Onomasiological and Semasiological Characteristics of Different Units of Lexicon
Onomasiological and Semasiological Characteristics of Different Units of Lexicon
Onomasiological and Semasiological Characteristics of Different Units of Lexicon
SEMASIOLOGICAL
CHARACTERISTICS OF
DIFFERENT UNITS OF LEXICON
Irrespective of the lexico-grammatical
class to which a word belongs, it may be
characterised in the contrasted languages
from two sides:
a) from its onomasiological side, i.e. from
its structure and nomination capacity
b) from its semasiological or
content side.
The onomasiological characteristics of a
word are displayed through its
morphological structure and its
categorial (if any) meaning.
Thus, the verb goes (the root go + es
inflexion) has the categorial meanings
of person, tense, aspect and voice
whereas the noun songs (song + s
inflexion) has only the category of
number (singular and plural).
From the semasiological side
words may be
WORDS
MONOSEMANTIC POLISEMANTIC
The semantic structure of the bulk of
English nouns, for example, is richer
than that of the Ukrainian nouns
FOR EXAMPLE
• ЧОВЕН,
• BOAT СУДНО/КОРАБЕЛЬ,
ШЛЮПКА
• COAT • ВЕРХНІЙ ОДЯГ, ПАЛЬТО,
ПІДЖАК,КІТЕЛЬ, ХУТРО
(ТВАРИН), ЗАХИСНИЙ
ШАР ФАРБИ НА
ПРЕДМЕТІ
Ukrainian words may sometimes have a
complicated semantic structure as well.
FOR EXAMPLE
• ПОДОРОЖ • CRUISE, JORNEY,
TRAVEL, TRIP, TOUR,
VOYAGE
• ЩЕ • STILL, YET, AS YET,
MORE, ANY MORE,
AGAIN, ELSE, BUT
Isomorphic if not universal is also the
existence of monosemantic words which are
sometimes represented by a whole lexico-
grammatical class, as it is in case of all
• pronouns,
• numerals,
• conjunctions
• various
nomenclature
words
(terms).
For example: we, she, nobody, ten, thirty,
and, or, atom, oxygen, sugar, today; він,
вони, десять, перший, і/та, чи,
кисень, цукор, сьогодні, торік, etc
Other means
of nomination
outer
inner means (borrowed)
means
• separate
morphemes,
• words,
• word-groups
• separate
sentences
The inner means of nomination include:
1) morphemes; 2) words;
3) phrases/word-groups and 4)
sentences.
Words in all languages constitute the
main means of nomination. Thus, in
English and Ukrainian they constitute
about 75 % of all nominations
Structurally they may be: a) simple words
(book, boy, new, alone, be, this, known,
ten, there, soon; книжка, хлопець,
новий, сам, знати, п'ять, скоро, там,
добре, etc.);
b) compound words (blackboard, classroom,
homework, schoolboy, steamship, railway,
etc.)
Or in Ukrainian: добродій, літописець,
книголюб, мовознавець, першочергово,
перекотиполе, лиходій, чортзнащо,
Білогородка, Незовибатько, Добридень,
Панібудьласка, etc
Very productive in present-day English but
rare in present-day Ukrainian is the
wholophrasal compounding; cf. break-
through, sit-in, commander-in-chief, merry-
go-round
occasionalisms like a to-be-or-not-
to-be question, a don't-beat-me-or-I-
shall-cry expression (on his face),
etc.
Compounds of this type belong
to rare stylistic exotisms in
Ukrainian. Cf. Наталка "теє того
як його" (І. Котляревський),
Грицько "чи то я, чи не я"
(Г.Тютюнник), "Йосип з гроша
здачі" (Б. Харчук). Common and
equally productive in the
contrasted languages is the
nomination by means of word-
groups and sentences (usually
nominative): fine weather гарна
погода, take part брати
участь,. The rain. The welcome
rain. (Longfellow) Вечір. Ніч.
(Тичина).
These same sentences are nominative in
English: Twilight. Night. Nominative sentences
may also be extended in both contrasted
languages. Cf. A lady's chamber in Bulgaria in a
small town near the Dragoman Pass late in
November in the year 1885. (B. Shaw) Мокрий
сніг, дощі і тумани, тумани. (М. Стельмах).
The semantic structure of
the bulk of what nouns is
richer?
a) English
b) Ukrainian
Inner means of nomination does not incude:
a)morphemes;
b)words;
c) groups of sentences
d) phrases/word-groups
e) sentences
How many percents do the
words constitute among the
means of commnication?
a) 55
b) 65
c) 75