Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 2
The Interim report will be marked according to the appropriate inclusion of 5 items.
The Poster will be assessed on clarity of message, subject content, and visual appeal. The final report will be marked on introduction, literature review, methodology, implementation, discussion, conclusion, and presentation. feedback Interim Report> 80% Missing employability engagement. Other components are included. Poster> 47% Too much textual information. Messages are not clearly conveyed to the audience. How is the increase in the use of video games related to your project? Project Report> 25% Introduction: The project aims to develop a simple game to record the reaction time of the user. The objectives are not shown in the report. The codes and the project files are not submitted. There are insufficient screenshots to show the functions of the application. This section is only 170 words long. Overall, what has been submitted does not meet the undergraduate standard.
Literature Review: Missing the whole section of Literature Review in the report.
Methodology: This section gives a brief description on the design of the game. The rationale for the approach was not included. A very simple game was aimed to develop following the Youtube tutorials and Github to start with. I can't see any detailed interface design with the actual function of the game. This section provides a brief summary, comprising 756 words, on the design of the game. However, the rationale for the approach was absent. The designed game was abstract and lacked significant information, testing, and evidence of implementation. While some information on the difficulty and originality of the project is included, it falls short of our expectations for this section.
Implementation: This part comes with some codes, but not organized enough to show how to relate these codes with the different segments in the application (title screen, score counter, difficulty level, crosshair). Only three screenshots to show the results (but the project codes are not submitted). No testing/assessment metrics are given. This section presented the codes; however, it is still not comprehensive enough to explain the main project idea. No critical analysis of the results was included. Only 273 words written for this section.
Discussion: Only three screenshots of the game are given. Without the submission of code and project files, there was no evidence the program was developed successfully. There was no testing of results! The entire section is missing.
Conclusion: Your conclusion should link with the original objectives (which were not given in the introduction part). It is stated that the application can calculate the accuracy correctly, but there was no evidence to prove the claims. No testing and performance evaluation are given. Another poor section with only 224 words. The appraisal of the original aims is missing, as well as the future work.
Presentation: The report is mostly readable, but some missing components - literature review, testing and evaluation. Only have a few (<5) sources in the reference list. The word count of the report is only 3292.
The report is mostly readable but has some missing components, such as the Literature Review, Testing, and Evaluation sections. Additionally, a few sources (only Four) in the reference list are not in the correct format. Overall, the report does not meet academic writing standards for a UG student.
