Reblogged worldsandemanations
©Nannimensch/Jurljin
Reblogged worldsandemanations
©Nannimensch/Jurljin
Reblogged varreblogger
weird freak mutual to weird freak mutual connection
Reblogged death-in-a-handbasket
As someone who has organized a gangbang, it is SO HARD to Wrangle People towards the sexy parts and away from the crafted table of snacks which just so happens to be in front of your book shelf and OMG you have THIS gaming System?? That was Kickstarter exclusive! Like, no. Stop. Please return the game book to the shelf and remove your clothes. Please?
well thank god it's not just me
favorite tags from the notes so far:
#throwback to that one time a platonic friend invited me to a swinger club#and his earnest reasoning was#'the buffet there is the best I have ever been to and it's so cheap we need to eat our way through the buffet together'#I didn't go but I have reliable sources that the buffet really is that good (via @notgreengardens)
The best sex party I ever went to nearly stopped because someone taped a sheet to the back of sliding glass windows and were using dry erase markers to make diagrams. A bunch of math and physics PhD’s were helping a chemistry phd with a thorny problem and they cheered when they solved it. A board game night broke out and it was really hard to pry people away from the games, science and snacks for sex so someone put up a pole in the living room and four women started pole dancing while shouting instructions to the scientists and board game nerds.
Epic party, I think I shagged 8 women that night and I won a card game.
i must write this or perish
There's an ongoing joke dating back to when my wife used to host Debauchery Night parties: "It's only an orgy if there's catering -- otherwise, it's just group sex."
Reblogged death-in-a-handbasket
fuck it homebrew boop button. reblog this post to boop the person you reblogged from.
Reblogged roguetelemetry
POWERLINES Wyoming-based photographer Mitchell Rouse captures power lines across the USA from an aerial perspective.
Source: behance.net
Reblogged
sweetmelody-38-deactivated20250
SO MUCH THIS! The idea that "sex" is just penis in vagina intercourse is a close cousin to the idea that the endpoint of sex is when the male ejaculates. It's a totally male-centric concept and it's about sex as procreation. That's why I reject the separation between "sex" and "foreplay". It's ALL sex. All the things that give one or both of you pleasure, turn you on, and maybe make you orgasm. When we are walking with arms linked and she moves in closer to rub her tit against my arm - that's sex. And all the things we do from then on.
Reblogged death-in-a-handbasket
Chapter 85 is now out, Shirahama posted the coloured version of the incredible chapter cover for this one.
Now if you'll excuse me I need to go and stare at a wall after that chapter.
Reblogged sin-aestheticx
straight men on this site are so absurd sometimes... bros are like "I have fucked up, sick, twisted dark fantasies" and then all they want is a thin conventionally attractive cis white woman to do anal and act like their mother.
Reblogged padraigin
it's true that the incel subculture is full of a lot of young, intensely lonely disabled men trying to cope with intense suicidal ideation and sharing their feelings/vulnerability amongst their peers for often the first time ever, but, crucially, they are dangerous misogynists (and racists) who literally advocate rape, child sexual abuse, individual murder, and mass attacks on women and/or society. they are NOT poor little meow meows who just need some love and attention and social skills or whatever--they are active members of a male supremacist subculture and, often, inter-personally violent to their family, particularly younger family members and girls. casting them as victims of a "male loneliness epidemic" (do women and nonbinary people not experience extreme loneliness????) just completely misses the point. plenty of men experience this kind of extreme loneliness and do not advocate what incels, or other male supremacists, advocate, because what incels advocate is completely repulsive.
Reblogged
Anonymous asked:
Does rescue breathing during CPR actually significantly improve survival chances vs. compression-only CPR? I keep seeing people (medical professionals) saying it's not worth it, but idk if that's just because they're assuming they'd be able to quickly access hospital treatment for the patient, so maybe it'd be different in a field medicine context?
No. And yes. It's a little complicated.
The more people without pulses that get CPR, the better and the more lives are saved. Within the last about 15-20 years, research showed that the two main barriers to giving CPR were an inability to figure out whether someone had a pulse or not, and the panic-inducing concept of doing mouth-to-mouth on a stranger.
So we eliminated both of those problems. Today, if you take a community-level CPR class, you'll find two differences from older classes. 1, you no longer have to feel for a pulse (just start CPR if there's no breathing) and 2, call 911 and start pushing hard and fast in the center of the chest, no need for rescue breaths.
Just because of population density, in the majority of CPR cases help is less than 10 minutes away. Which means that right about the time that the circulating oxygen has dropped to the point that CPR is becoming less effective, help is there to give rescue breaths and replenish that oxygen.
At a population level, this saves lives, because it increases the number of people who are actually getting CPR. Greatest good for the greatest number of people, and all that.
But that leaves out 2 groups- children, and people who are greater than 10 minutes from care.
Children, because they often become unresponsive due to respiratory issues. This means they probably have very low levels of oxygen in their blood at the time they need CPR.
And people who are greater than about 10 minutes from care, because the oxygen in their blood would rapidly be being used up by that point.
So for these groups, if you know how and are comfortable providing CPR with rescue breaths, you really want to do so.
One important note for field settings: if someone's heart has stopped because of drowning or a lightning strike, there is a chance they will regain a pulse even if they don't get medications or defibrillation. In this case, doing CPR with rescue breaths is warranted even if there is no help coming.
However, if the person has not regained a pulse in 30 minutes, it is safe to stop CPR, as there is an exceedingly low chance of success after this point. Also note that one person alone doing CPR for 30 minutes is generally not possible. A group might be able to do it.