NW NSC GR 10 Hist p1 Eng Memo Nov 2019
NW NSC GR 10 Hist p1 Eng Memo Nov 2019
NW NSC GR 10 Hist p1 Eng Memo Nov 2019
GRADE 10
HISTORY
NOVEMBER 2019
MARKING GUIDELINES
MARKS: 150
1. SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS
1.1 The following cognitive levels were used to develop source-based questions:
2. ESSAY QUESTIONS
2.1 The essay questions require candidates to:
Be able to structure their argument in a logical and coherent manner. They
need to select, organise and connect the relevant information so that they
are able to present a reasonable sequence of facts or an effective
argument to answer the question posed. It is essential that an essay has
an introduction, a coherent and balanced body of evidence and a
conclusion.
2.2 Marking of essay questions
Markers must be aware that the content of the answer will be guided by
the textbooks in use at the particular centre.
Candidates may have any other relevant introduction and/or conclusion
than those included in a specific essay marking guideline for a specific
essay.
When assessing open-ended source-based questions, learners should be
credited for any other relevant answers.
2.3 Global assessment of the essay
The essay will be assessed holistically (globally). This approach requires the teacher
to score the overall product as a whole, without scoring the component parts
separately. This approach encourages the learner to offer an individual opinion by
using selected factual evidence to support an argument. The learner will not be
required to simply regurgitate 'facts' in order to achieve a high mark. This approach
discourages learners from preparing 'model' answers and reproducing them without
taking into account the specific requirements of the question. Holistic marking of the
essay credits learners' opinions supported by evidence. Holistic assessment, unlike
content-based marking, does not penalise language inadequacies as the emphasis is
on the following:
The construction of argument
The appropriate selection of factual evidence to support such argument
The learner's interpretation of the question.
2.4 Assessment procedures of the essay
2.4.1 Keep the synopsis in mind when assessing the essay.
2.4.2 During the reading of the essay ticks need to be awarded for a relevant
introduction (indicated by a bullet in the marking guideline/memorandum),
each of the main points/aspects that is properly contextualized (also indicated
by bullets in the marking guideline/memorandum) and a relevant conclusion
(indicated by a bullet in the marking guideline/memorandum) e.g. in an answer
where there are 5 main points there will be 7 ticks.
2.4.3 The following additional symbols can also be used:
• Introduction, main aspects and conclusion not properly
contextualised
^
• Wrong statement _________________
• Irrelevant statement |
|
|
• Repetition R
• Analysis A
• Interpretation I
2.5 The matrix
2.5.1 Use of the matrix in the marking of essays
In the marking of essays, the criteria as provided in the matrix should be used. When
assessing the essay note both the content and presentation. At the point of
intersection of the content and presentation based on the seven competency levels, a
mark should be awarded.
(a) The first reading of the essay will be to determine to what extent the
main aspects have been covered and to allocate the content level
(on the matrix).
C LEVEL 4
(b) The second reading of the essay will relate to the level (on the matrix) of
presentation.
C LEVEL 4
P LEVEL 3
1.1
1.1.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
Southern Tswana (1 x 1) (1)
1.2
1.2.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
Written records
Archaeological records (1 x 2) (2)
1.3
1.3.1 [Interpretation of evidence in Source 1C – L2]
a) Females
Doing house chores
Cooking
Fermenting beer
Looking after the children
Any other relevant response (Any 1 x 2) (2)
b) Males
Attending meetings (kgotla)
Cattle herders
Farming
Trading
Any other relevant response (Any 1 x 2) (2)
1.3.2 [Interpretation of evidence in Source 1C – L2]
There were many houses built in Dithakong
Dithakong was one of the big villages with high population
The village grew so rapidly to accommodate many people
Any other relevant response (Any 2 x 2) (4)
1.3.3 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
Stones
Grass (thatch) (2 x 1) (2)
1.4
1.4.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1D – L1]
Angola
Mozambique
The Cape (3 x 1) (3)
1.4.2 [Extraction of information from Source 1D – L1]
Drought that reduced farming and grazing land
Competition for scarce resources (2 x 1) (2)
1.4.3 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1D – L1]
Dithakong
Molokwane (1 x 1) (1)
1.5 [Comparison of information in Sources 1C and 1D – L3]
Source 1D is supported by Source 1C as both sources explain/show
how the settlement of Dithakong became a big settlement during the
1820s.
Source 1D is supported by Source 1C as both sources reflect
Dithakong as a place where many activities took place, e.g. trading
Any other relevant response. (2 x 2) (4)
QUESTION 2: HOW DID THE 1913 LAND ACT INTENSIFY THE LAND
DISPOSSESSION AMONG BLACK SOUTH AFRICANS?
2.1
2.1.1 [Definition of a historical Concept in Source 2A – L1)
The act at the heart of land dispossession from the black South
African by white minority government.
The act that laid the foundation for Apartheid laws and poverty for
the black South Africans
Any other relevant response (Any 1 x 2) (2)
2.2
2.2.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2B – L1]
The 1913 Land Act reflects socio economic injustice of
Apartheid in South Africa (1 x 1) (1)
2.3
2.3.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1]
They slept in the ox-wagon
They slept next to the public road (Any 1 x 2) (2)
2.4
2.4.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2D – L1]
The Land Act of 1913
Forced Removals (Any 1 x 1) (1)
The Native Land Act was introduced in 1913 by the Union government
under the pretext of bringing uniformity on issues of land in all the
provinces (own knowledge)
Due to unhappiness in competing with black South African farmers, the
white farmers called for the government to restrict black landownership in
South Africa (2A)
The Act set aside 7.5% of the land as reserves where black South Africans
could reside and continue with their farming and other activities. (2A & B)
Thousands of black South African farmers were evicted from their land and
were forced to become farm labourers and tenants in the white owned
farms (2A)
Black children were also denied education in white owned farms (own
knowledge)
Although black people were in majority, they occupied only 7–8 percent
of the land (2B)
The Land Act brought misery and poverty among the Blacks, as some had
to leave the farms that they worked on for many years(2C)
A delegation of SANNC went to Britain to meet the Prime Minister over the
issue of land, Sol Plaatjie also wrote many stories of people who suffered
under the Land Act, but still the Union government was not willing to
introduce reforms(2D)
Any other relevant answer
[Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical
and interpretative skills]
SYNOPSIS
In writing this essay, learners should take a stance and explain all the changes which
were introduced by the British government at the Cape, and explain how the Boers
responded to these changes.
MAIN ASPECTS
Learners could include the following aspects in their answer:
Introduction: Learners should take a line of argument by either agreeing or
disagreeing whether the British introduced a policy of Anglicization after taking the
control of the Cape in 1803.
ELABORATION
Changes introduced by the British at the Cape
Abolition of system of slavery
Anglicisation of institutions; schools, churches . . .
English becoming a dominant language
Ordinance 50 of 1828- shortage of labour
Conclusion
Any relevant conclusion is acceptable.
[50]
[Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical
and interpretative skills]
SYNOPSIS
Learners are expected to critically discuss the reasons that led Britain to fight Boer
Republics and subsequently the reasons that made the Boers to decide to end the
war.
MAIN ASPECTS
Learners should include the following aspects in their answer:
Introduction: Learners should a stance and explain whether the franchise rights
were the main reasons that made Britain to launch a war against the Transvaal.
ELABORATION
British interest in South Africa
Economic reasons
Discovery of gold
Political power struggle- Franchise Rights
Role of Jameson –strained relations between the British and the Boers
Coarse of the war- strategies implemented by both the two parties
Treaty of Vereeniging
Results of the war
Any other relevant answer
CONCLUSION
Learners should tie up the discussion with a conclusion relevant to the essay.
[50]
TOTAL : 150