Avatar

here for a good time not a long time

@cordycepsfem

men have been doing this to women for months and i only seem to hear about it on radblr but the second a woman does it to a man it gets 40k likes and “it’s never ok to sexualize anyone like that”

Avatar
scumbhag
Avatar
scumbhag

They're blind when it's happening to women and become fuckn Daredevil when it happens once to a man

Avatar
Reblogged

This is flat out not correct.

The Illinois male was visiting Florida. He planned ahead of time to go use the women’s restroom at the Florida State Legislative Building.

He was so committed to his plan that he wrote to every single Florida State Legislator ahead of time to tell them his plan. He included a picture of himself and told them he was sure they would find it in their hearts to allow him access to the women’s restroom.

So when he showed up, the police were waiting for him. They asked him to stay out of the women’s restroom. He went in anyway. The dude did all this and was actually surprised at his arrest.

and the icing on the shit cake is that moids are comparing him to Rosa Parks.

Avatar
Reblogged

She fully didn't watch the segment because Jon did a very nuanced, thoughtful segment. He drilled down to kids just wanting to have a community and have fun.

What these TERFS are pissed off about is that he showed how disingenuous y'all are when you go "omg that trans athlete hit a ball really hard and it hurt a cis women" because when you look into it cis women even on their team hit harder then them. Because he pointed out that cis girls harm each other in sports all the damn time. He pointed out that when there was a bill to protect cis women athletes against sexual predators like coaches. Y'all decided not to pass that while passing an anti-trans bills all while claiming you just care about protecting women.

Riiight. He also 100% lied about she won saying they did not actually research stuff when that is just a fabrication. Glosses over that every man on a womans team has taken the place of a woman that actually deserves to be there. And conflated (as you yourself are doing) radical feminisim with conservatives when that couldn't be further from the truth. Sad hack comedian does a bad job "covering" the issue and you think thats a win. I really wish authoritarian leftist could get some introspection

Someone in the notes saying “She’s going to earn herself a Last Week Tonight episode” and we all know she is not. Because then John Oliver would have to actually look into what she’s saying and more people would be agreeing with her, which we just can’t have.

"He drilled down to kids just wanting to have a community and have fun."

They are welcome to start their own sports teams and have community there. They don't have to take over girls' spaces. Girls deserve to have a community and have fun too.

I think every computer user needs to read this because holy fucking shit this is fucking horrible.

So Windows has a new feature incoming called Recall where your computer will first, monitor everything you do with screenshots every couple of seconds and "process that" with an AI.

Hey, errrr, fuck no? This isn't merely because AI is really energy intensive to the point that it causes environmental damage. This is because it's basically surveilling what you are doing on your fucking desktop.

This AI is not going to be on your desktop, like all AI, it's going to be done on another server, "in the cloud" to be precise, so all those data and screenshot? They're going to go off to Microsoft. Microsoft are going to be monitoring what you do on your own computer.

Now of course Microsoft are going to be all "oooh, it's okay, we'll keep your data safe". They won't. Let me just remind you that evidence given over from Facebook has been used to prosecute a mother and daughter for an "illegal abortion", Microsoft will likely do the same.

And before someone goes "durrr, nuthin' to fear, nuthin to hide", let me remind you that you can be doing completely legal and righteous acts and still have the police on your arse. Are you an activist? Don't even need to be a hackivist, you can just be very vocal about something concerning and have the fucking police on your arse. They did this with environmental protesters in the UK. The culture war against transgender people looks likely to be heading in a direction wherein people looking for information on transgender people or help transitioning will be tracked down too. You have plenty to hide from the government, including your opinions and ideas.

Again, look into backing up your shit and switching to Linux Mint or Ubuntu to get away from Microsoft doing this shit.

there are multiple options here depending on how comfortable you are digging into your computer's registry. You can either simply disable it surface level through settings or excise it entirely from the system registry

Reblogging so I can do this later. They're coming for the gay comics makers any day now.

She fully didn't watch the segment because Jon did a very nuanced, thoughtful segment. He drilled down to kids just wanting to have a community and have fun.

What these TERFS are pissed off about is that he showed how disingenuous y'all are when you go "omg that trans athlete hit a ball really hard and it hurt a cis women" because when you look into it cis women even on their team hit harder then them. Because he pointed out that cis girls harm each other in sports all the damn time. He pointed out that when there was a bill to protect cis women athletes against sexual predators like coaches. Y'all decided not to pass that while passing an anti-trans bills all while claiming you just care about protecting women.

Riiight. He also 100% lied about she won saying they did not actually research stuff when that is just a fabrication. Glosses over that every man on a womans team has taken the place of a woman that actually deserves to be there. And conflated (as you yourself are doing) radical feminisim with conservatives when that couldn't be further from the truth. Sad hack comedian does a bad job "covering" the issue and you think thats a win. I really wish authoritarian leftist could get some introspection

Someone in the notes saying “She’s going to earn herself a Last Week Tonight episode” and we all know she is not. Because then John Oliver would have to actually look into what she’s saying and more people would be agreeing with her, which we just can’t have.

They really think explaining it over and over is somehow going to make it meaningful. Seeing an attractive person and being ready to jump their bones with zero other information is not a definitive form of human sexuality. Secondary attraction only is normal. Needing a secondary attraction first to feel primary attraction is normal. YOU ARE NORMAL. And for fucks sake none of this makes you gay adjacent.

Demisexual was made up on this fucking website as part of a role playing game. How embarrassing that now there’s people insisting it’s really and they’re oh so special and oppressed for *checks notes* needing to know someone a bit more before wanting to fuck them

Not wanting a one night stand and wanting to date for a while before having sex doesn’t make you special, it makes you NORMAL

also: your sexuality is about the sex of the people you are attracted to, not the minute details of how you feel attraction. same sex? homosexual. opposite sex? heterosexual. both? bisexual. neither? asexual. whether you want to jump them after knowing them for 5 minutes or you want to take it slow and build up an emotional connection first doesn’t affect your sexuality.

not to mention supposed “demisexual” people also feel primary attraction. if even after knowing and loving someone for a while you wouldnt wanna fuck them if you didnt find them sexually attractive

iconic

Avatar
totallysaneamber

They really said, “no you really are cringe, it’s scientific”

I’d bet actual money that one of the stereotypes listed was that “ace people aren’t interested in sex” which is like…the actual definition of human asexuality. The reviewer was doing their due diligence if so lol

It used to be the definition of asexual. If you look back at mainstream news articles from the late 00’s to early 10’s that’s the description you’ll find, but there’s now a ton of posts/cartoons/etc on social media claiming that asexuality is only a lack of sexual attraction, and that someone who has sex all the time still counts as asexual.

It’s the same kind of mission creep that means mainstream orgs like the NHS now talk about non-binary people as if that were a real thing.

Do share the screencaps

Ask and you shall receive!

I’ve limited myself to ones that specifically say ‘asexual’ rather than ‘aspec’ or similar.

(I’m putting a ‘keep reading’ in because it looks like we can no longer put photos next to each other. Also, content warning for sex toys!)

EDIT: looks like the ‘keep reading’ thing isn’t working any more …

EDIT2: It works on the blog, but not on the dashboard.

There are several reasons for this redefinition of asexuality:

1. Under queer theory any and all boundaries/definitions must be made fluid. There must be no boundaries males can’t override.

2. The definition being made fluid turned it into an identity anyone can claim, and therefore ripe for commodification, leading to more people calling themselves ace thus more people who will buy ace merchandise. Capitalism approves.

3. Straight people can now claim to be asexual which also somehow means they are in the lgb(t) community and they are of course oh so oppressed for it.

4. Teenage girls began calling themselves asexual as a way to set hard boundaries to avoid coercive and unwanted advances from porn-sick males in a sex-positive hookup-obsessed culture. Asexual used to mean no.

Of course males (and their female fandom) didn’t want vulnerable girls to have any valid way to say no to sex, so they started to flood social media with stories about how asexuality doesnt mean no to sex you are just an acephobic bigot, asexuals totally can have sex, asexuals can in fact love sex, i’m asexual and i love having sex and giving my boyfriend a blowjob to show i care about him, thereby making it harder for a lot of girls to find a way to say no or to make them believe they are wrong for saying no. That’s a form of grooming.

Very good points, especially in regards to porn culture.

It’s the same with ‘demisexual’ as an identity; not wanting to jump into bed with a stranger used to be normal human behaviour, now women and girls have to claim a special identity to be ‘allowed’ to say no to casual sex.

#4 is so huge. ive seen so many girls and women call themselves ace just bc theyre not ready for relationships or sex… and live in a hypersexual culture

in addition some boys and men think theyre asexual bc they dont like porn and are creeped out by the idea of objectifying women sexually (they will find other ways to objectify women)

Women protest against men entering women's locker rooms✋🏼🖖🏼

i hate that media always frame discussions about males in women's spaces as women objecting to trans people in general. the issue is not a trans colleague using the changing rooms. the issue is a male colleague using the changing rooms. his gender identity does not come into it: they would object equally strongly to a non-trans male using the women's changing room. and a trans-identified female colleague would be allowed in women's changing rooms. the core issue is maleness, not transness.

Trans activism is men’s rights activism. 

Avatar
that1betch

Funny how trans rights activists and men’s rights activists have exactly the same goal: destroy female safe spaces and opportunity for women.

Avatar
lesbian-lizards

They are both ultra-conservative in many of the same ways: categorizing the sexes via gender stereotypes, hatred of women and gay people, wanting to destroy female spaces and female class consciousness, the list goes on. The only real difference is conservatives see trans women are lower tier/failed men while transactivists see them as gods.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.