Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 25 views

    Rubricssss

    Uploaded by

    Jasmine
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating a team presentation across several criteria including quality of content, quality of scenario, organization, impact, and presentation skills. Each criteria is scored on a scale from poor (1 point) to fair (2 points) to good (3 points). A good presentation would accurately portray chapter content to fully develop skills, use a realistic and class-appropriate scenario that incorporates course concepts, be well-organized with smooth transitions, fully engage the student audience to be helpful for developing skills, and have all presenters speak confidently with appropriate delivery techniques.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Rubricssss

    Uploaded by

    Jasmine
    25 views2 pages
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating a team presentation across several criteria including quality of content, quality of scenario, organization, impact, and presentation skills. Each criteria is scored on a scale from poor (1 point) to fair (2 points) to good (3 points). A good presentation would accurately portray chapter content to fully develop skills, use a realistic and class-appropriate scenario that incorporates course concepts, be well-organized with smooth transitions, fully engage the student audience to be helpful for developing skills, and have all presenters speak confidently with appropriate delivery techniques.

    Original Description:

    Rubrics

    Original Title

    rubricssss

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides a rubric for evaluating a team presentation across several criteria including quality of content, quality of scenario, organization, impact, and presentation skills. Each criteria is scored on a scale from poor (1 point) to fair (2 points) to good (3 points). A good presentation would accurately portray chapter content to fully develop skills, use a realistic and class-appropriate scenario that incorporates course concepts, be well-organized with smooth transitions, fully engage the student audience to be helpful for developing skills, and have all presenters speak confidently with appropriate delivery techniques.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    25 views2 pages

    Rubricssss

    Uploaded by

    Jasmine
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating a team presentation across several criteria including quality of content, quality of scenario, organization, impact, and presentation skills. Each criteria is scored on a scale from poor (1 point) to fair (2 points) to good (3 points). A good presentation would accurately portray chapter content to fully develop skills, use a realistic and class-appropriate scenario that incorporates course concepts, be well-organized with smooth transitions, fully engage the student audience to be helpful for developing skills, and have all presenters speak confidently with appropriate delivery techniques.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    Team Presentation 

    Poor Fair Good


     
    1 pts 2 pts 3 pts

    Quality of Content  Poor Fair Good


    15 pts

    Chapter content is not Chapter content is accurately Chapter content is accurately


    accurately portrayed. portrayed as either effective portrayed as either effective
    or ineffective. or ineffective.
    Incomplete coverage of the
    topic. A student who wanted Adequate coverage of the Complete coverage of the
    to develop this skill would not topic. A student would need topic. A student could
    find this presentation to be to do more research to develop multiple aspects of
    effective.  develop this skill.  the skill with this resource. 

    Quality of Scenario  Poor Fair Good


    10 pts

    Scenario was not realistic, Scenario was realistic and Scenario was realistic, class-
    inappropriate for class, or class-appropriate,  appropriate, well-developed.
    poorly developed.
    Course concepts could be Scenario clearly incorporated
    Scenario failed to incorporate identified.  course concepts. 
    course concepts. 

    Organization  Poor Fair Good


    5 pts

    Presentation was not well- Presentation was fairly well- Presentation was well-
    organized. organized. organized.

    The transitions between the The transitions between the The transitions between the
    role-plays and the narrator role-plays and the narrator role-plays and the narrator
    and other presentation and other presentation and other presentation
    components were poor.  components flowed smoothly components flowed
    at most times.  smoothly. 

    Impact  Poor Fair Good


    10 pts

    cqwetw325ew3wqPresentatio Presentation engaged the Presentation fully engaged


    n failed to engage the student audience. the student audience.
    student audience.
    Presentation may provide Presentation would be helpful
    Presentation would not be some helpful information to to students in developing
    helpful to students. students. skills.

    Presentation would be Students who follow the Presentation would be easy


    difficult for students to use.  advice in the presentation for students to learn from.
    could develop skills with
    additional research.  Students who follow the
    advice in this presentation
    would be effective. 

    Presentation Skills  Poor Fair Good


    10 pts

    None of the presenters spoke Most presenters spoke with All presenters spoke with
    with appropriate eye contact, appropriate eye contact, appropriate eye contact,
    volume, tone, use of pauses, volume, tone, use of pauses, volume, tone, use of pauses,
    and gestures. and gestures. and gestures.

    None of the presenters Most presenters were well- All presenters were well-
    appeared prepared or prepared and spoke with prepared and spoke with
    confident.  confidence.  confidence. 

    You might also like