10 2339-Politeknik 1187864-27034
10 2339-Politeknik 1187864-27034
10 2339-Politeknik 1187864-27034
net/publication/369288860
CITATIONS READS
0 162
4 authors, including:
Ahmet Fenercioğlu
Bursa Teknik Üniversitesi
60 PUBLICATIONS 139 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Aksiyel Fan ve Blower Uygulamaları için Anahtarlamalı Relüktans Motor ve Sürücüsü View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Mücahit Soyaslan on 22 March 2023.
JOURNAL of POLYTECHNIC
ORCID1: 0000-0001-6658-5169
ORCID2: 0000-0001-5431-9285
ORCID3: 0000-0002-1522-6868
ORCID4: 0000-0001-7075-2994
To cite to this article: Soyaslan M., Avşar Y., Fenercioğlu A. ve Sarıhan F., “Design and production of belt
drive elevator traction machine: modelling of double side belt system”, Journal of Polytechnic, *(*): *,
(*).
Bu makaleye şu şekilde atıfta bulunabilirsiniz: Soyaslan M., Avşar Y., Fenercioğlu A. ve Sarıhan F.,
“Design and production of belt drive elevator traction machine: modelling of double side belt system”,
Politeknik Dergisi, *(*): *, (*).
DOI: 10.2339/politeknik.1187864
Design and Production of Belt Drive Elevator Traction Machine:
Modelling of Double Side Belt System
Highlights
❖ Belt drive elevator traction motor design
❖ Double side belt system and belt calculations
❖ Verification of design by mechanical analyses
❖ Selection of the components
❖ Prototype production and hoistway placement
Graphical Abstract
In this study, a gearless traction motor with double-sided belt connection was designed for elevator systems and a
prototype was produced.
Aim
It is aimed to design a belt drive elevator motor with a car speed of 1.6 m/s and a load capacity of 1175 kg and to
select all components according to elevator standards.
Design & Methodology
3D modelling software was used during the design process and the strength of the motor under loads was verified
using the finite element analysis (FEA).
Originality
A double side-belt drive elevator motor design, selection of components, materials and mechanical verification are
presented for the first time in this article.
Findings
The motor shaft, covers, body and stator teeth are located in the safe working area according to the standards.
Conclusion
In this study, the selection and strength of the all components of the belt drive elevator machine were made according
to the standards and the prototype production of the designed motor was carried out.
Declaration of Ethical Standards
The authors of this article declare that the materials and methods used in this study do not require ethical committee
permission and/or legal-special permission.
Design and Production of Belt Drive Elevator Traction
Machine: Modelling of Double Side Belt System
Araştırma Makalesi / Research Article
Mücahit SOYASLAN1*, Yusuf AVŞAR2, Ahmet FENERCİOĞLU3, Feyyaz SARIHAN4
1Faculty of Technology, Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Türkiye
Vocational School, Department of Electronics and Automation, Trakya University, Türkiye
2Ipsala
3Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Bursa Technical University, Türkiye
4Research And Development Unit, Emlak Konut Elevator Systems Industry and Trade Inc., Türkiye
ABSTRACT
Elevator traction motors are critical components of elevator systems. After the structural analysis of the traction motor, it is
necessary to proceed to the production processes for the comfortable and safe use of elevator systems. In this study, the static load
values for bearing lifetime calculation, belt selection, and finite element analyses (FEA) were determined. According to calculated
loads; materials, bearings, belt, pulley, brake, and encoder were selected. In order to obtain a design in accordance with elevator
standards, motor parts were examined for structural analysis. Finite element analyses were carried out according to the determined
maximum static load values, and a new belt elevator traction motor design that provides the safety coefficients has emerged. When
the FEA analysis results of bending moments are examined; the maximum Von Mises stress acting on the motor frame and shaft
was obtained 17.1 MPa and 27.62 MPa respectively. The maximum Von Mises stress was obtained under the torsional moment as
71.4 MPa and the shaft is 6.1 times safe against a torsional moment. This value is the minimum safety factor of the designed system
and safety factors of bending moments are higher than this value. The designed elevator machine has got 12.9 kW rated power, 1.6
m/s cabin speed, and 1175 kg carrying capacity. The advantage of the proposed design is to eliminate the casting process with
modular structure via double side belt system. The prototype of the designed motor was produced and it was observed that the
motor provided the desired constraints as a result of the loading experiments.
Keywords: Elevator traction machine, gearless machine, belt drive elevator motor, finite element analysis, FEA, design
calculation.
a) b) c)
d) e) f)
Figure 1. Belt Drive Elevator Machines: a) Otis-Gen2 [24], b) Ziehl-Abegg ZAtopx [25], c) Faxi 100A [26],
d) Schindler 3300 [27], e) Kisa KA100 [28], f) Akış S200 K2 [29]
2. MACHINE DESIGN used in mechanical strength calculations are different
2.1.Modelling of Double Side Belt System from each other. All static load calculations were made
according to the 2:1 elevator suspension system in Figure
In the field of belt traction elevator motors, companies
3. The expression 2:1 means that 1/2 of the load on the
have different machine designs. In most of these designs,
motor in elevators is transferred to the building with the
belt pulleys are located on one side of the motor, while in
suspension design. Considering that the belts flow from
a few designs they are located on the right and left side.
both sides of the motor, the loads on the bearings are
Belt elevator traction machines with different structures
divided into two part: the machine cabin side (Tcs) and
are shown in Figure 1. Only the Schindler 3300 model
the machine counterweight side (Tcw). In addition, Owb
has the belts running from the right and left sides of the
value which is the total force of the shaft, rotor, pulleys
center of these designs. The advantage of the design in
and belt weights also affects the bearings. There are
this study over the Schindler 3300 model is that it
pulleys on the right-left side of the designed elevator
eliminates the casting process and has a modular
machine and bearings on both sides of these pulleys. The
structure.
total loads on the bearings (Tsl) are the sum of Tcs, Tcw and
Considering the motor static and dynamic loads, the Owb values. For the lifetime calculation, the loads per
elevator traction machine should be placed in the balance bearing are calculated with the equations in (1-6). As a
center in the hoistway. For that purpose, the electric result, the load acting per single bearing was obtained as
motor is placed in the middle of the traction system, and 5381.88 N.
the belt pulleys attached to the shaft are positioned to be
on the right and left sides of the electric motor. Belt drive Table 1. Static load values for bearing lifetime calculation
elevator motor design is seen in Figure 2. The advantages Notations Value Unit
of the belt drive elevator motor design are listed below: Nominal Load (Q) 1175 kg
• Belt elevator motor will be placed in the balance Suspension weight (Ws) 185 kg
center in the hoistway and thus uncomfortable travels Frame weight (Wf) 185 kg
caused by the balance center in roped gearless Cabin weight (Wc) 1000 kg
elevator motors will be prevented. Machine cabin side weight (Mcs) 2360 kg
• Elevator loads accumulated on the motor are Machine counterweight side weight (Mcw) 1772.5 kg
Other loads affecting the bearing (Owb) 1257.64 N
transmitted to the building and the ground in a smooth
Total load on the machine counterweight side (Tcw) 8694.11 N
and balanced manner.
Total load on the machine cabin side (Tcs) 11575.8 N
• There will be no need for a cast body in the Total static load affecting to the bearings (Tsl) 21527.55 N
production of the proposed belt elevator motor, and a Load per bearing (for life calculation) (Lpb) 5381.88 N
lighter and more compact motor will be produced. Gravity (g) 9.81 m/s2
• Compared to rope systems of the same power, a lower
volume and lower weight, more efficient and more
comfortable elevator traction system has been
designed.
a) b)
Figure 4. a) Shaft cross section between bearings, b) Section view of designed motor
𝑀𝐵𝐿 with a nominal torque of 200 Nm, the Mayr Roba-
𝑆𝑓 = (𝐹 (9)
𝑏𝑚𝑎𝑥 /4) twinstop size-180 type brake, which has the ability to
brake loads of at least 2x200 Nm and can brake axially,
Table 3. Features of the belts [33] is chosen. The selected brake is a customized design for
Product Cross- Number Belt 2x200 Nm and works with a voltage of 207 VDC [35].
Min. Breaking
name
Load (kN)
section of steel weight The brake hub has a circular space for encoder
(BRUbelt) (mm x mm) cords (g/m) connection. The motor encoder was chosen as
3.6 kN 3,6 8 x 2.3 4 30 Heidenhain ECN 1313, which is a frequently used
7.5 kN 7,5 16 x 2.3 8 60 encoder in elevator systems. Heidenhain ECN 1313 is a
9 kN 9 25 x 2.3 10 90 12-pin rotary encoder with 2048 pulse/rotation resolution
15 kN 15 33 x 2.3 16 125 used in motor control [36]. Selected electromechanical
40 kN 40 25 x 3.4 8 200 brake and encoder are shown in Figure 6.
50 kN 50 31 x 3.4 10 250
7 0kN 70 44 x 3.4 14 350
109 kN 109 70 x 3.3 24 549
126 kN 126 100 x 3.0 42 691
218 kN 218 150 x 3.3 48 1136
a) b)
Figure 8. a) General dimensioning of the motor, b) Hoistway assembly
3.2.1. Motor frame bending analysis 3.2.2. Bending and torsion analysis of shaft
In the production of the motor prototype, AISI 1045 The elevator car, counterweight and passenger weights,
material, one of the medium carbon manufacturing steels, which are connected to the belts on the pulley create a
was used for the chassis elements. The fixing areas of the bending moment on the shaft. In addition, as the shaft
system are the connecting bolts under the covers, and the forces the load to rotate, torsional moment occurs on it.
loading points are the bearings, which are the contact Therefore, the reaction of the shaft when forced against
points of the shaft. The system has a modular structure both torsion and bending was tested by FEA. In the
and the chrome-plated grinded shafts located along the production of the prototype, 42CrMo4 material, which is
motor in 4 corners are connected by the nuts. Total of 46 a quenched and tempered steel, is predicted to be used for
kN of force was applied to the motor frame as a static the shaft. For the bending stress, Figure 10 gives the mesh
load. Figure 9 shows the results of the bending analysis structure of the shaft, applied force, Von Mises stress
performed on the motor frame using SolidWorks results and displacement results.
software. When the analysis results are examined; the maximum
When the analysis results are examined; the maximum Von Mises stress acting on the shaft under a force of 46
Von Mises stress acting on the motor frame under a force kN was obtained as 26.09 MPa. This value is well below
of 46 kN was obtained as 17.19 MPa. This value is well the yield limit of the material, 750 MPa, and the material
below the yield limit of the material, 530 MPa, and the is 28.7 times safe under the applied load. The maximum
material is 30.8 times safe under the applied load. The displacement of the material is 3.8 µm, which is a very
maximum displacement of the material is 5.1 µm, which low value. As a result, when there is maximum bending
is a very low value. Therefore, the motor body operates stress, the shaft operates in the safe zone. A torsional
in the safe zone under maximum bending load. The motor torque of 200 Nm which is the maximum output torque
frame safety coefficient was obtained at a high level. The of the motor is applied to the shaft.
places on the frame that can be revised are the motor The moment is applied to the rotor keyseat of the shaft
covers and outer plates. However, there are bearings in and the fixings are made from the pulley keyway regions.
the hubs of these elements and cover selection should be The applied torsional moment analysis results are shown
made according to the thickness of the bearings and the in Figure 11. The maximum Von Mises stress on the shaft
lifetime calculation. The minimum cover and plate was obtained as 71.4 MPa under the effect of applied
thicknesses have already been determined according to torsional moment of 200 Nm. The material's shear yield
the bearing thicknesses, and the inside of the cover has strength is taken into consideration when the torsion
been milled to reduce weight. effect will be analysed. This amount is roughly 0.58
a)
b) c)
Figure 9. Motor frame bending analysis a) Applied force and mesh structure, b) Von Mises stress analysis results
(N/mm2), c) Displacement analysis results (mm)
times the yield strength for bending [39]. The material's 3.2.3. Torsion Analysis of stator teeth
shear yield limit in this instance is 435 MPa. Thus, the To determine the deformations that may occur in the
shaft is 6.1 times safe against a torsional moment. The stator teeth, a torque of 200 Nm was applied. JFE Steel
maximum displacement in the shaft was determined 20 50JN350 (0.5 mm sheet equivalent of M350) was used
µm at the shaft's end points. As a result, when the as the stator sheet material in the motor analysis, and the
maximum output torque is applied, the shaft operates in yield strength of this material is 389 MPa. According to
the safe zone. Although the shaft has a high safety factor analysis results, the maximum Von Mises stress was
in bending analyses, it is 6.1 times safe under the effect obtained as 1.31 MPa. It was observed that the torsion
of torsion. In this case, no additional reduction was and displacement in the stator teeth were very low.
required in the shaft design.
a)
26.09 MPa
3.8 µm
b) c)
Figure 10. Motor shaft bending analysis a) Applied force and mesh structure, b) Von Mises stress analysis results
(N/mm2), c) Displacement analysis results (mm)
a)
20 µm
71.4 MPa
b) c)
Figure 11. Motor shaft torsion analysis a) Applied force and mesh structure, b) Von Mises stress analysis results
(N/mm2), c) Displacement analysis results (mm)
a)
b) c)
Figure 12. Stator torsion analysis a) Applied force and mesh structure, b) Von Mises stress analysis results
(N/mm2), c) Displacement analysis results (mm)
Figure 12 shows the analysis results of the torque applied of the shaft. In the experiments, acceleration, stopping
to the stator teeth. and loading operations were applied to the motor
separately. Quick stopping with powder brake was
4. PROTOTYPE PRODUCTION AND TESTS applied to the motor operating at rated speed and 125%
The structural analyses of the designed elevator motor load, and the strength of the shaft under the effect of
were carried out and its suitability according to the torsion was tested. The tests were completed successfully
elevator safety coefficients was proven by FEA. The and no deformation occurred in the shaft.
approved parts were produced by laser cutting and
machining methods. The produced parts are shown in Motor Belt Drive Powder
Figure 13. Driver Elevator Motor Brake
Torque
Sensor