Surface Electrode Emg
Surface Electrode Emg
Surface Electrode Emg
Initially, Claims Made by the Manufacturers Were Frankly Outrageous, and It Was Easy to Brush Paraspinal EMG off As Useless.
More Recently, However, Literature Is Beginning to Accumulate, and Manufacturers Appear to Have Upgraded the Quality of the Equipment While Downgrading the Claims.
When the Doctor Looks for Answers, It Seems That Only the Manufacturers and Distributors Are Supplying Them.
The Purpose of This Presentation Is to Sift Through the Claims, and Examine the Facts Regarding Paraspinal EMG.
You Should Not Consider Buying a Device Which Measures Something If You Cannot Answer Three Questions:
What Am I Measuring, and What Is Known About It? Is the Device Giving Me an Accurate Measure? What Useful Clinical Information Can Be Gleaned From This Measurement?
This Weekend, I Will Attempt to Present the Facts Necessary to Think Through Each of the Above Questions. In Doing So, Each of You Will Be Able to Make up His/her Own Mind, and Not Just Listen to My Opinions.
Without This Requisite Background, One Has No Chance at All of Critically Examining the Utility of This Technology, in Regard to Their Personal Clinical Needs.
There Are Numerous Problems Which Must Be Overcome Before One Can Say That They Can "Measure Spasm". What Exactly Is a Spasm? There Is an Embarrassing Lack of Information Related to Measuring Muscle Spasm, and the One Study of Interexaminer Reliability Shows Lousy Reproducibility. Ironically, Our Assessment of It Significantly Effect the Lives of Millions of People Each Year.
Surface Electrodes
This Is Really an Apples and Oranges Question, or at Least a Question Which Is Oversimplified And, Hence, Unanswerable. For What Purpose Is the Electrode Is Being Used? It Would Be Quite Painful to Look for Insertional Activity With a Surface Electrode.
It Is Generally Accepted That a Surface Electrode Is Superior for the Assessment of Global Myoelectric Activity. If You Are Looking for General Activity of Muscle Tissue in a Particular Area, the Surface Electrode Is Superior.
If You Are, However, Looking for Information Regarding a Specific Piece of a Specific Muscle, Then a Needle or Wire Has an Obvious Advantage. In Fact, Even Tiny Movements (.1 Mm) Can Significantly Alter the Day to Day Reliability of Needle Electrodes.
Most Equipment Manufacturers Will State That Surface Electrodes Are More Reliable, and Site Papers As Sources of Proven Reliability (Reproducibility). It Should Be Noted That Virtually All of These Studies Regard Peripheral Musculature. Spector at New York Chiropractic College Did Do a Very Good Study on Paraspinal Muscles and Attached Surface Electrodes, Reporting Excellent Reliability Coefficients.
If the Readings From Attached Surface Electrodes Are Reliable, We Must Next Ask How Does the Procedure of "Scanning" Emg Compare to Attached Surface Electrodes.
Thompson Et. Al. And the Mayo Clinic Study Are Often Sited As Proof of Scanning Electrode Reliability As Compared to Attached Surface Electrodes. Attached Surface Electrodes Were Never Even Used in This Study.
Thompson Was Attempting to See If a 2 Second Average of Integrated (MAP) Was Sufficient for a Reliable Reading. His Conclusion Was That It Was Not. He States That Only 37% of the Sites Sampled Fell Within an Acceptable Range With a Two Second Scan.
One of His Conclusions Stated, "a Longer Integration Period Enhances the Validity" and "A 10 Second Integration Period Would Improve the Quality of the Data Obtained..." This Raises a Significant Question As to the Reliability of Scanning Electrodes. A Properly Designed Reliability Study for Scanning Electrodes Versus Attached Surface Electrodes Should Be Undertaken.
Once the Issue of Reliability Is Addressed, One Must Ask If the Reading Is an Accurate Reflection of Myoelectric Activity. To Determine This, Let Us First Consider Variables Regarding Apparatus Detection and Recording of Signals.
"It Is Important to Remember That the Characteristics of the Observed EMG Signal Are a Function of the Apparatus Used to Acquire the Signal As Well As the Electrical Current Which Is Generated by the Membrane of the Muscle Fibers".
If the Filter Is Narrow at the Point of Signal Acquisition, It Does Not Matter What Band Width Is Available From That Point on. Like a Funnel Turned Upside Down.
Tissue Filtering
The Amplitude of Action Potentials Decreases to 25% Within 100 um. The Thickness of the Fatty and Skin Tissues Must Also Be Considered. The Tissue(s) Behaves As a Low-pass Filter Whose Bandwidth and Gain Decreases As the Distance Increases.
The Muscle Tissue Is Highly Anisotropic. Orientation of the Detection Surfaces of the Electrode With Respect to the Length of the Muscle Fibers Is Critical. Dirt, Oils, Etc. Must Be Removed From the Skin, So That They Do Not Distort the Signal. This Can Be Accomplished by Cleaning the Skin With an Abrasive, Or, Minimally Wipe It With Alcohol and Allowed to Dry Prior to Taking a Reading.
Electrode-electrolyte Interface
Behaves As a High-pass Filter. The Gain and Bandwidth Will Be a Function of the Area of the Detection Surfaces, Electrolytic Treatment of the Surfaces, and Any Chemical-electrical Alteration of the Junction. The Detection Surfaces Should Always Be Kept Clean.
This Property Ideally Behaves As a Band-pass Filter. However, This Is Only True If the Inputs to the Amplifier Are Balanced and If the Filtering Aspects of the Electrode-electrolyte Junctions Are Equivalent. A Larger Interdetection Surface Spacing Will Render a Lower Band-width. This Aspect Is Particularly Significant for Surface Electrodes. The Greater the Interdetection Surface Spacing, the Greater the Susceptibility of the Electrode to Detecting Measurable Amplitudes of Emg Signals From Adjacent and Deep Muscles.
A Rule of Thumb Is That the Electrodes Will Detect Measurable Signals From a Distance Equal to the Interdetection Surfaces Spacing. However, the Anisotropy of the Tissues Beneath the Electrode May Augment the Sensitivity of the Electrodes Along the Surface of the Muscle Creating Cross-talk. An Interdetection Surface Spacing of 1.0 Cm Is Recommended for Surface Electrodes.
Amplifier Characteristics
Values Should Minimally Distort the EMG Signal Detected by the Electrodes. Length of the Leads to the Preamp Should Be As Short As Possible and Should Not Be Susceptible to Movement. The Necessity of This Precaution Is Accentuated When Amplifiers With High Input Impedance Are Used.
Gain: Such That It Renders the Output With an Amplitude of Approximately +- 1v. Input Impedance > 10-12 Ohms Resistance in Parallel With 5 Pf Capacitance. Common Mode Rejection Ratio: > 100 db. Input Bias Current: As Low As Possible (Typically Less Than 50 Pa).
Noise < 5uv RMS. Bandwidth (3 Db Points for 12 Db/octave Rolloff). Surface Electrodes 20500 Hz. Wire Electrodes 20-1000 Hz. Monopolar and Bipolar Needle Electrodes for General Use - 20-1000 Hz.
The Bandwidth Filter of the Amplifier Is a Point of Contention Among Manufacturers. Median Frequency of the Power Density Spectrum Appears to Provide an Appropriate Representation of Biochemical Events Within the Muscle. It Is Well Documented That in Sustained, Constant Force Isometric Contraction, a Shift Toward Lower Median Frequencies Occurs, As the Muscle Fatigues.
Along With Decreasing Frequency Is an Increase in Amplitude. These Phenomenon May Be Due to Recruitment of Muscle Fibers, Motor Unit Synchronization, And/or Conduction Velocity Changes of Muscle Fibers.
One Must Carefully Define the Term "Muscle Fatigue" Before Determining How the Phenomena of Greater Amplitude and Lower Frequency of Emg Signal During Active Voluntary Muscle Contraction Can Be Clinically Applied.
Physiologically, Muscle Fatigue Does Not Happen All at Once. Histologically There Is No "Point of Fatigue", Just a Continuum of Chemical Changes Leading to an Eventual Clinical Failure of the Patient to Perform the Task.
The Emg Signal Under Voluntary Muscular Activity Has Been Extensively Studied. It Is Expressed As a Percent of (MVC). It Holds Excellent Prospects for Clinical Application in Assessment of Back Pain Patients.
Whether This Is the Same As "Spasm" Is Doubtful. Methodology for Signal Acquisition Must Be Meticulously Performed, "Placement Determination by Bony Landmarks Is Unacceptable".
Roy and Deluca
Other Considerations
It Is Preferable to Have the Subject, the Electrode, and the Recording Equipment in an Electromagnetically Quiet Environment. However, If All the Procedures and Cautions Discussed Are Followed and Heeded, High Quality Recordings Will Be Obtained in the Electromagnetic Environments Found in Most Institutions, Including Hospitals.
A Recent Article by Wolfe, Wolfe and Segal From Emory University Reveals That "Extraneous Movements Such As Neck Flexion and Pelvic Rotation Can Elicit Profound Activity From Percutaneously Placed EMG Electrodes While Little Change Is Seen at the Skin Surface."
So, Tissue Filtering, Electrodeelectrolyte Interface (Skin Preparation), Electrode Configuration, Amplifier Characteristics, Recording Characteristics, Electrode Location and Other Considerations Will All Effect the Accuracy of the Signal Being Measured. It Is Important to Check Into Manufacturers Specifications and Approaches to Each of These Variables, and See If They Are Satisfactorily Considered.
This Is a Difficult Question to Answer. Much Available Literature Is Not Published in Peer Reviewed, Referred Journals and Even the Referenced Literature Is Filled With Questionable Methodologies, Contradictions and Hardware Considerations. Let Us Begin With a Review What Is Known Regarding Paraspinal Muscle Function.
Commonly They Comprise (From Superficial to Deep): the Semispinales, the Multifidi, and the Rotatores Muscles. Some Contend That Deep Rotator Muscle Paralysis Is the Cause of Idiopathic Scoliosis. It Has Been Demonstrated That There Is Increased Muscular Activity on the Convex Side of the Scoliotic Curve.
As the Slowly Flexing Trunk Is Lowered, the Activity in Erector Spinae Increases Apace and Then Decreases to Quiescence When Full Flexion Is Reached. If an Attempt Is Made Then to Force Flexion Further, Silence Continues to Prevail in the Erector. In Full Flexion, Then, the Weight of the Torso Is Borne by the Posterior Ligaments and Fasciae-the Posterior Common Ligament, the Ligamentum Flavum, the Interspinous Ligaments, and the Thick Dorsal Aponeurosis.
With the Subject Standing, the Activity in Erector Spinae Ceases Earlier During Forward Bending Than It Does When Seated. In Some Patients They Find Complete Relaxation in the Sitting but Not the Standing Posture.
In Standing Erect, Activity in the Erector Spinae Is Not Required, Except for Forced Extension. In the Initial Stages of Flexion of the Trunk in Bending Forward, the Movement Is Controlled by the Intrinsic Muscles of the Back.
It Has Also Been Shown That the Position of Full Flexion While Seated (Slouching) Is Maintained Comfortably for Long Periods and That During This Time the Erector Spinae Remains Relaxed.
In Most Subjects Standing in a Relaxed Erect Posture Showed a "Low Level of Discharge" in the Erector Spinae. Small Adjustments of the Position of the Head, Shoulders, or Hands Could Be Made Which Would Abolish the Activity of the Muscle, I.E., An Equilibrium or Balance Could Be Achieved.
From the Easy Upright Posture, It Has Been Found That Extension (Hyperextension) of the Trunk Is Initiated, As a Rule, by a Short Burst of Activity.
Flexion of the Trunk to One Side Is Accompanied by Activity of the Erector Spinae of the Opposite Side "Antagonist. If the Back Is Already Arched in Hyperextension, Not Even This Sort of Activity Occurs. The Recording of Activity From Both Right and Left Erectores During Bending to Either Side Has Also Been Shown, and There Is a Pattern of Cooperative Activity and Not a Simple Simultaneous Antagonism.
Erectores Spinae Contract (Vigorously) During Coughing and Straining. This Occurs Even in the Midst of Their Normal Silence, Whether the Subject Is Erect or "Full-flexed." The Clinical Implications of This Last Observation Should Be Explored.
It Has Also Been Reported That the Erector Spinae Remained Relaxed During the Initial Movement of Lifting Weights of up to 56 Lbs. It Is Movement at the Hip Joint That Accounts for the Earliest Phase of Apparent Extension of the Trunk. However, the Ligaments of the Back Were Required to Carry the Added Weight Without Help From the Adjacent Muscles.
During the Performance of Various Trunk Movements, Deep Muscles Showed Patterns of Activity That Clearly Showed Two Functions, Sometimes They Initiate Movement, and at Other Times They Stabilize the Trunk. Almost All the Movements Recruit All the Muscles of the Back in a Variety of Patterns, Although the Predominance of Certain Muscles Is Also Obvious.
In Compound Movements, When Subjects Are Not Trying to Relax, There Is Constantly More Activity Than When the Movement Is Carried Out Deliberately and With Conscious Effort to Avoid Unnecessary Activity of Muscles. Complete Relaxation and Lower Levels of Contraction Are the "Ideal" Rather Than the Rule for Normal Bending Movements. Muscles That Might Be Expected to Return the Spine to the Vertical Position Often Remain Quiet; That Suggests That Such Factors As Ligaments and Passive Muscle Elasticity Play an Important Role.
A Position of Complete Silence Is Easily Found for Iliocostalis in the Erect Position, but With Slight Forward Swaying Activity Is Instantly Recruited. Forward Flexion and Rotation in the Flexed Position Bring Out Its Strongest Contractions, but It Is Also Fairly Active in Most Movements of the Spine.
Multifidus and Rotatores Have Rather Similar but Not Identical Activity. With Movements in the Sagittal Plane, They Are Active As They Also Are in Contralateral Rotary Movements. Yet, Like All the Other Muscles, These Too Relax Almost Completely During Full Flexion, Leaving the Trunk Practically Hanging on Its Ligaments.
In a Systematic Exploration of the Intrinsic Muscle of the Spinal Column During Various Exercises Widely Advocated for Physical Fitness, It Was Found That the Semispinalis Capitis and Cervicis Apparently Help to Support the Head by Continuous Activity During Upright Posture. This Finding Contradicts Other Studies.
In Almost All Vigorous Exercises Performed From the Orthograde Position, It Has Been Found That the Most Active Muscle Is Spinalis; Next in Order Is Longissimus, and Least Active Is the Iliocostalis Lumborum. Nevertheless All Three Muscles and the Main Mass of Erector Spinae Act Powerfully During Strong Arching of the Back in the Prone Posture. During Push-ups, There Is Considerable Individual Variation But, Typically, the Lower Back Muscles Remain Relaxed.
Simple Side-bending Exercises of the Trunk Do Not Recruit Erector Spinae As Long As There Is No Concomitant Backward or Forward Bending. This Clearly Refutes Earlier Opinions Whose Authors Had Ignored Movements in the Ventrodorsal Plane That Do Involve Erector Spinae. Much of This Work Has Been Confirmed, and the Technique Has Been Adopted for Ergonomics by Tichauer.
Deep Muscles
Variations in the Pattern of Activity During Forward Flexion, Extension, and Axial Rotation Suggest That the Transversospinal Muscles Adjust the Motion Between Individual Vertebrae. The Experimental Evidence Confirms the Anatomical Hypothesis That the Multifidi Are Stabilizers Rather Than Prime Movers of the Whole Vertebral Column
The Interpretation of Electrical Activity Presents Some Difficulties. Did a Muscle Showing Activity Produce the Movement, Prevent the Movement, or Was It Contracting Isometrically? Therefore Emphasis Must Be Placed on the Occurrence of Electrical Silence, Knowing That the Muscle Tested Was Not Taking Part in the Movement Under Observation. Decreasing or Increasing Activity During a Movement Also Seemed to Be Functionally More Important Than Unchanging Activity.
One Study by Anderson Et. Al. Attempted to Relate Paravertebral Muscle Function to Disc Pressures, and Found That the Amplitude of the EMG Signal and Pressure Increased Both With Angles of Forward Flexion and With Increasingly Static Loads in Flexion. During Asymmetric Loading, Pressure Values and Myoelectric Activity Increased, Being Greater on the Contralateral Side of the Lumbar Region and Ipsilateral Side of the Thoracic Region. The Disc Pressure, Intraabdominal Pressure, and Semiintegrated Rectified EMG Signal Were Higher Throughout When the Trunk Was Loaded in Rotation, Rather Than in Lateral Flexion.
Lumbar Muscles Have Been Shown to Be Inactive During Relaxed Sitting but Showed Some Activity in Straight Sitting and in the Standing Posture. This Finding Is in Agreement With the Results of Most Other Workers. Disc Pressure and Myoelectric Activity Change Together. When the Back of a Seated Subject Is Supported, Levels of Both Pressure and EMG Signal Fall. In This Study It Was Confirmed That Intramuscular Wire Electrodes Are Superior to Surface Electrodes in the Study of Intrinsic Back Muscles (Anderson Et Al, 1974, 1977).
Morris Et Al (1962) Found That Flexionrelaxation Can Occur, but They Felt That in Normal Bending Movements the Back Muscles Remained Frequently Active. Spontaneous Electrical Silence of the Lumbar Muscles in Extreme Flexion Has Also Been Found in Subjects, but Only Half of Them Showed Spontaneous Inactivity of Their Thoracic Muscles in Both Seated and Standing Postures.
Flexion/Relaxation Phenomenon
This Flexion-relaxation Phenomena Has Been Validated by Numerous Studies, and Does Appear to Be Absent in a Percentage of Low Back Pain Patients.
During the Valsalva Maneuver With Increased Intrathoracic and Abdominal Pressure While Holding a Sandbag of 11.25 Kg, All Thoracic and a Number of Lumbar Muscles Showed Activity Instead of Electrical Silence.
While Inactivity of the Back Muscles During the Last Stage of Flexion Can Be Explained in That the Muscles Are No Longer Needed and Ligaments Are Holding the Vertebral Column, There Is No Explanation of Why These Muscles Do Not Always Become Active Immediately When Extension Is Begun. Instead, There Frequently Are Short "Bursts" of Activity That Occur (Especially in the Lumbar Region) When the Movement of Extension Is Half Completed.
It Therefore Appears That in Most Persons the Lumbar Transversospinal Muscles Do Not Initiate Extension From the Fully Flexed Position.
Lifting Weights With Different Mechanical Advantages Seemed to Indicate That in Most Instances More Energy Is Used in the Lumbar and Thoracic Back Muscles When the Object Lifted Cannot Be Brought Close to the Line of Gravity of the Subject. Investigators Also Noticed Increased Activity of the Back Muscles When the Center of Gravity Was Shifted Forward.
In One Study Less Than Half of the Examined Subjects Showed the Expected Activity of the Transversospinal Muscles of the Thoracic Region, Whereas More Than Half of the Subjects Showed the Expected Activity in the Lumbar Region. This Finding Is Somewhat Surprising Considering That Most of the Actual Rotatory Movement Occurs in the Thoracic Region.
Paradoxical Activity of the Deep Muscles Was Found in Five Subjects at the Thoracic and in Three Persons at the Lumbar Level. In the Lumbar Region the Muscular Activity Seemed More Often to Support the Theory of Rotatory Function. On the Other Hand, the Position of Articular Facets in Relation to the Direction of Muscle Pull Casts Doubt on the Anatomical Feasibility of Such a Function.
Perhaps the Designation of Specific Function Is Almost Impossible in the Back, Where We Have a Complex Arrangement of Muscle Bundles Acting on a Multitude of Equally Complex Joints. Those Who Insist on Finding Prime Movers, Antagonists, and Synergists in the Genuine Musculature of the Back Will Be Always Disappointed.
In a Wire Electrode Study of Intrinsic Muscles, a Tokyo Orthopedics Team Was Unable to Provide Validation for Reeducation Exercises Widely Advocated and Used in France. Rather Than Abandon the Exercises, They Suggested That the Transversospinal Muscles Are Stabilizers and That This Function Is Important.
Standing
Continuous Activity of the Back Muscles in the Lower Thoracic Region During Standing Has Been Reported. The Activity of These Muscles Appears to Depended on Their Relation to the Line of Gravity. The Segments of the Vertebral Column Located Further Posterior to the Line of Gravity Had the Tendency to Fall Forward, a Movement That Was Counteracted by the Back Muscles. The Thoracic Muscles Showed a Greater Tendency to Remain Active, While the Lumbar Muscles Acted With "Bursts" of Electrical Potentials.
Some Muscles Apparently Contract Unnecessarily. These Contractions Were More Often Seen in Women and Untrained Men. Further Confounding Any Attempt to Seek What Is Normal for All.
Asymmetry
There Are Some Differences in Activity of the Transversospinal Muscles at the Same Levels. This Asymmetrical Activity Occurred During Quiet Sitting and Standing but Was Also Noted With Movements in the Sagittal Plane.
Wolf and Basmajian (1980) and Wolf Et Al. (1979) Assembled and Analyzed Quantified Data Correlating Normal Back Movements With the EMG Activity in 121 Adult Subjects Who Reported No History of Low Back Discomfort. EMG Records Were Obtained From Vertical Pairs of Surface Electrodes Placed Bilaterally 3 Cm From the Midline at the L3-4 and L4-5 Levels. Recordings Were Made of a Range of Possible Movements While Standing and Sitting (With the Pelvis Stabilized).
Differences in Left- and Rightsided Mobility Are Minimal And, As Expected, Men Showed a Significantly Greater Excursion in Vertebral Separation During Complete Trunk Flexion
Significantly Greater Activity Occurred During Extension From the Flexed Trunk Position Than Vice Versa for Each Electrode Pairing. For Rotational Movements in the Standing or Sitting Postures, Greater Activity Was Seen During Rotation Contralateral to the Location of a Unilaterally Placed Electrode Pair. The Magnitude of This Activity Level Was Not Significantly Greater for Male or Female Subjects.
During Stooping or Squatting Movements, Males Demonstrated Significantly Greater Activity Than Females for Recordings at All Electrode Placements, Except the Lower Bilateral Pair.
All Results in Relation to the Mechanical Advantage, Center and Line of Gravity, and the Possible Axis of Movement Confirm the Idea That the Transversospinal Muscles Act As Dynamic Ligaments. These Adjust Small Movements Between Individual Vertebrae, While Movements of the Vertebral Column Probably Are Performed by Muscles With Better Leverage and Mechanical Advantage (for Details, See Donisch and Basmajian, 1972).
Normative Data
Cram and Also Matheson Have Accumulated Normative Data for Nonpain Patients but One Must Be Extremely Careful Relying on This Data. Both Studies Used the Narrow Band Equipment. Wider Frequency Filters Will Detect More EMG Signal, and Therefore Readings Will Vary. The "Normal Range" Is Very Broad. Cram's Data Has Come Under Scrutiny for Statistical Error.
Finally Meeker and Others Have Been Unable to Detect Differences Between Pain and Non-pain Controls Using This Data. Most Manufacturers and Distributors Readily Admit to the Problem With Normative Data, but Speak of Side to Side Asymmetries. As Noted Above, Not Enough Is Known About Complex Acting Intrinsic Back Muscles to Know What Degree of Asymmetry Is Normal.
Recently, Some Very Impressive Studies, Specifically Sihvonen and Coworkers From Finland, and Arena and Co-workers in Augusta Georgia, Have Had Success in Differentiating Back Pain Patients From Non-pain Controls. Arena States That Disk Patients Had the Most Significant Findings, and Urges for Diagnostic Categorization of Patients for Future Studies. It Is Proposed That the Lack of Diagnostic Criteria Is Responsible for the Contradictory Findings of Earlier Investigators.
Conclusions
"Electromyography Has a Great Deal of Practical Value in This Area And, Aside From Some General-but Important Observations Recorded Above, Much Remains to Be Learned by This Technique, Especially About the Fine Functioning of Various Areas and Depths of the Intrinsic Muscles of the Back". Basmajian and Deluca