The document provides a rubric to evaluate student projects on various criteria such as accuracy, originality, meeting work requirements, spelling and grammar, formatting, and citing sources. Projects are rated on a scale from 0 to 4, with 4 being "Well Done" or satisfactory on all criteria, 3 being "Good" with only minor issues, 2 being "Needs Work" with significant problems, and 1 being "Unsatisfactory" where most or all aspects are incorrect or missing. A score of 0 indicates plagiarism.
The document provides a rubric to evaluate student projects on various criteria such as accuracy, originality, meeting work requirements, spelling and grammar, formatting, and citing sources. Projects are rated on a scale from 0 to 4, with 4 being "Well Done" or satisfactory on all criteria, 3 being "Good" with only minor issues, 2 being "Needs Work" with significant problems, and 1 being "Unsatisfactory" where most or all aspects are incorrect or missing. A score of 0 indicates plagiarism.
The document provides a rubric to evaluate student projects on various criteria such as accuracy, originality, meeting work requirements, spelling and grammar, formatting, and citing sources. Projects are rated on a scale from 0 to 4, with 4 being "Well Done" or satisfactory on all criteria, 3 being "Good" with only minor issues, 2 being "Needs Work" with significant problems, and 1 being "Unsatisfactory" where most or all aspects are incorrect or missing. A score of 0 indicates plagiarism.
The document provides a rubric to evaluate student projects on various criteria such as accuracy, originality, meeting work requirements, spelling and grammar, formatting, and citing sources. Projects are rated on a scale from 0 to 4, with 4 being "Well Done" or satisfactory on all criteria, 3 being "Good" with only minor issues, 2 being "Needs Work" with significant problems, and 1 being "Unsatisfactory" where most or all aspects are incorrect or missing. A score of 0 indicates plagiarism.
Well Done Good Needs Work Unsatisfactory Plagiarized
4 3 2 1 0 The information The information Half of the All information presented is presented is mostly information presented in the correct, and correct, and mostly presented is project is incorrect accurately used to makes valid incorrect, and the and the student make arguments/claims. arguments/claims provides no Accuracy arguments/claims. Some sources are made by the arguments or Arguments are applied incorrectly student do not claims, and overall valid and but the argument is have sufficient or paragraph/s are evidence/sources coherent for the correct supporting incomplete in are applied in a majority. evidence to back thought. logical way. the claim.
personal some personal 2 or fewer pieces no commentary or commentary on commentary on of commentary in analysis on the Originality & every point made some points made, the whole information Creativity and shows and shows analysis description, and presented. analysis of the of the information shows some information presented. analysis of the presented. information presented.
The project The project The project The project
contains 6 total contains all 5 or 4 contains 3 contains 2 or pictures, 3 total pictures, 2 of the 3 pictures, 1 fewer pictures, 1 descriptions, each descriptions, is or description, which or no descriptions, description is 400 is almost 400 is not 400 words does not need the or more words in words in length, in length, and word count Work length, and the and addresses the does not requirement, and Requirements effects of plastic effects on both the sufficiently does not address on both the environment and address the the effects on both environment and ecosystem. effects on both the environment ecosystem are the environment and ecosystem. addressed in each and ecosystem. description.
The project is The project Half of the project The entire project Spelling, unmarred by contains some contains is full of Punctuation, punctuation, punctuation, punctuation, punctuation, and grammar spelling, or spelling, or spelling, or spelling, or grammatical grammatical errors. grammatical grammatical errors. errors. errors.
The project is The project is The project is only The instructions
completely mainly formatted partially formatted were not followed Formatting formatted as correctly; a few correctly. and the project is instructed. formatting not formatted components are correctly. missing.
All cited used are All sources are Not all sources cited, and cited cited, but some are are cited. Sources Cited correctly. cited incorrectly.
Hou-Cheng Huang PHD, BSC, MSC, Asif S. Usmani PHD, BE, MS (Auth.) - Finite Element Analysis For Heat Transfer - Theory and Software-Springer-Verlag London (1994) PDF
