actually, i think that representation for trans women is, believe it or not, way more important and meaningful than representation for cis men. what you’re suggesting here — that it’s important to have examples of “just feminine boys” who aren’t trans than it is to have examples of trans girls in fiction — is pretty blatantly conservative. first of all, there are actually way more fictional characters who are “just feminine boys”; way more than there is positive representation for trans women.
like, literally everything you’re praising the show for would be even more incredible if the main character was trans. it actually is not “more impressive” or “more important” to cater to cis men, the most catered to demographic in all of television.
when you act like cisgender crossdressers are more transgressive than trans women, you’re pretty blatantly arguing that living as trans is somehow LESS transgressive? like, sorry, categorically you are saying the exact same transphobic shit that all those “Bridget should just be a feminine guy!!!!” people into Guilty Gear. in fact, “does he have to be trans? i think it’s more meaningful for him to be a feminine guy” is basically the only thing people ever say to trans headcanons. fuck, it’s actually what a lot of transphobic people say to REAL trans people