Pluton Resources 2012 Annual Report (JORC Reserves)

PLUTON
PLUTON RESOURCES LIMITED
AB N 12 114 5 6 1 7 3 2
For personal use only
ANNUAL REPORT 2012

PLUTON
Front cover photo (top):
“Mining on Irvine will provide significant benefits for the Mayala People.”
PLUTON RESOURCES LIMITED
Front cover photo (bottom)
“Hardstaff Peninsula on Irvine Island with Cockatoo Island in the
immediate background.”
Directors
Malcolm Macpherson
Anthony James Schoer
Russell George Williams
Chenxi Wang
Company secretary
Andrew Metcalfe
Notice of annual general meeting

The annual general meeting of
Pluton Resources Limited:
Will be held at The Westin Hotel

205 Collins Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
Time: 10:30 AM
Date: Thursday 29 November 2012
Registered office
Level 4, 468 St Kilda Road
Melbourne VIC 3004
Head office number: +61 (0) 3 9867 8283
Principal place of business

Level 4, 468 St Kilda Road
Melbourne VIC 3004
Share register
Boardroom Limited
Level 7, 207 Kent Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Investor phone number: (Aus) 1300 737 760
Investor phone number: (Overseas) +61 (0) 2 9290 9600
Auditor
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
550 Bourke Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
Stock exchange listing

Pluton Resources Limited shares are listed
on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX code: PLV)
Website address
www.plutonresources.com
Contents
Chairman’s Letter 02
CEO’s Review 04
Financial Report 11
Top photo:
“Mayala employees undergoing training with Pluton’s operations supervisor
Ben Carpenter.”
Bottom photo:
“Mayala employees assemble the Universal Drilling Platform at the Isthmus.”
The 6th annual general meeting is taking place just as your company is establishing itself as a producer of high
grade iron ore.
This is despite the totally unexpected setback in late June when a major backer of our potential joint venture
partner withdrew their support. Weeks of uncertainty followed as the Managing Director, Tony Schoer and his
team worked tirelessly to find alternative financers and were successful.
The acquisition of the Cockatoo Island iron ore project was completed in September, 2012 and the
management handover occurred on October 1, 2012. We see plenty of potential to extend the life of the
open-cut operations on Cockatoo and will be examining the possibility of an underground mine.
Our largest shareholder, Wise Energy, have given the Company great support over the past few months. They
were there when we needed urgent funding to complete the Cockatoo purchase, and to date have successfully
raised US$12.7 million by pre-selling Cockatoo ore to fund the acquisition as well as for working capital.
Moreover they negotiated a 1 million tonne off-take agreement that includes a $20 million pre-payment to fund
the environmental bonds.
Cockatoo and Irvine offer significant infrastructure synergies. Irvine will benefit from utilising Cockatoo
infrastructure thereby eliminating duplication, while lowering our environmental footprint. In addition, lower
grade Cockatoo ore could be processed through the Irvine pre-concentrator, extending the operational lives of
both islands.
Our success will be shaped by the quality of our people. To that end we have recruited experienced
professionals from the iron ore industry.
It is also pleasing to have the opportunity to provide more jobs for the indigenous people of the Kimberley.
Our primary goal in 2013 will be to achieve production targets on Cockatoo, carry out drilling to extend the life
of the open-cut operations; and further assess the feasibility of an underground operation. Also we will continue
the process of seeking environmental approvals for the Irvine Project.
I would like to extend my thanks to you our shareholders for your support during the year, my fellow Directors,
and to Tony and the management team for their continued hard work during some difficult times.
Malcolm Macpherson – Chairman

“Mayala elders and employees during a recent heritage visit to Irvine Island.”
CEO’s Review 04
“Location of Pluton tenements in the Kimberley, Western Australia.”
Overview
Pluton has made significant progress over the past 12 months. The acquisition of the Cockatoo Island iron
ore project has transformed the Company from an explorer to a producer. The Company commenced mining
activities in October and will load its maiden shipment in November.
This has been achieved despite a difficult few months when a major financial backer of joint venture partner Wise
Energy Group withdrew its support.
With the support of Wise Energy, Pluton has pre-sold shipments of Cockatoo ore to fund the acquisition of
Cockatoo and provide funding for the environmental bonds and working capital.
Cockatoo is an exciting project for the Company. There is significant potential to increase the mine life for the
open-cut operation as well as potential for a significant long-life underground operation.
CEO’s Review 05
“Cockatoo Island operations with Irvine Island in the background.” “Schematic showing previous drilling into Cockatoo underground.”
The Irvine Island project also continues to progress well. The main focus has been on final data collection
required for submission of the Public Environmental Review. This is a slow and tedious process but one that is
important to gain the required approvals to commence development of the island.
Importantly, timing of development on Irvine Island ties in with the Cockatoo operations. Significant synergistic
opportunities exist to share infrastructure, process Cockatoo low grade ore through the Irvine pre-concentrator
and create employment and business opportunities for the indigenous people of the region.
CEO’s Review 06
Irvine Island Iron Ore Project

During the past 12 months, Pluton completed all exploration activities on Irvine Island. Drilling high priority holes on
Hardstaff Peninsula enabled the expected mine life to increase from 11 years to 21 years (see tables 1-4 below), to
produce an estimated 72 million tonnes of high grade concentrate averaging 67.5% iron (Fe).
Further test work on the optimum grind size for the pre-concentrate to be produced at Irvine confirms a 3mm product
will provide initial capital savings of $54 million, lowering capital spend previously advised in the Pre-feasibility Study.
Significant further capital savings are expected by manufacturing the plant, including the pre-concentrator, in China.
These savings will be quantified during the Definitive Feasibility Study (“DFS”). Much of the data capture for the DFS is
on-going and will be finalised for an investment decision to be made well before final statutory approval of the project.
The Company has spent considerable time in the 2012 year finalising environmental data capture through multiple
land and marine surveys, including drilling of environmental holes to capture data on subterranean fauna and flora,
for the Public Environmental Review (“PER”) submission. This is a tedious process covering several dry and wet
seasons. It is expected the PER will be lodged by the 2nd quarter of calendar year 2013, which will commence the
formal environmental review process.
On 6th July 2012 a mining lease was granted over Irvine Island (M04/452). The mining lease replaces the previous
exploration lease and is a step forward in the approvals process.
The Company continues to meet its commitments to employ and train indigenous people of the Kimberley, particularly
members of the Mayala People. The purchase of the Cockatoo Island iron ore project allows Pluton the opportunity to
increase the number of indigenous people into the work force. Initially, nine positions have been created on Cockatoo
Island for indigenous people and we expect that number to grow significantly over time.
Table 1: Yampi Member Mineral Resource, Hardstaff Peninsula, Irvine Island, Western Australia (E04/1172)
as at 31 August 2012.
Classification In-Situ Mineralisation Magnetite Mineralisation
COG Tonnes Total Iron SiO2 LOI at Wt Rec Fe by DTR SiO2 by
Wt Rec* (%) 950° C DTR
Fe (%) (Mt) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
Indicated >40% iron (Lens 1) 40 5 49.2 45 32.5 1.2 34.2 69 2.4
Indicated >50% iron (Lens 2) 50 59 55.1 51 25.6 0.7 37.7 70 1.9
Indicated >30% and <50% Iron (Lens 2) 30 43 39.2 33 47.5 1.0 30.8 69 3.2
Sub Total Indicated (Lens 1 and 2) 107 48.5 43 34.7 0.8 34.8 70 2.5
Indicated >10% iron and < 30% iron 10 68 23.0 18 62.6 1.8 20.5 68 5.2
Total Indicated - 175 38.6 33 45.5 1.2 29.3 69 3.6
Supporting Notes for Table 1.

1 The Mineral Resource is reported in accordance with the JORC Code¹.
2 All resources have been rounded to the nearest 1 million tonnes.
3 CoG is defined as cut-off grade.
4 *Total weight recovery includes both the magnetite and hematite mineralisation. A 50% recovery for hematite is based on metallurgical test work.
CEO’s Review 07
“Pluton’s patented Universal Drilling Platform minimises ground disturbance “It is almost impossible to find areas where drilling occurred”
during exploration drilling”
Table 2: Wonganin Sandstone Mineral Resource, Hardstaff Peninsula, Irvine Island, Western Australia
(E04/1172) as at 31 August 2012.
Classification COG Fe Tonnes Total Wt Iron SiO2 Al2O3 S P LOI at
Rec 950° C
(%) (Mt) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
Indicated Wonganin Sandstone - 368 19.7 21 61.0 4.20 0.09 0.032 1.9

2 All resources have been rounded to the nearest 1 million tonnes.
4 No cut-off grade has been applied to the Wonganin Sandstone Indicated Mineral Resource estimation.
Table 3: Yampi Member Mineral Resource, Isthmus Region, Irvine Island, Western Australia (E04/1172)
as at 31 August, 2012.
Classification COG Fe Tonnes Iron SiO2 Al2O3 S P LOI
950°C
(%) (Mt) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
Inferred - 18.5 33 43.4 4.7 0.04 0.03 1.5
Total Inferred - 18.5 33 43.4 4.7 0.04 0.03 1.5

2 All resources have been rounded to the nearest 1 million tones.
4 No cut-off grade has been applied to the Yampi Member Inferred Mineral Resource.
Irvine Ore Reserve

A maiden Ore Reserve estimate for the Hardstaff Peninsula at the Irvine Island Project has been completed.
The delineation of the Ore Reserve at the Hardstaff Peninsula is in line with the Company’s development strategy and
represents a key milestone in the development of the project. The open-pit Ore Reserve estimate for the Hardstaff
Peninsula as reported in accordance with the JORC Code is summarised in Table 4.
CEO’s Review 08
Table 4: Ore Reserve Statement, Hardstaff Peninsula, Irvine Island, Western Australia (E04/1172).
Classification Tonnes Total Wt Mineralisation Magnetite Hermatite
Rec Wt Rec Wt Rec
Fe SiO2 AI203 S P LOI at
(Mt) (%) (%) (%) (%) 950˚ C (%) (%)
Probable Yampi 51 40 38 42.1 1.7 0.1 0.03 0.9 27 14
Probable Wonganin 93 22 23 57.9 3.7 0.1 0.03 1.9 11 11
Total 143 28 28 52.3 3.0 0.1 0.03 1.5 17 12
Notes for Table 4: The Ore Reserve Estimate is based on Indicated Mineral Resources contained within mine designs above an economic cut-off. The economic
cut-off is based on the value of each minable block incorporating the processing, grade control, rehabilitation, and ore rehandle costs. The figures presented
were rounded and include mining dilution and ore loss.
The Ore Reserve Estimate has been derived as a result of a pre-feasibility mining study prepared to a level of accuracy with estimates prepared within ± 30%.
The mining study is based on an operation and associated higher costs for processing a final concentrate product on Irvine Island mine design, production and
cash flow schedules were prepared. The economic assessment achieved a positive cash flow for a range of downside sensitivities, of both prices and costs. All
Fe prices were supplied by Pluton Resources and based upon the Macquarie Commodities Research (18 May 2011), and pricing outlook prepared by Ferrum
Consultants. Capital and operating costs for processing were provided together with Port, G&A by Pluton and Calibre Projects. Costs and modifying factors used
in the mining study assume mining by conventional open pit methods utilising hydraulic excavators and haul trucks. Modifying factors applied include mining
dilution (5%) and ore loss of (5%). A cut-off grade of 15% Fe was applied to the Wonganin Sandstone. No cut-off grade was applied to the Yampi Member. The
schedule is based on a maximum plant feed rate of 17.0 Mtpa with the expected project life of over 10 years. The project remains subject to environmental
approval. Wt Rec = Weight recovery of ore to final concentrate product if the ROM was processed to a final concentrate as per design at Irvine Island as provided
by Calibre Projects.
Mineral Resources have been converted to Ore Reserves recognising the level of confidence in the Mineral Resource
estimate and reflecting any modifying factors. The Ore Reserve Estimate is based on the Mineral Resource estimate
for the Hardstaff Peninsula that was previously compiled and announced to the Australian Stock Exchange on
27th April, 2011.
The Ore Reserve includes that part of the Mineral Resource contained within the open pit mine design. Indicated
Mineral Resources within the design convert to Probable Ore Reserves, after consideration of all mining, metallurgical,
social, environmental, statutory and financial aspects of the project.
Cockatoo Island Iron Ore Project

On 7th September 2012, Pluton completed the purchase of the Cockatoo Island iron ore project. Mining operations
commenced in October 2012 with the first ore shipment scheduled in November.
Included in the consideration for purchasing the project, Pluton assumes responsibility for rehabilitation of the island.
The total cost of rehabilitating Cockatoo Island is not expected to be materially greater than the $20 million, submitted
as environmental bonds. At time of writing, funding for the bonds has been arranged via a prepayment of $20 million
against an off-take agreement for 1 million tonnes of ore.
The Company has entered into a 50/50 unincorporated joint venture, subject to shareholder and regulatory approvals,
with Wise Energy Group Limited (“WEG”), a major shareholder. Pluton is Manager of the Joint Venture and
responsible for all operational activities. WEG is responsible for shipping and marketing of Cockatoo ore.
¹Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves, 2004 Edition, prepared by the Joint Ore Reserves Committee of the
Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Minerals Council of Australia.
CEO’s Review 09
Pluton has appointed Watpac Civil & Mining (“Watpac”) as the preferred mining contractor. Agreements are expected
to be finalised and executed by 29th October 2012. Watpac have mobilised personnel and equipment to site and are
responsible for all operational activities from mining through to ship loading. In addition many of the skilled Cockatoo
Island employees have joined Watpac, e ensuring continuity of operations.
As announced on the 10th September, Pluton commences mining operations with an opening inventory of 12 million
tonnes of direct shipping ore (see Tables 5-7 below). The available tonnage on Cockatoo gives the project an initial
3 year life of open-cut operations. Under the current mine plan, FOB operating costs (excluding statutory royalties)
are estimated at $51/tonne. Total capital costs are expected to be approximately $16 million and will be funded by
cash flow.
Pluton will begin drilling in early 2013 and is aiming to convert resources into reserves to extend the open-cut mine
life. Pluton will also commence a campaign of drilling to assess the viability of an underground operation. Previous
historic drilling has returned very high grade ore at depth. Pluton has engaged underground consultants to prepare a
conceptual study and initial results suggest an underground operation is feasible.
The Cockatoo project provides significant synergies and benefits for the Irvine project. These include eliminating
the need for duplicate infrastructure which not only reduces capital expenditure, but also reduces our environmental
footprint on Irvine. Additionally, there may be opportunities to process low grade ore from Cockatoo through the Irvine
pre-concentrator, increasing the commercial life of both islands.
Table 5: Cockatoo Island Seawall Hematite Mineral Resources as at 31 July 2012

Classification Tonnage COG Fe Fe SiO2 Al2O3 S P
(Mt) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
Indicated 1.3 67.0 68.3 1.0 0.5 0.01 0.01
Indicated 2.6 65.5 69.0 0.6 0.3 0.003 0.004
Total Indicated 3.9 68.8 0.7 0.4 0.005 0.006
Inferred 1.4 67.0 68.2 0.9 0.01 0.01 0.01
Inferred 0.4 67.0 68.3 0.9 0.5 0.01 0.02
Inferred 0.8 67.0 68.3 1.0 0.6 0.01 0.01
Inferred 1.3 65.5 69.0 0.5 0.3 0.003 0.005
Total Inferred 3.9 68.5 0.8 0.3 0.008 0.009
Notes:
1: Mineral Resources 2350E to 2950E are exclusive of Stage 4 Probable Ore Reserve.
2: Tonnage is rounded to the nearest 100,000 tonnes.
Table 6: Cockatoo Island Highwall Mineral Resource as at 31 July 2012

(Mt) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
Inferred 3.0 - 60.0 7.0 4.9 0.03 0.009
Total Inferred 3.0 - 60.0 7.0 4.9 0.03 0.009
Notes:
1: Mineral Resources 2350E to 2950E are exclusive of Stage 4 Probable Ore Reserve.
2: Tonnage is rounded to the nearest 100,000 tonnes.
3: Mineralisation is composed of Seawall Hematite and Footwall Schist.
CEO’s Review 10
Table 7: Cockatoo Island Seawall Hematite Ore Reserves as at 31 July 2012

(Mt) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
Probable Stage 4 Onshore Seawall 1.2 65.5 68.5 1.0 0.5 0.003 0.005
Total Probable 1.2 65.5 68.5 1.0 0.5 0.003 0.005
Notes:
1: Ore Reserves are in addition to 2350E to 2950E Mineral Resources.
2: Tonnage is rounded to nearest 100,000 tonnes.
Dove River & Cethana – Tasmania

The Irvine and Cockatoo Island projects have been the key focus of activity for Pluton in 2012 with little work carried
out at the Dove River and Cethana tenements.
The Company continues to review its options regarding these tenements.
Priorities for 2013

In 2013 our priorities include the following:
Cockatoo Island
• Bring production and shipments to a steady state at the expected operating cost.
• Increase expected open-cut mine life by conversion of resources through drilling.
• Assess the underground potential and feasibility through drilling and technical studies.
• Increase indigenous participation through employment, training and business opportunities.
Irvine Island
• Finalise remaining environmental data capture and submit the Public Environmental Review to commence formal
environmental approval process.
• Commence formal Definitive Feasibility Study.
Tony Schoer
Managing Director & CEO
The information in this report that relates to Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimates for the Cockatoo Island and Irvine Island Iron Ore Deposits – is based on
information compiled by Mr A Griffith, who is a member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a full time employees of Pluton Resources Ltd. Mr
Griffith has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a
Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’
Financial Report 2012 11
Pluton Resources Limited ABN 12 114 561 732
Contents
Directors’ Report 12
Auditor’s Independence Declaration 20
Corporate Governance Statement 21
Statement of Comprehensive Income 27
Statement of Financial Position 28
Statement of Changes in Equity 29
Statement of Cash Flows 30
Notes to the Financial Statements 31
Directors’ Declaration 60
Independent Auditor’s Report 61
ASX Additional Information 63
General information
The financial report covers Pluton Resources Limited as a consolidated entity consisting of Pluton Resources Limited and the entities it controlled. The financial report is presented in Australian
dollars, which is Pluton Resources Limited’s functional and presentation currency.
The financial report consists of the financial statements, notes to the financial statements and the directors’ declaration.
Pluton Resources Limited is a listed public company limited by shares, incorporated and domiciled in Australia. Its registered office and principal place of business is:
Level 4, 468 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004.
A description of the nature of the consolidated entity’s operations and its principal activities are included in the directors’ report, which is not part of the financial report.
The financial report was authorised for issue, in accordance with a resolution of directors, on 27 September 2012. The directors have the power to amend and reissue the financial report.
30 JUNE 2012
The directors present their report, together with the financial statements, On 11 January 2012, the consolidated entity held an extraordinary
on the consolidated entity (referred to hereafter as the ‘consolidated general meeting of shareholders and received approval of the issue
entity’) consisting of Pluton Resources Limited (referred to hereafter as of 84,507,041 ordinary shares to Timeone Holdings Limited over four
the ‘company’ or ‘parent entity’) and the entities it controlled for the year tranches at $0.355 per share.
ended 30 June 2012. On 22 February 2012, under a binding term sheet with Timeone
Directors Holdings Limited, the third tranche totalling $1,835,312 was received
The following persons were directors of Pluton Resources Limited during for an issue of 5,169,892 ordinary shares at $0.355 per share.
the whole of the financial year and up to the date of this report, unless On 11 April 2012, under a binding term sheet with Timeone Holdings
otherwise stated: Limited, tranche 4A totalling $3,000,000 was received for an issue of
Malcolm Macpherson 8,450,704 ordinary shares at $0.355 per share.
Anthony James Schoer On 12 April 2012, the consolidated entity agreed to a binding Term
Russell George Williams Sheet with key commercial terms for a proposed 50/50 unincorporated
Chenxi (Elly) Wang (appointed on 20 April 2012) joint venture with its strategic partner, Timeone Holdings Limited over
Principal activities the mining operations on Cockatoo Island; whereby Timeone and its
The principal activity of the consolidated entity during the financial year funding partner SS&T Group Limited, a leading Shanghai based mining,
was the exploration of mineral assets within Australia. logistics and commodities trading company, would provide funding of
Dividends $70 million, the proceeds of which would be used to fund the remainder
There were no dividends paid or declared during the current or previous of tranche 4 at 35.5 cents a share, the proposed acquisition of the
financial year. Cockatoo Island project (including the provision of a $20 million bank
guarantee to use for statutory environmental bonds for the Cockatoo
Review of operations Island project) and the initial development of stage 4 mining on the
The loss for the consolidated entity after providing for income tax island.
amounted to $2,883,341 (30 June 2011: $5,640,307).
On 10 May 2012, under a binding term sheet with Timeone Holdings
The consolidated entity continued its exploration activities on Irvine Limited, tranche 4B totalling 2,000,000 was received for an issue of
Island, located northwest of Broome, Western Australia. Work also 5,633,803 ordinary shares at $0.355 per share.
continued during the year on environmental surveys and data collection
for inclusion in the Public Environmental Review (‘PER’) document that The scheduled Extraordinary General Meeting for 29 June 2012 was
the company will lodge as part of the Ministerial approvals process. postponed after the company was officially notified that potential
Cockatoo partner Timeone/SST Group would not complete the
On 22 July 2011, the consolidated entity issued 10,244,697 fully paid transaction under the terms of the binding Term Sheet announced in
ordinary shares at $0.831 per share and 14,342,576 options with a April 2012.
strike price 83.1 cents, expiring 22 July 2017. The issue was made
following shareholder approval received on 23 June 2011 and pursuant Significant changes in the state of affairs
to the signing of the Wonganin Project Co-existence Agreement (Native On 4 August 2011, the consolidated entity announced that it entered
Title Agreement). into a binding term sheet with Timeone Holdings Limited, a company
owned by private Chinese investors holding a contractual relationship
In August 2011, under a binding term sheet with Timeone Holdings with Rizhao Port Group, operator of the world’s largest iron ore import
Limited, the first and second tranche totalling $10,504,688 was received terminal, located in Shandong Province, China. Under the terms of the
for an issue of 29,590,671 ordinary shares at $0.355 per share. Funds binding term sheet Timeone would invest up to $30,000,000 for a
received were used to fund the on-going exploration and environmental 30 per cent stake in the capital of the company (post investment) to be
work program, regulatory approvals of the Irvine Island project and the satisfied by the issue of fully paid ordinary shares at $0.355 per share,
commencement of the Definitive Feasibility Study. in four tranches.
On 27 September 2011, the consolidated entity announced that assay On 2 September 2011, the consolidated entity announced that it
results from continued exploration activities significantly increased had signed a legally binding term sheet with Cliffs Asia Pacific Iron
the 11 year mine life on Irvine Island as defined in the PFS stage 1 Ore and HWE Mining in relation to the acquisition of 100% of the
valuation. Cockatoo Island iron ore assets in the Kimberley Iron Ore Hub. The
On 8 November 2011 the consolidated entity announced an update consolidated entity expects to complete the acquisition of Cockatoo
from Inferred to Indicated Mineral resource for Hardstaff Peninsular, Island operations after the current mining stage has been completed in
on Irvine Island. 2012. The consolidated entity will be responsible for the environmental
rehabilitation of Cockatoo Island when it concludes mining.
On 10 November 2011, the consolidated entity issued 476,872 ordinary
shares to KRED Enterprises Pty Ltd as trustee of the Mayala People, On 23 December 2011, the consolidated entity announced that after the
being an issue in consideration for commitments given by the Mayala completion of due diligence for the company’s acquisition of the iron
People to allow the consolidated entity to undertake exploration activities ore assets on Cockatoo Island, it advised the Cockatoo Island vendors of
on Irvine Island. the consolidated entity’s intention to continue with the acquisition.
On 22 December 2011, the consolidated entity announced that it had There were no other significant changes in the state of affairs of the
entered into a commercial hire agreement with Winmax Drilling for two consolidated entity during the financial year.
company patented Universal Drilling Platforms.
30 JUNE 2012
Matters subsequent to the end of the financial year Environmental regulation

On 6 July 2012, the consolidated entity was granted a mining lease The consolidated entity’s operations are subject to environmental
over Irvine Island. The lease (M04/452) replaces exploration licence regulation under the law of the Commonwealth and State for Western
E04/1172. The issue of the mining lease is a significant step forward in Australia and Tasmania. The consolidated entity has continued studies
the approvals process towards commercialisation of Irvine. directed towards obtaining environmental approvals for the Irvine Island
Following the withdrawal of the Extraordinary General Meeting of project. The consolidated entity, as part of its operations, maintains
shareholders, the Board put the company’s securities into voluntary strict adherence to environmental rehabilitation and protection of flora
suspension on 2 July 2012 and embarked on an urgent review of the and fauna in its areas of interest.
consolidated entity’s existing and future operations (including a review Information on directors
of its ability to acquire the Cockatoo Island project) to determine the Name: Malcolm Macpherson
future strategy of the consolidated entity; and pursued discussions Title: Non-Executive Chairman
with a number of parties who expressed interest in supporting the Qualifications: B.Sc. FAICD, F.AusIMM
consolidated entity’s activities to acquire the Cockatoo Island Project
Experience and expertise: Malcolm Macpherson has broad mining
from the Cockatoo Island vendors; Cliffs Asia Pacific Iron Ore Holdings
industry experience and built a successful career as Chief Executive
Pty Limited and HWE Cockatoos Pty Ltd.
of Iluka Resources Limited, growing it from a $50 million market cap
The Cockatoo Island vendors agreed to extend the acquisition execution in 1978 to a $1 billion company by 2001. He has a strong interest in
date to 31 July 2012 to enable the consolidated entity to find a research and innovation and has served on CSIRO advisory committees
replacement funding partner. and the Murdoch University Senate.
On 31 July 2012 an Asset Sales agreement between Pluton Resources Other current directorships: Non-Executive Director of Bathurst
Ltd and the Cockatoo Island vendors was signed with completion of Resources Limited, Non-Executive Director of Canadian listed
all condition precedent under the agreement taking place on 10th Titanium Corporation.
September 2012, and final completion of the acquisition of Cockatoo Former directorships (in the last 3 years): Range River Gold Limited
Island to take place on 28 September 2012. Cockatoo Island vendors (resigned February 2011), Minara Resources Limited (resigned
have security over the consolidated entity’s interest in both Cockatoo December 2011)
Island and Irvine Island in the event the consolidated entity does not Special responsibilities: None
meet its financial obligations under the Asset Sale agreement. Interests in shares: 240,289 ordinary shares
On 1 August, the consolidated entity agreed to a binding term sheet Interests in options: None
for a proposed 50/50 unincorporated joint venture with Wise Energy Name: Anthony James Schoer
Group Limited (‘WEG’). Title: Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
On 13 August 2012, the consolidated entity completed an initial Qualifications: BBus, FCPA
pre-sale agreement of ore from Cockatoo Island whereby a loan of Experience and expertise: Tony Schoer has 28 years’ experience in
US$2.5 million was received from WEG. On 30 August 2012 the the mining and oil and gas industries, including direct experience in
consolidated entity completed a second pre-sale agreement of ore commodities such as iron ore, coal, gold, manganese, nickel and oil
from Cockatoo Island whereby a loan of US$3 million was received and gas. Tony was the Chief Financial Officer of Portman Ltd. until the
from WEG. takeover offer by Cleveland Cliffs Inc. He previously worked for WMC
On 31 August 2012, the consolidated entity announced that a binding Ltd and was employed by BHP Co Ltd for 20 years commencing as
term sheet has been agreed and executed for the proposed 50/50 a Commercial Trainee. He held various senior roles including Vice
unincorporated joint venture with WEG over the mining operations on President Commercial for BHP Minerals, and was a member of the
Cockatoo Island. BHP Minerals Executive Committee. He represented BHP on several
Boards and Ownership Committees. He has operating experience in
Pursuant to the term sheet, WEG has provided a $3 million interest three countries and has worked on three mine sites as well as in several
free loan. regional and head offices.
WEG is considered a related party in that Chenxi Wong, a non-executive Other current directorships: None
director of the company, is also a director of WEG. Former directorships (in the last 3 years): None
No other matter or circumstance has arisen since 30 June 2012 that has Special responsibilities: None
significantly affected, or may significantly affect the consolidated entity’s Interests in shares: 1,189,971 ordinary shares
operations, the results of those operations, or the consolidated entity’s Interests in options: 5,231,694 options over ordinary shares
state of affairs in future financial years.
Likely developments and expected results of
operations
The consolidated entity is expecting to commence production from
Cockatoo Island in October 2012. The ore will be sold under a sales and
marketing agreement with Wise Energy Group Limited, the consolidated
entity’s proposed joint venture partner.
30 JUNE 2012
Name: Russell George Williams Remuneration report (audited)

Title: Non-Executive Director The remuneration report, which has been audited, outlines the
Qualifications: BSc. Eng director and executive remuneration arrangements for the company
and consolidated entity, in accordance with the requirements of the
Experience and expertise: Russell Williams trained as a mechanical
Corporations Act 2001 and its Regulations.
engineer at the University of Manchester and has spent 30 years with
Alcoa Inc. He was first involved in all facets of alumina production and The remuneration report is set out under the following main headings:
then became involved in bauxite production managing Alcoa’s West A Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration
Australian bauxite mining operations, then had oversight of all of Alcoa’s B Details of remuneration
global mining activity in Brasil, Jamaica and Suriname. Russell spent C Service agreements
his final years with Alcoa in Pittsburgh, USA, and was responsible for all D Share-based compensation
activity at the Alcoa JV in Guinea, Company Bauxite de Guinee (CBG), E Additional information
the third largest export bauxite producer in the world.
A Principles used to determine the nature and amount of
Other current directorships: Non-Executive Director of Anglo Aluminium remuneration
Corp., listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange, Canada, and Queensland The performance of the company and consolidated entity depends
Bauxite Limited upon the quality of its directors and executive officers. To prosper, the
Former directorships (in the last 3 years): None company and consolidated entity must attract, motivate and retain highly
Special responsibilities: None skilled personnel. To this end, the company and consolidated entity:
Interests in shares: 456,021 ordinary shares
Interests in options: None • Works to attract the appropriate staff by providing a competitive
remuneration structure and a productive working environment.
Name: Chenxi (Elly) Wang (appointed 20 April 2012)
Title: Non-Executive Director • Reviews and recommend remuneration, HR policies, performance
Qualifications: Dip. Ed. management and procedures for the company and consolidated entity,
including:
Experience and expertise: Ms Wang is an executive director of Timeone
Holdings Limited (‘Timeone’) and WiseEnergy Group Limited (‘WEG’) - directors of each subsidiary;
- the chief executive officer; and
Other current directorships: None - executive and senior management.
Former directorships (in the last 3 years): None
Special responsibilities: None • Assures that all compliance, governance, accounting, legal approvals
Interests in shares: 48,845,070 ordinary shares and disclosure requirements associated with company’s employment
Interests in options: None practices are satisfied.
‘Other current directorships’ quoted above are current directorships The Board of Directors (the ‘Board’) has not established a Remuneration
for listed entities only and excludes directorships in all other types of and Nomination Committee. Therefore the Board is responsible for
entities, unless otherwise stated. determining and reviewing compensation arrangements for the directors
and the executive officers. The Board assesses the appropriateness of
‘Former directorships (in the last 3 years)’ quoted above are the nature and amount of emoluments of such officers on a periodic
directorships held in the last 3 years for listed entities only and excludes basis by reference to relevant market conditions with the overall
directorships in all other types of entities, unless otherwise stated. objective of ensuring maximum stakeholder benefit from the retention of
Company secretary an experienced and high quality Board and executive team. Such officers
Andrew Metcalfe (B.Bus, CPA, FCIS) is a qualified accountant with are given the opportunity to receive their base emolument in a variety of
over 25 years’ experience across a variety of industry sectors, holding forms including cash and superannuation salary sacrifice. The directors’
the position of Company Secretary and CFO for a number of ASX listed emoluments are comparable to similar sized companies in the resources
entities and unlisted public entities for property, retail, energy, media industry.
and technology industries. Andrew is employed by Accosec Consultants Consolidated entity performance and link to remuneration
and assists the consolidated entity in Company Secretarial practice and There is no formal link between the company’s and consolidated entity’s
procedures and governance issues. performance and the directors’ emoluments as the company’s and
Meetings of directors consolidated entity’s exploration operations represent no guarantee of
The number of meetings of the company’s Board of Directors held their future value.
during the year ended 30 June 2012, and the number of meetings Key management personnel performance rights issued in 2010 that
attended by each director were: vested this year:
Full Board • 240,000 performance rights vesting from 31 March 2012 when
Attended Held the share price reaches $1.25. The performance rights expire
31 March 2014.
Malcolm Macpherson 12 12
Anthony James Schoer 12 12
Russell George Williams 12 12
Chenxi Wang 1 3
Held: represents the number of meetings held during the time the
director held office.
30 JUNE 2012
These performance rights are issued as part of remuneration and are not Variable remuneration (short term incentive) - objective:
linked to performance hurdles of individual employees. The objective of a short term incentive programme is to link the
All directors and executives have the opportunity to qualify for achievement of the consolidated entity’s operational targets with the
participation in the Executive Share Scheme, which provides for a salary remuneration received by the executives charged with meeting those
sacrifice of directors fees to acquire shares in the company. targets. The total potential short term incentive available is set at a level
so as to provide sufficient incentive to the executive to achieve the
Remuneration structure operational targets and such that the cost to the consolidated entity is
In accordance with corporate governance principles and reasonable in the circumstances.
recommendations, the company substantially complies with the
guidelines for executive remuneration packages and non-executive The company and consolidated entity seeks to attract and retain high
director remuneration. calibre executives into key leadership positions and to align its executive
reward with the delivery of strategic objectives and the creation of value
Non-executive directors remuneration for security holders.
The Constitution and the ASX Listing Rules specify that the aggregate
remuneration of non-executive directors shall be determined from The variable remuneration framework provides long term incentives,
time-to-time by a general meeting. The latest determination was at delivered through participation in the Employee Share Option Plan,
the Annual General Meeting held 20 October 2006 when shareholders to those executives who have the capacity to influence the overall
approved an aggregate remuneration of $400,000 per annum to be performance of the consolidated entity.
apportioned amongst non-executive directors. Variable remuneration (short term incentive) - structure:
The amount of aggregate remuneration sought to be approved by At the 2009 Annual General Meeting the shareholders approved the
shareholders and the fee structure is reviewed annually. The Board establishment of an Employee Share Option Plan (‘ESOP’) to provide
considers advice from external consultants as well as the fees paid to short-term incentives for executive directors and employees.
non-executive directors of comparable companies when undertaking the Use of remuneration consultants
annual review process. During the financial year ended 30 June 2012, the company did not
On appointment, non-executive directors are advised of their directors engage the use of remuneration consultants.
duties and responsibilities and the remuneration fee to be paid to that Voting and comments made at the company’s 2011 Annual General
director in carrying out their individual duties. This fee covers the Board Meeting (‘AGM’)
position where the non-executive director is a member. At the last AGM 75% of the shareholders voted to adopt the
Non-executive directors aggregate emoluments are detailed in section remuneration report for the year ended 30 June 2011. The company
B below. The non-executive directors do not receive retirement benefits, did not receive any specific feedback at the AGM regarding its
nor do they participate in any incentive programs. remuneration practices.
Executive remuneration B Details of remuneration

The company and consolidated entity aims to reward its executives with Amounts of remuneration
a level and mix of remuneration commensurate with their position and Details of the remuneration of key management personnel of Pluton
responsibilities within the company and consolidated entity, so as to Resources Limited are set out in the following tables. Key management
reward executives for meeting or exceeding targets set by reference to personnel are defined as those who have the authority and responsibility
appropriate benchmarks; align the interests of executives with those for planning, directing and controlling the major activities of the
of shareholders; and ensure remuneration is competitive by market consolidated entity.
standards. The key management personnel of the consolidated entity consisted of
Remuneration consists of the following key elements: the directors of Pluton Resources Limited and the following executives:
• fixed remuneration (base salary, superannuation and non-monetary • Brett Clark - Chief Operating Officer (appointed 1 February 2012)
benefits) • Pamela Kaye - General Counsel
• variable remuneration - short-term incentive (‘STI’) • Anson Griffiths - Project Manager
Fixed remuneration - objective: • Cedric Davies - Community and Environment Advisor
Fixed remuneration is reviewed at the end of each contract term by the
• Diane Dowdell - Environment Manager
Board. The process consists of a review of the consolidated entity and
(appointed 15 November 2011)
individual performance, relevant comparative remuneration externally
and internally and, where appropriate external advice on policies and • Reece Power - General Manager Corporate
practices. (appointed 20 February 2012)
Fixed remuneration - structure: • John McDougall - Senior Geologist
Executives receive their fixed (primary) remuneration in form of cash • Ben Carpenter - Project Manager
payments to their nominated accounts (with appropriate PAYG tax
deducted) and superannuation funds. The level of fixed remuneration
is set so as to provide a base level of remuneration which is both
appropriate to the position and is competitive in the market. Fixed
remuneration is reviewed annually by the Board as part of an assessment
on that executive’s performance. The Board has access to external
independent advice if necessary.
30 JUNE 2012
2012 Short-term benefits Post-employment Long-term Share-based

benefits benefits payments
Name Cash salary Bonus Non-monetary Superannuation Long service Equity-settled Total
and fees leave
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
Non-Executive Directors:
Malcolm Macpherson (Chairman) 94,802 - - 8,532 - - 103,334
Russell Williams 55,922 - - 1,362 - - 57,284
Executive Directors:
Anthony Schoer 477,310 - - 42,958 - - 520,268
Other Key Management Personnel:
Brett Clark 220,930 - - 12,383 - - 233,313
Pamela Kaye 218,400 - - 8,379 - - 226,779
Anson Griffiths 218,400 - - 6,577 - - 224,977
Cedric Davies 162,240 - - 7,488 - - 169,728
Diane Dowdell 136,425 - - 3,750 - - 140,175
Reece Power 117,213 - - 5,674 - - 122,887
John McDougall 86,833 - - 7,815 - - 94,648
Ben Carpenter 81,667 - - 7,350 - - 89,017
1,870,142 - - 112,268 - - 1,982,410
Chenxi Wang received no remuneration during the year.
2011 Short-term benefits Post-employment Long-term Share-based

benefits benefits payments
Name Cash salary Bonus Non-monetary Superannuation Long service Equity-settled Total
and fees leave
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
Non-Executive Directors:
Malcolm Macpherson (Chairman) 91,743 - - 8,257 - - 100,000
Russell Williams 41,284 - - 3,716 - - 45,000
Raymond Schoer * 40,875 - - - - - 40,875
Executive Directors:
Anthony Schoer 428,260 - - 18,327 - - 446,587
Other Key Management Personnel:

Pamela Kaye 243,750 - - 21,937 - 10,643 276,330
Anson Griffiths 210,000 - - 18,900 - 10,643 239,543
Cedric Davies 156,000 - - 14,040 - 8,514 178,554
John McDougall 135,200 - - 10,140 - 8,514 153,854
Ben Carpenter 130,000 - - 11,700 - 8,514 150,214
1,477,112 - - 107,017 - 46,828 1,630,957
* Raymond Schoer resigned as a director on 15 February 2011.
30 JUNE 2012
C Service agreements
Remuneration and other terms of employment for key management personnel are formalised in service agreements. Details of these agreements
are as follows:
Name: Anthony James Schoer
Title: Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
Agreement commenced: 1 July 2006
Term of agreement: No end date
Details: Anthony James Schoer’s fixed remuneration is $520,268 which includes car allowance and superannuation) and his variable remuneration is
any executive share scheme or executive share option scheme or cash bonus payment as may be determined by the Board.
Key management personnel have no entitlement to termination payments in the event of removal for misconduct.
D Share-based compensation
Issue of shares
There were no shares issued to directors and other key management personnel as part of compensation during the year ended 30 June 2012.
However, 240,000 performance rights issued to key management personnel on 31 March 2010 vested on 31 March 2012 into fully paid ordinary
shares.
Options
There were no options issued to directors and other key management personnel as part of compensation that were outstanding as at 30 June 2012.
There were no options granted to or exercised by directors and other key management personnel as part of compensation during the year ended
30 June 2012.
Performance rights
The terms and conditions of each grant of performance rights affecting remuneration of directors and other key management personnel in this financial
year or future reporting years are as follows:
Grant date Vesting date Expiry date Share price target Fair value per right
for vesting at grant date
31 March 2010 (ESOP-T2) From 31 March 2012 31 March 2014 $1.250 $0.2900
ESOP Tranche 2 (‘ESOP-T2’) have a performance hurdle of the company share price being at least $1.25 by 31 March 2014 for each performance right
to be convertible into an ordinary share.
Performance rights granted carry no dividend or voting rights.
Details of performance rights over ordinary shares issued to directors and other key management personnel as part of compensation during the year
ended 30 June 2012 are set out below:
Number of rights granted during the year Number of rights vested during the year
Name 2012 2011 2012 2011
John McDougall * - - - 40,000

John McDougall ** - - 40,000 -
Pamela Kaye * - - - 50,000
Pamela Kaye ** - - 50,000 -
Ben Carpenter * - - - 40,000
Ben Carpenter ** - - 40,000 -
Anson Griffiths * - - - 50,000
Anson Griffiths ** - - 50,000 -
Cedric Davies * - - - 40,000
Cedric Davies ** - - 40,000 -
Johari Bin Demin * - - - 20,000
Johari Bin Demin ** - - 20,000 -
* Performance rights vested under ESOP-1

** Performance rights vested under ESOP-2
30 JUNE 2012
Values of performance rights over ordinary shares granted, exercised and lapsed for directors and other key management personnel during the year
ended 30 June 2012 are set out below:
Name Value of rights granted Value of rights vested Value of rights lapsed Remuneration consisting
during the year during the year during the year of rights for the year
$ $ $ %
John McDougall - 8,514 - -
Pamela Kaye - 10,643 - -
Ben Carpenter - 8,514 - -
Anson Griffiths - 10,643 - -
Cedric Davies - 8,512 - -
E Additional information
The earnings of the consolidated entity for the five years to 30 June 2012 are summarised below:
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
$ $ $ $ $
Revenue and other income 390,340 162,957 566,222 595,783 787,870
Loss before interest and tax (1,453,754) (1,502,101) (1,753,174) (5,640,307) (2,883,341)
Loss after income tax (1,453,754) (1,502,101) (1,753,174) (5,640,307) (2,883,341)
The factors that are considered to affect total shareholders return (‘TSR’) are summarised below:
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Share price at financial year end ($A) 2.050 0.715 0.395 0.280 0.170
Basic earnings per share (cents per share) (1.930) (1.930) (1.350) (3.269) (1.280)
This concludes the remuneration report, which has been audited.
30 JUNE 2012
Shares under option

Unissued ordinary shares of Pluton Resources Limited under option at the date of this report are as follows:
Grant date Expiry date Exercise price Number under option

3 October 2006 3 October 2016 $0.300 23,396,572
22 July 2011 22 July 2017 $0.831 14,342,576
37,739,148
No person entitled to exercise the options had or has any right by virtue of the option to participate in any share issue of the company or of any other body
corporate.
Shares under performance rights Non-audit services

There were no unissued ordinary shares of Pluton Resources Limited There were no non-audit services provided during the financial year by
under performance rights outstanding as at 30 June 2012. the auditor.
Shares issued on the exercise of options Officers of the company who are former audit
There were no shares of Pluton Resources Limited issued on the exercise partners of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
of options during the year ended 30 June 2012. There are no officers of the company who are former audit partners of
Indemnity and insurance of officers Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu.
The company has indemnified the directors and executives of the Auditor’s independence declaration
company for costs incurred, in their capacity as a director or executive, A copy of the auditor’s independence declaration as required under
for which they may be held personally liable, except where there is a lack section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 is set out on the following
of good faith. page.
During the financial year, the company arranged Directors and Officers Auditor
Liability Insurance for its directors and officers. The premium paid Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu continues in office in accordance with section
was $51,148 and insured each of the directors and officers against 327 of the Corporations Act 2001.
liabilities for costs and expenses incurred by them in defending any
This report is made in accordance with a resolution of directors, pursuant
legal proceedings arising out of their conduct while acting in the capacity
to section 298(2)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001.
of director or officer of the company, other than conduct involving a wilful
breach of duty in relation to the company. The insurance policy had a On behalf of the directors
liability limit of $10 million on any one claim and in the aggregate. The
nature of the liabilities covered was Official Investigation, Inquiries and
Proceedings, Occupational Health and Safety, Mitigation Costs and
Civil Awards.
Indemnity and insurance of auditor
The company has not, during or since the financial year, indemnified
or agreed to indemnify the auditor of the company or any related entity
against a liability incurred by the auditor. Tony Schoer
Director
During the financial year, the company has not paid a premium in respect
of a contract to insure the auditor of the company or any related entity. 27 September 2012
Proceedings on behalf of the company Melbourne
No person has applied to the Court under section 237 of the Corporations
Act 2001 for leave to bring proceedings on behalf of the company, or
to intervene in any proceedings to which the company is a party for the
purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of the company for all or part
of those proceedings.
Auditor’s Independence Declaration 20
The Board of Directors of Pluton Resources Limited is responsible for the corporate governance of the company and consolidated entity. The Board
guides and monitors the business and affairs of Pluton Resources Limited on behalf of the shareholders by whom they are elected and to whom they
are accountable.
The table below summarises the company’s compliance with the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Revised Principles and Recommendations.
Principles and Recommendations Compliance Comply

Principle 1 – Lay solid foundations for management and oversight
1.1 E stablish the functions reserved The Board is responsible for the overall corporate governance of the company. Complies.
to the Board of Directors (‘Board’) The Board has adopted a Board charter that formalises its roles and responsibilities and defines the matters
of Pluton Resources Limited that are reserved for the Board and specific matters that are delegated to management.
(‘company’) and those delegated
to manage and disclose those The Board has adopted a Delegations of Authority that sets limits of authority for senior executives.
functions. On appointment of a director, the company issues a letter of appointment setting out the terms and
conditions of appointment to the Board.
1.2 D
isclose the process for evaluating Senior executives prepare strategic objectives that are signed off by the Board. These objectives must then Complies.
the performance of senior be met by senior executives as part of their performance targets. The CEO then reviews the performance of
executives. the senior executives against those objectives. The Board reviews the CEO’s compliance against his and the
company’s objectives. These reviews occur annually.
1.3 P rovide the information indicated in A Board charter has been disclosed on the company’s website and is summarised in this Corporate Complies.
Guide to reporting on Principle 1. Governance Statement.
A performance evaluation process is included in the Board Charter, which has been disclosed on the Complies.
company’s website and is summarised in this Corporate Governance Statement.
The Board conducted a formal performance evaluation for senior executives in the financial year. Complies.
Principle 2 – Structure the Board to add value
2.1 A
majority of the Board should be As at the date of this statement, the Board comprises two independent directors, one executive director Complies.
independent directors. and one non-executive director of the company.
Mr Malcolm Macpherson and Mr Russell Williams are both independent, non-executive directors.
Ms Chenxi Wang is a non-executive director.
Mr Tony Schoer is an executive director.
2.2 T he chair should be an Malcolm Macpherson (Chair) is an independent, non-executive director of the Board. Complies.
independent director.
2.3 T he roles of chair and chief Malcolm Macpherson is the chairman and Tony Schoer the chief executive officer. Complies.
executive officer should not be
exercised by the same individual.
2.4 T he Board should establish a The nomination committee should comprise two non-executive directors and the CEO as an ex-officio Does not comply.
Nomination Committee. member. Given the size of the Board, it was determined that the Board will execute the functions of a
Given the size of the Board, the directors
nomination committee and that a separate nomination committee is unnecessary.
determined that it will execute the
functions of a nomination committee and
that a separate nomination committee
is unnecessary. The Board considers
the skills and experience of both
independent non-executive directors
allows the Board to act in the best
interests of shareholders.
2.5 D
isclose the process for evaluating The company conducts the process for evaluating the performance of the Board, its Committees and senior Complies.
the performance of the Board, executives/management as outlined in the Board Charter, which is available on the company’s website. This
its committees and individual includes supporting ongoing education of directors for the benefit of the company.
directors.
2.6 P rovide the information indicated The skills and experience of each director has been disclosed (where applicable) in the Directors’ Report Complies.
in the Guide to reporting on attached to this Corporate Governance Statement.
Principle 2. The Board has undertaken a review of the mix of skills and experience on the Board in light of the company’s
principal activities and direction, and has considered diversity in succession planning. The Board considers
the current mix of skills and experience of members of the Board and its senior management is sufficient to
meet the requirements of the company.
A director is considered independent when he substantially satisfies the test for independence as set out in
the ASX Corporate Governance Recommendations.
Members of the Board are able to take independent professional advice at the expense of the company.
The Board supports the nomination and re-election of non-executive directors at the company’s forthcoming
Annual General Meeting.
Principle 3 – Promote ethical and responsible decision making

3.1 E stablish a code of conduct and The Board has adopted a code of conduct. The code establishes a clear set of values that emphasise a Complies.
disclose the code or a summary culture encompassing strong corporate governance, sound business practices and good ethical conduct.
of the code.
The code is available on the company’s website.
3.2 C
ompanies should establish a The Board has undertaken a review of the mix of skills and experience on the Board in light of the company’s Complies.
policy concerning diversity and principal activities and direction.
disclose the policy or a summary
of that policy. The policy should The company has adopted a Diversity Policy that considers the benefits of diversity, ways to promote a Does not comply, however measurable
include requirements for the Board culture of diversity, factors to be taken into account in the selection process of candidates for Board and objectives are being considered and
to establish measurable objectives senior management positions in the company, education programs to develop skills and experience in will be set by the Board as the company
for achieving gender diversity and preparation for Board and senior management positions, and processes to include review and appointment expands its operations.
to assess annually both the of directors.
objectives and progress in The Board has not estblished measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity.
achieving them.
3.3 P rovide the information indicated in The Board has adopted a code of conduct. The code establishes a clear set of values that emphasise a Complies.
Guide to reporting on Principle 3. culture encompassing strong corporate governance, sound business practices and good ethical conduct.
The Board has adopted a Diversity Policy.
The company has included in this Corporate Governance Statement a statement by the company supporting
the diversity of employees with differing skills, values, backgrounds and experiences, and a statement of the
proportion of women employees and their positions held within the company.
Principle 4 – Safeguard integrity in financial reporting

4.1 T he Board should establish an As at the date of this statement the Board does not have an audit committee. Does not comply.
Audit Committee.
determined that it will execute the
functions of an audit committee and
that a separate audit committee is
unnecessary. The Board considers
the skills and experience of both
independent non-executive directors
and the Managing Director allows the
Board to act in the best interests of
shareholders.
4.2 T he audit committee should be As at the date of this statement, the company does not comply with Recommendation 4.1 and 4.2 Does not comply for reasons given
structured so that it consists of as there was no audit committee. above. With respect to this complaince
only non-executive directors, issue, the Board will review its position
a majority being independent annually.
directors; is chaired by an
independent chair who is not
chair of the Board; and have at
least 3 members.
4.3 T he audit committee should The Board has adopted an audit and risk committee charter. Complies.
have a formal charter.
This charter is available on the company’s website.
4.4 P rovide the information indicated in In accordance with the information suggested in Guide to Reporting on Principle 2, this has been disclosed Complies.
Guide to reporting on Principle 4. in the Directors’ Report attached to this Corporate Governance Statement and is summarised in this
Corporate Governance Statement.
When formally constituted, the members of an audit and risk committee are appointed by the Board and
recommendations from the committee are presented to the Board for further discussion and resolution.
There was no audit and risk committee during the year.
The audit and risk committee charter, and information on procedures for the selection and appointment of
the external auditor, and for the rotation of external audit engagement partners (which is determined by the
audit and risk committee), is available on the company’s website.
Principle 5 – Make timely and balanced disclosure

5.1 Establish written policies designed to The company has adopted a continuous disclosure policy, to ensure that it complies with the continuous Complies.
ensure compliance with ASX Listing disclosure regime under the ASX Listing Rules and the Corporations Act 2001.
Rules disclosure requirements and
to ensure accountability at a senior The company has adopted a securities trading policy
executive level for that compliance
and disclose those policies or a
summary of those policies.
5.2 Provide the information The company’s continuous disclosure policy and securities trading policy is available on the company’s Complies.
indicated in the Guide to reporting website.
on Principle 5.
The securities trading policy has been released to the Australian Stock Exchange.
Principle 6 – Respect the rights of shareholders

6.1 Design a communications policy for The company has adopted a shareholder communications policy. The company uses its website Complies.
promoting effective communication (www.plutonresources.com), annual report, market announcements and media disclosures to communicate
with shareholders and encouraging with its shareholders, as well as encourages participation at general meetings.
their participation at general
meetings and disclose that policy This policy is available on the company’s website.
or a summary of that policy.
6.2 P rovide the information indicated in The company’s shareholder communications policy is available on the company’s website. Complies.
the Guide to reporting on Principle 6.
Principle 7 – Recognise and manage risk

7.1 E stablish policies for the oversight The company has adopted a risk management statement within the audit and risk committee charter. The Complies.
and management of material audit and risk committee is responsible for managing risk; however, ultimate responsibility for risk oversight
business risks and disclose a and risk management rests with the Board.
summary of these policies.
The audit and risk committee charter is available on the company’s website and is summarised in this
Corporate Governance Statement.
7.2 T he Board should require The company has identified key risks within the business. In the ordinary course of business, management Complies.
management to design and monitor and manage these risks.
implement the risk management
and internal control system to Key operational and financial risks are presented to and reviewed by the Board at each Board meeting.
manage the company’s material
business risks and report to it
on whether those risks are being
managed effectively. The Board
should disclose that management has
reported to it as to the effectiveness
of the company’s management of its
material business risks.
7.3 T he Board should disclose whether it The Board has received a statement from the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer that the Complies.
has received assurance from the Chief declaration provided in accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 is founded on a sound
Executive Officer and Chief Financial system of risk management and internal control and that the system is operating efficiently and effectively in
Officer that the declaration provided all material respects in relation to the financial reporting risks.
in accordance with section 295A
of the Corporations Act is founded
on a sound system of risk
management and internal control
and that the system is operating
efficiently and effectively in all
material respects in relation to the
financial reporting risks.
7.4 P rovide the information indicated in A statement of the company’s risk policies is included in the Audit and Risk Committee charter. Complies.
Guide to reporting on Principle 7.
This charter is available on the company’s website and is summarised in this Corporate Governance
Statement.
The company has identified key risks within the business and has received a statement of assurance from
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer in relation to the financial report.

Principle 8 – Remunerate fairly and responsibly
8.1 The Board should establish a The Board has not established a remuneration committee and has not adopted a remuneration charter. Does not comply.
remuneration committee.
have determined that it will execute the
functions of a remuneration committee
and that a separate remuneration
committee is unnecessary. With respect
to this complaince issue, the Board will
review its position annually.
8.2 Clearly distinguish the structure The company complies with the guidelines for executive remuneration packages and non-executive director Complies.
of non-executive directors’ remuneration.
remuneration from that of
executive directors and senior
executives.
8.3 Provide the information indicated The Board has not adopted a remuneration committee charter. Does not comply for reasons given
in the Guide to reporting on above.
The company does not have any schemes for retirement benefits other than superannuation for
Principle 8.
non-executive directors.
Pluton Resources Limited’s corporate governance practices were in place Responsibilities/functions of the Board include:
for the financial year ended 30 June 2012 and to the date of signing the • selecting, appointing and evaluating from time to time the performance
Directors’ Report. of, determining the remuneration of, and planning for the successor of,
Various corporate governance practices are discussed within this the Chief Executive Officer (‘CEO’);
statement. For further information on corporate governance policies • reviewing procedures in place for appointment of senior management
adopted by Pluton Resources Limited, refer to our website: and monitoring of its performance, and for succession planning.
http://www.plutonresources.com This includes ratifying the appointment and the removal of the Chief
Financial Officer and Company Secretary;
Board functions
• input into and final approval of management development of corporate
The role of the Board of Pluton Resources Limited is as follows:
strategy, including setting performance objectives and approving
• Representing and serving the interests of shareholders by overseeing operating budgets;
and appraising the strategies, policies and performance of the
• reviewing and guiding systems of risk management and internal control
company. This includes overviewing the financial and human resources
and ethical and legal compliance. This includes reviewing procedures
the company has in place to meet its objectives and the review of
in place to identify the main risks associated with the company’s
management performance;
businesses and the implementation of appropriate systems to manage
• Protecting and optimising company performance and building these risks;
sustainable value for shareholders in accordance with any duties
• monitoring corporate performance and implementation of strategy and
and obligations imposed on the Board by law and the company’s
policy;
constitution and within a framework of prudent and effective controls
that enable risk to be assessed and managed; • approving major capital expenditure, acquisitions and divestitures, and
monitoring capital management;
• Responsible for the overall Corporate Governance of Pluton Resources
Limited and its controlled entities, including monitoring the strategic • monitoring and reviewing management processes in place aimed at
direction of the company and those entities, formulating goals for ensuring the integrity of financial and other reporting;
management and monitoring the achievement of those goals; • monitoring and reviewing policies and processes in place relating
• Setting, reviewing and ensuring compliance with the company’s to occupational health and safety, compliance with laws, and the
values (including the establishment and observance of high ethical maintenance of high ethical standards; and
standards); and • performing such other functions as are prescribed by law or are
• Ensuring shareholders are kept informed of the company’s assigned to the Board.
performance and major developments affecting its state of affairs. In carrying out its responsibilities and functions, the Board may delegate
any of its powers to a Board committee, a director, employee or other
person subject to ultimate responsibility of the directors under the
Corporations Act.
Matters which are specifically reserved for the Board or its committees The term in office held by each director in office at the date of this report
include the following: is as follows:
• appointment of a Chair; Name Position Term in Office
• appointment and removal of the CEO; Tony Schoer Chief Executive Officer Appointed 1 July 2006
• appointment of directors to fill a vacancy or as additional directors; Malcolm Macpherson Non-executive director Appointed 1 January 2009
Russell Williams Non-executive director Appointed 19 May 2010
• establishment of Board committees, their membership and delegated Ms Chenxi (Elly) Wang Non-executive director Appointed 20 April 2012
authorities;
Further details on each director can be found in the Directors’ Report
• approval of dividends;
attached to this Corporate Governance Statement.
• development and review of corporate governance principles and
Diversity policy
policies;
At the core of the company’s diversity policy is a commitment to equality
• approval of major capital expenditure, acquisitions and divestitures in and respect. The company is committed to providing an inclusive
excess of authority levels delegated to management; workplace and recognises the value of individuals with diverse skills,
• calling of meetings of shareholders; and values, backgrounds and experiences will bring to the company. Diversity
is recognising and valuing the unique contribution people can make
• any other specific matters nominated by the Board from time to time.
because of their individual background and different skills, experiences
Structure of the Board and perspectives. People differ not just on the basis of race and gender,
The company’s constitution governs the regulation of meetings and but also other dimensions such as lifestyle, education, physical ability,
proceedings of the Board. age and family responsibility.
The Board determines its size and composition, subject to the terms of The company trains and employs indigenous people to assist in the
the constitution. The Board does not believe that it should establish a exploration and development of Pluton’s Irvine Island project located
limit on tenure other than stipulated in the company constitution. north-west of Broome, WA. Approximately 50% of the workforce on Irvine
While tenure limits can help to ensure that there are fresh ideas and Island comprise local indigenous Mayala People.
viewpoints available to the Board, they hold the disadvantage of losing The company employs women across a broad cross-section of the
the contribution of directors who have been able to develop, over a company’s workforce including the Board and senior management
period of time, increasing insight in the company and its operation positions. As at the date of this statement, the company employed four
and, therefore, an increasing contribution to the Board as a whole. It is females in senior executive and administration positions, representing
intended that the Board should comprise a majority of independent 26% of the company’s full-time workforce, with one female residing as a
non-executive directors and comprise directors with a broad range of member of the Board.
skills, expertise and experience from a diverse range of backgrounds. It
Securities trading policy
is also intended that the Chair should be an independent non-executive
Under the company’s Guidelines for Dealing in Securities Policy, a
director. The Board regularly reviews the independence of each director
director or company employee (‘Relevant Persons’) must not trade in
in light of the interests disclosed to the Board.
any securities of the company at any time when they are in possession of
The Board only considers directors to be independent where they unpublished price sensitive or ‘inside’ information in relation to
are independent of management and free of any business or other those securities.
relationship that could materially interfere with - or could reasonably
Relevant Persons are permitted to buy or sell the company’s securities
be perceived to interfere with - the exercise of their unfettered
throughout the year except during the period up to 14 days preceding
and independent judgment. The Board has adopted a definition of
the following:
independence based on that set out in the ASX Corporate Governance
Recommendations. The Board will review the independence of each • the company’s financial results; or
director in light of interests disclosed to the Board from time to time. • the holding of a shareholders meeting.
In accordance with the definition of independence above, and the and ending two days after the end of the day of the announcement of
materiality thresholds set, the following directors of Pluton Resources the company’s financial results or the holding of the shareholders
Limited are considered to be independent: meeting to allow the market to absorb the contents of the announcement
(Non Trading Period).
Name Position
Malcolm Macpherson Chairman, Non-executive
Outside of the Non Trading Period (before commencing to trade) any
Russell Williams Non-executive director
person in possession of price sensitive information not released to
market is ineligible to trade in any securites of the Company; a director
There are procedures in place, agreed by the Board, to enable directors in must first obtain the approval of the Chairman to do so; the Chairman
furtherance of their duties to seek independent professional advice at the must first obtain approval from the Board; and all other employees must
company’s expense. inform and receive approval from the Company Secretary.
As required by the ASX Listing Rules, the company notifies the ASX of Performance
any transaction conducted by directors in the securities of the company The performance of the Board, its Committees and key executives is
within five days of the transaction taking place. reviewed regularly using both measurable and qualitative indicators.
The Securities Trading Policy has been issued to ASX and can be found On an annual basis, directors will provide written feedback in relation
on the company’s website. to the performance of the Board and its Committees against a set of
Audit and risk committee agreed criteria.
As at the date of this statement the Board does not have a formal audit • Each Committee of the Board will also be required to provide feedback
and risk committee. The company does have a formal Charter approved in terms of a review of its own performance.
by the Board and it is the Board’s responsibility to ensure that an effective
• Feedback will be collected by the chair of the Board, or an external
internal control framework exists within the entity. This includes internal
facilitator, and discussed by the Board, with consideration being given
controls to deal with both the effectiveness and efficiency of significant
as to whether any steps should be taken to improve performance of the
business processes, the safeguarding of assets, the maintenance of
Board or its Committees.
proper accounting records, and the reliability of financial information
as well as non-financial considerations such as the benchmarking of • The Chief Executive Officer will also provide feedback from senior
operational key performance indicators. management in connection with any issues that may be relevant in the
context of Board performance review.
Risk
The responsibility of overseeing risk falls within the charter of the • Where appropriate to facilitate the review process, assistance may be
audit and risk committee. The company identifies areas of risk within obtained from third party advisers.
the company and continuously undertakes a risk assessment of the Remuneration
company’s operations, procedures and processes. The risk assessment is It is the company’s objective to provide maximum stakeholder benefit
aimed at identifying the following: from the retention of a high quality Board and executive team by
• a culture of risk control and the minimisation of risk throughout the remunerating directors and key executives fairly and appropriately
company, which is being done through natural or instinctive process with reference to relevant employment market conditions. To assist in
by employees of the company; achieving this objective, the Board, in assuming the responsibilities
of assessing remuneration to employees, links the nature and amount
• a culture of risk control that can easily identify risks as they arise an
of executive directors’ and officers’ remuneration to the company’s
amend practices;
financial and operational performance. The expected outcomes of the
• the installation of practices and procedures in all areas of the remuneration structure are:
business that are designed to minimise an event or incident that could
• retention and motivation of key executives;
have a financial or other effect on the business and its day to day
management; and • attraction of high quality management to the company; and
• adoption of these practices and procedures to minimise many of the • performance incentives that allow executives to share in the success of
standard commercial risks, i.e. taking out the appropriate insurance the company.
policies, or ensuring compliance reporting is up to date. For a more comprehensive explanation of the company’s remuneration
CEO and CFO certification framework and the remuneration received by directors and key executives
The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have provided a in the current period, please refer to the Remuneration Report, which is
written statement to the Board that in their view: contained within the Directors’ Report.
1. the company’s financial report is founded on a sound system of risk There is no scheme to provide retirement benefits to non-executive
management and internal compliance and control which implements (or executive) directors.
the financial policies adopted by the Board; and The Board is responsible for determining and reviewing compensation
2. the company’s risk management and internal compliance and control arrangements for the directors themselves and the Chief Executive Officer
system is operating effectively in all material respects. and executive team.
Corporate social responsibility
The company has, through its own actions, clearly embraced
responsibility for the company’s actions and encourages a positive
impact through its activities on the environment, employees,
communities and stakeholders.
The company has embraced environmental, heritage and indigenous
issues and has developed a platform that encourages preservation of flora
and fauna, recognises the value of protecting heritage assets in regions
that it operates and respects the values and social issues surrounding
indigenous communities with whom the company engages.
Statement of Comprehensive Income 27
For the year ended 30 June 2012
Consolidated
Note 2012 2011
$ $
Revenue 4 173,495 370,307

Other income 5 614,375 225,476
Expenses
Occupancy expense (86,959) (115,906)
Employee benefits expense (1,165,880) (848,539)
Tenement management fees - (13,331)
Depreciation and amortisation expense 6 (154,813) (193,008)
Travel expense (60,128) (95,049)
Legal and professional fees (495,727) (520,592)
General and administrative expense (918,821) (1,254,205)
Exploration costs impairment 6 (788,883) (3,195,460)
Loss before income tax expense (2,883,341) (5,640,307)
Income tax expense 7 - -
Loss after income tax expense for the year attributable to the owners
of Pluton Resources Limited 17 (2,883,341) (5,640,307)
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax - -
Total comprehensive income for the year attributable to the owners
of Pluton Resources Limited (2,883,341) (5,640,307)
Cents Cents
Basic earnings per share 30 (1.280) (3.269)
Diluted earnings per share 30 (1.280) (3.269)
Statement of Financial Position 28
AS AT 30 JUNE 2012
Consolidated
Note 2012 2011
$ $
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents 8 592,452 3,805,412
Trade and other receivables 9 1,106,340 624,019
Total current assets 1,698,792 4,429,431
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 10 556,415 687,908
Intangibles 11 323,257 301,196
Exploration and evaluation 12 72,522,192 48,636,491
Total non-current assets 73,401,864 49,625,595
Total assets 75,100,656 54,055,026
Liabilities
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 13 2,682,628 2,357,988
Provisions 14 369,324 243,737
Total current liabilities 3,051,952 2,601,725
Total liabilities 3,051,952 2,601,725
Net assets 72,048,704 51,453,301
Equity
Issued capital 15 81,951,059 62,045,859
Reserves 16 4,114,326 540,782
Accumulated losses 17 (14,016,681) (11,133,340)
Total equity 72,048,704 51,453,301
Statement of Changes in Equity 29
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
Issued Reserves Accumulated Total

capital losses equity
$ $ $ $
Consolidated
Balance at 1 July 2010 44,578,417 648,904 (5,493,033) 39,734,288
Loss after income tax expense for the year - - (5,640,307) (5,640,307)
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax - - - -
Total comprehensive income for the year - - (5,640,307) (5,640,307)
Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners:
Contributions of equity, net of transaction costs 17,359,320 - - 17,359,320
Conversion of options 108,122 (108,122) - -
Balance at 30 June 2011 62,045,859 540,782 (11,133,340) 51,453,301
Issued Reserves Accumulated Total

capital losses equity
$ $ $ $
Consolidated
Balance at 1 July 2011 62,045,859 540,782 (11,133,340) 51,453,301
Loss after income tax expense for the year - - (2,883,341) (2,883,341)
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax - - - -
Total comprehensive income for the year - - (2,883,341) (2,883,341)
Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners:
Contributions of equity, net of transaction costs 19,905,200 - - 19,905,200
Issue of options - 3,573,544 - 3,573,544
Balance at 30 June 2012 81,951,059 4,114,326 (14,016,681) 72,048,704
Statement of Cash Flows 30
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
Consolidated
Note 2012 2011
$ $
Cash flows from operating activities

Payments to suppliers (inclusive of GST) (2,062,357) (477,463)
Interest received 132,822 348,096
Other revenue 61,348 22,211
Government grants received - 225,476
Net cash from/(used in) operating activities 28 (1,868,187) 118,320
Cash flows from investing activities

Payments for property, plant and equipment 10 (12,879) (197,779)
Payments for intangibles 11 (32,502) (206,229)
Payments for security deposits (55,183) -
Payments for exploration and evaluation (17,636,329) (21,447,700)
Proceeds from release of security deposits - 8,380
Net cash used in investing activities (17,736,893) (21,843,328)
Cash flows from financing activities

Payment of loans to related parties (48,369) -
Proceeds from issue of shares 17,340,000 18,098,765
Share issue transaction costs (899,511) (739,445)
Net cash from financing activities 16,392,120 17,359,320
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (3,212,960) (4,365,688)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the financial year 3,805,412 8,171,100
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the financial year 8 592,452 3,805,412
30 JUNE 2012
Note 1. Significant accounting policies

The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently
applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.
New, revised or amending Accounting Standards and Interpretations adopted
The consolidated entity has adopted all of the new, revised or amending Accounting Standards and Interpretations issued by the Australian Accounting
Standards Board (‘AASB’) that are mandatory for the current reporting period.
Any new, revised or amending Accounting Standards or Interpretations that are not yet mandatory have not been early adopted.
Any significant impact on the accounting policies of the consolidated entity from the adoption of these Accounting Standards and Interpretations are
disclosed in the relevant accounting policy. The adoption of these Accounting Standards and Interpretations did not have any significant impact on the
financial performance or position of the consolidated entity.
The following Accounting Standards and Interpretations are most relevant to the consolidated entity:
AASB 2010-4 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Annual Improvements Project
The consolidated entity has applied AASB 2010-4 amendments from 1 July 2011. The amendments made numerous non-urgent but necessary
amendments to a range of Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations. The amendments provided clarification of disclosures in AASB 7
‘Financial Instruments: Disclosures’, in particular emphasis of the interaction between quantitative and qualitative disclosures and the nature and extent
of risks associated with financial instruments; clarified that an entity can present an analysis of other comprehensive income for each component of
equity, either in the statement of changes in equity or in the notes in accordance with AASB 101 ‘Presentation of Financial Instruments’; and provided
guidance on the disclosure of significant events and transactions in AASB 134 ‘Interim Financial Reporting’.
AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures (December 2009)
The consolidated entity has applied AASB 124 (revised) from 1 July 2011. The revised standard simplified the definition of a related party by clarifying
its intended meaning and eliminating inconsistencies from the definition. A subsidiary and an associate with the same investor are related parties
of each other; entities significantly influenced by one person and entities significantly influenced by a close member of the family of that person are
no longer related parties of each other; and whenever a person or entity has both joint control over a second entity and joint control or significant
influence over a third party, the second and third entities are related to each other.
AASB 1054 Australian Additional Disclosures
The consolidated entity has applied AASB 1054 from 1 July 2011. The standard sets out the Australian-specific disclosures as a result of Phase I of
the Trans-Tasman Convergence Project, which are in addition to International Financial Reporting Standards, for entities that have adopted Australian
Accounting Standards.
AASB 2011-1 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Trans-Tasman Convergence Project
The consolidated entity has applied AASB 2011-1 amendments from 1 July 2011. These amendments made changes to a range of Australian
Accounting Standards and Interpretations for the purpose of closer alignment to International Financial Reporting Standards (’IFRSs’) and
harmonisation between Australian and New Zealand Standards. The amendments removed certain guidance and definitions from Australian Accounting
Standards for conformity of drafting with IFRSs but without any intention to change requirements.
Going concern
The financial statements has been prepared on the going concern basis, which assumes the continuity of normal business activities and the realisation
of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. For reasons described below, there is significant uncertainty whether the
company and consolidated entity will continue as going concerns.
The consolidated entity has made commitments to make a number of payments in the near future. These include:
• environmental bonds in relation to Cockatoo Island with an estimated cash outflow of $19,200,000. This payment is anticipated to occur within the
coming financial year and is dependent upon the completion of an assessment by the Western Australian government;
• other commitments in relation to Cockatoo Island of $525,000 on 1 October 2012, $500,000 on 1 November 2012.
An amount of $3,000,000 has been paid subsequent to the year end in connection with taking possession of Cockatoo Island;
• funding ongoing operating costs of $1,425,000 per calendar month prior to the commencement of operations at Cockatoo Island in October 2012
and $5,250,000 per calendar month after the commencement of operations at Cockatoo Island; and
• funding the working capital deficiency at 30 June 2012 of $1,353,159.
The consolidated entity has entered into iron ore presale contracts amounting to USD$12,700,000 under which it is to receive payments in advance of
providing iron ore. At the date of this report, it has received all amounts due under the presale contracts and has $4,100,000 on deposit.
The consolidated entity needs to fund the estimated future costs of iron ore production estimated to be $13,500,000 to deliver quantities sufficient
to complete its obligations under these presale contracts. Upon delivery of this ore, further receipts are expected and these are to be calculated with
reference to the prevailing price of iron ore at delivery date. These extra payments are estimated to be an additional $8,000,000.
30 JUNE 2012
Note 1. Significant accounting policies (continued)

In summary of the matters noted above, the consolidated entity’s budgets indicate additional short term operational funding of approximately
$3,800,000 will be required in relation to its activities, as well as funding for the environmental bond payments, estimated to be $19,200,000.
Notwithstanding the above, the directors are confident that the company and the consolidated entity will be able to continue as going concerns given
the following:
• The consolidated entity has secured iron ore pre sale contracts with advance payments amounting to $12,700,000;
• Subsequent to 30 June 2012 a director-related party has made a short term advance to the consolidated entity of $3,000,000;
• The consolidated entity has signed a binding term sheet for a proposed 50/50 unincorporated joint venture with WiseEnergy Group and is in
discussions with other parties seeking to participate in the Cockatoo Island project. It is expected that the introduction of such parties will generate
a cash injection sufficient to substantially meet the short term cash requirements of the consolidated entity. At the date of this report, these
negotiations are ongoing;
• The company has a successful history of raising cash through capital raising activities and anticipates that this may also provide further funding if
required; and
• The consolidated entity anticipates generating positive cash flow from conducting iron ore operations on the Cockatoo Island project once payments
in connection with the acquisition and establishment have been made.
The directors anticipate iron ore extraction operations to commence on or around 15 October 2012 and to the period to 30 June 2013 have budgeted
sales of $73,000,000 representing 766,000 tonnes.
Notwithstanding this there is material uncertainty whether the company and consolidated entity will continue as going concerns and, therefore, whether
they will realise their assets and discharge their liabilities in the normal course of business.
The financial statements does not include adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or to the amounts
and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the company and consolidated entity not continue as going concerns.
Basis of preparation
These general purpose financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations issued by the
Australian Accounting Standards Board (‘AASB’) and the Corporations Act 2001, as appropriate for-profit oriented entities. These financial statements
also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (‘IASB’).
Historical cost convention
The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention.
Critical accounting estimates
The preparation of the financial statements requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its
judgement in the process of applying the consolidated entity’s accounting policies. The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or
areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements, are disclosed in note 2.
Parent entity information
In accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, these financial statements present the results of the consolidated entity only. Supplementary
information about the parent entity is disclosed in note 25.
Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets and liabilities of all subsidiaries of Pluton Resources Limited (‘company’ or ‘parent
entity’) as at 30 June 2012 and the results of all subsidiaries for the year then ended. Pluton Resources Limited and its subsidiaries together are
referred to in these financial statements as the ‘consolidated entity’.
Subsidiaries are all those entities over which the consolidated entity has the power to govern the financial and operating policies, generally
accompanying a shareholding of more than one-half of the voting rights. The effects of potential exercisable voting rights are considered when
assessing whether control exists. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the consolidated entity. They are
de-consolidated from the date that control ceases.
Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between entities in the consolidated entity are eliminated. Unrealised losses
are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of the impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been
changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the consolidated entity.
The acquisition of subsidiaries is accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Refer to the ‘business combinations’ accounting policy for
further details. A change in ownership interest, without the loss of control, is accounted for as an equity transaction, where the difference between the
consideration transferred and the book value of the share of the non-controlling interest acquired is recognised directly in equity attributable to
the parent.
30 JUNE 2012

Where the consolidated entity loses control over a subsidiary, it derecognises the assets including goodwill, liabilities and non-controlling interest
in the subsidiary together with any cumulative translation differences recognised in equity. The consolidated entity recognises the fair value of the
consideration received and the fair value of any investment retained together with any gain or loss in profit or loss.
Operating segments
Operating segments are presented using the ‘management approach’, where the information presented is on the same basis as the internal reports
provided to the Chief Operating Decision Makers (‘CODM’). The CODM is responsible for the allocation of resources to operating segments and
assessing their performance.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is recognised when it is probable that the economic benefit will flow to the consolidated entity and the revenue can be reliably measured.
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable.
Interest
Interest revenue is recognised as interest accrues using the effective interest method. This is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial
asset and allocating the interest income over the relevant period using the effective interest rate, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated
future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial asset to the net carrying amount of the financial asset.
Other revenue
Other revenue is recognised when it is received or when the right to receive payment is established.
Government grants
Grants from the government are recognised at their fair value where there is a reasonable assurance that the grant will be received and the consolidated
entity will comply with all attached conditions.
Government grants relating to costs are deferred and recognised in profit or loss over the period necessary to match them with the costs that they are
intended to compensate.
Government grants relating to the purchase of property, plant and equipment are included in non-current liabilities as deferred income and are credited
to profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the expected lives of the related assets.
Income tax
The income tax expense or benefit for the period is the tax payable on that period’s taxable income based on the applicable income tax rate for each
jurisdiction adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to temporary differences and unused tax losses and the adjustment
recognised for prior periods, where applicable.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised for temporary differences at the tax rates expected to apply when the assets are recovered or liabilities
are settled, based on those tax rates that are enacted or substantively enacted, except for:
• When the deferred income tax asset or liability arises from the initial recognition of goodwill or an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a
business combination and that, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting nor taxable profits; or
• When the taxable temporary difference is associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates or interests in joint ventures, and the timing of the
reversal can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
Deferred tax assets are recognised for deductible temporary differences and unused tax losses only if it is probable that future taxable amounts will be
available to utilise those temporary differences and losses.
The carrying amount of recognised and unrecognised deferred tax assets are reviewed each reporting date. Deferred tax assets recognised are reduced
to the extent that it is no longer probable that future taxable profits will be available for the carrying amount to be recovered. Previously unrecognised
deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that there are future taxable profits available to recover the asset.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset only where there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities and
deferred tax assets against deferred tax liabilities; and they relate to the same taxable authority on either the same taxable entity or different taxable
entity’s which intend to settle simultaneously.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits held at call with financial institutions, other short-term, highly liquid investments with
original maturities of three months or less that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of
changes in value.
Trade and other receivables
Other receivables are recognised at amortised cost, less any provision for impairment.
30 JUNE 2012

Investments and other financial assets
Investments and other financial assets are measured at either amortised cost or fair value depending on their classification. Classification is
determined based on the purpose of the acquisition and subsequent reclassification to other categories is restricted. The fair values of quoted
investments are based on current bid prices. For unlisted investments, the consolidated entity establishes fair value by using valuation techniques.
These include the use of recent arms length transactions, reference to other instruments that are substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis,
and option pricing models.
Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows from the financial assets have expired or have been transferred and the
consolidated entity has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership.
Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are carried
at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. Gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss when the asset is derecognised or impaired.
Impairment of financial assets
The consolidated entity assesses at the end of each reporting period whether there is any objective evidence that a financial asset or group of
financial assets is impaired. Objective evidence includes significant financial difficulty of the issuer or obligor; a breach of contract such as default
or delinquency in payments; the lender granting to a borrower concessions due to economic or legal reasons that the lender would not otherwise do;
it becomes probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganisation; the disappearance of an active market for the financial
asset; or observable data indicating that there is a measurable decrease in estimated future cash flows.
The amount of the impairment allowance for loans and receivables carried at amortised cost is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount
and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate. If there is a reversal of impairment, the reversal
cannot exceed the amortised cost that would have been had the impairment not been recognised and is reversed to profit or loss.
Property, plant and equipment
Plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly
attributable to the acquisition of the items.
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis to write off the net cost of each item of property, plant and equipment over their expected useful
lives as follows:
Plant and equipment 3-15 years
Motor vehicles 3-5 years
The residual values, useful lives and depreciation methods are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each reporting date.
An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when there is no future economic benefit to the consolidated entity. Gains
and losses between the carrying amount and the disposal proceeds are taken to profit or loss.
Leases
The determination of whether an arrangement is or contains a lease is based on the substance of the arrangement and requires an assessment of
whether the fulfilment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset or assets and the arrangement conveys a right to use the asset.
A distinction is made between finance leases, which effectively transfer from the lessor to the lessee substantially all the risks and benefits incidental
to ownership of leased assets, and operating leases, under which the lessor effectively retains substantially all such risks and benefits.
Finance leases are capitalised. A lease asset and liability are established at the fair value of the leased assets, or if lower, the present value of
minimum lease payments. Lease payments are allocated between the principal component of the lease liability and the finance costs, so as to achieve
a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability.
Leased assets acquired under a finance lease are depreciated over the asset’s useful life or over the shorter of the asset’s useful life and the lease term
if there is no reasonable certainty that the consolidated entity will obtain ownership at the end of the lease term.
Operating lease payments, net of any incentives received from the lessor, are charged to profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the term of the
lease.
Intangible assets
Intangible assets acquired as part of a business combination, other than goodwill, are initially measured at their fair value at the date of the acquisition.
Intangible assets acquired separately are initially recognised at cost. Intangible assets are subsequently measured at cost less amortisation and any
impairment. The gains or losses recognised in profit or loss arising from the derecognition of intangible assets are measured as the difference between
net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the intangible asset. The method and useful lives of finite life intangibles are reviewed annually.
Changes in the expected pattern of consumption or useful life are accounted for prospectively by changing the amortisation method or period.
30 JUNE 2012

Software
Significant costs associated with software are deferred and amortised on a straight-line basis over the period of their expected benefit, being their finite
life of 3 to 5 years.
Research costs
Research costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred. Development costs are capitalised when it is probable that the project will be
a success considering its commercial and technical feasibility; the consolidated entity is able to use or sell the asset; the consolidated entity has
sufficient resources; and intent to complete the development and its costs can be measured reliably. Capitalised development costs are amortised on a
straight-line basis over the period of their expected benefit, being their finite life of 10 years.
Exploration and evaluation assets reclassified as development are amortised over the estimated economic life of the mine on a units-of-production
basis. Changes in factors such as estimates of proved and probable reserves that affect unit-of-production calculations are dealt with on a prospective
basis.
Platform costs
Costs in relation to platform expenses are capitalised as an asset and amortised, when available for first use, on a straight-line basis over the period of
their expected benefit, being their finite life of 10 years.
Exploration and evaluation assets
Exploration and evaluation expenditure in relation to separate areas of interest for which rights of tenure are current is carried forward as an asset in
the statement of financial position where it is expected that the expenditure will be recovered through the successful development and exploitation of
an area of interest, or by its sale; or exploration activities are continuing in an area and activities have not reached a stage which permits a reasonable
estimate of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable reserves. Where a project or an area of interest has been abandoned, the
expenditure incurred thereon is written off in the year in which the decision is made.
Exploration and evaluation assets are initially measured at cost and include acquisition of rights to explore, studies, exploratory drilling, trenching and
sampling and associated activities and an allocation of depreciation and amortisation of assets used in exploration and evaluation activities. General
and administrative costs are only included in the measurement of exploration and evaluation costs where they are related directly to operational
activities in a particular area of interest.
Where a decision is made to proceed with development in respect of a particular area of interest, the relevant exploration and evaluation asset is tested
for impairment and the balance is then reclassified to development.
Impairment of non-financial assets
Intangible assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortisation and are tested annually for impairment, or more frequently if events
or changes in circumstances indicate that they might be impaired. Other non-financial assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the asset’s
carrying mount exceeds its recoverable amount.
Recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value-in-use. The value-in-use is the resent value of the estimated
future cash flows relating to the asset using a pre-tax discount rate specific to the asset or cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. Assets that
do not have independent cash flows are grouped together to form a cash-generating unit.
Trade and other payables
These amounts represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the consolidated entity prior to the end of the financial year and which are
unpaid. Due to their short-term nature they are measured at amortised cost and are not discounted. The amounts are unsecured and are usually paid
within 30 days of recognition.
Finance costs
Finance costs attributable to qualifying assets are capitalised as part of the asset. All other finance costs are expensed in the period in which they
are incurred.
Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the consolidated entity has a present (legal or constructive) obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable
the consolidated entity will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. The amount
recognised as a provision is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the reporting date, taking into account the
risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. If the time value of money is material, provisions are discounted using a current pre-tax rate specific
to the liability. The increase in the provision resulting from the passage of time is recognised as a finance cost.
30 JUNE 2012

Restoration and rehabilitation
The initial estimate of the restoration and rehabilitation provision relating to exploration development is capitalised into the cost of the related asset and
amortised on the same basis as the related asset, unless the present obligation arises from the production of inventory in the period, in which case the
amount is included in the cost of production for the period. The estimated future obligations include the costs of removing facilities, abandoning sites
and restoring the affected areas.
Employee benefits
Wages and salaries and annual leave
Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non-monetary benefits, and annual leave expected to be settled within 12 months of the reporting date are
recognised in current liabilities in respect of employees’ services up to the reporting date and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when
the liabilities are settled.
Long service leave
The liability for long service leave is recognised in current and non-current liabilities, depending on the unconditional right to defer settlement of the
liability for at least 12 months after the reporting date. The liability is measured as the present value of expected future payments to be made in respect
of services provided by employees up to the reporting date using the projected unit credit method. Consideration is given to expected future wage and
salary levels, experience of employee departures and periods of service. Expected future payments are discounted using market yields at the reporting
date on national government bonds with terms to maturity and currency that match, as closely as possible, the estimated future cash outflows.
Defined contribution superannuation expense
Contributions to defined contribution superannuation plans are expensed in the period in which they are incurred.
Share-based payments
Equity-settled and cash-settled share-based compensation benefits are provided to employees.
Equity-settled transactions are awards of shares, or options over shares, that are provided to employees in exchange for the rendering of services.
Cash-settled transactions are awards of cash for the exchange of services, where the amount of cash is determined by reference to the share price.
The cost of equity-settled transactions are measured at fair value on grant date. Fair value is independently determined using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model that takes into account the exercise price, the term of the option, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date and expected
price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk free interest rate for the term of the option, together with non-vesting
conditions that do not determine whether the consolidated entity receives the services that entitle the employees to receive payment. No account is
taken of any other vesting conditions.
The cost of equity-settled transactions are recognised as an expense with a corresponding increase in equity over the vesting period. The cumulative
charge to profit or loss is calculated based on the grant date fair value of the award, the best estimate of the number of awards that are likely to vest and
the expired portion of the vesting period. The amount recognised in profit or loss for the period is the cumulative amount calculated at each reporting
date less amounts already recognised in previous periods.
The cost of cash-settled transactions is initially, and at each reporting date until vested, determined by applying the Black-Scholes option pricing
model, taking into consideration the terms and conditions on which the award was granted. The cumulative charge to profit or loss until settlement of
the liability is calculated as follows:
• during the vesting period, the liability at each reporting date is the fair value of the award at that date multiplied by the expired portion of the
vesting period.
• from the end of the vesting period until settlement of the award, the liability is the full fair value of the liability at the reporting date.
All changes in the liability are recognised in profit or loss. The ultimate cost of cash-settled transactions is the cash paid to settle the liability.
Market conditions are taken into consideration in determining fair value. Therefore any awards subject to market conditions are considered to vest
irrespective of whether or not that market condition has been met, provided all other conditions are satisfied.
If equity-settled awards are modified, as a minimum an expense is recognised as if the modification has not been made. An additional expense is
recognised, over the remaining vesting period, for any modification that increases the total fair value of the share-based compensation benefit as at the
date of modification.
If the non-vesting condition is within the control of the consolidated entity or employee, the failure to satisfy the condition is treated as a cancellation.
If the condition is not within the control of the consolidated entity or employee and is not satisfied during the vesting period, any remaining expense for
the award is recognised over the remaining vesting period, unless the award is forfeited.
If equity-settled awards are cancelled, it is treated as if it has vested on the date of cancellation, and any remaining expense is recognised immediately.
If a new replacement award is substituted for the cancelled award, the cancelled and new award is treated as if they were a modification.
30 JUNE 2012

Issued capital
Ordinary shares are classified as equity.
Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.
Business combinations
The acquisition method of accounting is used to account for business combinations regardless of whether equity instruments or other assets
are acquired.
The consideration transferred is the sum of the acquisition-date fair values of the assets transferred, equity instruments issued or liabilities incurred
by the acquirer to former owners of the acquiree and the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. For each business combination,
the non-controlling interest in the acquiree is measured at either fair value or at the proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets. All
acquisition costs are expensed as incurred to profit or loss.
On the acquisition of a business, the consolidated entity assesses the financial assets acquired and liabilities assumed for appropriate classification
and designation in accordance with the contractual terms, economic conditions, the consolidated entity’s operating or accounting policies and other
pertinent conditions in existence at the acquisition-date.
Where the business combination is achieved in stages, the consolidated entity remeasures its previously held equity interest in the acquiree at the
acquisition-date fair value and the difference between the fair value and the previous carrying amount is recognised in profit or loss.
Contingent consideration to be transferred by the acquirer is recognised at the acquisition-date fair value. Subsequent changes in the fair value
of contingent consideration classified as an asset or liability is recognised in profit or loss. Contingent consideration classified as equity is not
remeasured and its subsequent settlement is accounted for within equity.
The difference between the acquisition-date fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and
the fair value of the consideration transferred and the fair value of any pre-existing investment in the acquiree is recognised as goodwill. If the
consideration transferred and the pre-existing fair value is less than the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired, being a bargain purchase to
the acquirer, the difference is recognised as a gain directly in profit or loss by the acquirer on the acquisition-date, but only after a reassessment of
the identification and measurement of the net assets acquired, the non-controlling interest in the acquiree, if any, the consideration transferred and the
acquirer’s previously held equity interest in the acquirer.
Business combinations are initially accounted for on a provisional basis. The acquirer retrospectively adjusts the provisional amounts recognised and
also recognises additional assets or liabilities during the measurement period, based on new information obtained about the facts and circumstances
that existed at the acquisition-date. The measurement period ends on either the earlier of (i) 12 months from the date of the acquisition or (ii) when the
acquirer receives all the information possible to determine fair value.
Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to the owners of Pluton Resources Limited, excluding any costs of servicing
equity other than ordinary shares, by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year, adjusted for bonus
elements in ordinary shares issued during the financial year.
Diluted earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into account the after income tax effect of
interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares and the weighted average number of shares assumed to have been
issued for no consideration in relation to dilutive potential ordinary shares.
Goods and Services Tax (‘GST’) and other similar taxes
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of associated GST, unless the GST incurred is not recoverable from the tax authority.
In this case it is recognised as part of the cost of the acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense.
Receivables and payables are stated inclusive of the amount of GST receivable or payable. The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the
tax authority is included in other receivables or other payables in the statement of financial position.
Cash flows are presented on a gross basis. The GST components of cash flows arising from investing or financing activities which are recoverable
from, or payable to the tax authority, are presented as operating cash flows.
Commitments and contingencies are disclosed net of the amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the tax authority.
Rounding of amounts
Amounts in this report have been rounded off to the nearest dollar.
30 JUNE 2012

New Accounting Standards and Interpretations not yet mandatory or early adopted
Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations that have recently been issued or amended but are not yet mandatory, have not been early adopted
by the consolidated entity for the annual reporting period ended 30 June 2012. The consolidated entity’s assessment of the impact of these new or
amended Accounting Standards and Interpretations, most relevant to the consolidated entity, are set out below.
AASB 9 Financial Instruments, 2009-11 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 9 and 2010-7 Amendments to
Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 9
This standard and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 and completes
phase I of the IASB’s project to replace IAS 39 (being the international equivalent to AASB 139 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and
Measurement’). This standard introduces new classification and measurement models for financial assets, using a single approach to determine
whether a financial asset is measured at amortised cost or fair value. To be classified and measured at amortised cost, assets must satisfy the
business model test for managing the financial assets and have certain contractual cash flow characteristics. All other financial instrument assets are
to be classified and measured at fair value. This standard allows an irrevocable election on initial recognition to present gains and losses on equity
instruments (that are not held-for-trading) in other comprehensive income, with dividends as a return on these investments being recognised in
profit or loss. In addition, those equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income would no longer have to apply any
impairment requirements nor would there be any ‘recycling’ of gains or losses through profit or loss on disposal. The accounting for financial liabilities
continues to be classified and measured in accordance with AASB 139, with one exception, being that the portion of a change of fair value relating to
the entity’s own credit risk is to be presented in other comprehensive income unless it would create an accounting mismatch. The consolidated entity
will adopt this standard from 1 July 2013 but the impact of its adoption is yet to be assessed by the consolidated entity.
AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements
This standard is applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. The standard has a new definition of ‘control’. Control
exists when the reporting entity is exposed, or has the rights, to variable returns (e.g. dividends, remuneration, returns that are not available to other
interest holders including losses) from its involvement with another entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its ‘power’ over that other
entity. A reporting entity has power when it has rights (e.g. voting rights, potential voting rights, rights to appoint key management, decision making
rights, kick out rights) that give it the current ability to direct the activities that significantly affect the investee’s returns (e.g. operating policies, capital
decisions, appointment of key management). The consolidated entity will not only have to consider its holdings and rights but also the holdings and
rights of other shareholders in order to determine whether it has the necessary power for consolidation purposes. The adoption of this standard from
1 July 2013 may have an impact where the consolidated entity has a holding of less than 50% in an entity, has de facto control, and is not currently
consolidating that entity.
AASB 11 Joint Arrangements
This standard is applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. The standard defines which entities qualify as joint
ventures and removes the option to account for joint ventures using proportional consolidation. Joint ventures, where the parties to the agreement
have the rights to the net assets will use equity accounting. Joint operations, where the parties to the agreements have the rights to the assets and
obligations for the liabilities will account for the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses separately, using proportionate consolidation. The adoption
of this standard from 1 July 2013 will impact the accounting for the joint venture agreement in respect of Cockatoo Island.
AASB 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities
This standard is applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. It contains the entire disclosure requirement associated
with other entities, being subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures. The disclosure requirements have been significantly enhanced when compared
to the disclosures previously located in AASB 127 ‘Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements’, AASB 128 ‘Investments in Associates’, AASB
131 ‘Interests in Joint Ventures’ and Interpretation 112 ‘Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities’. The adoption of this standard from 1 July 2013 will
significantly increase the amount of disclosures required to be given by the consolidated entity such as significant judgements and assumptions made
in determining whether it has a controlling or non-controlling interest in another entity and the type of non-controlling interest and the nature and risks
involved.
AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement and AASB 2011-8 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 13
This standard and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. The standard
provides a single robust measurement framework, with clear measurement objectives, for measuring fair value using the ‘exit price’ and it provides
guidance on measuring fair value when a market becomes less active. The ‘highest and best use’ approach would be used to measure assets whereas
liabilities would be based on transfer value. As the standard does not introduce any new requirements for the use of fair value, its impact on adoption
by the consolidated entity from 1 July 2013 should be minimal, although there will be increased disclosures where fair value is used.
AASB 127 Separate Financial Statements (Revised)
AASB 128 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures (Reissued)
These standards are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. They have been modified to remove specific
guidance that is now contained in AASB 10, AASB 11 and AASB 12. The adoption of these revised standards from 1 July 2013 will not have a material
impact on the consolidated entity.
30 JUNE 2012

AASB 119 Employee Benefits (September 2011) and AASB 2011-10 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB
119 (September 2011)
This revised standard and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. The
amendments eliminate the corridor approach for the deferral of gains and losses; streamlines the presentation of changes in assets and liabilities
arising from defined benefit plans, including requiring remeasurements to be presented in other comprehensive income; and enhances the disclosure
requirements for defined benefit plans. The amendments also changes the definition of short-term employee benefits, from ‘due to’ to ‘expected to’
be settled within 12 months and will require annual leave that is not expected to be wholly settled within 12 months to be discounted allowing for
expected salary levels in the future period when the leave is expected to be taken. The adoption of the revised standard from 1 July 2013 will not have
a material impact on the consolidated entity.
AASB 2011-4 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards to Remove Individual Key Management Personnel Disclosure Requirement
These amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2013, with early adoption not permitted. They amend
AASB 124 ‘Related Party Disclosures’ by removing the disclosure requirements for individual key management personnel (‘KMP’). The adoption of
these amendments from 1 July 2013 will remove the duplication of information relating to individual KMP in the notes to the financial statements and
the directors report. As the aggregate disclosures are still required by AASB 124 and during the transitional period the requirements may be included
in the Corporations Act or other legislation, it is expected that the amendments will not have a material impact on the consolidated entity.
AASB 2011-7 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Consolidation and Joint Arrangements Standards
The amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. The amendments make numerous consequential
changes to a range of Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations, following the issuance of AASB 10, AASB 11, AASB 12 and revised
AASB 127 and AASB 128. The adoption of these amendments from 1 July 2013 will not have a material impact on the consolidated entity.
AASB 2011-9 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income
These amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2012. The amendments requires grouping together of
items within other comprehensive income on the basis of whether they will eventually be ‘recycled’ to the profit or loss (reclassification adjustments).
The change provides clarity about the nature of items presented as other comprehensive income and the related tax presentation. The adoption of the
revised standard from 1 July 2012 will impact the consolidated entity’s presentation of its statement of comprehensive income.
AASB 2012-2 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Disclosures – Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
The amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. The disclosure requirements of AASB 7 ‘Financial
Instruments: Disclosures’ (and consequential amendments to AASB 132 ‘Financial Instruments: Presentation’) have been enhanced to provide users
of financial statements with information about netting arrangements, including rights of set-off related to an entity’s financial instruments and the
effects of such rights on its statement of financial position. The adoption of the amendments from 1 July 2013 may increase the disclosures by the
consolidated entity.
AASB 2012-3 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
The amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014. The amendments add application guidance to
address inconsistencies in the application of the offsetting criteria in AASB 132 ‘Financial Instruments: Presentation’, by clarifying the meaning of
“currently has a legally enforceable right of set-off”; and clarifies that some gross settlement systems may be considered to be equivalent to net
settlement. The adoption of the amendments from 1 July 2014 will not have a significant impact on the consolidated entity.
AASB 2012-5 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from Annual Improvements 2009–2011 Cycle
The amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. The amendments affect five Australian Accounting
Standards as follows: Confirmation that repeat application of AASB 1 (IFRS 1) Firsttime Adoption of Australian Accounting Standards’ is permitted;
Clarification of borrowing cost exemption in AASB 1; Clarification of comprehensive information requirements when an entity provides a third balance
sheet in accordance with AASB 101 ‘Presentation of Financial Statements’; Clarification that servicing of equipment is covered by AASB 116 ‘Property,
Plant and Equipment’, if such equipment is used for more than one period; AASB 132 Financial Instruments: Presentation’ Clarification of the tax effect
of distributions to holders of an equity instrument is recognised in the income statement; and clarification of the financial reporting requirements in
AASB 134 ‘Interim Financial Reporting’ and the disclosure requirements of segment assets and liabilities. The adoption of the amendments from
1 July 2013 will not have a significant impact on the consolidated entity.
Interpretation 20 Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine and AASB 2011-12 Amendments to Australian Accounting
Standards arising from Interpretation 20
This interpretation and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 The
Interpretation clarifies when production stripping costs should lead to the recognition of an asset and how that asset should be initially and
subsequently measured. The Interpretation only deals with waste removal costs that are incurred in surface mining activities during the production
phase of the mine. The adoption of the interpretation and the amendments from 1 July 2013 will not have a material impact on the consolidated entity.
30 JUNE 2012
Note 2. Critical accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions

The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
in the financial statements. Management continually evaluates its judgements and estimates in relation to assets, liabilities, contingent liabilities,
revenue and expenses. Management bases its judgements, estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on other various factors, including
expectations of future events, management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. The resulting accounting judgements and estimates
will seldom equal the related actual results. The judgements, estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment
to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below.
Share-based payment transactions
The consolidated entity measures the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at
the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined by using the Black-Scholes model taking into account the terms and conditions upon
which the instruments were granted. The accounting estimates and assumptions relating to equity-settled share-based payments would have no impact
on the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next annual reporting period but may impact profit or loss and equity.
Estimation of useful lives of assets
The consolidated entity determines the estimated useful lives and related depreciation and amortisation charges for its property, plant and equipment
and finite life intangible assets. The useful lives could change significantly as a result of technical innovations or some other event. The depreciation
and amortisation charge will increase where the useful lives are less than previously estimated lives, or technically obsolete or non-strategic assets
that have been abandoned or sold will be written off or written down.
Impairment of non-financial assets other than goodwill and other indefinite life intangible assets
The consolidated entity assesses impairment of non-financial assets other than goodwill and other indefinite life intangible assets at each reporting
date by evaluating conditions specific to the consolidated entity and to the particular asset that may lead to impairment. If an impairment trigger exists,
the recoverable amount of the asset is determined. This involves fair value less costs to sell or value-in-use calculations, which incorporate a number
of key estimates and assumptions.
Income tax
The consolidated entity is subject to income taxes in the jurisdictions in which it operates. Significant judgement is required in determining the
provision for income tax. There are many transactions and calculations undertaken during the ordinary course of business for which the ultimate tax
determination is uncertain. The consolidated entity recognises liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on the consolidated entity’s current
understanding of the tax law. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the carrying amounts, such differences will impact the
current and deferred tax provisions in the period in which such determination is made.
30 JUNE 2012
Note 3. Operating segments

Identification of reportable operating segments
The consolidated entity operates in the mineral exploration industry in Australia and reports using two segments, Iron Ore and Base Metals. These
operating segments are based on the internal reports that are reviewed and used by the Board of Directors (who are identified as the Chief Operating
Decision Makers (‘CODM’)) in assessing performance and in determining the allocation of resources. There is no aggregation of operating segments.
Base metal segment
The consolidated entity continues to hold Tasmanian Tenement interests in the Base Metals segment. Activity in regard to this segment has been
minimal while directors assess strategic options regarding these tenements.
Intersegment receivables, payables and loans
Intersegment loans are initially recognised at the consideration received. Intersegment loans receivable and loans payable that earn or incur non-
market interest are not adjusted to fair value based on market interest rates. Intersegment loans are eliminated on consolidation.
Major customers
During the year ended 30 June 2012 there were no major customers (2011: nil).
Operating segment information
2012 Iron Ore Base Intersegment Consolidated
metals eliminations/
unallocated
$ $ $ $
Revenue
Other revenue - - 787,870 787,870
Total revenue - - 787,870 787,870
Segment result - - (2,072,467) (2,072,467)

Depreciation and amortisation (154,813)
Interest revenue 132,822
Write-off exploration expenditure (788,883)
Loss before income tax expense (2,883,341)
Income tax expense -
Loss after income tax expense (2,883,341)
Assets
Segment assets 73,074,327 6,800 2,019,529 75,100,656
Total assets 75,100,656
Total assets includes:
Acquisition of non-current assets 24,678,681 - 41,284 24,719,965
Liabilities
Segment liabilities 2,370,256 - 681,696 3,051,952
Total liabilities 3,051,952
30 JUNE 2012
Note 3. Operating segments (continued)

2011 Iron Ore Base Intersegment Consolidated
metals eliminations/
unallocated
$ $ $ $
Revenue
Other revenue - - 595,783 595,783
Total revenue - - 595,783 595,783
Segment result (22,774) - (2,577,162) (2,599,936)
Depreciation and amortisation (193,008)
Interest revenue 348,097
Write-off exploration expenditure (2,048,227)
Loss on investment (1,147,233)
Loss before income tax expense (5,640,307)
Income tax expense -
Loss after income tax expense (5,640,307)
Assets
Segment assets 49,280,932 4,026 4,770,068 54,055,026
Total assets 54,055,026
Total assets includes:
Acquisition of non-current assets 21,658,066 125,028 68,614 21,851,708
Liabilities
Segment liabilities 2,543,898 402 57,425 2,601,725
Total liabilities 2,601,725
Consolidated
2012 2011
$ $
Note 4. Revenue
Other revenue
Interest 132,822 348,096
Other revenue 40,673 22,211
Revenue 173,495 370,307
Note 5. Other income

Research and development rebate 534,617 225,476
ATO refund 79,758 -
Other income 614,375 225,476
30 JUNE 2012
Consolidated
2012 2011
$ $
Note 6. Expenses
Loss before income tax includes the following specific expenses:
Depreciation
Plant and equipment 139,024 172,780
Motor vehicles 5,348 6,010
Total depreciation 144,372 178,790
Amortisation
Software 10,441 14,218
Total depreciation and amortisation 154,813 193,008
Impairment
Mining agreements (note 12) - 1,147,233
Exploration and evaluation (note 12) 788,883 2,048,227
Total impairment 788,883 3,195,460
Rental expense relating to operating leases
Minimum lease payments 52,182 48,860
Superannuation expense
Defined contribution superannuation expense 236,785 181,012
Employee benefits expense excluding superannuation
Employee benefits expense excluding superannuation 929,095 667,527
30 JUNE 2012
Consolidated
2012 2011
$ $
Note 7. Income tax expense

Numerical reconciliation of income tax expense and tax at the statutory rate
Loss before income tax expense (2,883,341) (5,640,307)
Tax at the statutory tax rate of 30% (865,002) (1,692,092)
Tax effect amounts which are not deductible/(taxable) in calculating taxable income:
Entertainment expenses - 3,440
Legal expenses 1,331 -
Capital raising costs (191,664) (120,017)
Exploration expenditure (5,241,356) (5,475,672)
Impairment of assets 254,549 344,350
Research and development expenditure 2,707 14,439
(6,039,435) (6,925,552)
Current year tax losses not recognised 5,994,756 6,894,431
Current year temporary differences not recognised 44,679 31,121
Income tax expense - -
Tax losses not recognised

Unused tax losses for which no deferred tax asset has been recognised 45,418,695 42,594,967
Potential tax benefit @ 30% 13,625,609 12,778,490
The above potential tax benefit for tax losses has not been recognised
in the statement of financial position. These tax losses can only be utilised in the future
if the continuity of ownership test is passed, or failing that, the same business test is passed.
Deferred tax assets not recognised
Deferred tax assets not recognised comprises temporary differences attributable to:
Employee benefits 110,797 73,121
Transaction costs arising on shares issued 468,584 390,671
Total deferred tax assets not recognised 579,381 463,792
The above potential tax benefit, which excludes tax losses,

for deductible temporary differences has not been recognised
in the statement of financial position as the recovery of this benefit is uncertain.
Deferred tax liabilities, in respect of exploration expenditure,
not recognised amounted to $15,416,695 (2011: $10,175,339).
Note 8. Current assets - cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents 592,452 3,805,412
30 JUNE 2012
Consolidated
2012 2011
$ $
Note 9. Current assets - trade and other receivables

Other receivables 681,650 50,629
Deposits and bonds 72,433 17,250
Receivable from Pluton Operations Pty Ltd 8,071 5,678
GST receivable 344,186 550,462
1,106,340 624,019
Deposits and bonds - should the consolidated entity not continue to operate their mining tenements, the bonds may become refundable under the
terms and conditions of the agreement with the Commonwealth of Australia.
Pluton Operations Pty Ltd, which is not a related company, is the Trustee of the Pluton Operations Deferred Directors Salary Sacrifice Share
Purchase Plan.
Impairment of receivables
The consolidated entity has recognised a loss of $nil (2011: $nil) in profit or loss in respect of impairment of receivables for the year ended
30 June 2012.
Past due but not impaired
At 30 June 2012 no receivables were past due or impaired (2011: $nil).
Consolidated
2012 2011
$ $
Note 10. Non-current assets - property, plant and equipment

Plant and equipment - at cost 1,012,738 999,859
Less: Accumulated depreciation (484,167) (345,143)
528,571 654,716
Motor vehicles - at cost 48,390 48,390
Less: Accumulated depreciation (20,546) (15,198)
27,844 33,192
556,415 687,908
Reconciliations
Reconciliations of the written down values at the beginning and end of the current and previous financial year are set out below:
Plant and Motor Total
equipment vehicles
$ $ $
Consolidated
Balance at 1 July 2010 670,695 7,922 678,617
Additions 166,499 31,280 197,779
Transfers in/(out) (9,698) - (9,698)
Depreciation expense (172,780) (6,010) (178,790)
Balance at 30 June 2011 654,716 33,192 687,908
Additions 12,879 - 12,879
Depreciation expense (139,024) (5,348) (144,372)
Balance at 30 June 2012 528,571 27,844 556,415
30 JUNE 2012
Consolidated
2012 2011
$ $
Note 11. Non-current assets - intangibles

Platform - at cost 291,781 287,684
291,781 287,684
Software - at cost 75,841 47,436
Less: Accumulated amortisation (44,365) (33,924)
31,476 13,512
323,257 301,196
Reconciliations
Platform Software Total
$ $ $
Consolidated
Balance at 1 July 2010 81,455 18,032 99,487
Additions 206,229 - 206,229
Transfers in/(out) - 9,698 9,698
Amortisation expense - (14,218) (14,218)
Balance at 30 June 2011 287,684 13,512 301,196
Additions 4,097 28,405 32,502
Amortisation expense - (10,441) (10,441)
Balance at 30 June 2012 291,781 31,476 323,257
30 JUNE 2012
Consolidated
2012 2011
$ $
Note 12. Non-current assets - exploration and evaluation

Mining agreements 1,147,233 1,147,233
Less: Impairment (1,147,233) (1,147,233)
- -
Exploration and evaluation 72,522,192 48,636,491
72,522,192 48,636,491
72,522,192 48,636,491
Reconciliations
Mining Exploration Total
agreements and evaluation
$ $ $
Consolidated
Balance at 1 July 20101,147,233 29,237,018 30,384,251
Additions - 21,447,700 21,447,700
Impairment of assets (1,147,233) (2,048,227) (3,195,460)
Balance at 30 June 2011 - 48,636,491 48,636,491
Additions - 24,674,584 24,674,584
Impairment of assets - (788,883) (788,883)
Balance at 30 June 2012 - 72,522,192 72,522,192
Total exploration and evaluation expenditure capitalised is solely intangible. The directors have performed an impairment review based on the potential
for future economic benefits that may arise.
Recoverability of the carrying amount of exploration assets is dependent on the successful exploration and mining of the existing mining agreements,
and successful exploration activities. The directors have determined that whilst the Dove River assets have potential, the level of exploration and
evaluation activity in connection to this region is no longer significant and active and does not currently qualify to continue to be recognised as an
exploration and evaluation asset. Accordingly in 2011 mining agreements of $1,147,233 and exploration and evaluation assets of $2,048,227 were
impaired. There was no further impairment during the current financial year.
Capitalised costs have been included in the statement of cash flows as an investing activity.
30 JUNE 2012
Consolidated
2012 2011
$ $
Note 13. Current liabilities - trade and other payables

Trade payables 2,371,766 1,191,512
Other payables 310,862 1,166,476
2,682,628 2,357,988
Refer to note 19 for further information on financial instruments.
Note 14. Current liabilities - provisions

Employee benefits 369,324 243,737
Note 15. Equity - issued capital

Consolidated Consolidated
2012 2011 2012 2011
Shares Shares $ $
Ordinary shares - fully paid 246,593,087 187,026,448 81,951,059 62,045,859
Movements in ordinary share capital

Details Date No of shares Issue price $
Balance 1 July 2010 156,049,880 44,578,417

Issue of shares 9 November 2010 23,407,482 $0.570 13,342,265
Share purchase plan 19 May 2011 5,329,086 $0.780 4,156,500
Conversion of options 8 February 2011 2,000,000 $0.300 640,008
Conversion of performance rights 1 April 2011 240,000 68,114
Share issue costs - (739,445)
Balance 30 June 2011 187,026,448 62,045,859

Issue of ordinary shares 22 July 2011 10,244,697 3,339,771
Issue of ordinary shares 5 August 2011 8,450,704 $0.355 3,000,000
Issue of ordinary shares 22 August 2011 5,633,803 $0.355 2,000,000
Issue of ordinary shares 6 October 2011 15,506,164 $0.355 5,504,688
Issue of ordinary shares to KRED Enterprises Pty Ltd
as Trustee for Mayala People 10 November 2011 476,872 124,940
Issue of ordinary shares 23 February 2012 5,169,892 $0.355 1,835,312
Issue of ordinary shares 12 April 2012 8,450,704 $0.355 3,000,000
Issue of ordinary shares 11 May 2012 5,633,803 $0.355 2,000,000
Share issue costs (899,511)
Balance 30 June 2012 246,593,087 81,951,059
30 JUNE 2012
Note 15. Equity - issued capital (continued)

Ordinary shares
Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on the winding up of the company in proportion to the number of and
amounts paid on the shares held. The fully paid ordinary shares have no par value.
At the shareholders meetings each ordinary share is entitled to one vote when poll is called, otherwise each shareholder has one vote on a show of
hands.
Options
At the reporting date there were 23,396,572 (2011: 23,396,572) options on issue with an exercise price of 30 cents and an exercise date any time to
3 October 2016. These options were issued to directors on 3 October 2006 in their capacity as founders of the company prior to listing on the ASX and
not as compensation. Each option gives the holder the right to subscribe for one share of the company. Anthony Schoer is the only remaining founder
of the company on the Board.
At the reporting date there were 14,342,576 (2011: nil) options on issue with an exercise price of 83.1 cents and an exercise date any time to
22 July 2017. These options have been issued to shareholders on 22 July 2011. Each option gives the holder the right to subscribe for one share of
the company.
Performance rights
There was also nil (2011: 240,000) performance rights on issue with a performance hurdle of $1.25 per share and an exercise date of 31 March 2014.
Each performance right gives the holder the right to subscribe for one share of the company.
Share buy-back
There is no current on-market share buy-back.
Capital risk management
The consolidated entity’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern, so that it can provide returns for
shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimum capital structure to reduce the cost of capital.
Management are constantly adjusting the capital structure to take advantage of favourable costs of capital or high returns on assets. As the market is
constantly changing, management may change the amount of dividends to be paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or
sell assets to reduce debt.
Management may issue further shares on the market for the purpose of continuing its exploration activities and to ensure an optimum working
capital level.
The consolidated entity is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements.
The capital risk management policy remains unchanged from the 30 June 2011 Annual Report.
Note 16. Equity - reserves

Consolidated
2012 2011
$ $
Options reserve 4,114,326 540,782
Options Total
Consolidated $ $
Balance at 1 July 2010 648,904 648,904
Conversion to share capital (108,122) (108,122)
Balance at 30 June 2011 540,782 540,782
Issuance of options * 3,573,544 3,573,544
Balance at 30 June 2012 4,114,326 4,114,326
*O
n 22 July 2011 the consolidated entity granted 14,342,576 options. The value of these options using a Black-Scholes valuation model calculation
was $3,573,544.
Option reserve
The reserve is used to recognise the value of options, including issue of performance rights under the Employee Share Option Plan, provided to
employees and directors as part of their remuneration, and other parties as part of their compensation for services.
30 JUNE 2012
Consolidated
2012 2011
$ $
Note 17. Equity - accumulated losses

Accumulated losses at the beginning of the financial year (11,133,340) (5,493,033)
Loss after income tax expense for the year (2,883,341) (5,640,307)
Accumulated losses at the end of the financial year (14,016,681) (11,133,340)
Note 18. Equity - dividends

There were no dividends paid or declared during the current or previous financial year.
Note 19. Financial instruments

Financial risk management objectives
The consolidated entity’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. The consolidated entity’s overall
risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the financial
performance of the consolidated entity. The Board reviews and agrees policies for managing each of the risks identified.
The consolidated entity uses different methods to measure different types of risk to which it is exposed. These include monitoring levels of exposure to
interest rate and foreign exchange risk and assessments of market forecasts for interest rate, foreign exchange and commodity prices. Liquidity risk is
monitored through the development of future rolling cash flow forecasts.
The consolidated entity’s principal financial instruments comprise receivables, payables, cash and short-term deposits.
Market risk
Foreign currency risk
The transactions of the consolidated entity are predominantly in Australian dollars, therefore the consolidated entity’s exposure to foreign exchange risk
is minimal.
Price risk
The consolidated entity is not exposed to any significant price risk.
Interest rate risk
The consolidated entity’s main interest rate risk arises from its cash and deposit balances. The consolidated entity incurred no debt liability during
the financial year ended 30 June 2012 (2011: $nil). The consolidated entity constantly analyses its interest rate exposure. Within this analysis
consideration is given to potential renewals of existing positions, alternative financing, alternative hedging positions and the mix of fixed and variable
interest rates.
As at the reporting date, the consolidated entity had the following exposure to interest rate risk:
2012 2011
Weighted Balance Weighted Balance
average average
interest rate interest rate
% $ % $
Consolidated
Cash and cash equivalents 2.28 592,452 5.20 3,805,412
Net exposure to cash flow interest rate risk 592,452 3,805,412
An official increase/decrease in interest rates of one (2011: one) percentage point would have a favourable/adverse effect on profit before tax of $5,925
(2011: $38,054) per annum.
The percentage change is based on the expected volatility of interest rates using market data, historical trends over prior years and based on the
consolidated entity’s on going relationships with financial institutions.
30 JUNE 2012
Note 19. Financial instruments (continued)

Credit risk
Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the consolidated entity. The
consolidated entity trades only with recognised, creditworthy third parties and high rated financial institutions to minimise the risk of default of
counterparties. The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date to recognised financial assets, is the carrying amount, net of any provisions
for impairment of those assets, as disclosed in the statement of financial position and notes to the financial statements. The consolidated entity does
not hold any collateral.
Liquidity risk
Vigilant liquidity risk management requires the consolidated entity to maintain sufficient liquid assets (mainly cash and cash equivalents) and available
borrowing facilities to be able to pay debts as and when they become due and payable.
The consolidated entity objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and flexibility through the use of bank overdrafts, bank loans,
preference shares, finance leases and committed available credit lines.
Remaining contractual maturities
The following tables detail the consolidated entity’s remaining contractual maturity for its financial instrument liabilities. The tables have been drawn
up based on the undiscounted cash flows of financial liabilities based on the earliest date on which the financial liabilities are required to be paid.
The tables include both interest and principal cash flows disclosed as remaining contractual maturities and therefore these totals may differ from their
carrying amount in the statement of financial position.
Consolidated - 2012 Weighted average 1 year Between 1 Between 2 Over 5 years Remaining
interest rate or less and 2 years and 5 years contractual
maturities
% $ $ $ $ $
Non-derivatives
Non-interest bearing
Trade payables - 2,371,766 - - - 2,371,766
Other payables - 310,861 - - - 310,861
Total non-derivatives 2,682,627 - - - 2,682,627
Consolidated - 2011 Weighted average 1 year Between 1 Between 2 Over 5 years Remaining
interest rate or less and 2 years and 5 years contractual
maturities
% $ $ $ $ $
Non-derivatives
Non-interest bearing
Trade payables - 1,191,512 - - - 1,191,512
Other payables - 1,166,476 - - 1,166,476
Total non-derivatives 2,357,988 - - - 2,357,988
The cash flows in the maturity analysis above are not expected to occur significantly earlier than contractually disclosed above.
Fair value of financial instruments
Unless otherwise stated, the carrying amounts of financial instruments reflect their fair value. The carrying amounts of trade receivables and trade
payables are assumed to approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature. The fair value of financial liabilities is estimated by discounting
the remaining contractual maturities at the current market interest rate that is available for similar financial instruments.
30 JUNE 2012
Note 20. Key management personnel disclosures

Directors
The following persons were directors of Pluton Resources Limited during the financial year:
Malcolm Macpherson Non-Executive Chairman
Anthony James Schoer Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
Russell George Williams Non-Executive Director
Chenxi (Elly) Wang Non-Executive Director
Other key management personnel
The following persons also had the authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the major activities of the consolidated entity,
directly or indirectly, during the financial year:
Brett Clark Chief Operating Officer (appointed 1 February 2012)
Pamela Kaye General Counsel
Anson Griffiths Project Manager
Cedric Davies Community and Environment Advisor
Diane Dowdell Environment Manager (appointed 15 November 2011)
Reece Power General Manager Corporate (appointed 20 February 2012)
Compensation
The aggregate compensation made to directors and other members of key management personnel of the consolidated entity is set out below:
Consolidated
2012 2011
$ $
Short-term employee benefits 1,870,142 1,477,112

Post-employment benefits 112,268 107,017
Share-based payments - 46,828
1,982,410 1,630,957
Shareholding
The number of shares in the parent entity held during the financial year by each director and other members of key management personnel of the
consolidated entity, including their personally related parties, is set out below:
2012 Balance Received Additions Disposals/other Balance

at the start as part of at the end
of the year remuneration of the year
Ordinary shares
Malcolm Macpherson 240,289 - - - 240,289
Anthony James Schoer 493,040 - 696,931 - 1,189,971
Russell George Williams 86,021 - 370,000 - 456,021
Chenxi Wang * - - - 48,845,070 48,845,070
John McDougall ** 40,000 - - (40,000) -
Pamela Kaye 65,187 - - - 65,187
Anson Griffiths 54,000 - - - 54,000
Cedric Davies 40,000 - - - 40,000
Ben Carpenter ** 40,000 - - (40,000) -
1,058,537 - 1,066,931 48,765,070 50,890,538
* Other represents individual being a director of an entity holding securities in the consolidated entity
** Other represents individual no longer being a key management personnel and not actual disposal
30 JUNE 2012
Note 20. Key management personnel disclosures (continued)

2011 Balance Received Additions Disposals/other Balance
at the start as part of at the end
of the year remuneration of the year
Ordinary shares
Malcolm Macpherson 221,058 - 19,231 - 240,289
Anthony James Schoer * 2,671,790 - 43,250 (2,222,000) 493,040
Russell George Williams - - 86,021 - 86,021
Raymond John Schoer ** 4,530,239 - 36,361 (4,566,600) -
John McDougall - - 40,000 - 40,000
Pamela Kaye 7,175 - 58,012 - 65,187
Anson Griffiths - - 54,000 - 54,000
Cedric Davies - - 40,000 - 40,000
Ben Carpenter - - 40,000 - 40,000
7,430,262 - 416,875 (6,788,600) 1,058,537
* Other represents transfer to family superannuation fund not controlled by the director
** Other represents individual no longer being a key management personnel and not actual disposal
Option holding
The number of options over ordinary shares in the parent entity held during the financial year by each director and other members of key management
personnel of the consolidated entity, including their personally related parties, is set out below:
2012 Balance Granted Exercised Expired/ Balance

at the start forfeited/ at the end
of the year other of the year
Options over ordinary shares
Anthony James Schoer 5,231,694 - - - 5,231,694
5,231,694 - - - 5,231,694
* Other represents individual no longer being a key management personnel and not actual disposal
All options held at the reporting date are vested and exercisable.
2011 Balance Granted Exercised Expired/ Balance

Options over ordinary shares
Anthony James Schoer 5,231,694 - - - 5,231,694
Raymond John Schoer * 4,761,857 - - (4,761,857) -
John McDougall 40,000 - - (40,000) -
10,033,551 - - (4,801,857) 5,231,694
* Other represents individual no longer being a key management personnel and not actual disposal
All options held at the reporting date are vested and exercisable.
30 JUNE 2012
Note 20. Key management personnel disclosures (continued)

Performance rights holding
The number of performance rights over ordinary shares in the parent entity held during the financial year by each director and other members of key
management personnel of the consolidated entity, including their personally related parties, is set out below:
2012 Balance Granted Vested Expired/ Balance

Performance rights over ordinary shares
John McDougall 40,000 - (40,000) - -
Pamela Kaye 50,000 - (50,000) - -
Ben Carpenter 40,000 - (40,000) - -
Anson Griffiths 50,000 - (50,000) - -
Cedric Davies 40,000 - (40,000) - -
220,000 - (220,000) - -
2011 Balance Granted Vested Expired/ Balance

Performance rights over ordinary shares
John McDougall 80,000 - (40,000) - 40,000
Pamela Kaye 100,000 - (50,000) - 50,000
Ben Carpenter 80,000 - (40,000) - 40,000
Anson Griffiths * - - (50,000) 100,000 50,000
Cedric Davies * - - (40,000) 80,000 40,000
260,000 - (220,000) 180,000 220,000
* Other represents holding when individual becoming a key management personnel

Related party transactions
Related party transactions are set out in note 24.
Note 21. Remuneration of auditors

During the financial year the following fees were paid or payable for services provided by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, the auditor of the company:
Consolidated
2012 2011
$ $
Audit services - Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

Audit or review of the financial statements 42,000 52,800
Note 22. Contingent liabilities

Contingent consideration payable (Mayala People):
Within one year 2,000,000 2,000,000
One to five years 5,000,000 5,000,000
7,000,000 7,000,000
The contingent consideration is payable to the Mayala People in respect of the Wonganin Project coexistence Agreement signed on 28 June 2011
in relation to the Irvine Island Project. The contingent consideration is subject to meeting agreed milestones through to the commencement of
production. These milestones were not met in the year ending 30 June 2012 and hence the consideration owing remains unchanged.
The consolidated entity had no other contingent liabilities at 30 June 2012 and 30 June 2011.
30 JUNE 2012
Consolidated
2012 2011
$ $
Note 23. Commitments

Lease commitments - operating
Committed at the reporting date but not recognised as liabilities, payable:
Within one year 7,998 7,992
One to five years 150,400 39,960
158,398 47,952
Granted exploration tenement statutory expenditure commitments (100% owned)
Committed at the reporting date but not recognised as liabilities, payable:
Within one year 545,916 59,724
One to five years 2,040,400 18,099
2,586,316 77,823
Operating lease commitments includes contracted amounts for offices and plant and equipment under non-cancellable operating leases expiring
within 1 to 5 years with, in some cases, options to extend. On renewal, the terms of the leases are renegotiated.
Note 24. Related party transactions

Parent entity
Pluton Resources Limited is the parent entity.
Subsidiaries
Interests in subsidiaries are set out in note 26.
Key management personnel
Disclosures relating to key management personnel are set out in note 20 and the remuneration report in the directors’ report.
Transactions with related parties
Chenxi Wong (non-executive director) is a director of Timeone Holdings Limited and Wise Energy Group Limited which subscribed for and received
48,845,070 ordinary shares at $0.355 per share. Refer to note 15.
Receivable from and payable to related parties
There were no trade receivables from or trade payables to related parties at the current and previous reporting date.
Loans to/from related parties
There were no loans to or from related parties at the current and previous reporting date.
Terms and conditions
All transactions were made on normal commercial terms and conditions and at market rates.
30 JUNE 2012
Note 25. Parent entity information

Set out below is the supplementary information about the parent entity.
Statement of comprehensive income
Parent
2012 2011
$ $
Loss after income tax (2,952,108) (5,652,329)
Total comprehensive income (2,952,108) (5,652,329)
Statement of financial position

Total current assets 1,691,812 4,429,431
Total assets 75,034,061 54,057,200
Total current liabilities 3,051,950 2,601,724
Total liabilities 3,051,950 2,601,725
Equity
Issued capital 81,951,059 62,045,859
Options reserve 4,114,326 540,782
Accumulated losses (14,083,274) (11,131,166)
Total equity 71,982,111 51,455,475
Guarantees entered into by the parent entity in relation to the debts of its subsidiaries
The parent entity had no guarantees in relation to the debts of its subsidiaries as at 30 June 2012 and 30 June 2011.
Contingent liabilities
The parent entity had no contingent liabilities as at 30 June 2012 and 30 June 2011.
Capital commitments - Property, plant and equipment
The parent entity had no commitments for expenditure at 30 June 2012 and 30 June 2011.
Significant accounting policies
The accounting policies of the parent entity are consistent with those of the consolidated entity, as disclosed in note 1, except for the following:
• Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for at cost, less any impairment. Dividends received from subsidiaries are recognised as other income by
the parent entity and its receipt may be an indicator of an impairment of the investment.
• Equity-settled awards by the parent to employees of subsidiaries are recognised as an increase in investment in the subsidiary with a corresponding
credit to equity and not as a charge to profit or loss. The investment in subsidiary is reduced by any contribution by the subsidiary.
Note 26. Subsidiaries

The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets, liabilities and results of the following subsidiary in accordance with the accounting
policy described in note 1:
Equity holding
Country of 2012 2011
Name of entity incorporation % %
Dove River Pty Ltd Australia 100.00 100.00

30 JUNE 2012
Note 27. Events after the reporting period

On 6 July 2012, the consolidated entity was granted a mining lease over Irvine Island. The lease (M04/452) replaces exploration licence E04/1172.
The issue of the mining lease is a significant step forward in the approvals process towards commercialisation of Irvine.
Following the withdrawal of the Extraordinary General Meeting of shareholders, the Board put the company’s securities into voluntary suspension on
2 July 2012 and embarked on an urgent review of the consolidated entity’s existing and future operations (including a review of its ability to acquire the
Cockatoo Island project) to determine the future strategy of the consolidated entity; and pursued discussions with a number of parties who expressed
interest in supporting the consolidated entity’s activities to acquire the Cockatoo Island Project from the Cockatoo Island vendors; Cliffs Asia Pacific
Iron Ore Holdings Pty Limited and HWE Cockatoos Pty Ltd.
The Cockatoo Island vendors agreed to extend the acquisition execution date to 31 July 2012 to enable the consolidated entity to find a replacement
funding partner.
On 31 July 2012 an Asset Sales agreement between Pluton Resources Ltd and the Cockatoo Island vendors was signed with completion of all
condition precedent under the agreement taking place on 10th September 2012, and final completion of the acquisition of Cockatoo Island to take
place on 28 September 2012. Cockatoo Island vendors have security over the consolidated entity’s interest in both Cockatoo Island and Irvine Island in
the event the consolidated entity does not meet its financial obligations under the Asset Sale agreement.
On 1 August, the consolidated entity agreed to a binding term sheet for a proposed 50/50 unincorporated joint venture with Wise Energy Group Limited
(‘WEG’).
On 13 August 2012, the consolidated entity completed an initial pre-sale agreement of ore from Cockatoo Island whereby a loan of US$2.5 million was
received from WEG. On 30 August 2012 the consolidated entity completed a second pre-sale agreement of ore from Cockatoo Island whereby a loan of
US$3 million was received from WEG.
On 31 August 2012, the consolidated entity announced that a binding term sheet has been agreed and executed for the proposed 50/50
unincorporated joint venture with WEG over the mining operations on Cockatoo Island.
Pursuant to the term sheet, WEG has provided a $3 million interest free loan.
WEG is considered a related party in that Chenxi Wong, a non-executive director of the company, is also a director of WEG.
No other matter or circumstance has arisen since 30 June 2012 that has significantly affected, or may significantly affect the consolidated entity’s
operations, the results of those operations, or the consolidated entity’s state of affairs in future financial years.
Note 28. Reconciliation of loss after income tax to net cash from/(used in) operating activities
Consolidated
2012 2011
$ $
Loss after income tax expense for the year (2,883,341) (5,640,307)
Adjustments for:
Depreciation and amortisation 154,813 193,008
Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets 788,883 3,195,460
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables (593,700) 170,660
Increase in trade and other payables 539,571 2,074,013
Increase in other provisions 125,587 125,486
Net cash from/(used in) operating activities (1,868,187) 118,320
30 JUNE 2012
Consolidated
2012 2011
$ $
Note 29. Non-cash investing and financing activities

Shares issued on acquisition of exploration and evaluation assets (note 15) 3,464,711 -
Options issued on acquisition of exploration and evaluation assets (note 16) 3,573,544 -
7,038,255 -
Note 30. Earnings per share

Loss after income tax attributable to the owners of Pluton Resources Limited (2,883,341) (5,640,307)
Number Number
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating basic earnings per share 225,315,137 172,527,528
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share 225,315,137 172,527,528
Cents Cents
Basic earnings per share (1.280) (3.269)
Diluted earnings per share (1.280) (3.269)
37,739,148 options over ordinary shares have been excluded from the above calculations as they were anti-dilutive during the period.
30 JUNE 2012
Note 31. Share-based payments

A director’s share option plan has been established where the consolidated entity may, at the discretion of the Board, grant options over its ordinary
shares to directors, senior managers and key suppliers.
An Employee Share Option Scheme has been established where the consolidated entity may, at the discretion of the Board, grant options and other
performance rights over its shares to directors and employees.
Set out below are summaries of options granted under the plan:
2011
Grant date Expiry date Exercise Balance Granted Exercised Expired/ Balance
price at the start forfeited/ at the end
30/11/08 28/02/11 $2.100 40,000 - - (40,000) -
40,000 - - (40,000) -
Set out below are summaries of performance rights granted under the plan:
2012
Grant date Expiry date Exercise Balance Granted Vested Expired/ Balance
31/03/10 31/03/14 $1.250 240,000 - (240,000) - -
240,000 - (240,000) - -
2011
Grant date Expiry date Exercise Balance Granted Vested Expired/ Balance
31/03/10 31/03/13 $0.750 240,000 - (240,000) - -
31/03/10 31/03/14 $1.250 240,000 - - - 240,000
480,000 - (240,000) - 240,000
Directors’ Declaration 60
In the directors’ opinion:

• the attached financial statements and notes thereto comply with the Corporations Act 2001, the Accounting Standards, the Corporations Regulations
2001 and other mandatory professional reporting requirements;
• the attached financial statements and notes thereto comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board as described in note 1 to the financial statements;
• the attached financial statements and notes thereto give a true and fair view of the consolidated entity’s financial position as at 30 June 2012 and of
its performance for the financial year ended on that date; and
• there are reasonable grounds to believe that the company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
The directors have been given the declarations required by section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of directors made pursuant to section 295(5) of the Corporations Act 2001.
On behalf of the directors
Tony Schoer
Director
27 September 2012
Melbourne
Indepent Auditor’s Report 61
TO THE MEMBERS OF PLUTON RESOURCES LIMITED
Indepent Auditor’s Report 62
TO THE MEMBERS OF PLUTON RESOURCES LIMITED
30 JUNE 2012
The shareholder information set out below was applicable as at 30 September 2012.
Distribution of equitable securities
Analysis of number of equitable security holders by size of holding:
Number of holders
of ordinary shares
1 to 1,000 391
1,001 to 5,000 658
5,001 to 10,000 458
10,001 to 100,000 1,119
100,001 and over 222
2,848
Holding less than a marketable parcel of 2,500 ordinary shares 636
Equity security holders

Twenty largest quoted equity security holders
The names of the twenty largest security holders of quoted equity securities are listed below:
Ordinary shares
Number held % of total
shares
issued
WISE ENERGY GROUP COMPANY LIMITED 48,845,070 19.81

CLIFFS ASIA PACIFIC IRON ORE PTY LTD 19,462,200 7.89
BOND STREET CUSTODIANS LIMITED <OFFICIUM EMERGING RES A/C> 13,600,759 5.52
KRED ENTERPRISES PTY LTD <MAYALA PEOPLE A/C> 8,416,512 3.41
M F CUSTODIANS LTD 6,424,993 2.61
ABN AMRO CLEARING SYDNEY NOMINEES PTY LTD <CUSTODIAN A/C> 5,772,177 2.34
UBS WEALTH MANAGEMENT AUSTRALIA NOMINEES PTY LTD 5,662,828 2.30
HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED 5,653,359 2.29
J P MORGAN NOMINEES AUSTRALIA LIMITED 4,605,823 1.89
MCNEIL NOMINEES PTY LIMITED 4,000,000 1.62
MR ROBERT JOHN HANCOCK & MRS JULIE WYNN HANCOCK <HANCOCK S/F A/C> 3,492,000 1.42
PERSHING AUSTRALIA NOMINEES PTY LTD <PHILLIP SECURITIES (HK) A/C> 3,014,499 1.22
CITICORP NOMINEES PTY LIMITED 2,537,468 1.03
UBS NOMINEES PTY LTD 2,356,272 0.96
KRED ENTERPRISES PTY LTD <KRED ENTERPRISES CHAR A/C> 2,305,057 0.94
THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY 1,795,000 0.73
JP MORGAN NOMINEES AUSTRALIA LIMITED <CASH INCOME A/C> 1,738,611 0.71
MR ANTONIO ACETI 1,697,500 0.69
MR NICK NICOLAZZO 1,500,000 0.61
HUNMAR PTY LTD <HUNMAR INVESTMENTS A/C> 1,465,000 0.60
144,345,128 58.54
Unquoted equity securities

Number Number
on issue of holders
Options over ordinary shares issued ($0.30 strike price, expire 3 October 2016) 23,396,572 5
Options over ordinary shares issued ($0.831 strike price, expire 22 July 2017) 14,342,576 1
Substantial holders
Substantial holders in the company are set out below:
Ordinary shares
% of total
shares
Number held issued
WISE ENERGY GROUP COMPANY LIMITED 48,845,070 19.81
CLIFFS ASIA PACIFIC IRON ORE PTY LTD 19,462,200 7.89
BOND STREET CUSTODIANS LIMITED <OFFICIUM EMERGING RES A/C> 13,600,759 5.52
Voting rights
The voting rights attached to ordinary shares are set out below:
Ordinary shares
At the shareholders meetings each ordinary share is entitled to one vote when poll is called, otherwise each shareholder has one vote on a show
of hands.
There are no other classes of equity securities.
Tenements
Description Tenement number Interest owned
Irvine Island, WA EL 04/1172 100.00%
West Kimberley, WA PL 04/242 50.00%
Dover River, Tasmania 37km 2
EL 14/2006 100.00%
Cethana, Tasmania 9km2 EL 29/2006 60.00%

Pluton Resources 2012 Annual Report (JORC Reserves)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pluton Resources 2012 Annual Report (JORC Reserves)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pluton Resources 2012 Annual Report (JORC Reserves)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PLUTON

PLUTON RESOURCES LIMITED

ANNUAL REPORT 2012

Notice of annual general meeting

Will be held at The Westin Hotel

Principal place of business

Stock exchange listing

Malcolm Macpherson – Chairman

“Location of Pluton tenements in the Kimberley, Western Australia.”

Irvine Island Iron Ore Project

Supporting Notes for Table 1.

Supporting Notes for Table 2.

Supporting Notes for Table 3.

Irvine Ore Reserve

Cockatoo Island Iron Ore Project

Table 5: Cockatoo Island Seawall Hematite Mineral Resources as at 31 July 2012

Table 6: Cockatoo Island Highwall Mineral Resource as at 31 July 2012

Table 7: Cockatoo Island Seawall Hematite Ore Reserves as at 31 July 2012

Dove River & Cethana – Tasmania

The Company continues to review its options regarding these tenements.

Priorities for 2013

• Increase expected open-cut mine life by conversion of resources through drilling.

• Increase indigenous participation through employment, training and business opportunities.

• Commence formal Definitive Feasibility Study.

ASX Additional Information 63

Level 4, 468 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004.

Matters subsequent to the end of the financial year Environmental regulation

Name: Russell George Williams Remuneration report (audited)

Executive remuneration B Details of remuneration

2012 Short-term benefits Post-employment Long-term Share-based

2011 Short-term benefits Post-employment Long-term Share-based

Other Key Management Personnel:

John McDougall * - - - 40,000

* Performance rights vested under ESOP-1

Shares under option

Grant date Expiry date Exercise price Number under option

Shares under performance rights Non-audit services

Principles and Recommendations Compliance Comply

Principles and Recommendations Compliance Comply

Principle 3 – Promote ethical and responsible decision making

The Board has adopted a Diversity Policy.

Principle 4 – Safeguard integrity in financial reporting

There was no audit and risk committee during the year.

Principles and Recommendations Compliance Comply

Principle 5 – Make timely and balanced disclosure

Principle 6 – Respect the rights of shareholders

Principle 7 – Recognise and manage risk

Principles and Recommendations Compliance Comply

Revenue 4 173,495 370,307

Issued Reserves Accumulated Total

Issued Reserves Accumulated Total

Cash flows from operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities

Note 1. Significant accounting policies

Note 1. Significant accounting policies (continued)

Note 1. Significant accounting policies (continued)

Note 1. Significant accounting policies (continued)

Note 1. Significant accounting policies (continued)

• Increase expected open-cut mine life by conversion of resources through drilling.

• Increase indigenous participation through employment, training and business opportunities.