It amazes me how the National Park Service is the most vocal department against Fascism. Even the Democrats are a mumble when compared to these park rangers' adamant denouncement and exposing of this administration. Support our bravest federal workers who keep our world one worth living in.
Several documentaries publically treating Luigi Mangione as guilty before his trial even started got released over the past 2 months.
Here's the billion dollar companies behind them.
while this is a completely valid warning... i just want to take a second to remind everyone that you could literally say this about almost any movie, documentary or piece of media made since 2011. 90% of the United States media is controlled by 6 companies who create over 50% of the content.
and if you want to take it a step further because Vanguard and BlackRock were listed on the original graphic, their reach is lightyears beyond just media. BlackRock and/or Vanguard are among the three largest institutional investors for 505 out of 505 of the S&P 500. (100%). one or the other is the single largest institutional investor in 422 of these (84%). they, along with State Street, control about 23% of the votes of the S&P 500 single-class companies.
the truth is that virtually all corporate-backed media that you consume in 2025 from top to bottom is going to be subject to the oversight of the board of directors for one of these 6 mega billionaire-controlled companies. you should have that fact in mind basically at all times.
Donald Trump Is Not Joking About Annexing Canada: A Fucking Timeline
December 3, 2024: Trump's quip about Canada becoming 51st state was a joke, says minister who was there (CBC News ๐จ๐ฆ) <- This is when it could have feasibly been a joke
January 7, 2025: Donald Trump is quoted in a press conference directly stating his intentions to annex Canada (New York Times, timestamp 0:45 ๐บ๐ธ) <- This is where Americans should have stopped telling Canadians it's just a joke
REPORTER 1: Are you also considering military force to annex and acquire Canada? DONALD TRUMP: No. Economic force.
February 7, 2025: Trudeau says Trump threat to annex Canada 'is a real thing' (BBC ๐ฌ๐ง) <- This is where the Commonwealth starts to take it seriously
Trudeau suggested Trump has floated the idea of taking over Canada and making it the "51st state" because he wants to access the country's critical minerals. "Mr Trump has it in mind that the easiest way to do it is absorbing our country and it is a real thing," the prime minister said.
February 9, 2025: "Trump's national security adviser: 'I don't think there's any plans to invade Canada'" (NBC News ๐บ๐ธ) <- CANADIANS NOTICE THAT THIS IS NOT A VERY STRONG DENIAL OF POSSIBLE MILITARY FORCE
February 10, 2025: Trump Confirms Heโs Serious About Wanting Canada As 51st State (Forbes ๐บ๐ธ)
Fox News host Bret Baier asked Trump whether Trudeau was right in telling business leaders the U.S. presidentโs threat to absorb Canada is a โreal thing,โ to which Trump agreed with Trudeau and responded, โYes it is.โ
February 12, 2025: โTrump effectโ: How US tariffs, โ51st stateโ threats are shaking up Canada (Al Jazeera ๐ถ๐ฆ) <- This is where the rest of the fucking world outside America starts to take it seriously
February 18 2025: CBC releases podcast episode: "What if the U.S. invaded Canada?" (CBC's Front Burner ๐จ๐ฆ)
March 4, 2025: Canada Eyeing NATO Ally's Nukes To Deter Trump 'Threat': Candidate (Newsweek ๐บ๐ธ), British nuclear weapons can protect Canada against Trump, says Trudeau party candidate (The Telegraph ๐ฌ๐ง)
โI would be working urgently with [European Nato allies] to build a closer security relationshipโฆ in a time when the United States can be a threat,โ said [Canada's] ex-foreign minister and finance minister at the final Liberal leadership debate last week.
March 4, 2025: Prime Minister Trudeau: "What he wants is to see a total collapse of the Canadian economy, because thatโll make it easier to annex usโ (CTV News ๐จ๐ฆ)
March 7, 2025: BC Premier David Eby: โWe know the president in back rooms with Canadian officials has said he wants to redraw the border" (Global News ๐จ๐ฆ)
Eby: "If this president wants to annex Canada, he should save his breath to cool his soup, it is never going to happen.โ
March 7, 2025: How Trumpโs โ51st Stateโ Canada Talk Came to Be Seen as Deadly Serious (New York Times ๐บ๐ธ) <- This is where American news media starts to treat this as maybe possibly not a joke
March 9, 2025: U.S. Congress bill aims to prevent funding of invasion of Canada (CTV News ๐จ๐ฆ) <- This is where you should understand that military force is ON THE TABLE
March 11, 2025: Canadian opinion of U.S. falls sharply; 63% take Trump's threats 'very seriously' (National Post ๐จ๐ฆ)
March 13, 2025 (TODAY): Trump threatens to acquire Canada, Greenland while next to NATO chief (Global News ๐จ๐ฆ)
โTo be honest with you, Canada only works as a state...This would be the most incredible country visually,โ [Trump] said. โIf you look at a map, they drew an artificial line right through it, between Canada and the U.S., just a straight artificial line. Somebody did it a long time ago, many many decades ago, and it makes no sense.โ -Donald Trump
And hey, just for fun, let's contrast that with another quote:
First of all, I would like to emphasize that the wall that has emerged in recent years between Russia and Ukraine, between the parts of what is essentially the same historical and spiritual space, to my mind is our great common misfortune and tragedy...I am confident that true sovereignty of Ukraine is possible only in partnership with Russia. -Vladimir Fucking Putin, the year before launching an attack on Ukraine, which everyone also said he was joking about and definitely wouldn't do (2021 essay, Kremlin official website ๐ท๐บ)
I know you're overwhelmed, Americans, but please stop saying this is a joke. Canadians are anticipating an invasion, possibly within the year. This is not a fucking drill.
Hat tip @darkmoonstruck for drawing my attention to the lovely rufous snowy owl spotted in Michigan!
So cool!
excuse me I'mtearing up a bit
... I dunno, this could be good.
Brennan Lee Mulligan arguing for the primal nature of morality on Ep. 40โs Fireside Chat is one of the funniest and realest things Iโve ever heard. He once again put into words what I have been trying to say for what feels like forever.
EDIT: No, I actually need to quote this out for myself.
Choose joy, motherfucker! If youโre not, weโre in conflict!!!
Chair Stop-Motion ๐ช๐จ Made with 444 pictures taken over 10 days
How I made this: https://youtu.be/UyqbPF5IN54
I donโt think youโre ready to have an adult conversation about politics until youโre able to admit that there are things you love and enjoy that would not and should not exist in a just world. $8 billion dollar budget movies every other month donโt exist in a just world. New 900 GB AAA video games every year donโt exist in a just world. Next day delivery doesnโt exist in a just world. 80 different soda brands donโt exist in a just world.ย
All of those things come from exploitation on some level, and if you wouldnโt trade those for a world where everyone can eat and have a home no matter who they are or what they do, I donโt know what to tell you.ย
Man, this post makes me feel conflicted, because on the one hand, of the things listed, next-day delivery is the only one that DOES actually exist in the world today. The others are exaggerations, and while I understand the point being made, they do detract from it.
I understandโand agree withโthat sentiment of, โI want slower deliveries by drivers who are paid better,โ as one recent tumblr post put it. I absolutely agree with the idea that we need to produce and consume less as a culture, and that an actual substantive conversation about politics should involve willingness to relinquish the many modern luxuries that are built on exploitation.
I donโt think these are good examples of those luxuries, though.
Large budget movies are possible because consumers (and investors) are willing to pay for them. A large budget is actually a necessary component in making sure workers are being adequately compensated; the fact that they currently are often exploited by studios is a result of deliberate misallocation of resources, not anything intrinsic to the size of the production. Same thing goes with high-quality video games. As for releasing a new film/game every month/year, thatโs only unsustainable because thereโs only a handful of monopolistic studios doing it. In a well-regulated industry that encourages growth and competition, we could see tens, if not hundreds of studios producing big-budget films and games. And, with a well-compensated and socially-supported citizenry, consumers would have enough disposable income to support it.
Similarly, the problem with soda isnโt that we have 80 brands; itโs that we have two. And those two brands each own 800 different labels. In a healthy economy, these monopolies would be dissolved, and we could support well over 80 moderately-sized independent beverage companies producing their own sodas.
Same-day delivery, again, could be easily supported with proper allocation of resources. Currently, we have huge centralized distributors like Amazon exploiting gig-workers with slave-wages to ferry cheap mass-produced crap to people, and thatโs what makes it bad, not the speed at which they do it. If instead, we had something like a super-robust USPS, with well-compensated deliverypeople working reasonable hours within a decentralized network of independent-but-cooperative suppliers, there would be absolutely no reason why you couldnโt get something delivered to you from the distro ten miles down the road within a day.
When we critique capitalism, and they respond, โYeah, well capitalism made the cell phone youโre using!โ our response shouldnโt be, โOh shit u right,โ it should be, โNo, capitalism made the cell phone Iโm using break after a year so Iโll buy a new one, and they use slave labor to do it while they pocket the rest.โ
There are luxuries, and there are artificially-valued, mass-produced, built-to-break trash that are marketed as luxuries. But we donโt solve the problems of fast-fashion by saying, โWelp I guess I shouldnโt wear clothes.โ
yeah thatโs a decent rebuttal imma reblog now
But we donโt solve the problems of fast-fashion by saying, โWelp I guess I shouldnโt wear clothes.โ
I want you to remember:
The fascists hate you too and they just will pretend otherwise until after they've killed the rest of us, before they turn on you.
Thanks to whoever tried, but I knew they'd never allow it.
Let's do it the old fashioned way. Spread it far and wide.
Reminder: you can't be the whole wall against stopping fascism by yourself. Nobody can. But you damn sure can be a brick.
There's a lot of good comments and tags in the notes, but this one is very important, I feel like it deserves some emphasis.
Part of how authoritarianism works is telling you that you can't stop it. And you can't stop it by yourself. But it wants to stop the train of thought there and let you fall into despair.
You need to remember the next part: you don't have to stop it by yourself.
You're not alone. Take care of your community and let your community take care of you. Supporting each other is so vital.
I love how these are from an Unreality subreddit but to my eye they just read like regular Tumblr shitposts. Did we cross-pollinate or something