Avatar

Professional Yapper

@dumber-alek / dumber-alek.tumblr.com

main/art blog : dumb-alek || BELOVED MUTUAL IF YOU'RE READING THIS THINKING I UNFOLLOWED YOU PLS CONSIDER THIS IS MY SIDE BLOG 😭😭😭

I just to get ahead of any grievances and disappointments for people who might think about following me:

  • This blog is my garbage chute. Not to call any posts here garbage (anything is reblog is chosen by the prime selection of vibes) but rather that everything is haphazardly thrown around
  • I don't tag/categorise things. I don't particularly find it necessary to justify myself, but some people might expect it. To put it shortly: it is my personal blog and I don't have any intentions of getting followers or reaching a wider public, quite the opposite. I have ADHD which makes it hard for me to do anything consistently, and I know myself - if I'm gonna start to pressure myself to tag things I'll simply stop posting. And I like posting.
  • That doesn't mean I don't reblog with a lot of tag comments. I'm an unfortunately explosive combination of opinionated, can't keep my mouth shut and I'll implode if I don't point out inaccuracies or inconsistencies in stuff I read because I'm allergic to ambiguity. I'm sorry but not sorry enough to stop doing it - the only thing I can promise is I'm trying to not be too nasty about it.
  • I also spam reblog for any fandom I currently get into and my hyperfixations hit hard and fast. And when they do I'll reblog 50 gifsets in span of an hour which i know can be a bit annoying
  • Honestly people who are still following me are saints and I hold no grievances over anyone unfollowing or blocking me. If I annoy you, block me! If my reblogging 100 posts in quick succession annoys you, I totally get it, you can just unfollow me! I love that this is 'curate your experience' webbed site and it would be hypocritical of me to not apply this to myself.

If any of these points are going to be personally annoying to you - I'm glad that you considered me worth following, but please rethink it. Ultimately this is my blog and yours is yours so it is your preference on what kind of blogging you find grating, as it is mine to run this blog the way I like.

Thanks 🙏

A lot of people genuinely do hate or dismiss romance novels because they think all sexual frankness in fiction is immoral and harmful, or because they think women (and only women) are too stupid to know fiction from reality, or because they think it’s gross and laughable for women (especially ones they don’t consider fuckable) to have sexual desires, or because they automatically assume that anything popular with women is inferior, or because they only care about fiction being formulaic or light entertainment when it’s something women like. This doesn’t mean that every romance novel is great and deep and progressive, but these people aren’t coming from a good place with their criticism and they don’t deserve a pass.

whenever characters have a weird dad and a missing/dead/unmentioned mom the fandom tendency is to assume she's normal to balance it out. but it's always valid to instead assume she matched his freak. that she was freakier. if canon won't give you enough insane women to work with it's always morally correct to fill in the blanks with your own

last night I had a dream that we all used skull emoji 💀 to mean ‘literally’ due to the obvious etymology (‘literally’ -> ‘litch’ for short -> ‘lich’(undead skeleton looking guy) -> no full skeleton emoji -> the skull 💀)

influencers actively trying to convince young women to aspire to unemployment and servitude is literally so sinister

I mean I know a certain level of projection on fictional characters and situations is inevitable and even healthy, but sometimes you got to step back into the real world to remind yourself that Character X is not your shitty parent/abusive ex/asshole boss/bully from high school, and that people who like Character X are not personally victimizing you.

op is getting death threats now probably

the rapid disintegration of rainbow capitalism pretty much encapsulates the problem with rainbow capitalism in the first place: it is and always was performative fair-weather allyship that evaporated in the face of any real political pressure

Problem? It was never a problem, unless you had unrealistic expectations for what it meant. It was a symptom, and a good one. — Be strategic and think about this deeper for a minute.

It was absolutely performative fair-weather allyship. But it was a bellwether that the pink dollar was worth taking over any hypothetical backlash a business might face for supporting the queers. For some, and at some times in the past, it was a reassurance that they would do business with you even if they knew you were gay, and that was a huge issue if you eg. wanted to buy a house or a car. And it helped make queerness both more visible and more normalised in society, instead of trying to sweep teh gays back into the closet.

You’re not going to get rid of cynical cash grabs so long as capitalism is around, so you might as well be clear-eyed about it and recognise that while rainbow merch is totally unreliable for actual support, it was a sign that the smart money was betting in your favour.

You can always trust a business to find a sort of middle space that's vaguely agreeable to most of its customers and sit there avoiding all controversy in the absolute most craven and soulless way possible.

This means that a business is in fact a very good indicator of what's vaguely agreeable to most of its customers and what counts as controversy.

Don't think of them as allies. They aren't people. They can't be. Think of them as a barometer. If the barometer is up, you've probably got sunny skies. When the barometer starts dropping, prepare for heavy weather moving in.

I often refer to rainbow capitalism as an indicator species. Not a keystone species, not a load-bearing organism holding an ecosystem (or an economic system) together. Rainbow capitalism is fragile like a frog species dependent on clean water and an abundance of insects. When its environment changes, becomes polluted, becomes fragmented, it vanishes. Its presence or absence indicates to observers the health of its surroundings just as a literal indicator species reflects whether specific environmental conditions are met.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.