This rubric evaluates role playing presentations on three criteria: content quality, scenario quality, and organization. A very good presentation accurately portrays chapter content and scenario, incorporates course concepts, and is well-organized with smooth transitions. A good presentation adequately covers topics and could develop skills with more research. A fair presentation inaccurately portrays content, has an unrealistic or inappropriate scenario, and lacks organization.
This rubric evaluates role playing presentations on three criteria: content quality, scenario quality, and organization. A very good presentation accurately portrays chapter content and scenario, incorporates course concepts, and is well-organized with smooth transitions. A good presentation adequately covers topics and could develop skills with more research. A fair presentation inaccurately portrays content, has an unrealistic or inappropriate scenario, and lacks organization.
This rubric evaluates role playing presentations on three criteria: content quality, scenario quality, and organization. A very good presentation accurately portrays chapter content and scenario, incorporates course concepts, and is well-organized with smooth transitions. A good presentation adequately covers topics and could develop skills with more research. A fair presentation inaccurately portrays content, has an unrealistic or inappropriate scenario, and lacks organization.
This rubric evaluates role playing presentations on three criteria: content quality, scenario quality, and organization. A very good presentation accurately portrays chapter content and scenario, incorporates course concepts, and is well-organized with smooth transitions. A good presentation adequately covers topics and could develop skills with more research. A fair presentation inaccurately portrays content, has an unrealistic or inappropriate scenario, and lacks organization.
Quality of Chapter content is Chapter content is Chapter content is not Content accurately portrayed accurately accurately portrayed. 50 pts as either effective or portrayed as either ineffective. effective or Incomplete coverage of ineffective. the topic. A student Complete coverage of who wanted to develop the topic. A student Adequate coverage this skill would not could develop multiple of the topic. A find this presentation aspects of the skill student would need to be effective. with this resource. to do more research to develop this skill. Quality of Scenario was realistic, Scenario was Scenario was not Scenario class-appropriate, realistic and class- realistic, inappropriate 15 pts well-developed. appropriate, for class, or poorly developed. Scenario clearly Course concepts incorporated course could be identified. Scenario failed to concepts. incorporate course concepts. Organization Presentation was well- Presentation was not 20 pts organized. Presentation was well-organized. fairly well- The transitions organized. The transitions between the role-plays between the role-plays and the narrator and The transitions and the narrator and other presentation between the role- other presentation components flowed plays and the components were smoothly. narrator and other poor. presentation components flowed smoothly at most times. Presentation All presenters spoke Most presenters None of the presenters Skills with appropriate eye spoke with spoke with appropriate 15 pts contact, volume, tone, appropriate eye eye contact, volume, use of pauses, and contact, volume, tone, use of pauses, gestures. tone, use of pauses, and gestures. and gestures. All presenters were None of the presenters well-prepared and Most presenters appeared prepared or spoke with confidence. were well-prepared confident. and spoke with confidence.