Avatar

BlueCat Writer

@bluecatwriter

Classic lit, fanart and fic

Welcome to my Tumblr! You can call me BlueCat (any pronouns are fine). I like to write fic and draw silly lil Gothic/Victorian lit characters.

All my Ao3 fics are linked above. Mostly Dracula, with some other Victorian and Gothic lit too: 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, The Picture of Dorian Gray, Frankenstein, and Moby Dick.

You can also check out...

Avatar
Reblogged
Anonymous asked:

Carmilla is not original conflicted vampire in literature. Varney the Vampire was conflicted vampire in 1840s already. He even committed suicide by throwing himself into Mount Vesuvius to end it all. Many of today's standard vampire tropes also originated in Varney: Varney has fangs, leaves two puncture wounds on the necks of his victims, comes through a window to attack a sleeping maiden, has hypnotic powers, and has superhuman strength.

Carmilla was influenced and inspired by Varney. All other multi-dimensional vampires or takes on vampires exist also thanks to Varney.

I admit that you got me there, BUT Carmilla does have something that Varney does not have which is pure unfiltered inmortal teenage angst. And yeah! It's really interesting to see how all of the tropes about vampires that we have today sort of pile from every single vampire related piece of literature that has one. It's almost like a collaborative work that spawned from centuries ago that is still going to this day to build what literature calls classic vampire stories.

Let's see what we can trace from the beginning until we run into Carmilla:

  1. The creature Strigói from romanian mythology, linked to vampirism thanks to characteristics like: Not eating garlic and onions, avoiding incense, and how towards the feast of Saint Andrew they sleep outdoors. It has been around Romania for a long time, and it's most early mentions was the story of Jure Grando Alilović who lived from 1579 to 1656. He is possibly the first person to be described as a vampire, or in the correct language a strigói.
  2. The vampire from Der Vampir by Heinrich August Ossenfelder, a poem published in 1748. It references the vampire outside the figure of the Strigoi.
  3. The bride from The Bride of Corinth by Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe, a german poem published in 1797. Starring a female figure as the vampire.
  4. Geraldine from the unfinished two part narrative ballad Christabel by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, published in 1816. She has vampiric like qualities, and a "terrible but undefined" mark on her chest.
  5. The infamous lord Ruthven, from the Vampyre which was published in 1819 by John William Polidori. The first cohesive story about vampirism entails.
  6. Anthony Gibbons, and the Prince from The Black Vampyre: A Legend of St. Domingo by Uriah Derick D’Arcy, also published in 1819. Introduces the literary concept of the dhampir, and the first story to feature black vampires.
  7. Vampirismus or Aurelia by ET Hoffman, published in 1820. The narrative focuses on the rise and downfall of Aurelia after transforming into a ghoul who has vampire like qualities.
  8. Brunhilda from Laßt die Todten ruhen by Ernst Raupach, published in 1823. It features the reanimation, and transformation of a person into a vampire, along with the consequences that it brings.
  9. Alinska from La Vampire by Etienne-Léon de Lamothe-Langon, published in 1825. It shows the rather tragic transformation of a vampire via suicide.
  10. Lady Clarimonde from La Morte Amoureuse, published in 1836 by Théophile Gautier. Establishing the trope of the female vampire as a figure of seduction.
  11. The mysterious Stranger from Der Frembe by Karl Von Wachsman, published in 1844. features the use of vampiric powers like turning into fog to enter the chambers of their victim, and wolf control.
  12. The titular Varney the Vampire by James Malcolm Rymer and Thomas Peckett Prest, published around 1845 to 1847. Another instance of the vampire being presented as a victim of its nature, and a more complex character work.
  13. Carmilla Karnstein (She's here! ♥️) from Carmilla by Sheridan Le Fanu, published in 1872. Introduces the prototype literary trope of the lesbian vampire.
  14. The Gorcha family from The Family of the Vourdalak by Aleksey Konstantinovich Tolstoy, published in 1884. It plays with the concept of vampires transforming their loved ones into vampires.
  15. Count Dracula and the Weird Sisters from Dracula by Bram Stoker, published in 1897. Establishes the modern tropes, look, and notions of the vampire in popular culture.

Wow... those are lots of vampires!

Edit: Christabel, Aurelia, and Alinska added thanks to the important note of @wiliecoyotegenius!

Avatar
Avatar
Reblogged

It's often said that Carmilla influenced Dracula, but usually it's left at that.

Hopefully I'll expand on this soon, but one of the Carmilla influences on Dracula can be found in Lucy Westenra:

  • Lucy and Carmilla are both victims of a vampire who bit them, attacked them in their beds, and turned them.
  • Both of them died ill, shy of turning 20.
  • Both Carmilla and Lucy slip through cracks and locked spaces that are otherwise impossible to get through.
  • Both are seen at night in white.
  • Both of them move at night in a trance-like state when spotted by outsiders (among trees with Carmilla, among graves with Lucy). Lucy's sleepwalking could have been influenced by Carmilla's nightly trances, from when she prowls to feed.
  • Both of them will choose a random victim at night, feed on them, and then leave them to their fate, to hunt another day (Carmilla with the villagers, Lucy with the children). The difference is that Carmilla's feedings prove fatal after a few days.
  • Carmilla and Lucy both have a target with whom they have formed a bond. They see this person not as a source of sustenance, but as someone they want to accompany them in undeath (Carmilla with Laura, Lucy with Arthur).

Lucy has similarities with Laura as well, in that both of them are also the same age, from an old, known family, in peril of turning into a vampire, and are being kept in ignorance by parental/male figures. The narratives have differing attitudes towards the latter point.

You might be frustrated by the library never having a complete manga collection on its shelves at any given time, but the 12 year old checking out 14 volumes of One Piece at once is vital to the library ecosystem. He's like the sea otter keeping the kelp forest from being devastated by an excess of sea urchins.

To those curious some other keystone library species include:

—the retirees who’ve read more murder mysteries than I’ve had hot meals

—the paperback romance girlies (gender neutral) who check out every single bodice ripper the second it hits the shelves

—the dads very slowly making their way through a ‘1001 movies to see before you die’ list

—the one-man criterion collection who checks out like, three movies per day and brings them back the next. (TV series are only a minor roadblock.)

—kids who like Minecraft

---The new parents checking out 47 picture books for their 7 month old baby who clearly has nothing going on in their head except the Wii Sports Resort theme song

Just in case

I’m actually going to reblog a thing just because this is really important.

As someone who has epilepsy and used to have several grand mal seizures a day, I’d also like to add that “offer help” can range anywhere from keeping the person calm to explaining to them where they are and what they were doing to even just telling them they should sit and rest for a while longer (lack or coordination is common, and it can be hard to walk straight or see clearly).

It’s okay for them to take up to a half hour to fully regain their bearings and sort out what they were doing prior to the seizure. Just answer any questions calmly and be there for support.

If they come around and you start to panic or shake them or ask them what the heck is wrong with them they are going to freak out and panic too.

I cannot stress it enough that this is bad.

If someone has a seizure and they come out of it, please. please stay calm. They are likely disoriented and confused, even if it’s only for a minute or two, and you don’t want them panicking on top of that because they can have another seizure as a result.

Avatar
felicityredbarrow

IMPORTANT

IMPORTANT because last year a kid in my class had a seizure, none of us even knew he was at risk for them either so just cause you don’t think you know anyone doesn’t mean you don’t 

stay safe

I have to stress how important it is to time a seizure. If it lasts more than a few minutes, call an ambulance.

DO NOT CALL THE POLICE. I’m dead fucking serious. I had a grand mal in public once and the POLICE were called and imagine coming out of the seizure, feeling like you got smacked in the head with a sack full of bricks, confused, dazed, in desperate need of some sugar to boost low blood pressure and some DIPSHIT has called the police and I was being threatened with being ‘drunk and disorderly’. It took a phone call to my doctors office to get them to back off. The police cannot properly deal with sick people

Offer help can be:

  • assuring person where they are/what time it is
  • getting them something to drink if they can; seizure burns so much energy and does cause a blood pressure drop
  • getting them safely to transport or a carer
  • getting them some dignity like a blanket/towel [loosing control of your bladder and bowels is fucking horrifying]
  • ensuring they have a way to get home. Someone who has just had a seizure should NEVER DRIVE straight after
  • calling emergency services if you notice any of these symptoms because they may have stroked out.

Why you shouldn’t put anything in someone’s mouth: they will choke. Yes, they may bite their tongue but I can assure you it’s less traumatic than cracking your jaw on someone’s greasy wallet or choking on a spoon.

DO NOT HOLD ANYONE DOWN. Example: someone pinned my right shoulder mid-seizure a few years back and how I have a permanently displaced and clicking shoulder. Let the person flail around, those muscles are out of control and restraining them does cause more damage to the patient and you.

do people have no shame anymore?

LISTEN. Do I like this?? NO, absolutely not, fuck the planet burning automatic plagiarism machine!

BUT! Look at me. LOOK AT ME!

It is VITAL that we do not flame in the tag. Do you know what will happen then?? PEOPLE WILL STOP TAGGING FOR GENERATIVE AI!!!

If you want to preserve your ability to filter a lot of this nonsense out? WALK AWAY. Rant on here, rant to your friends, rant in Discord, but DO NOT make asshole comments on these works!!!

Yeah. If they stop tagging their work for this, your blocking of the tag won't keep them out of your searches. In fact, don't give stories with this tag engagement of any kind. Don't give them hits. Don't give them comments. Leave them to rot in the field with nothing to suggest to other readers that they contain anything worth seeing.

Also: AO3 is an archive. Of fanworks that were created. Do we like how they were created? No. But they were created. There's plenty of stuff on AO3 that we don't like. Remember Don't Like Don't Read? This counts too. This is why we have filters and back buttons.

@onwinedarkseas point missed re: the meaning of an archive. Archiving the historical moment When Kids Were Using The Plagerism Machine, And This Is What It Made has value. Blocking and filtering and such is fine. Removing your own works from an archive if you don't want them archived there is fine. But invective at the people who are pointing out the value of a wholly uncensored archive is not cool.

Feel free to block people who use AI at AO3. Block them everywhere you can find them, if you want.

If you flame them publicly - they won't stop using AI. They'll just stop telling people about it.

As long as they're tagging for it, you can avoid the stuff. If they stop tagging, then you wind up with AI results mixed in your normal searches.

Eventually, they will stop making AI-generated fanworks. Either they'll want to write things outside the scope of AI, or they'll get bored with the lack of praise, or they'll stop only when the AI tech bubble collapses. Either way, it's a temporary thing. Document it while it's going on and ignore it until it's not around anymore.

My doctor: Okay so one of the side effects of these steroids is that your baby might not be moving as much, so don't get freaked out and just pay attention for those subtle movements.

Me: Okay, got it.

My baby, every day since I started the course of steroids: IT'S FUN TO STAY AT THE YYYYY-M-C-A!!

Mosquitoes actually are not replaceable in any ecosystem that naturally has them and that includes replacing them with any of the non biting species because these are the traits that make them so core to food webs:

  • Tiny
  • Can use every single pool of moisture to raise generations no matter how dirty and stagnant and low in oxygen
  • Can fly
  • Males get by on just sugars
  • Females take protein from larger animals to manufacture thousands more eggs

All these things combined allow thst ecosystem to make huge volumes of insects from conditions barren to most other macroscopic life. You might think there are other insects that seem to make huge massive swarms out of nothing but there's really nothing that hits all the same qualities *except other insects that also suck blood.*

It's the precise combo of being able to "prey" on things millions of times larger and breed in nothing but a few drops of filthy rainwater or the moisture in a rotten log. That's the most efficient combination for anything that size to multiply that rapidly where nothing else can even survive, except of course the things that can move in because they eat them :)

A lot of people ask "could they just not be itchy though?" and I regret to inform that isn't actually their doing, there's no evolutionary advantage to making you itchy. That's your own body detecting the intrusion of another creature's saliva into your skin, where it doesn't belong, and reacting with histamines.

If you've ever been bit hard enough by a cat, dog or even human you may notice a similar effect!

I remember having a conversation with someone about my hummingbird banding volunteering and how the data went toward support for conservation efforts among other things.

They were all for that, and loved hummingbirds and supported it!

And made a quip about how the only thing they wanted to see extinct were mosquitoes and small biting insects/fruit flies.

40 to 60% of a hummingbird’s diet, and their main source of other nutrients, is small, soft bodied insects.

Including mosquitoes and fruit flies.

They had a massive struggle not wanting to accept that no fruit flies and mosquitoes = no hummingbirds.

Bluebirds also eat tons of mosquitoes!

I've also added this on other big threads about this topic but I should add it here: Being INCREDIBLY OBNOXIOUS to larger animals, even when they aren't spreading any pathogens (and again, most mosquitoes don't!) actually is another vital purpose. Ecosystems need biting and stinging things to keep big, stompy, hungry beasts from getting too cozy. Mammals are the most resource-hogging animals in almost any biome but parasites can inhibit their growth a little (a good thing), discourage them from spending as much time in the same area or ward them away from whole areas to begin with. Mosquitoes in particular breed in filthy, stagnant bacteria-rich water. You know what leaves behind conditions like that? ANIMALS! Animals eating all the plants, wallowing in the mud and shitting everywhere! A herd of ungulates can turn a lush and healthy marsh into just a cesspit if nothing stops them. But it's mosquitoes that find a cesspit an appealing nursery. And then you get a cloud of mosquitoes so dense that the ungulates move on! There used to be a great BBC documentary that actually showed "mosquito season" driving a mass migration of African megafauna but the shittified search engines right now are only showing me articles about mosquito control no matter how I try to find this again, gee thanks, maybe someone else can find it? So while the "mosquitoes are bad" all the big animals leave for months. Months of the plants growing back, months of the water clearing up until it's drinkable again (and the mosquito larvae themselves are filter feeders!), months of the mosquitoes becoming food for tiny birds and lizards and arachnids and amphibians, and the beautiful wetland is back again strong enough to survive the repeat of that cycle the next year. Everything you hate in nature - the ticks, the territorial wasps, the stinging plants - are pretty much nature's immune system. Obviously this doesn't mean the big mammals are "bad" either. The cycles of destruction are themselves also something ecosystems come to rely on as a regulatory force :)

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.