Shankarrao Moot Proposition
Shankarrao Moot Proposition
Shankarrao Moot Proposition
Ganeshkhind, Pune - 16
17 TH
"SHANKARRAO KANITKAR
NATIONAL
MOOT COURT COMPETITION"
13 - 14 Jan 2023
www.modernlawcollege.org
kanitkarmoot.mlc@gmail.com
Savitribai Phule Pune University Circle, Pashan Road, Ganeshkhind, Pune - 411016
PROF. DR. GAJANAN EKBOTE
Chairman,
Progressive Education Society, Pune
Pune
Pune
PUNE
PUNE
+91 8668903451 +91 9960097704
STUDENT COORDINATORS
institute in Maharashtra situated close to the “Oxford of the East” the Savitribai Phule Pune University.
Established in 2003, Modern Law College has carved a niche for itself. Permanently affiliated to the
Savitribai Phule Pune University, recognised by the Bar Council of India, U/S 2(f) 12 (B) of UGC Act, 1956
and accredited by NAAC Bengaluru, the College stands as one of the best law colleges in Pune.
All the courses are approved by University, which include LL.B. (3 years), B.A. LL.B and B.B.A. LL.B (5
years), Masters in Laws (LL.M.); along with various Diploma programs and iCertificate Courses. The
College is recognised as a PhD. Research Centre by Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune.
The academic excellence is manifested from the results of the students of PES Modern Law College, not
only in academics but also sports and co curricular activities. The students have won laurels for the
college in various state and National level competitions. PES Modern Law College also accommodates
several foreign students from countries like Iran, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, Thailand, and South African
continent etc. with special attention to their orientation, counselling and problems faced in studies.
SHANKARRAO KANITKAR
NATIONAL MOOT COURT
COMPETITION
P.E.S. Modern Law College, gives adequate opportunities to its students for development of
knowledge based skills besides the academic curriculum. The Moot Court Competition
gives the law students the opportunity, for the drafting of briefs (or memorials) and
participating in oral argument. It provides them a real live court room experience and tests
their advocacy skills. Comprehending this thought, Modern Law College, Ganeshkhind,
initiated the Moot Court Competition for the first time in the year 2006. This Moot Court
Competition is named after Late Shri Shankarraoji Kanitkar, who is one of the founders of
Progressive Education Society, of which Modern Law College is a creation. This Moot Court
Competition is one of the most prestigious extracurricular activities in of the Law College.
Modern Law College, annually organizes the Shankarrao Kanitkar Moot Court Competition.
This Competition mainly deals with the current issues of the society which require social
awareness and immediate concern. In the beginning for 9 year it was organised at State
level and provided a platform to all the Law Students from all over the State of
Maharashtra. In the 10th year of the competition Shankarrao Kanitkar Moot Court
Competition was organised at national level and received the huge response from all over
the country. It provides a platform to all the Law Students from all over the country to
actively contribute in the pursuit of Knowledge.
A, was a 24 yr old single woman, having 3 sisters and a mother living in Banipur. She met B, a
28 yr old man and they had a live- in-relationship.
During the cohabitation, A conceived their child. Due to this A asked B, to marry her for
legitimizing their child. However despite multiple requests from A, B refused to marry her.
Already plagued with responsibilities, A did not want to add up to her troubles by being a single
Mother.
A approached to the High court for seeking permission to terminate her 22 week pregnancy out
of consensual relationship.
High Court denied her permission by reference to the provisions of the Medical Termination of
Pregnancy Act 1961, which allowed only married woman to undergo abortion after 20 weeks.
She was not covered in any clauses under MTP Rules, 2003 on account of mental anguish, rape
and health complications.
She approached the Supreme Court on grounds of social stigma & harassment pertaining to
unmarried single parent & continuation of unwanted pregnancy as it would involve a risk of the
grave & immense injury to her mental ,Physical, social and financial health.
Issues:-
1. Whether the rule 3B of MTP Rules 2003 is violative of Article 14 of the Indian Constitution since
it excludes an unmarried woman & deprives her access to safe & legal abortion?
2. Whether denial of Right to abortion violates the right to privacy under provisions of Constitution
of India?
3. Any relevant issue
(Note- This moot problem has been drafted for academic purpose only. All laws and judicial
precedents applicable in India are applicable in this problem)
17th SHAKARRAO KANITKAR NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION
MOOT PROBLEM - 2 (Final Round)
Aryana is the largest democratic country whose laws are similar with that of India. There are
many national as well as regional political parties contributing towards national politics. The
State of Maharajya is one of the prosperous States of Aryana.
In the year 2019, during the Maharajya Legislative Assembly elections, People’s Party and
Garjana Party contested the election jointly under the Royal alliance.
There were two other Political parties who fought as Forward alliance. Due to power sharing
conflict, People’s Party and Garjana Party could not form the Government amicably. As a
result, Garjana Party formed an alliance with the parties in the forward alliance and formed a
separate “Maha forward alliance”.
In the month of June of 2022, one of the MLA’s from Garjana party, Mr. Aloknath Patil,
claimed of having gathered the support of two-third MLAs declared himself as a leader of
Garjana Party.
Meanwhile, the leader Mr. Sudhav Akhade who was the leader of Garjana Party called for an
emergency party meeting in which the rebel Mr. Aloknath Patil and his supporting MLAs
remained absent.
Hence Mr. Sudhav Akhade as a result of clear rebellion urged for the disqualification
proceedings to be initiated against Mr. Aloknath Patil and his supporting MLAs for defecting
from Garjana Party and it was approved by the Deputy Speaker of the Maharajya Legislative
Assembly.
On the same day, two independent MLAs moved a no confidence motion against the Deputy
Speaker.
The Deputy Speaker gave the rebellion MLAs two days to respond to the disqualification
notice. In course of time, a no confidence motion was passed against the Forward Alliance as a
result of the defection of Mr. Aloknath Patil and his supporting MLAs.
Subsequently Mr. Aloknath Patil and his supporting MLAs formed an alliance with the People’s
Party & proceeded to form the Government in the State of Maharajya.
Mr. Aloknath Patil and his supporters challenged the disqualification proceedings before the
Apex Court.
Issues:
1. Does the rebellion by Mr. Aloknath Patil and his supporters amount to defection?
2. Is the MLAs’ rebellion an exercise of inner-party democracy or a unconstitutional of defection?
3. Any relevant issue.
Note: Aryana is a democratic Country like India and all Indian laws/rules/regulations are similar
and applicable to Aryana.
Disclaimer – This moot problem is imaginary. Any resemblance with any fact, case, person or
character is merely coincidental.
Progressive Education Society’s
Modern Law College
Ganeshkhind, Pune 16
17th SHAKARRAO KANITKAR NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION
*All participants are requested to give only one email id
Mobile No _____________________________________
Class _____________________________________
Roll No _____________________________________
Photo of Second
Mobile No _____________________________________ Speaker
Name of the Researcher _____________________________________
Class _____________________________________
Roll No _____________________________________
Mobile No _____________________________________
13. Marks
Written Submission/ Memorial 20 Marks
Substance in Argument 30 Marks
Advocacy Skills 30 Marks
Questions from the Bench 10 Marks
Time Adherence 10 Marks
Total 100 Marks
14. The decision of the judges shall be final, and no disputes shall be entertained in
this regard. Personal Interaction with judges is strictly prohibited.
15. In case of a tie, memorial marks will be considered to determine the winner.
16. The Organizers reserve the right to take appropriate action for any unethical,
unprofessional, and immoral conduct.
17. The Organizers decision as regards the interpretation of rules, situation which is
not contemplated in the rules or any other matter related to the competition will be final.
18. Prizes:
First Rs. 10000 /- Cash + Trophy + Certificate
Second Rs. 7000/- Cash +Trophy + Certificate
Best Speaker Rs. 5000/- Cash + Trophy + Certificate Judge’s Special Appreciation
Certificate (2)
Ganeshkhind, Pune - 16