The document discusses physical vulnerability to hazards, noting that learners should be able to conduct hazard hunts to identify exposed physical elements and propose corrective actions, and understand why certain structures are more vulnerable than others to specific hazards based on factors like their design, materials, and engineering. It also provides examples of structural, non-structural, and functional vulnerabilities from an earthquake in Bohol and discusses vulnerabilities of different building typologies.
The document discusses physical vulnerability to hazards, noting that learners should be able to conduct hazard hunts to identify exposed physical elements and propose corrective actions, and understand why certain structures are more vulnerable than others to specific hazards based on factors like their design, materials, and engineering. It also provides examples of structural, non-structural, and functional vulnerabilities from an earthquake in Bohol and discusses vulnerabilities of different building typologies.
The document discusses physical vulnerability to hazards, noting that learners should be able to conduct hazard hunts to identify exposed physical elements and propose corrective actions, and understand why certain structures are more vulnerable than others to specific hazards based on factors like their design, materials, and engineering. It also provides examples of structural, non-structural, and functional vulnerabilities from an earthquake in Bohol and discusses vulnerabilities of different building typologies.
The document discusses physical vulnerability to hazards, noting that learners should be able to conduct hazard hunts to identify exposed physical elements and propose corrective actions, and understand why certain structures are more vulnerable than others to specific hazards based on factors like their design, materials, and engineering. It also provides examples of structural, non-structural, and functional vulnerabilities from an earthquake in Bohol and discusses vulnerabilities of different building typologies.
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 21
PHYSICAL VULNERABILITY
Content Standard • The learners demonstrate understanding of various elements that may be exposed to hazards including physical, social, economic, and environmental. Performance Standard • The learners shall be able to: conduct hazard hunts of exposed element and propose corresponding corrective actions of one’s preparedness. Learning Competencies • The learners are able to: – analyze why certain structures are more vulnerable to specific hazards than others. (DRR11/12 Ic-10) Specific Learning Outcomes
• I will be able to:
– explain the structural vulnerabilities of physical structures with respect to different hazards; and – distinguish between structural, non-structural and functional vulnerabilities OCTOBER 15, 2013: BOHOL EARTHQUAKE -Details of the event (time of day, day of the week, magnitude of the earthquake), impacts of the earthquake on exposed elements, number of people killed, injured and affected, economic damage resulting directly or indirectly from the earthquake. Also research eye witness accounts of the earthquake. BACLAYON CHURCH (BOHOL EQ DAMAGE) Baclayon Church ruins after 7.2 magnitude earthquake.mp4 CARMEN (BOHOL EQ DAMAGE) Carmen, Bohol, epicenter ng 7.2 magnitude na lindol (OCT152013).mp4
Bohol October 2013 Earthquake - Villa Teresita Resort
CCTV - Cebu Philippines.mp4 PIC: Undamaged house of the 2013 earthquake (BOHOL EQ)
Bohol ghost town struggles after quake.mp4
CASITA MODULE 5
Guide Questions: I. What is the difference between structural, non- structural, and functional vulnerability? II. For earthquakes, what are the causative factors of structural vulnerability? III. What particular types of structures (typology) are vulnerable to earthquakes (flood, or typhoon)? CASITA MODULE 5 Guide Questions: IV. Why are non-engineered or owner constructed structures generally more vulnerable than engineered structures. V. What general categories comprise the non- structural elements at risk? Give local examples for each of these categories. CASITA MODULE 5 Guide Questions: VI. In the modules gives examples of functional vulnerability in terms of the operations of a hospital. Identify what elements would be at risk with regards to the functional vulnerability of a school? DISCUSSION • Structural vulnerability pertains to the vulnerability of parts of the building structure that carry load such as the columns, beams, floor, or roof. • Non-structural vulnerability pertains to the vulnerability of the parts of the building structure that do not carry loads such as walls intended for partitioning the interior space of a building into individual rooms, ceiling tiles, or decorative moldings or finishes. DISCUSSION • Functional vulnerability pertains to the ability of the structure to function properly. For example if the stairway collapses or elevator becomes inoperable, mobility within the structure is affected. DISCUSSION • Causative factors: (structural vulnerability- EQ) include the : • a.) location of the structure, • b.) number of buildings and space in between buildings, c.) number of stories, shape, symmetry, age of building, construction typology • d.) age of the building, and • e.) alterations to the building and use of the building. DISCUSSION: Structures that are vulnerable to EQ
• Masonry structures that are brittle and massive are
generally vulnerable to earthquake. • Light structures made from bamboo and straw are generally vulnerable to typhoon and strong winds. • Timber structures are generally vulnerable to flood. Steel structures are vulnerable to fire. DISCUSSION: Engineered vs. Non-engineered Structure • An non-engineered structure: is a structure that has been designed and constructed without proper supervision from an architect and/or engineer. They generally are designed to withstand normal conditions, but often are not designed to resist wind or earthquake loads that would have been considered had an architect or engineer designed and supervised the construction. DISCUSSION: General categories comprise the non-structural elements at risk • Non-structural vulnerabilities include: partition walls, ceilings, lighting fixtures, door frames, mechanical equipment, plumbing and sewerage, electromechanical devices (elevators or machines). Note that non-structural vulnerabilities pertain to elements of the structure or its contents that can either fall or move around and kill/injure people or damage property within the structure. Examples would include walls or ceilings falling or the occupants of a school or hospital during an earthquake. DISCUSSION: Functional Vulnerability (Hospital & School) • Examples of functional vulnerabilities for a hospital would be damage to electrical systems which would prevent electrical life support equipment in the hospital from being operated. • Example of functional vulnerabilities for a school would include the roof being damaged during a strong typhoon leaving the school building exposed to elements and preventing the holding of classes. ENRICHMENT • Video presentation: – 1. Resonance: – Why do buildings fall in earthquakes_ - Vicki V. May.mp4 – 2. Soft Storey: – We Can Solve the Soft-Story Problem.mp4 ENRICHMENT • Video presentation: – 3. Effects of typology on seismic response: – Shaking table test on strenghtened existing masonry building.mp4 – Concrete Hollow Block House testing by JICA and PHIVOLCS.mp4 • Question: Building Typology: Based on the PHIVOLCS video, why are non-engineered structures more vulnerable that engineered structures. Based on the videos why are masonry structures more vulnerable that timber structures?
Perancangan Dan Implementasi Pengukuran Kinerja Supply Chain Produk Ferrosulfat Kristal Dengan Pendekatan Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) Pada PT - Kimia Farma TBK Plant Watudakon
Perancangan Dan Implementasi Pengukuran Kinerja Supply Chain Produk Ferrosulfat Kristal Dengan Pendekatan Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) Pada PT - Kimia Farma TBK Plant Watudakon
