Avatar

piss on the puritan in your head

@incubus-puppy

your favorite faggy psychological experiment ♡ You can call me hezey if you must call me ♡ Just another transmasc w/ a piss kink ♡ 25, this is 18+ ♡ backup @occult-puppy ♡ they/them or he/him pronouns please, but no preference between them ♡ I do have a vent sideblog on this acct ♡ @tismrizz

the pimned post

AGE IN BIO. I DO NOT GIVE WARNINGS. YOU WILL BE BLOCKED.

if you'd like to help a little doggy out, you can find my kofi here; anything helps and is appreciated. my boyfriend creature also does pixel art commissions.

you can call me hezekiah or hezey. I'm a 25 y/o transmasc mainly-t4t switch that posts a pretty large variety of kinks. probably more than most other things, this is a petplay blog and this is a piss kink blog (more on specifics later). my partner is pax (@tismrizz). my backup blog will be @occult-puppy if i get termed. mutuals n pseudo-mutuals who have interacted before can ask for discord. i also have a hazbin sideblog @old-redemption-flair and a general games blog @rough-tempest. i have an undisclosed vent sideblog attached to this account alsooo

I instant-block interacters who are:

  • a minor (or don't have an age in your bio/pinned), a pedophile, a pro-contact sympathizer, or post pedobait.
  • similarly, people who give me reason not to believe the age in their bio.
  • user of any of the "t33n" or "p3do" tags. i get ageplay, but I've had too many experiences seeing actual minors and actual child abusers use those tags. icky tags are fine.
  • into raceplay. do what you want but like. yikes

rules for interaction - if your blog is about or features:

  • ageplay. while I'm not into ageplay personally, i don't much mind it as a bystander and do not block for this alone. if you message me unprompted about explicit ageplay, or try to engage in ageplay involving me, you will be blocked.
  • feederism/weight gain. i am in eating disorder recovery and will not be fetishized about this. i block for weight-related comments not obviously in good faith (fat people are hot, much like people who aren't fat are), and for blogs that are weight-centric. if you don't want blocked but regularly post feederism, make it tagged and easily blacklist-able. DO NOT send weight-related messages to me.
  • detrans/misgen. i may not block for posting. same as the above, but also DO NOT interact with any explicitly t4t or trans posts on my blog (by anyone, not just me).
  • incest/fauxcest. I won't block just for posting, but don't leave comments or tags. no messages about it.
  • idgaf really about using tma and tme to categorize people, it's fine, but if you call nonbinary or transmasc people "theyfabs" unironically you can take your 4chan troll shit and shove it so deeply far up your ass.

i block at my own discretion. try it and see what entitlement gets you.

more below (tags etc)

in general somebody who is direct and to the point about having a rape fetish is 10000x more trustworthy than somebody who goes on and on about how disgusting and vile rapeplay is and how everyone who does it is an evil fetishist or a predator waiting to happen couched inbetween posts about somno or intox or reluctant sex or "forceful brat taming" or whatever obvious consentplay it is that they're choosing to position as totally and completely natural and wholesome and separate from kinks that play with the aesthetics of consent (and, by extension, the necessary pre-negotiation, boundaries, and situational awareness which are expected to be part of them)

Principles

1. We are all flawed, traumatized humans at the end of their rope. Many of our actions say more about the conditions we live under than who we are as people.

2. No one is disposable. No one is unsalvageable.

3. Life holds greater value than being right or comfortable. Hurt is preferable to death.

4. No one should be deprived of community.

5. Harm does not require further harm. Punishment does not equate protection or healing.

dehumanising puppy play.

"down" you can't get on the bed, that's for people.

"sit!" because you're not allowed on the bed but you can follow commands.

"paw" because you don't have a hand, puppy has a paw.

"shake" because you're being taught new tricks like a good dog.

"awww. does puppy think its a person." in a condescending voice, and something in you breaks because puppy isn't a person and puppy is suddenly whining and barking and humping the air and puppy doesn't know why.

I've said this before but every basic feminism 101 women's empowerment event I've ever been to has been all about telling women and girls that it's okay to speak up for ourselves, it's okay to take up space, it's okay to be strong and fast and loud and hungry and sexy and smart and good at things without feeling shame, but apparently, with the way some people talk, the second a trans woman does any of these things it's evidence of "male socialization" and needs to be called out and "corrected." like, even if this were the case, which it isn't, I think it's patently insane to believe "it looks like these women don't have as much crushing shame from a lifetime of experiencing misogyny as most other women" (<- a claim that, from my experience, is simply not true about trans women) and then follow it up with "I must Fix This by teaching them to shut up and be ashamed" instead of, like, idk "good for them, I wish this type of liberation for all other women as well."

Similar for Black women (both trans and cis) who are told they are too aggressive or manly when they speak up or even just are presenting neutrally (not overly accommodating), but are interpreted as combative. For example in the workplace, having a neutral face with no smile being seen as “rude” and making everyone “uncomfortable,” and so they are told to force themselves to smile and become more chatty and submissive to make up for their Blackness which supposedly detracts from their womanhood, so they can finally be accepted as Real Women

Luigi Mangione could be getting the death penalty…

This man is innocent, his appearance and build doesn’t match that of the killers, the only “motive” he had was a convenient written confession showing that he supposedly viewed healthcare companies as “parasitic” and too expensive (which does somewhat contradict the actual killers actions) he had said note and the murder weapon conveniently on him while living his ordinary life, the killer held the gun in his right hand while Luigi is left-handed, Luigi and the Killer were potentially seen simultaneously, they wore slightly different coats.

The NYPD KNOW these are different people, they know the evidence is lacking, this isn’t a mistaken identity, it’s framing, they are trying to make themself appear to still be control by catching this man, humiliating him, killing him, when they know full well that the person they are prosecuting ISNT EVEN THE RIGHT GUY! This is an injustice! This is not a fair trial! This is downright tyranny!

They confiscated his bag at the mcdonald's, took it out of everyone's sight, unpacked it and repacked it, and THEN took it down to the station and wow there was a manifesto in there that he was just carrying around in daily life for some reason

Definitely the sort of thing that the Bag Of Monopoly Money Guy would be carrying to McDonald's

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.