Module For Literature Review
Module For Literature Review
Module For Literature Review
In writing a research paper, literature review helps the researcher to situate his/her
research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives the researcher a
chance to: Familiarity with the topic and scholarly context, develop a theoretical
framework and methodology for the research, ppositioning of oneself in relation to
other researchers and theorists and show how research addresses a gap or
contributes to a debate.
Literature review provides information about past research studies related to the
intended investigation, preventing the duplication of research undertakings. It
presents gaps in the field of study. Gaps may either be areas in the body of
knowledge that are not explored yet or parts where research studies yielded
inconclusive results. It affords confidence and authority to the researchers since
reviewing the literature can provide them all possible constructs and
perspectives of the present study (ELCOMBLUS, 2020).
2
It gives information about the methods used in similar studies, including the
characteristics of the samples, the sampling techniques, or the process of selecting
the research participants, the variables considered, the kinds of data gathered, and
the type of analysis and interpretation done on the collected data. It enumerates
findings from previous studies that may support those of the present study. It
provides ideas on how implications may be drawn out of the analysis and
interpretation of data (ELCOMBLUS, 2020).
A. Introduction
Cronin, et al (2008) argue that the introduction should include the purpose of the
review and a brief overview of the ‘problem’. It is important that the literature
sources and the key search terms are outlined. The introduction will not only
present the main topic but will also make a statement about the status of
knowledge in this area of research.
Some areas of concern in preparing the introduction is (a) Define or identify the
general topic or area of concern to provide a context for reviewing the literature;
(b) Point out overall trends, conflicts in theory, methodology, evidence and
conclusions, or gaps in research and scholarship, to identify a particular problem;
(c) Establish your purpose for reviewing the literature or point of view; explain the
criteria used to select and evaluate the literature; explain what it included or
excluded (scope); and forecast the organization or sequence of the review.
B. Main Body
The main body of the report presents and discusses the findings from the
literature. There are several ways in which this can be done (Cronin et al, 2008;
Carnwell & Daly, 2001). Regardless of the way the main body of the review is
framed, there are key points that must be considered. First, Group research
studies and other literature according to common denominators such as
qualitative or quantitative approaches, purposes, theories, methodologies, or
3
For your reader to move through your information with ease while keeping the big
picture in view, order your body paragraphs in the same way that you did in the
statement about how your literature review will proceed. Order the abstractions
(main ideas) from general to specific, deciding which sources have contributions
to make to which concepts. You will then present more specific information from
the sources, using in-text citation, to discuss the abstractions in more detail and
to point out areas of agreement or debate among sources. Your body paragraphs
should work to not only summarize what sources have said, but to demonstrate
relationships between them.
Here are three of the most important ones that have been used to effectively
structure the body paragraph of a literature review:
1. Chronologically
This approach is the simplest as you write the review based on the overall
timeline which starts at the beginning, to the end. In this approach, you can
identify the development and growth of the chosen topic or a particular concept
that you have examined over time. Keep in mind not to list down all the events
in order, but to rather analyze important patterns, major themes, or key turning
points in chronological order.
2. Thematically
Very different from the timeline approach, in this, you are required to examine,
elaborate, and find a link between your sources and your chosen literary text.
The thematic approach revolves around the central issue or dispute which are
organized into subsections that address each aspect of the issue(s). These
are analyzed in-depth and are time-consuming.
3. Methodologically
This type of approach is to understand the methods used to define or analyze
a certain concept. By presenting the methods, you can compare them based
4
C. Conclusion
The conclusion should provide a summary of findings from the literature review.
Explain what your analysis of the material leads you to conclude about the overall
state of the literature, what it provides and where it is lacking. Cronin et al (2008)
mention that the review should conclude with a concise summary of the findings
that describes current knowledge and offer a rationale for conducting future
research.
In a review, which forms part of a study, any gaps in knowledge that have been
identified should lead logically to the purpose of the proposed study. In some
cases, it may also be possible to use the developed themes to construct a
conceptual framework that will inform the study. In all reviews, some
recommendations or implications for practice, education and research should be
included.
Before writing a Literature review it is very important on how to make an outline first before
starting writing. According (Adela Belin, 2021) we can make an outline using the following
steps.
a. Narrow down on your topic
Before you start looking for literary texts to analyze, you need to figure out a clear and
defined topic. Based on this topic, you can start searching for relevant literature that
surrounds your chosen topic or the question that is to be analyzed. During the search
for your literature review topic, consider subject matters that are interesting to you,
or something that you would want to know in-depth about. You can also look for
popular texts that could have multiple sources to work with.
3. Try mapping out the concepts for your outline by creating a graphic map with
all the ideas and concepts that you would want to include in the review. Make
it a point to incorporate all of these ideas while writing your literature review.
Literature review sources can be divided into three categories as illustrated in table
below (Business Research Methodology, 2021):
your paper. Through this organized skeleton structure of the paper, you can quickly
and easily identify the points that you want to be included.
I. Introduction
a. Describe the topic that you have been investigating, why it is important
to the field
b. Give a “big picture” of the literature.
c. Present a thesis or argument statement – why is it important to explore
this topic?
II. Theme A1
a. Overview of characteristics of the theme (commonalities, differences,
nuances)
b. Sub-theme – narrow but grouped findings related to the theme
i. Study 1 (Research question(s), Methods/Participants, Related Findings)
ii. Study 2 (Research question(s), Methods/Participants, Related Findings)
iii. Study 3 (Research question(s), Methods/Participants, Related Findings)
iv. Do these studies share commonalities? How do these studies differ? Discuss
Working on this point will help show your professor that you can contribute a major
portion of ideas and knowledge through your research, to the already existing
content.
The type of strategy a young person utilises depends largely on perceived control
(Spirito et al., 1991). Problem-focused strategies are used if a solution to the problem is
considered within the individual’s capabilities, whilst emotion-focused strategies are
used if the situation is perceived to be out of the individual’s control (Spirito et al., 1991).
Despite this distinction it is important to recognise that coping is a dynamic process that
often involves a combination of both strategies, depending on the nature of the stressful
circumstances (Caltabiano et al., 2008; Delahaij et al., 2011; Herman-Stahl, Stemmler &
Peterson, 1995; Lohman & Jarvis, 2000; Williams & McGillicuddy-De Lisi, 1999; Yahav
& Cohen, 2008).
Adolescent stressors
The effect of daily stressors can be particularly harmful to the psychological and
physiological wellbeing of young people (Yahav & Cohen, 2008). The stressors
adolescents experience range from the school environment to home and family life, and
extend as far as global social issues (de Anda et al., 2000). Spirito et al. (1991) identified
9
four main stressful domains in their research on young people - school, siblings, parents
and friends. Increasing academic pressure, sibling and parental conflict, peer pressure
and romantic relationship problems were the main issues children encountered daily
(Spirito et al., 1991). This data was based on a sample of adolescents aged 12-13 years,
thus it is possible the stressors could differ to those encountered by an older sample.
The article is also relatively dated therefore it is possible that the types of stressors
prevalent today have changed.
In concurrence with the article by Spirito et al. (1991) however, de Anda et al.
(2000) also identified school as a major stressor for adolescents. Pressure surrounding
future goals was reported as most stressing, with personal expectations, academic
performance and homework also significant anxiety provoking situations. (de Anda et al.,
2000). de Anda et al.’s (2000) list of adolescent stressors is extensive and included
issues unrelated to school such as body image, social issues, relationships, violence and
death. The age range for this sample was 15-18 years of age, which suggests that older
adolescents have less egocentrism and greater concern for issues outside of the
personal domain of school and home.
Persike and Seiffge-Krenke (2012) conducted a multicultural analysis of
adolescent stressors and found that academic achievement and parental control were of
most concern, whilst anxiety about peers and relationships was less than expected.
Similar to de Anda et al. (2000) and Spirito et al. (1991), Persike and Seiffge-Krenke
(2012) suggest that adolescents are increasingly concerned about school, future
employment and further education.
Comparisons of these studies indicate that time has not significantly altered the types of
stressors adolescents experience.
Stress and coping literature identify an extensive range of coping strategies that
young people adopt (de Anda et al., 2000; Moskowitz, Stein & Lightfoot, 2013; Skinner
& Zimmer- Gembeck, 2006; Williams & McGillicuddy-De Lisi, 1999). Some examples of
emotion- focused coping include relaxation, distraction, escape, helplessness and
withdrawal (Caltabiano et al., 2008; de Anda et al., 2000; Skinner & Zimmer-Gembeck,
2006). Examples of problem-focused coping include problem-solving and support-
seeking (Skinner & Zimmer-Gembeck, 2006).
An individual’s ability to handle stress is determined by the relationship between
personal attributes such as cognitive, emotional and behavioural development (Delahaij
et al., 2011; Skinner & Zimmer-Gembeck, 2006). The highly influential work of Lazarus
(1966) as cited by Folkman, Tedlie and Moskowitz (2004), emphasised the role of
cognitive interpretation in both stress perception and coping. Folkman et al. (2004)
suggests that how an individual appraises a situation determines the level of stress
experienced. Williams and McGillicuddy-De Lisi’s (1999) study on stress also focuses
on the role of cognitive development in appraisal and coping. Results indicated that due
to having a wider coping repertoire, older adolescents utilised more adaptive strategies
than those younger (Williams & McGillicuddy-De Lisi, 1999). This suggests that
experience with stress prepares adolescents for certain problems, thus allowing the
individual to cope adaptively (Williams & McGillicuddy-De Lisi, 1999). It is important to
10
note however that the data was gathered over a short time and from a sample of
predominantly white, middle-class students. This allows little room for generalisation to
the wider population, however effectively demonstrates the role of cognition in stress
coping.
Visconti, Sechler and Kochenderfer-Ladd (2013) suggest that emotional attributes
such as self-esteem are what influence the coping strategies individuals utilise. Visconti
et al. (2013) hypothesised that children with low self-esteem would lack the confidence
to deal with life stressors independently, thus were likely to engage in emotion-focused
coping. Unfortunately this hypothesis was unsupported. Dumont and Provost’s (1999)
study of adolescent coping however supports the relationship between low self-esteem
and unhealthy coping strategies. The results demonstrate a negative correlation
between avoidant coping and self-esteem levels, indicating that those lacking positive
coping methods also lack healthy self-esteem (Dumont & Provost, 1999). It is unknown
however, whether this correlation is bidirectional. Despite these limitations, results
suggest that those that think highly of themselves will be more capable and confident to
handle problems in a positive manner (Dumont & Provost, 1999).
During the stressful transition of adolescence, young people are at risk of
engaging in dangerous behaviour such as alcohol and drug use, as an attempt to deal
with increased stress levels (Rose & Bond, 2008). Caltabiano et al. (2008) support this
notion and indicate that older adolescents are more likely to engage in these types of
maladaptive emotion-focused coping. Rose and Bond (2008) also suggest that
adolescents lacking healthy coping skills and exposed to stressful environments are at
a higher risk of substance abuse. This study however emphasises that cognitive
appraisal and perception of the stressful situation is what determines the level of risk
(Rose & Bond, 2008). Conversely, Fromme and Rivet (1994) contend that an
adolescent’s coping repertoire is what determines the likelihood of using destructive
behaviour to cope. This study argues that young people that lack any form of coping
strategies, regardless of maladaptive or adaptive nature, have a greater likelihood of
using substance abuse to cope with stress (Fromme & Rivet, 1994). This research
emphasizes the importance of promoting healthy coping skills in young people.
De Anda et al.’s (2000) research on adolescents disagrees with Fromme and
Rivet (1994), and Rose and Bond (2008). This study found that very few respondents
of the adolescent sample reported using drugs and alcohol as a coping strategy. The
results however failed to identify a coping method with a frequency higher than moderate.
Despite this limitation, adolescents reported using adaptive coping methods most often,
with reading a book, watching television or listening to music scoring the highest on
frequency and effectiveness (de Anda et al., 2000). These findings indicate that not all
young people turn to dangerous behaviour to cope with life stressors.
Conclusion
ACTIVITY 5:
Directions: Using your chosen Topic/Title, create a Literature Review Outline using the
template below.
Title: ______________________________________________________________
I. Introduction
a. Describe the topic that you have been investigating. Why it is important to the field
you are investigating?
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
V. Conclusion:
What will be the content of the conclusion? Give at least the expected content of
the conclusion part.
the source. For example, a short story may be contained in an anthology. The short story
is the source, and the anthology is the container.
Rationale
The Modern Language Association, the authority on research and writing, takes a fresh
look at documenting sources in the eighth edition of the MLA Handbook. Works are
published today in a dizzying range of formats. A book, for example, may be read in print,
online, or as an e-book--or perhaps listened to in an audio version. On the Web, modes
of publication are regularly invented, combined, and modified. Previous editions of the
MLA Handbook provided separate instructions for each format, and additional instructions
were required for new formats. Starting with the 8th edition of its best-selling handbook,
the MLA recommends instead one universal set of guidelines, which writers can apply to
any type of source.
Author's name in reference This argument has been developed elsewhere (Magny 67-69).
Two authors' names in The most notorious foreign lobby in Washington is the "Sugar
reference Mafia" (Howe and Trott 134).
Quotation found in indirect or The philosopher Alain states that "admiration is not pleasure but a
"secondhand" source kind of attention. . ." (qtd. in Magny 66).
An article in a print Doggart, Julia. "Minding the Gap: Realizing Our Ideal Community
journal Writing Assistance Program." The Community Literacy Journal, vol. 2,
no. 1, 2007, pp. 71-80.
An article in an Sherrard-Johnson, Cherene. "'A Plea for Color': Nella Larsen's
electronic journal Iconography of the Mulatta." American Literature, vol. 76, no. 4, 2004,
pp. 833-869, doi:10.1215/00029831-76-4-833.
A encyclopedia entry “Patanjali.” Benét’s Reader’s Encyclopedia, edited by Bruce Murphy,
4th ed., HarperCollins Publishers, 1996, p. 782.
A government United States, Federal Maritime Commission. Hawaiian Trade Study:
publication An Economic Analysis. Government Printing Office, 1978.
An interview you Brandt, Deborah. Personal interview. 28 May 2008.
conducted
(Note: List the interview under the name of the interviewee)
A film/DVD Note: This depends on the focus of your work. Please see the MLA
Style blog for a detailed explanation.
A website Note Style: 1.“Google Privacy Policy,” last modified March 11,
2009, http://www.google.com/intl/en/privacypolicy.html.
Duplicate Note: “Google Privacy Policy.”
Bibliography: Google. “Google Privacy Policy.” Last modified
March 11, 2009.
http://www.google.com/intl/en/privacypolicy.html.
The author-date style has long been used by those in the physical, natural, and social
sciences. In this system, sources are briefly cited in the text, usually in parentheses, by
author’s last name and date of publication. The short citations are amplified in a list of
references, where full bibliographic information is provided.
Author-date style has long been used in the physical, natural, and social sciences. In
this system, sources are briefly cited in parentheses in the text by author’s last name and
date of publication. The parenthetical citations are amplified in a list of references, where
full bibliographic information is provided.
Material Parenthetical Citation Reference List
Books in print (Doniger 1999, 65) Doniger, Wendy. 1999. Splitting the
Difference. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
An article in a (Smith 1998, 639) Smith, John Maynard. 1998. "The Origin
print journal of Altruism." Nature 393: 639–40.
An article in an (Kiser 2011, 340) Kiser, Lisa J. 2011. "Silencing the
electronic Lambs: Economics, Ethics, and Animal
journal Life in Medieval Franciscan
18
ACTIVITY 6:
Directions: Identify whether the following format follows APA or MLA Style. Write APA
or MLA.
3. Author(s). Title of Book. City Where Published: Publisher, Year of Publication. Print.
4. Author(s). (Year published). Title of Book:Captial letter for subtitle. City Where
Published, State (if city can be confused): Publisher.
5. Title. (n.d. or date published) In Name of online resource. Retrieved Month date,
year, from http://webaddress.
9. "Episode Title." Title of Program. Title of series. Name of network. Station call
letters, City. Broadcast Day Month Year.
1. Read the following published sentence and then paraphrase it—that is, rewrite it in
your own words. You do not need to repeat every element. Instead, try changing the
focus of the sentence while preserving the meaning of the original.
2. Write an APA Style reference list entry for the published work using the source
information provided. Look up the document type in Chapter 10 of the Publication
Manual and follow the appropriate reference example.
3. Figure out the in-text citation that corresponds to the reference list entry. Then add
a parenthetical citation to your paraphrased sentence. Use the standard citation
formats shown in Table 8.1 of the Publication Manual.
Published Sentence:
Leaders who lack emotional and social competence undoubtedly can become a liability
to organizations, directly leading to employee disengagement, absenteeism, stress-
disability claims, hostile-workplace lawsuits, and increased health care expenses.
Source Information:
• Document type: Journal article (Section 10.1)
• Authors: Kenneth Nowack and Paul Zak
• Publication year: 2020
• Article title: Empathy enhancing antidotes for interpersonally toxic leaders
• Journal information: C onsulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, Volume
72, Issue 2, pages 119–133
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000164
PERFORMANCE TASK 3
WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW
Directions: Make a Literature review of your chosen topic/title. Make an introduction,
the main body and conclusion. Use thematic style in writing a literature review.
(Research Title)
A. Introduction
B. Main Body
C. Conclusion
D. Reference
References
University of Pittsburg Library System, 2021, Citation Styles: APA, MLA, Chicago,
Turabian, IEEEhttps://pitt.libguides.com/citationhelp/ap
7th Edition Paraphrasing and Citation Activities. 2021 https:// -aids/paraphrasing-
citation-activities.pd