ASSIGNMENT
ASSIGNMENT
ASSIGNMENT
However, it has been found that polygraphs are not really reliable in detecting
truths, nor a person’s ability to detect lies is no more accurate than chance
that’s why such methods of deception detection have not yet attained legal
recognition to have their results admissible as an evidence in court.
first, the pre-test interview where the examiner must first make an informal
interview of the subject for the purpose of determining whether or not the
subject is suffering from any psychiatric condition or has taken drugs that
MAGPATOC, PRINCESS F. 2
would render the test inefficacious. Next phase is the actual interrogation and
recording where the examiner will give relevant, irrelevant and control
questions. Lastly, post-test interrogation the purpose of which is for the
examiner to make clarificatory questions and obtain additional information.
When necessary, the examiner may also conduct a supplementary test
depending upon the result of the standard test in order to draw a better
conclusion
The examiner will then ask the subject new series of questions relating to a
real incident and that which the subject could not have committed. If the
subject does not respond to the added relevant questions, it indicates that the
subject was being deceptive as to the primary issue under investigation.
However, no conclusion can be drawn if the response to the added guilt
complex question is similar to the real issue questions.
MAGPATOC, PRINCESS F. 3
Is a test where stimulus and non-stimulus words are read to the subject who
is instructed to answer as quickly as possible. The answers to the questions
may be a "yes" or a "no". When the subject is asked questions with reference
to things which has no relation to the matter of the investigation, the tendency
is to answer quickly as opposed to questions with words which have to do
with the criminal act the subject allegedly committed the tendency is to delay
the answer. The test is not concerned, with the answer but rather with the
time of response in relation to stimulus or non-stimulus words.
the other hand, where the subject is under stress, he is deemed to have been
lying.
Statements taken from the subject while under the state of hypnosis are
likewise inadmissible as evidence in court because it lacks the general
scientific acceptance of the reliability of hypnosis per se in ascertaining the
truth from falsity; the possibility that the hypnotized subject will deliberately
fabricate; the possibility of distortion of the fact rather than the truth; and the
fact that the state of the mind, skill and professionalism of the examiner are
too subjective to permit admissibility of the expert testimony.
After such warning and in order to secure a waiver, the following questions
should be asked. An affirmative answer to each question constitutes a waiver
to the rights:
a. Do you understand each of these rights I have explained to
you?
b. Having these rights in mind, do you wish to talk to us now?