Incident Command System
Incident Command System
Incident Command System
Chapter 3
Managing The
Incident:
Incident Command
System
Textbook Page
87
Chapter 3 - 1 © Hazardous Materials - Managing the Incident 2005
HAZARDOUS Managing The Incident: ICS
Managing The Incident
MATERIALS
Objectives
• List The Categories Of Players And Participants At A
Hazardous Materials Incident.
• Identify The Key Organizational Elements Of The Incident
Command System.
• Describe The Concept Of Unified Command, And Its
Application And Use At A Hazardous Materials Incident.
• Identify The Key Elements Of The Incident Command System
Necessary To Coordinate Response Activities At A Hazardous
Materials Incident.
Objectives
• Identify The Duties And Responsibilities Of The
Following Hazmat Group Functions Within The
Incident Command System: [NFPA 472 - 6.4.1.2]
• Backup
• Decontamination
• Entry
• Hazmat Group Management
• Hazmat Group Safety
• Information/Research
• Reconnaissance
• Resources
Introduction
• Direct, Effective Command And Control Operations
Are Essential At Every Type Of Incident.
• This Chapter Will Review The Fundamental
Concepts Of Incident Management And Its
Application At A Hazmat Incident.
• Primary Topics Will Include:
• The Various Players Who Characteristically Appear At A
Hazmat Incident
• The Elements Of The Incident Command System (ICS)
• The Functions And Responsibilities Of The Hazmat Group
• “Street Smart” Tips
The Players
• Fire/Rescue/EMS Companies
• Police Officers And Law
Enforcement Personnel
• Emergency Response Team (ERT)
• Hazardous Materials Response Teams (HMRT).
• Special Operations Teams
• Communications Personnel
• Responsible Party
• Facility Managers
• Support Personnel
The Players
• Technical Information Specialist
• Environmental Clean-up
Contractors
• Government Officials
• News Media
• Investigators
• Victims
• Spectators
• The Bad Guy
• The Hazardous Material
92
Chapter 3 - 9 © Hazardous Materials - Managing the Incident 2005
HAZARDOUS Managing The Incident: ICS
Managing The Incident
MATERIALS
ICS Elements
• Division Of Labor
• Lines Of Authority Are
Clearly Defined
• Unity Of Command
• Optimum Span Of Control
• Establishment Of Both Line
And Staff Functions
Modular Organization
• The ICS Organizational Structure Develops In A
Modular Fashion Based Upon The Size And Nature
Of The Incident.
• The System Builds From The Top Down, With Initial
Responsibility And Performance Placed Upon The
IC.
• At The Very Least, An IC Must Be Identified On All
Incidents, Regardless Of Their Size.
• The Specific ICS Organizational Structure Will Be
Based Upon The Management Needs Of The
Incident.
Integrated Communications
• Communications Are Critical To The Safe And
Efficient Incident Management.
• Communications Are Managed Most Effectively
Through The Use Of A Common Communications
Center And Network.
• Whenever A Situation Is Encountered Which Could
Immediately Cause Injuries The Term “Emergency
Traffic” Should Precede The Radio Transmission.
• Communications Of A Sensitive Nature Should Not
Be Given Over Non-secure Cellular Telephones Or
Radios Which Can Be Monitored.
106
Chapter 3 - 25 © Hazardous Materials - Managing the Incident 2005
HAZARDOUS Managing The Incident: ICS
Managing The Incident
MATERIALS
110
Chapter 3 - 34 © Hazardous Materials - Managing the Incident 2005
HAZARDOUS Managing The Incident: ICS
Managing The Incident
MATERIALS
114
Chapter 3 - 48 © Hazardous Materials - Managing the Incident 2005
HAZARDOUS Managing The Incident: ICS
Managing The Incident
MATERIALS
Incident Potential
• The Development Of Strategies And Tactics To
Defeat The Enemy Must Be Based Upon The
Assessment Of Incident Potential.
• Elements Of Incident Potential Can Include:
• Incident Severity
• Magnitude And Duration Of The Event
• The Nature Of the Incident
• The Degree Of the Incident Impact
Incident Potential
• What Are Some Of The Causes Of A Delayed
Assessment Of Incident Potential?
• Responders Get So Focused Upon The Tactical Problem
That They Fail To Consider The “Big Picture” Or Strategic
Aspects Of The Incident.
• Response Agencies That Think They Can Do It All.
• Belief That A Request For Mutual Aid Or Assistance Might
Involve Acknowledging A Mistake.
• Defining A Problem Down To A Manageable Level.
• Inexperience.
• Lack Of Information
Decision-Making
• The Decision-Making Process Begins With Both
Command And The Hazmat Group Leader
Recognizing The Need To Avoid “Dead-end”
Decisions.
• Whenever Possible, Decisions Must Be Open-
ended, Allowing For Expansion Or Reversal.
• Distinguish Between Assumptions And Facts.
• Maintain A Flexible Approach To Decision-making.
• Shift To A Management Role After Initiating Action.
Information Is Power
• Emergency Scene "Intelligence" Can Rapidly
Supply Command And The Hazmat Group With
Random Data And Information.
• Tactical Worksheets Can Facilitate This Process
• But Information Quality And Quantity During The Initial
Stages Of An Incident Are Sometimes Incomplete.
• Fog of War = Fog of The Emergency
• Equally Critical Is The Ability To Manage And
Disseminate Information In A Timely Manner.
• Most Information Has A “Half-life,” In That It Is Valuable For
A Limited Period Of Time.
Information Is Power
• There Is Often A Reluctance For On-scene
Personnel To Provide Regular And Timely Updates
To The ICP Or EOC.
• In The Heat Of Battle, The Operations Section May
Start To Reduce The Flow Of Information To The
Remainder Of The ICS Organization.
• This Creates a “Black Hole”
• Whoever Controls the Flow of Information Controls
the Incident
Liaison Officer
• Hazmat Incidents Pose A Multitude Of Technical,
Managerial, And Political Issues.
• ICS Is An Effective And Necessary Tool For
Ensuring That The Internal, Technical, And
External/Political Aspects Of An Emergency Are
Addressed.
• The Liaison Officer Is Sometimes Viewed As The
“Political Officer” Who Serves As The Point Of
Contact For All Assisting And Cooperating External
And Governmental Representatives.
119
Chapter 3 - 63 © Hazardous Materials - Managing the Incident 2005
HAZARDOUS Managing The Incident: ICS
Managing The Incident
MATERIALS
Random Thoughts
• Command Must Be Aware Of All Major Decisions
And Operations Made Under His/Her Jurisdiction.
• From The Time Of Arrival On Scene, The IC Must
Prioritize Problems And Develop Solutions By
Collecting Information
• The Effective IC Will:
• Seek Out Data That Is Current, Accurate, And Specific
• Delegate Information Retrieval
• Know How To Find Reference Data And How To Use It
• Collect The Right Information In The Right Order
• Use A Wide Variety Of Sources
Random Thoughts
• Managing A Major Hazmat Incident Is No Different
Than Taking An Army To War
• Solicit Opinions And Ideas—they Foster Both
Individual And Organizational “Buy-in” Into The
Decision-making Process
• Emergency Responders Often Seek Direction On
How To Handle A Decision-making Situation Where
The IC Or A Senior Officer Does Not Agree With A
Subordinate’s Recommendation.
Random Thoughts
• Never Say Never When Dealing With A Long-term,
Campaign Operation.
• Consider The Art Of Communications. Effective
Communications Is One Part Talking And Ten Parts
Listening.
• When An Incident Goes Bad Or Is Particularly
Politically Sensitive, Anticipate Being The
Scapegoat.
• Consult And Build A Consensus On The IAP
• Document Everything
• Not Assume Anything
Summary
• The Successful Management Of A Hazmat Incident
Is Directly Linked To The Rapid Development Of An
Effective Incident Management Process And
Organization
• A Functional Hazmat Command System Must Allow
The Incident Commander To Use The Standard
Elements Present At Every Hazmat Incident To
Establish And Maintain Control
• Apply The Same ICS System And Process To Every
Incident, Regardless Of Its Nature And Size.
Summary
• Your Emergency Response Performance Will Be
Evaluated On Two Interrelated Factors:
• The Implementation Of A Timely, Well-trained And
Equipped Emergency Response Effort In The Field
• The Effective Management Of The Interpersonal,
Organizational, And External Impacts Created By The
Incident.
• An Effective Response Effort Can Be Compromised
Or Completely Negated By Poor Management Of
The Political And External Issues.