Jet Engine Design

Jet Engine Design
2 3 4 5
1 6 Idealized air-standard
Brayton cycle
diffuser combustion chamber turbine nozzle

compressor T 4
P=constant
• 1-2 Isentropic compression in diffuser qin
• 2-3 Isentropic compression through compressor 3 5
• 3-4 Constant pressure heat addition
in combustion chamber
• 4-5 Isentropic expansion through turbine 6
2
• 5-6 Isentropic expansion in nozzle qout
• 6-1 Constant pressure heat rejection 1 P=constant
s
Problem Statement
A jet aircraft moves with a velocity of 200 m/s where the air temperature is 20°C
and the pressure is 101 kPa. The inlet and exit areas of the turbojet engine of the
aircraft are 1 m2 and 0.6 m2, respectively. It is known that the exit jet nozzle
velocity is 1522 m/s (from lab calculation) if the exhaust gases expand to 101
kPa at a temperature of 1,000°C. The mass flow rates of the inlet and exhaust
flow are 240 kg/s and 252 kg/s, respectively. As a thermal engineer, your task is
to (a) determine if the temperature of the exhaust gases is too high for the turbine
blades as they exit from the combustion chamber. (b) Determine the amount of
combustion energy necessary to provide the thrust. The maximum tolerable
temperature of the blades is 3,000 K. It is known that the pressure ratio of the
multi-stage compressor is 8 to 1.
Assumptions and simplifications:

• neglect all losses and irreversibilities. All processes are isentropic.
• Neglect all kinetic energy components except at the inlet and the nozzle.
• Air and fuel mixture behaves as an ideal gas and has the same thermal
properties as the air.
• All shaft works produced by the turbine are used to drive the compressor.
• Air (& mixture) has a constant CP=1 kJ/kg.K, and k=1.4
Procedures
• Between sections 1 and 2, the incoming flow slows down to increase both the
pressure and the temperature before it enters the compressor section. It is an
isentropic process. 3 4 5
2 2 1 2 6
V V
h1  1  h2 , CPT1  1  CPT2
2 2
V12 (200) 2 /1000
T2  T1   293   313( K )
2CP 2(1)
( k 1) / k
T2  P2 
From isentropic relation:  
T1  P1 
k /( k 1) 3.5
 T2   313 
P2  P1    101    127.3( kPa )
 T1   293 
• Across the compressor, the pressure is further increase to eight times of P 2 and this
is accompanied by an increase of temperature also. P3=8P2=1018.4(kPa)
( k 1) / k
T3  P3 
Isentropic compression:   , T3  T2 (8) 0.286  567.3( K )
T2  P2 
Procedures (cont.)
• The shaft work of the compressor is equal to the difference of enthalpy
before and after the compressor.
Wcompressor  m I ( h3  h2 )  m I CP (T3  T2 )  (240)(1)(567.3  313)  61037( kJ )
• The same amount of shaft work is produced across the turbine section as
assumed.
Wcompressor  Wturbine  m mixture (h4  h5 )  m m CP (T4  T5 )
 (240  12)(1)(T4  T5 )  61037( kJ )
T4  T5  242.2( K ). That is, there is a 242.2 K temperature drop as
the mixture expands through the turbine.
• In order to determine the temperature entering the turbine (T4), we need to

find the temperature exiting the turbine (T5) and it is related to the temperature
exiting the nozzle (T6) as it is expanding in the nozzle through an isentropic
process. 2 2 2
V6 V (1522) /1000
h5  h6  , T5  T6  6  1273   2431( K )
2 2CP 2(1)
Procedures (cont.)
• Therefore, the temperature of the hot gas entering the turbine section will be
at a temperature of T4=T5+242.2=2673.2(K) and it is below the maximum
tolerable temperature of 3,000 K.
• The total thermal energy supplied into the engine can be determined as the
difference of the energy in and out of the combustion chamber:
Q  m m h4  m a h3  CP [(252)T4  (240)T3 ] 
(1)[(252)(2673.2)  (240)(567.3)]  537494( kJ )
Power output TV
The overall efficiency of the engine= 
Heat input Q
 (335.5)(200) / 537494  12.5% (thrust data obtained from lab-6)
This is significantly lower than the Brayton cycle's efficiency
 =1-rP(1-k)/k  44.8%, where rP : pressure ratio across the compressor
• Note: I neglect the energy of the fuel by assuming that is small compared to
the combustion energy.
Propulsion Efficiency
Define propulsion efficiency as the ratio of the thrust power (PT) to the rate of
production of propellant kinetic energy (PT+PL). Where the total kinetic
energy is the sum of the thrust power and the power that is lost to the exhaust
jet (PL).
The power lost to the exhausted jet is equal to:
1
PL  m (V6  V1 ) 2 , where V6  V1 is the absolute velocity of the jet
2
The thrust power is equal to:PT  TV1  m (V6  V1 )V1
PT
The propulsion efficiency: P 
PT  PL
P 
m (V6  V1 )V1

2  
V1
V6

2
,
m (V6  V1 )V1  m  V6  V1 
  1 
2
 V1
2 1 
V6
where  is the velocity ratio
Propulsion Efficiency & Turbofan
1 • The propulsion efficiency

0.8 increases as the velocity ratio is
propulsion efficiency
increased.
0.6 • It reaches a maximum at v=1
 ( v) and =1. No lost kinetic energy
0.4 but also no thrust since V1=V6.
• It also suggests that in order to
0.2
increase the propulsion efficiency
0 one would like to operate at
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 relatively low jet nozzle velocity.
v • In order to avoid the loss of
velocity ratio thrust, the mass flow rate has to
be increased.
• Consequently, turbofan engine is a more efficiency engine as compared to

the turbojet engine since the fan can induce large amount of the propellant into
the engine and can operate at a relatively low jet exhaust speed.
Gas Power Cycle - Jet Propulsion Technology, A Case Study
Pratt_Whitney Turbojet Engine
Pratt-Whitney Turbofan Engine

Jet Engine Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Jet Engine Design

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Jet Engine Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Jet Engine Design

diffuser combustion chamber turbine nozzle

Assumptions and simplifications:

• In order to determine the temperature entering the turbine (T4), we need to

1 • The propulsion efficiency

• Consequently, turbofan engine is a more efficiency engine as compared to

Pratt-Whitney Turbofan Engine

You might also like