Himiko Toga was right every time I like a character I also get the irresistable urge to bite them
lgbtlunaverse reblogged
my issue with the argument that "disliking ai art is inherently reactionary" is that it acts like pro-ai art people are somehow less reactionary on their views on art, when like the majority of defense's of ai art as like a higher form art are indistinguishable from the arguments people use to defend the art of like. hitler
like the logic is that hitler was actually a great artist, entirely hinges on the belief that "objectively good art" is just art that looks detailed if you've never drawn before, which like why ai artists who want to prove their actual artists will just make a pretty looking building or lady, cause it's all about aesthetics i guess
like i'm not saying your a nazi if you like ai art, i just think it's silly when people act like anti-ai artist's are just hysterical luddites, and that ai artists are the ONLY people who actually care about art, when 99 percent of ai artists on twitter only care about art that's "beautiful" on an extremely superficial level.
#yeahhhh#it's funny because ostensibly the argument in favor of ai art being art would have to come from the same angle as dadaism and pop art#in the sense that we have already concluded that art recquires neither hard work nor originality to be art.#we've reached the limit. anything is art as long you say it is. ai art is art in the same way that that banana taped to a wall was art.#but the thing about ai art is that it is best at being decently pretty and generic and unchallenging.#and so the people that aesthetically flock to it are mostly those who HATE that other stuff and think art means stuff they find pretty
lgbtlunaverse reblogged
Anonymous asked:
do you think a 5'4 and 6'2 height difference is predatory?
Aaksjejaozkwksjaozhqodjwizhqbsjqnssjhqsbkqzj$:&.$^€\€|€\+\€|¥]£|.*%[€]*jensbshaoswahajsihwhwoqi$/$:$:8:&2$:$/$.&102$;!;$;8:&;$494882:891jsjsjsjsoajajwbejxjwhhqausbwuwijeehjediwijwjwjejsiwjai/&/&/&.!benwnejxbabsjsjzhwnejehehsjaij$$2$/18828/!.!/&-!:$::8:.$.?2)ghshsbevdidirjdjdjdjsijdjeojjdj$&/&.!ahhahHshbsnsjshajajanshsjsjwjwsshwhwhw
estrogenesis-evangelion
this just in: relationships are now predatory if one person could beat the other in a fight. the only acceptable dating is between two perfectly matched warriors locked in perpetual stalemate
God help that poor doomed 6'2" bastard
lgbtlunaverse reblogged
We'll never recover from XiYao. Cry if you agree
lgbtlunaverse reblogged
a phrase that kinda bothers me when talking about women's historical roles in europe is "cooking, cleaning, and taking care of the children." you hear it so often, those exact words in the same order even. and once you learn a little more you realize that the massive gaping hole in that list is fiberwork. im not an expert and have no hard numbers, but i wouldnt be surprised if fiberwork took up nearly as much time as the other three tasks combined, so it's not a trivial omission.
it's not a hot take to say that the mass amnesia about fiberwork is linked to the belittlement of women's work in geneal, but i do think there's a special kind of illusion that is cast by "cooking, cleaning, and taking care of the children." you hear that and think "well i cook and clean and take care of children (or i know someone who does) and i have a sense of how much work that is" and you know of course that cooking and cleaning were more laborious before modern technology, but still, you have a ballpark estimate you think, when in fact you are drastically underestimating the work load.
i also think that this just micharacterizes the role of women's work in livelihoods? cooking, cleaning, and taking care of the children are all sisyphean tasks that have to be repeated the next day. these are important, but not the whole picture. when we include all kinds of fiberwork—and other things, such as making candles or soap—women's work looks much more like manufacturing, a sphere we now associate more with men's work. i feel like women's connection to making and craftsmanship is often elided.
Nah pop off queen you hit it.
lgbtlunaverse reblogged
"And I, of course, am obviously not allowed to want anything... then who's flying the plane?!"
I don’t have anything serious take this
saw that qin su post and i literly dont think i could ever make out exactly WHY jgy felt he needed to kill his child or if he didnt why did he have to die? like if people found out would that really.....im not laughing but would that rly even be that bad?? like would people really care considering all about his father, their own sexual exploits, and how generally messed up powerfulrich peopls sex lives usually are anyways?? like was there something about the child like did he have a disability due to incest, but even then why would that mean he has to die lol they couldve just hidden him away and tell everyone he died! or just say hes not ~fit~ to be the heir so then he could just have another one lol?? or just have a child with a concubine and name him heir?? do you remember/know the reason or was it like paranoia or shame or
There is a big difference between jgy and his father. Jin Guangshan is the rightful Noble-born sect leader of the richest sect in the Jianghu, and Jin Guangyao is a bastard son of a whore who was thrown down a flight of stairs as a child for the crime of showing up to his father's house, and the reaction by the cultivation world at large to this news was that he had it coming and he should've known his place.
I would say that incest and cheating have a different level of taboo, yes. Of it turned out Jin Guangshan had accidentally slept with his half sister that would have been more of a scandal than every single one of his previous exploits ever were, and the child would suffer most of all.
But the nobles of the jianghu don't see jgy as one of their own. They see him as fundamentally an outsider who they tolerate because he's good at his job, has access to money, and keeps his public record so clean they don't have anything to say about him except for his parentage. The moment he slips up they'll pounce on him like piranhas. Which... they do! We dont have to speculate about how they'd react, we see them do it in the story, with calls for his death and lurid glee, attributing his sexual deviancy to his mother's profession. What else could you expect form the son of a whore?
Did A-song have a disability? Maybe, we're told he was a bit slow, but it was subtle enough that no one thought anything of it (certainly not that the cause could be incest) before the news came out. But maybe it was more severe behind closed doors, and the only reason the rumours are so mild its that jgy has worked very, very hard to keep them that way. Who knows!
Why didn't jgy fake a-song's death? who knows! Too many loose ends? An actual dead child means no one to come back one day to ask his parents on why they sent him away, nor any caretakers you'd have to keep quiet.
Have another one? With who? His sister-wife?? (you name this and the concubine as different options so I can only assume)
So why not a concubine? Well, jgy has a chip on his shoulder about cheating and refuses to be unfaithful to Qin Su, even in ways that his society would condone. Especially if it would involve disinheriting his legitimate son in favor of the concubine's child which would basically be spitting directly in his wife's face.
But... A-Song was never the heir. Jin Ling was. Jin Guangyao was only ever acting sect leader until Jin Ling came of age. Jgy didn't need an heir, hence why he didn't need to have another child after A-song died.
So do I remember what this precise reasons were? no! And I never knew! Because no one does! It's left so unclear in the story on purpose, to leave us speculating just like the character are. Because mdzs is a story about how much you can, and can't, know another person. And so it deprives us of crucial information intentionally. jgy clearly feels responsible in some way, but that still leaves a wide variety of possible scenarios, which as I say in the post I love to play around with. (Maybe that other sect leader really did kill rusong but jgy had prior knowledge that that was likwly and still let it happen?) But anything confirmed? Zilch. Nada. We don't know why he did it, we don't even know if he did it. All we have is rumours.
lgbtlunaverse reblogged
Gay sex as a metaphor for friendship
lgbtlunaverse reblogged
HARMING and INJURING him.
lgbtlunaverse reblogged
if the character has canonically reproduced - don't worry about it. idk presume they have some sort of magic for stuff like that lol
lgbtlunaverse reblogged
“go to hell” is basic “i hope one person in your gay ship refers to the other in canon as ‘like a brother to me’ as a way of expressing affection for him, thus leading people online to think they are actually related” is smart. it’s possible. it’s happened to me like five times.
lgbtlunaverse reblogged
just because i’m not posting about it does not mean i am not thinking about it. absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
lgbtlunaverse reblogged
Being in I Saw The TV glow would've saved Nie Mingjue.
"You've been trapped by an evil villain and you have to accept you're a woman to wake up and defeat him" might be the only way to get nmj out of the closet. She would've buried herself alive so fast, she loves being buried it's like her second favorite hobby.
Being in I Saw The TV glow would've saved Nie Mingjue.
lgbtlunaverse reblogged
#do i even need to say it#girljue truthers rise#a character agressively performing masculinity exclusively out of a sense of familial duty and it's also LITERALLY KILLING THEM?#what do you want me to do? stand in the middle of this chicken coop and NOT see the eggs?#anyway even tho i am not as enthusiastic about them i do idealogically agree with jin zixuan and jiang cheng winning