Saying being trace is racist is like saying being transgender is sexist. I get it, new things may make you uncomfortable, but you need to stop with your bias. Trace individuals aren't hurting anyone, the same way Transgender people are not hurting anyone.

Heart breaking to see so many tracephobic Trans people.

Transgenderism IS sexist and rooted in stereotypes.

Transracialism IS racist and rooted in stereotypes!

Hope this helps.

the paralells to incel men who identify as cute anime girls are so clear here

you say to a man fetishizing women and girls “you are male” and they hear “i am an OGRE who will NEVER BE LOVED and have to perform masculine stereotypes and BODYBUILD and abuse women and burn art”

they are so sexist their ideas around sex and gender are disorted. the same way this person hears “you are not white” as “you are [insert all the racist slurs and stereotypes they listed]”

j.k. rowling is probably the biggest example of why i say that TERFs and GC’s aren’t the same group of people and they have a different orientation towards enforcing patriarchy. because rowling isn’t even pretending to be a “feminist.” she never posts about feminist politics. she’s a straight woman doing what they do best i fear (derogatory).

yeah no she only founded a shelter for female abuse victims that she also funds and helped save over 100 female lawyers and their families from taliban kill lists but whatever

Yeah but she doesn’t post about it, how are we supposed to know?!

She actually does post, though, a lot. OP doesn't know because they don't actually read what the women they've been told to hate actually say. Good little soldiers don't question orders.

ok, for those of you who don't know, jk rowljng donated £70k to an organisation of Scottish women who wanted the legal definition of a woman to be based on biological sex alone in the uk. today they had this ruled for in court.

the legal definition of a woman in the uk is now based purely on biological sex, likely preventing trans people from changing their sex on legal documents. we are still apparently protected from discrimination though.

the worst part of this is that news reports have been treating this as a good thing. jk rowling is painted as an amazing person in school assemblies. after doing not only what she does on twitter, but actively funding the discrimination of trans people.

Even news stations leaning left have said this causes for celebration. They emphasise and amplify the voices of those who champion this rewriting of human rights and dignity.

More like even the most tolerable left leaning media have woken up to how misogynistic the modern trans community is. Women deserve single sex spaces. Trans women need to make their own spaces.

"Re-writing human rights and dignity," hello? You guys have been trying to re-write the definition of woman, and your efforts to do that have violated the human rights and dignity of every woman who had to share a prison, locker rooms, bathroom, shelter, sorority house, female support group, etc with a male. Women want spaces away from males and its our right to have them.

We know from global history in all stretches of time and space, that trans people have always existed. When we as human beings started to ravage, invade, and colonise, we systematically snuffed and murdered gender non conforming identities.

Unfortunately we were the ones who rewrote womanhood and manhood to how we understand it today.

This is a free, accessible fact and is not hidden from you. You cannot claim the trans community is taking away your rights when your ancestors made sure to burn anyone who did not conform at the stake.

your points and my rebuttals:

1. trans people have always existed.

no, gender non conforming people have always existed. somehow there was no cohort of children killing themselves before hormones and surgery were invented for cosmetic procedures. interesting. gender non conforming people have always existed, i and and many other radfems are gender non conforming people too. but not adhering to the sexist stereotypes of your current society does not change your sex, and it does not make sex irrelevant. women are still victimized by men. due to sex, not how gender conforming me are.

2. we rewrote womanhood and manhood and how we understand it today.

correct. every society and time period has its own ideas of what stereotypes they adhere to the concept of man and woman. BUT! every society theoughout history has know what a man is (adult human male) and what a woman is (adult human female). they affixed stereotypes to the sexes, but the sexes always existed. AND theres a reason every society had words for this, its because sex is one of the most important characteristics for deciphering certain thing, especially when it comes to safety from women from males!

3. you cant claim trans people are taking your rights when gender non conforming people were killed in the past

this is a non-sequitor. its possible for both to be true: gender non conforming people, including gnc males, have been persecuted for being gnc. AND at the same time, gnc males are persecuting women and taking away female rights by destroying female private spaces and making them open to any male who says so, destroying female sports by allowing males in, and all other female rights for privacy, safety, and dignity.

its possible for both to be true.

ok, for those of you who don't know, jk rowljng donated £70k to an organisation of Scottish women who wanted the legal definition of a woman to be based on biological sex alone in the uk. today they had this ruled for in court.

the legal definition of a woman in the uk is now based purely on biological sex, likely preventing trans people from changing their sex on legal documents. we are still apparently protected from discrimination though.

the worst part of this is that news reports have been treating this as a good thing. jk rowling is painted as an amazing person in school assemblies. after doing not only what she does on twitter, but actively funding the discrimination of trans people.

Actually under the Equality Act (2010) trans people retain their rights

What has been clarified is the legal definition of women

Woman meaning Adult Human Female has been verified as the legal functional definition of woman for all interpretations of legal protections for women including women’s only spaces and measures to achieve gender equality such as women’s representation in politics, business and law

This case was about securing women’s rights and legally clarifying Women as a class with rights and protections under law

No rights were taken from trans people unless you believe it is trans people’s right to undermine and dismantle women’s rights

CLOCK IT

@medievilknights you can the L with dignity or sulk in the tags

This decision was about allowing women to live our lives free from male incursions on not just women as a legal entity women’s entire existence

If we play the oppression olympics

Women will win every time

BTW: terves aren’t following your blog

"when it literally doesn't affect you whatsoever" actually it does affect every single woman and girl who lives anywhere this kind of legal protection is not enshrined, actually. It does affect us. This isn't just "living your life" it's rewriting facts to suit a belief system not everyone shares. YOUR group is the group that cannot let other people just live. I don't believe in gender identity, you do. Why can't you let ME live?

did that idiots tags claim that bullying, mental health issues and suicide don't affect women

“doesnt affect women whatsoever” males in female locker rooms

males in female sports

males in female prisons

males in female shortlists and scholarships

males in female crises centers

the list goes on and on. you just dont give a shit about women, admit it.

"I don't like JRK but I still love Harry Potter"

You have blood on your hands

Burn your fucking Harry Potter merch or be burned with it.

I'm fucking livid.

If you're more upset about a me saying "burn your Harry Potter merch" than you are that trans women are being politically persecuted, then maybe do some self-reflection?

Not being able to legally lie about your biological sex isn't a persecution you absolute joker

My god, can men and their handmaidens just shut the fuck up forever?

You can’t lie anymore, and you can’t go into spaces you don’t belong anymore.

That’s not fucking persecution, you privileged little shit, that’s called justice.

Are we burning our Good Omens merch too? Because I still see y'all posting art and jokes about that and he's an actual criminal who actually harms actual womyn.

No. Just Harry Potter merch, because you see, Gaiman only abused and raped multiple women.

But JKR said men can’t become women! That’s way worse! /s

not being able to lie about your sex and go into private female spaces as a male is not oppression jfc

dear trans people, you are in a death cult.

if you see a country enact sex-based definitions & protections for women and homosexuals, and your echo chamber begins repeating how you're gonna be hunted for sport in the streets — you are in a death cult.

if you see a country give a ruling that woman is a sex-based category, and your echo chamber begins preaching how you must donate immediately to "save trans women's lives" — you are in a death cult, one that cares for your money more than your wellbeing.

if that same country within that very ruling recognizes legal protections for trans people and recognizes their transness, and your echo chamber begins shrieking how this is equivalent to genocide — you are in a death cult, one that wants you afraid, believing unconditionally, and not thinking with your own head.

it takes an inhuman amount of strength for me not to say to my they/them friend “no you were not ‘serving twink’ today you are a woman in a heterosexual marriage” at the end of a long ass day

TERF court

i dont wanna write this all out, the joke was a terf was on trial for being a terf and the judge’s sentencing was she had to have sex with four pre-op trans women

lesbian being legally punished for being homosexual by being gang raped by 4 dick-havers

nothing homophobic about this “corrective” rape fantasy right?

This is absolutely horrifying holy fuck.

Gotta love trans activists’ lovingly described gang rape fantasies.. but somehow we’re the violent ones? Meanwhile, they want to punish us by having us gang-raped by multiple males for the “crime” of not having sex with them.

Just fucking stone me to death, okay? Just fucking make like Iran and fucking kill me! It would be so much better than being raped and committing suicide like y’all WANT to happen to any lesbian who won’t lie down and willingly let y’all rape us!! You filthy fucking rape-hungry freaks!!!!

transactivists: here’s a funny joke- a woman is raped! by four males! lol hilarious right?!

also transactivists: terfs are so violent

“but NO ONE is EVER saying you HAVE to have sex with trans women!!!  NO ONE EVER SAYS THAT!!!!”

This sounds like a plot for a porn vid. Absolutely disgusting. I only see these kind of things directed towards radfems too. Never white supremacist or pedophiles or bad people like that. Just us lesbian radfems, because we don’t want to fuck males. Like legit, wtf.

So the joke is raping women? How original. Never been done before. Why are TRAs so obsessed with raping women they hate?

UK supreme court has ruled in law that trans women are not to be considered women

"The UK Supreme Court has unanimously decided that the definition of sex under the Equality Act 2010 refers solely to biological sex, and does not include people with a Gender Recognition Certificate." - Jess O'Thompson

Trans women are no longer protected under sex based protections against discrimination

GRCs are now functionally harmful

A post op trans woman with a GRC is now banned from "women only spaces" like a women's toilet.

I'm gonna build a bomb

great! males are not allowed in female only spaces! make 3rd spaces for extreme outliers, most others are fine in the room of their sex.

Do they only agree to make movies about real women who weren't conventionally attractive if they can lie about it? How can women and girls identify with female historical figures when they never look "real?"

Absolutely fucking despise how the trans movement has co-opted the term conversion therapy. No, refusing to subject a child to unnecessary medicalisation is NOT the practice of homophobic psychiatric and/or sexual abuse directed at homosexuals. Every time I see it used I now have to check if they mean actual conversion therapy or “my counsellor politely asked me to do some critical self reflecting.”

Any female athlete on any kind of team sport can list off 10 of her friends or teammates.

Or do high schoolers or college athletes not count. Are the only female athletes that count to this person professionally paid athletes and Olympians? Just the Mia Hamms and the Billy Jean Kings and the Flo-Jos?

I don’t even necessarily disagree that barely anyone cares about women’s sports, but those female athletes care. The players care.

They really fucking repackaged “oh, you want to speak? Name 10 [noun]s first”.

i dont have to watch sports to care about women’s right to fairness in sports

i dont watch football, but if they suddenly started letting lions play in football, id be against that

'trans people are not violent! they're actually the most marginalized group' and then radfem minors get rape threats from tims on the daily. maybe that's why your group has such a stigma attached to it

its so wild they even have to be told to not give violent threats and sexual threats

radfems just debate calmly most of the time “i disagree that you are a woman” “i believe that female safety includes female only spaces etc”

why is it that tims and tras have to be told not to give violent threats and rape threats and radfems dont have to be told that? i wonder what it could be….

I think that some people close their eyes to very obvious ways that men try to discredit their victims because those methods complicate their simplistic view of the world, and they need to open them back up.

It is not insane or racist to say that different men use different methods to discredit their victims based on their victims race, weight, wealth, religions, previous job - pick a way to to differentiate between one woman and the next, and you have got a new way to discredit a female victim.

I knew a woman once who was stalked and harassed and then finally violently attacked by a man in a parking lot. When that man wrote a story about wanting to rape and kill her, her friends believed him instead of her…because he was awkward.

I can come up with a different way to discredit any woman I want if I think for 15 seconds, and so can an attorney for any famous or rich man.

Any victim can be turned into an “acceptable” victim.

To the best of my knowledge, Brad Pitt tried to keep the upper hand in his divorce by starting to wear skirts on red carpets as if a skirt=progressive=not a bad person.

Men are not above anything when it comes to making their wives or girlfriends look crazy.

No, it was fetishization

fetishization can lead to self insertion…

see: weebs who think theyre literally japanese

see: people who fetishize black culture to the point where they believe theyre black deep down like rachel dolezal or others

see: straight/bi males who identify as lesbians

see: straight/bi females who identify as gay men

A hero without a cape

Her name is Theresa Kachindamoto, and she is a senior chief - political leader of a region with a population of about 900,000 people.

She didn’t run for election; she was appointed, without her knowledge, while she was living and working in a completely different part of the country. She just received a call one day telling her to come back to her childhood home, because she was in charge now.

So she did; and when she arrived, she discovered widespread sexual abuse of children. She browbeat 50 uncooperative local leaders into accepting her decision to annul all the marriages. She then fired four of them when they continued to allow children to be married off in their areas. She still faces widespread opposition from parents who consider it their right to sexually abuse their daughters if they want to; but Kachindamoto very evidently does not give a fuck, and is continuing to use political and legal means to protect children in the region.

She’s not just an anonymous do-gooder; she’s an effective political leader despite incredibly difficult circumstances. Theresa Kachindamoto.

[Image Description: a twitter post from user Al Jazeera English @ AJEnglish that reads “This woman has broken up 850 child marriages and banned sexual initiation camps in Malawi”

Below the text is a picture of Theresa Kachindamoto. She is a dark skinned woman with short hair. She is outside and smiling. End ID]

got worried checking the dates on this post and seeing 2016, knowing how risky this kind of political activism is

good news: Kachindamoto is still in office, and last year (2024) she received honorary doctorates from 2 universities and was given the African Genius Award 🙏