0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views3 pages

Barilla Spa Group 11

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 3

Group 11

Raunaq Walia 2022PGP453


Chinmay Kumar Sharma 2022PGP113
Bhawank Tamakuwala 2022PGP588
Gautam 2022PGP140
Sushant Mandaokar 2022PGP583
Hyder Mundoly 2022PGP624

BARILLA SPA CASE ANALYSIS


Background:
One of the biggest producers of pasta in the world is an Italian firm called
Barilla Spa. Barilla has a market share of 22% in Europe and around 35% in
Italy alone. It is renowned for its bread, cookies, biscuits, and other bakery
goods in addition to the variety of pastas it produces. By giving its pasta a
distinctive brand name and image and distributing it in a sealed cardboard box
with a recognisable colour pattern, they revolutionised the marketing techniques
used by the Italian pasta business. Italian-based Barilla owned and ran a vast
network of manufacturing facilities, including fresh bread and pasta factories.
For the development and testing of novel goods and manufacturing techniques,
Barilla maintained cutting-edge R&D facilities and a pilot production facility.
Three brands were used by Barilla to advertise its pasta products; the old Barilla
brand had 32% of the market, while the Voiello and Briabanti brands each held
3%. In Italy, the north and the south each received half of the sales of Barilla's
pasta. Three pasta divisions, Bakery Products, Fresh Bread, Catering, and
International were the seven divisions that Barilla was divided into in 1990.
Barilla separated its product line into two categories: "dry" and "fresh," which
accounted for 75% and 25% of Barilla's sales, respectively. The majority of
Barilla goods were transported from the manufacturing facilities to one of the
two central distribution locations (CDCs). Products arriving at these distribution
centres were sent fast through the system; generally, each CDC carried three
days' worth of fresh product inventory, but one month's worth of dry product
inventory. The CDCs did not handle fresh goods like bread, which had a shelf
life of just a few days.
Analysis:
Barilla began to see the consequences of changing demand more and more. The
demand for dry goods was erratic and changed week to week. Barilla's
production and logistics operations struggled to maintain adequate finished
products inventories due to the high unpredictability in demand.
The shifting demand made it incredibly costly to meet distributor order needs
each and every week. The production staff advised the distributors to have more
inventory on hand to smooth out any changes in their orders. This decision was
opposed by a large number of distributors since it had drawbacks of its own.
At the time, Brando Vitali, Barilla's head of logistics, stated strong opinions in
favour of developing an alternate method of order fulfilment that benefits both
distributors and producers.
For both themselves and the stores, he wanted to make the operations better. His
strategy was to transport goods only when they were really required, which
would save production, distribution, and inventory expenses. The distributor
would provide Barilla the information it needed on the goods that had been
delivered to the distribution centre the day before.
The corporation wanted to increase its market edge via forward integration.
Barilla's forecasting system had flaws of its own, but they planned to fix them
based on the information they finally received. "Just-in-Time-Distribution" was
Vitali's suggestion. This approach was suggested as a solution to issues that
strain Barilla's Manufacturing and Logistics operations, such as the
consequences of variable demand and the stock out problem.

Recommendation:
Supplying distributors with numbers decided by Barilla rather than the
distributors The purpose of placing the order is to assist end users in meeting
their needs and burden. If this approach is used, the workload will be equally
allocated between the logistics division and the plant. Manufacturing and
logistics won't be pushed to fulfil a specific request. The JITD system will be
challenging to implement and has some drawbacks as well. commercial
promotions The transaction becoming predictable causes sales personnel to lose
their incentives. The Distributors may sometimes be reluctant to give their sales
information, even if it is essential for the firm to ship the items. They
anticipated that the number of sales representatives would be cut when disputes
emerged inside the sales and marketing divisions. The updated system isn't
adaptable enough to handle the adjustments. The rivals would benefit if the
shelves in the distributor's unit were only partially stocked, allowing them to
highlight their products more prominently than Barilla's. You may claim that
these issues are brought on by a lack of enough flexibility in both the
manufacturing process and the pay scale. for reps in sales. If JITD is introduced,
the whole organisation should benefit. The management should craft the plan
such that if it were adopted, it would be in the company's best interests. It is
important to acquire the mindset that working with distributors is a one-time,
long-term collaboration that should be maintained methodically via the use of
several points of contact and data exchange between the distributor and
provider. In order to deploy the system at the firm, it is important for me to
understand a number of things as a Barilla client. I must first understand how
the system would benefit my distribution facility and how it will assist me
manage my stock. The system's contribution to enhancing performance
indicators like delivery time and flexibility is the other important factor. and at
the cheapest price. One of the main issues with doing business with Barilla is
letting them handle all of the product forecasting and supply. The system's
benefits exceed its drawbacks, and the supplier and distributor may cooperate
with one another to improve and streamline the system.

You might also like