Press.
_____________________
8|
Instructional Guide for Teachers
Module 5: Political Structures (Part I)
| Lesson Objectives
| Key Concepts
● Constitution - system of rules which defines the responsibilities and powers of the government and its
institutions, and the dynamics between the state and its citizens
● Constitutionalism - political components which establish a system of check and balance
| Study Guide
● Watch this short video on the constitution and its purposes, https://youtu.be/0UzKD8rZCc0 (video made
by International Idea);
● Read pages 501-518 of the book, Politics, 5th edition by Andrew Heywood; and
● Get a copy of the 1987 Philippine Constitution and read the preamble and go through its different parts.
| Constitution
A constitution is broadly defined as “a set of rules, written and unwritten, that seek to establish the duties,
powers and functions of the various institutions of government; regulate the relationships between them; and
define the relationship between the state and the individual” (Heywood 2019: 502-503). The term constitution is
also narrowly used to refer to “the highest law of the land”, implying a “single, authoritative document or a
written constitution” (Heywood 2019: 503). There are, however, constitutions that are not codified or are
referred to as unwritten. In relation to the discussion on the concept of a social contract, the constitution is
_____________________
9|
Instructional Guide for Teachers
Module 5: Political Structures (Part I)
deemed to express the “fundamental law of the land that sets the principles, powers, organization and functions
of the state and its government, the relations between state-government and the people, (the) rights and
obligations of the people, (and the) relations among the people” (Rebullida in Philippine Politics and
Governance: An Introduction, 2006:147). Thus, in a narrow sense, constitutionalism implies the practice of a
limited government ensured by the existence of a constitution. More broadly, “constitutionalism is a set of
political values and devices that fragment power, thereby creating a network of checks and balances”
(Heywood 2019: 512). The value of a constitution is widely recognized. Its existence serves a number of
purposes other than ensuring the existence of a limited government. Heywood (2019:514) identifies the
following purposes of constitutions:
● Empower states
● Establish unifying values and goals
● Provide government stability
● Protect freedom
● Legitimize regimes
In this way, the constitution serves as the legal basis of government. It outlines the extent of the government’s
power and the breadth of its responsibilities. Therefore, the constitution limits the power of the government in
order to preserve and protect the rights of a nation’s citizens.
| Synchronous Activities
● What is a constitution?
● How are constitutions classified?
● What are examples of different types of constitutions? Where can these be found?
● What is meant by constitutionalism?
● What type of constitution does the Philippines have?
● How is a limited government enshrined in the Philippine constitution?
| Asynchronous Activities
Activity: Video
Instructions. Watch this short video on the constitution and its purposes, https://youtu.be/0UzKD8rZCc0
(video made by International Idea) and provide your reflection in an essay of 400-500 words.
_____________________
10 |
Instructional Guide for Teachers
Module 5: Political Structures (Part I)
1. Review your answer on the first part of the self-evaluation form. After the discussion on this module, do
you still have the same answer? Will you change it? Why will you change it? What will you change?
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
2. How will you apply the knowledge you have learned in this lesson in improving Philippine society?
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Content:
The central theme/idea of the
paper is focused and
supported by evidence which
indicates mastery of the
content.
Organization:
The flow of the discussion of
the central theme/idea is
coherent.
_____________________
11 |
Instructional Guide for Teachers
Module 5: Political Structures (Part I)
Presentation:
Content:
The central
theme/idea/argument of the
student’s output is focused and
supported by evidence which
indicates mastery of the
content.
Organization:
The flow of the discussion of
the central theme/idea/theme
is coherent.
Presentation:
The form and presentation of
the central theme/idea is clear,
persuasive, polite, and easy to
understand.
| Learning Material
COMELEC (2012, May 2). 1987 Philippine Constitution Preamble. Retrieved from
https://comelec.gov.ph/index.html?r=References/RelatedLaws/Constitution/1987Constitution/Pre
amble.
_____________________
12 |
Instructional Guide for Teachers
Module 5: Political Structures (Part I)
International IDEA (2016). Constitutional history of Philippines. Retrieved from Constitutional history of
the Philippines
| References
Heywood, A. (2019). Politics, 5th ed. L.I. London : Macmillan International Higher Education/Red Globe
Press.
Lowndes, V., Marsh, D. and Stoker, G. A. (2018). Theory and Methods in Political Science: Political
Analysis (4th ed.). Red Globe Press.
Tadem, T. S. E., & Morada, N. M. (2006). Philippine politics and governance: An introduction. Diliman,
Quezon City: Dept. of Political Science, College of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of
the Philippines.
_____________________
13 |