Retracted: Clinical and technical
phosphoproteomic research
López et al.
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
REVIEW
Open Access
Retracted: Clinical and technical
phosphoproteomic research
Elena López1*, Isabel López2, Antonio Ferreira3 and Julia Sequí4
ED
A notice has been published about this article. See full information at: http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
Abstract
Background
Importance of the field
TR
AC
T
An encouraging approach for the diagnosis and effective therapy of immunological pathologies, which would
include cancer, is the identification of proteins and phosphorylated proteins. Disease proteomics, in particular, is a
potentially useful method for this purpose. A key role is played by protein phosphorylation in the regulation of
normal immunology disorders and targets for several new cancer drugs and drug candidates are cancer cells and
protein kinases. Protein phosphorylation is a highly dynamic process. The functioning of new drugs is of major
importance as is the selection of those patients who would respond best to a specific treatment regime. In all
major aspects of cellular life signalling networks are key elements which play a major role in inter- and intracellular
communications. They are involved in diverse processes such as cell-cycle progression, cellular metabolism, cell-cell
communication and appropriate response to the cellular environment. A whole range of networks that are involved
in the regulation of cell development, differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis, and immunologic responses is
contained in the latter. It is so necessary to understand and monitor kinase signalling pathways in order to
understand many immunology pathologies. Enrichment of phosphorylated proteins or peptides from tissue or
bodily fluid samples is required. The application of technologies such as immunoproteomic techniques,
phosphoenrichments and mass spectrometry (MS) is crucial for the identification and quantification of protein
phosphorylation sites in order to advance in clinical research. Pharmacodynamic readouts of disease states and
cellular drug responses in tumour samples will be provided as the field develops. We aim to detail the current and
most useful techniques with research examples to isolate and carry out clinical phosphoproteomic studies which
may be helpful for immunology and cancer research. Different phosphopeptide enrichment and quantitative
techniques need to be combined to achieve good phosphopeptide recovery and good up- and-down
phosphoregulation protein studies.
Areas covered in this review
RE
The personalized management of diseases has and is being
extended and this implies the prescription of specific therapeutics best suited for the individual patient and his/her
type of illness. With the combination of different proteomic
strategies this can be improved, and this would imply the
coupling of proteomic and clinical research.
* Correspondence: elena.lopez.villar@gmail.com
1
Inflammatory core, Centro de Investigación i + 12 del Hospital Universitario
12 de Octubre, Avda de Córdoba s/n, 28041, Madrid, Spain
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
Clinical and Proteomic research can be carried out in a
complementary manner in order to advance and innovate
therapies and diagnostics. We also point out the importance of immunology diseases including cancer, especially
those which are directly connected to phosphorylated protein kinases and the way in which to isolate and methodologically analyse phosphoproteins-phosphopeptides, with
their advantages and disadvantages, when using proteomic
tools.
What the reader will gain
An overview of various types of different proteomic
strategy-combinations personalized for specific diseases.
The principles of phosphoproteomic techniques with
© 2011 López et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
Take home message
TR
AC
T
A high number of proteomic-combination-approaches
are available for clinical research. It is always necessary
to test different proteomic tools in order to raise a
greater level of efficiency for your clinical proteomic
study, especially those related to phosphorylated proteins which are poorly expressed as some kinases. Nowadays it is essential that clinicians and proteomic experts
work together in order to improve the therapies and
drug candidates development.
We aim to detail the current and most useful techniques with research examples to isolate and carry out
clinical phosphoproteomic studies which may be helpful
for immunology and cancer research. Different phosphopeptide enrichment and quantitative techniques need to
be combined to achieve good phosphopeptide recovery
and good up- and-down phospho-regulation protein
studies.
which is a calcium dependent phospholipid binding protein that has been linked to membrane trafficking
through exocytosis and endocytosis [11], is a second
relevant example. Other studies have evaluated the role
of annexin A1 in the modulation of the MAPK/ERK
[12]. In fact, many members of the Annexin family are
known to undergo alternative splicing yielding a number
of isoforms. The resulting variant forms may have different functions and binding capacity in comparison to the
native forms [13]. The DNA-Protein Kinase catalytic
subunit (DNA-PKcs) - another relevant example - a
macromolecule found to be involved in the repair of
double stranded DNA fractures through activation of
p53, found to be expressed in cancer specimens in its
tyrosine phosphorylated and cleaved form [14]. In contrast, in normal specimens DNA-PKcs existed in its
whole, full length in non-phosphorylated form. This
study was aimed at identifying differential expression
and modification of proteins that could suggest erratic
pathways which could serve as novel targets for developing new therapies in the treatment of cervical cancer
and help in monitoring disease recurrence or progression. The general principles of signalling pathways are illustrated (Figure 1) and also, an example of the structure
of a relevant phosphorylated protein kinase (Figure 2).
On the other hand, the CDC25 family of proteins consists of dual specificity phosphatases which regulate cell
cycle transitions, and they are key targets for the checkpoint machinery to maintain genome stability during
DNA damage. Three isoforms of CDC25 have been
identified in mammalian cells: CDC25A, CDC25B, and
CDC25C. CDC25A and CDC25B over-expression has
been reported in many types of human cancers, but
these are insufficient to cause cancer, and the mechanism responsible for CDC25 over-expression is unclear
[15,16]. The study of dose–response effects of the anticancer drug rapamycin on the phosphoproteomics level
has identified hundreds of novel rapamycin-targeted cellular proteins and their phosphorylation sites. This information has enabled us to identify CDC25B as the key
enzyme in mediating rapamycin induced oncogenic
AKT activation. It is important to point out that we can
demonstrate that phosphoproteomic profiling of a certain therapeutic agent does not only identify potential
drug target(s) to improve the efficiency of that therapeutic approach in disease treatment, but it can also
provide cellular information about possible beneficial
and adverse side effects of a specific disease therapy
when treating patients [17].
In addition, primary immunodeficiencies (PID) are
“nature’s experiments” which have allowed, not only the
elucidation of many signalling pathways, but also their
function an clinical relevance. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase,
is an interesting example: (Btk; member of the Tec
ED
examples are also presented in a simple manner. In
addition, important mass spectrometry clues will be detailed in order to identify and correctly assign a phosphate
group in a phosphorylated protein.
Page 2 of 20
(A) Phosphorylation’s role in immune disorders and cancer
RE
Phosphorylation and de-phosphorylation at serine,
threonine and tyrosine residues are one of the most
common mechanisms of activation and/or inactivation
signalling pathways. A variety of cellular processes including cellular growth, proliferation, cell cycle control,
cytoskeletal mobility and receptor regulation [1] are controlled by this type of modification. Phosphorylation
leads to allosteric modifications that may result in conformational changes sufficient to cause activation or inactivation of various proteins and associated altered
functioning. It is our hypothesis that identification of
phosphoproteins associated with the various stages of
different immunological disorders, including cancer, may
provide information on the development of the pathology. In addition the mechanism of tumorigenesis gives
us insight into the development of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
The mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways are known to be deregulated in many human malignancies [2-5]. With relation to malignancy, the best
studies MAPKs are the extracellular signal regulated
protein kinases (ERK). ERKs phosphorylate cytoplasmic
targets migrate to the nucleus where they can activate
transcription factors involved in cellular proliferation.
Eractic signalling in the MAPK/ERK pathways has been
described in prostate, breast and colon cancers in vitro
as well as in vivo models [6-9]. In cervical cancer, furthermore, a study has described decreased activation of
ERK1/2 in invasive cervical carcinoma [10]. Annexin A1,
Page 3 of 20
TR
AC
T
ED
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
RE
Figure 1 Signalling pathways: general principles. Followed by communication of the signal to different cellular compartments are signal
processing and amplification by plasma membrane proximal events. The activation of multiple signal cascades by receptors, different protein
post-translational modifications (PTMs), crosstalk between signalling pathways and feedback loops to ensure optimal signalling output are
involved in this process. The binding of receptor Tyr kinases (RTKs) to their cognate ligands at the cell surface results in receptor dimerization and
autophosphorylation. Phosphorylated Tyr residues subsequently serve as docking sites to recruit signalling mediators, such as growth factor
receptor-bound protein 2 (GRB2). Multiple signalling cascades such as the phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K)-AKT, Ras-Raf- extracellular
signalregulated kinase (ERK) mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways are
activated by the assembly of these signalling complexes. Casitas B-lineage lymphoma (CBL)-mediated ubiquitylation of RTKs controls their
endocytosis and the duration of receptor signalling. In addition, binding of tumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα) to its receptor, TNFR1, induces
trimerization of the receptor and recruitment of the adaptor protein TNFR1-associated death domain (TRADD) This functions as a hub to
assemble a multiprotein signalling complex containing TNFR-associated factor 2 (TRAF2), receptor interacting Ser/Thr protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) and
nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) essential modulator (NEMO). The result is the activation of different signalling networks, such as the ERK MAPK, p38
MAPK and NF-κB pathways. Proteins in the MAPK signalling pathways are activated by both RTKs and TNFα, which allows cells to integrate
multiple signals. [Dotted lines indicate indirect activation of signalling pathways or translocation of proteins into the nucleus. IκB, inhibitor of NFκB; IKK, inhibitor of NF-κB kinase; JNK1, Jun N-terminal kinase 1; MEK, MAPK ERK kinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; p70S6K, p70
ribosomal S6 kinase-α; RSK, ribosomal protein S6 kinase-α].
family of kinases) [18,19], important in B-lymphocyte
development, differentiation, and signalling. Btk is predominantly expressed in B lymphocytes and monocytes
but not in plasma cells [20,21]. Btk expression in the Bcell lineage is also developmentally regulated, with bone
marrow derived hematopoietic stem cells, common
lymphoid progenitor cells, developing B and myeloid
lineages showing the highest levels, whereas the
remaining mature cells prior to activation have reduced
cellular Btk. What remains to be established is the
physiological significance of Btk expression in other cell
types as B lymphocytes are the only cells known to be
affected in X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA). Mutations in the Btk gene lead to XLA in humans and X-
Page 4 of 20
TR
AC
T
ED
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
Figure 2 Example of a phosphorylated protein kinase. The location of phosphorylated Ser-279 in the protein structure of human MAP kinase
p38beta (p38B) is shown in this figure. A model for phosphorylated serine was located in the structural position of residue Ser-279 in the 3D
crystallographic coordinates of p38B (Protein Data Bank code: 3GC8). Position of the ATP binding site is indicated. Plot was generated using
PyMOL (DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA). The p38 pathway is one of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling cascades along
with the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathways. Similar to other MAPK pathways, the p38
signalling cascade involves sequential activation of MAPK kinases (MAP3Ks) and MAPK kinases (MKKs) including MKK3, MKK4, and MKK6, which
directly activate p38 through phosphorylation in a cell-type- and stimulus-dependent manner. Once activated, p38 MAPKs phosphorylate serine/
threonine residues on their substrates, such as transcription factors, cell cycle regulators as well as protein kinases. By the p38 signalling pathway
cells can interpret a wide range of external signals, such as inflammation, hyperosmorality, UV radiation and oxidative stress and they respond
appropriately by generating an excessive abundance of different biological effects.
RE
linked immunodeficiency (Xid) in mice. Activation of
Btk triggers a cascade of signalling-events that culminates in the generation of calcium mobilization and
fluxes, cytoskeletal rearrangements, and transcriptional
regulation involving nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT). In B cells, NFκB was shown to bind to the Btk promoter and induce
transcription, whereas the B-cell receptor dependent
NF-κB signalling pathway requires functional Btk. In
addition, Btk activation is strictly regulated by a plethora
of other signalling proteins including protein kinase C
(PKC), Sab/SH3BP5, and caveolin-1. Additionally, the
prolyl isomerase Pin1 negatively regulates Btk by decreasing tyrosine phosphorylation and uniform state
levels of Btk [22]. It is of great interest that PKC and
Pin1, both of which are negative regulators of Btk, bind
to the pleckstrin homology domain of Btk. For this purpose, novel mutations in the pleckstrin homology are
under research, in order to design selective and novel
drugs [23]. Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID)
is a PID disease. CVID is the result of intrinsic deficits
affecting immunologic functions. Moreover lymphomas
and neoplams are found to be related to CVID. CVID is
heterogeneous, can be present early or late in life, and it
is associated with specific comorbidities [24,25]. Efforts
to subcategorize CVID to predict outcomes and
comorbid-condition, both clinically and based on
immunologic phenotypes, are ongoing [26]. B cellactivating factor of the TNF family receptor [27], transmembrane activator, calcium modulator, cyclophilin
ligand interactor (TACI) [28-30], and certain HLA haplotypes [31,32] have been identified as potential gene
candidates for susceptibility to CVID. Inducible
costimulator [33,34], CD81 [35], CD19 [36,37] and
CD20 [38] harbour disease-causing mutations that presently explain only a small percentage of cases [39]. Recently, a genome-wide association work [40] has
identified diverse causes of common variable immunodeficiency providing new mechanistic insights into
immunopathogenesis based on these unique genetic variations. A highly significant number of subjects with duplications in ORC4L, a gene previously associated with
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
(B) Analytical techniques used in phosphoproteomics
TR
AC
T
B.1. Preparation of samples The key to any successful
analysis is good sample preparation; phosphorylated proteins are quite stable, chemically, but there are highly
susceptible to enzymatic modification. We emphasize
the importance of phosphorylation of protein kinases
due to the fact that they modulate many immunology
diseases and they are usually poorly expressed. Moreover, the human genome contains around 500 kinases
and over 100 phosphatases [42], so that when tissues or
cells are lysed and extracted, it is highly probable that
further enzymatic reactions will occur. Samples have to
be prepared (a) quickly, (b) generally be snap-frozen and
(c) treated with phosphatase inhibitors to avoid modification of phosphopeptides during sample work-up
[43,44]. Phosphopeptides generally constitute a small
portion of the peptides in a given protein sample, making them difficult to detect by MS; their enrichment
helps to overcome this problem. It is important (d) to
avoid salts and detergents, which can decrease the recovery of phosphopeptides and/or interfere with subsequent analysis [45].
protein and search for phosphorylation sites. Immunoprecipitation permits the isolation of a protein under a variety
of biological conditions to assess changes in phosphorylation on that protein. In the same way, antibodies raised
against a specific phosphosite on a protein can be used for
immunoprecipitation. Assessment of other phosphosites
on a protein is possible when one phosphosite is known
(the epitope of the antibody) under this scenario. However,
care must be taken when a protein is phosphorylated at
multiple serines as certain phosphorylation events could be
mutually exclusive and be obliterated during subsequent
analysis. Phosphospecific antibodies can be used to determine
the proteins that bind to a phosphoprotein (protein-phosphoprotein interactions) using phosphositespecific immunoprecipitation followed by analysis of the binding partners.
Furthermore, antibodies specific for phosphotyrosines, not affected by the surrounding amino acids, have been successfully
used to immunoprecipitate the “phosphotyrosineome” of cells.
Since phosphoserine and phosphothreonine are much more
abundant in cells and these antibodies seem to have less specificity, phosphoproteome-wide experiments are much more
complicated [46].
Moreover, phospho-specific antibodies against a consensus sequence-motif for a specific kinase-motif (for
example SXR, where × is any amino acid) can also be
used to immunopurify all proteins that contain this
motif. This form of phosphorylation has been enriched
by the use of antiphosphotyrosine antibodies. It is an interesting strategy as phosphotyrosine is far less common
than phosphoserine or threonine; the antibodies generally have a higher specificity and tyrosine kinases play a
prominent role in human cancer. The isolated proteins
are enzymatically cleaved with trypsin and analysed by
MS or the phosphopeptides can be further enriched for
analysis by MS. Tyrosine phosphorylated proteins are
enriched by these methods to levels sufficient for detection and sequencing by MS [47-52]. Antiphosphoserine
and antiphosphothreonine antibodies have been also
generated [43] but have not been widely used due to
their low specificity.
We would like to mention the scientific study of Kemna
and co-workers (2007) [53], who used immunocapture,
and tandem MS to identify and characterize hepcidin in
serum and urine. In addition to diagnostic application, they
investigated analytical reproducibility and biological and
preanalytical variation for both serum and urine sample
fluids. Samples were obtained from healthy controls and
patients with documented iron-deficiency anaemia,
inflammation-induced anaemia, thalassemia major, and
hereditary hemochromatosis. This important proteomic
technique showed that hepcidin-20, -22, and −25 isoforms
are present in urine. Hepcidin-25 in serum had the same
amino acid sequence as hepcidin-25 in urine, whereas
hepcidin-22 was not detected in serum. In this work,
ED
B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders was observed. All
these new insights could be susceptible to phosphoproteomic analysis in order to clarify the clues of the
different pathologies [41].
Page 5 of 20
RE
B.2. Enrichment of phosphoprotein and phosphopeptide
The aim in many focuses, including the study of
immune disorders, is to generate a global view of serine,
threonine and tyrosine phosphorylation within the sample, concentrating specifically on the selected subset of
phosphopeptides. Since the detection of phosphopeptides
by MS is often hindered by suppression effects, many different strategies have been established: for the removal of
unphosphorylated peptides: (I) immunoprecipitation by
antibodies, (II) pre-fraction systems such as ionic chromatographic exchange (SCX/SAX), calcium phosphate precipitation and hydrophilic interaction chromatography
(HILIC) (III) metal affinity chromatography i.e. IMAC,
TiO2,ZrO2, and (IV) reverse phase chromatography (RP).
(V) Immunoprecipitation of phosphotyrosine coupled or
not to polyacrylamide gels, is still much more frequent [43]
than immunoprecipitation using phospho- serine or threonine antibodies. This is because affinity chromatography
such as IMAC or titanium dioxide has higher a capacity for
phosphoserine and phosphothreonine peptide binding.
• Antibody purification and Polyacrylamide gels Affinity
purification, a method for purifying proteins, can be used
together with SDS-PAGE or alone. Antibodies raised
against a protein can be used to immunoprecipitate the
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
ED
• Immobilised metal ion affinity chromatography
(IMAC) IMAC [60] is an enrichment technique that
makes use of metal ions to capture and enrich negatively
charged phosphopeptides prior to mass spectrometric
analysis [61-66]. Simple and complex samples containing
phosphopeptides and non-phosphorylated peptides are
dissolved in an acidic solution to stimulate the electrostatic interactions between the negatively charged peptides, mainly phosphopeptides, and the metal ions [64].
The phosphopeptides are eluted from the stationary
phase using alkaline buffers. It is also possible to bind
peptides containing the acidic amino acid residues glutamic acid and aspartic acid to the metal ions. Ficarro
and co-workers [67] bypassed this problem with IMAC
(Fe3+) by converting acidic amino acid residues to methyl esters. They were able to purify and sequence hundreds of phosphopeptides from yeast, although there
was a strong tendency towards phosphoproteins highly
expressed within the cell.
Collins and co-workers (2008) [68] analyzed the
mouse forebrain cytosolic phosphoproteome using sequential (protein and peptide) IMAC purifications, enzymatic dephosphorylation, and targeted tandem mass
spectrometry analysis strategies (MS clues will be detailed later) which we consider a relevant biological
study. To summarize, Collins et al., (2008) [68] with the
use of complementary phosphoenrichment and LCMS/
MS strategies, 512 phosphorylation sites on 540
nonredundant phosphopeptides from 162 cytosolic
phosphoproteins were characterized. Analysis of protein
domains and amino acid sequence composition of this
data set of cytosolic phosphoproteins revealed that it is
significantly enriched in intrinsic sequence disorder,
which enrichment is associated with both cellular location and phosphorylation status. The majority of phosphorylation sites found by MS were located outside
structural protein domains (97%) They were mostly located in regions of intrinsic sequence disorder (86%).
368 phosphorylation sites were located in long regions
of disorder (over 40 amino acids long), and 94% of proteins contained at least one such long region of disorder.
In addition, it was found that 58 phosphorylation sites in
this data set occur in 14-3-3 binding consensus motifs;
linear motifs that are associated with unstructured regions in proteins. These results demonstrate that in this
data set protein phosphorylation is distinctively depleted
in protein domains and distinctively enriched in disordered protein sequences and that enrichment of intrinsic
sequence disorder may be a common feature of
phosphoproteomes. This goes to support the hypothesis
that disordered regions in proteins allow kinases, phosphatases, and phosphorylation-dependent binding proteins to gain access to target sequences to regulate local
protein conformation and activity.
RE
TR
AC
T
Kemna and co-workers(2007) also observed that urine
hepcidin is more affected by multiple freeze-thaw cycles
and storage conditions, but less influenced by diurnal variation, than serum hepcidin.
Barbey and co-workers (2009) [54] also produced another interesting scientific work where they described
the results of a proteomic analysis based on SDS-PAGE,
immunoblot and mass spectrometry, aimed at the identification of secreted proteins that are differently
expressed at 30°C versus 37°C and at mid-exponential
versus early-stationary growth phase and antigenic proteins from Rhodococcus equi ATCC 33701. A total of 48
proteins were identified irrespective of growth conditions. Cholesterol oxidase ChoE appears to be the major
secretory protein. Four proteins, in addition, revealed
high homologies with the mycolyl transferases of the
Ag85 complex from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. 24 proteins are transported by a signal peptide-dependent
pathway according to the prediction of the sequence
analysis. Moreover, five antigenic proteins of R. equi
were identified by immunoblot, including a novel,
strongly immunoreactive protein of unknown function.
In conclusion, the elucidation of the secretome of R.
equi identified several proteins with different biological
functions and a new candidate developing vaccines
against R. equi infection in horses.
Radio-labelling polyacrylamide gels (P32 & 2DE)
and 2D phosphopeptide mapping P32 labelling has long
been used, on the other hand, for the analysis of
immunoprecipitated and gel-separated signalling complexes and for quantify cation of differentially phosphorylated proteins by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis
(2DE) of total cell lysates. The latter technique uses differential labelling of cells with P32 and P33 in a control and
experimental group respectively. The samples are combined, and then separated by 2DE before the gels are exposed twice to radio-sensitive film. Comparison of these
two exposures will reveal spots that are specifically phosphorylated under the experimental conditions tested
[55,56]. It measures the incorporation of the label but not
the phosphorylation level, although interesting studies can
be carried out to study different isoforms of the same protein [57]. Two-dimensional (2D) phosphopeptide mapping
by electrophoresis is another useful technique combined
with thin-layer chromatography of peptides derived by
proteolysis of a phosphoprotein. The number of spots
detected indicates the number of sites of phosphorylation,
but it is not easy to determine the position of the phosphorylation sites. Nevertheless, analysis of temporal and
positional changes in a protein phosphorylation pattern
under different physiological conditions [58] is permitted
by this technique. Immunoprecipitation with specific antibodies against phosphopeptides can be used to immunoprecipitate phosphoproteins from the cell lysates [59].
Page 6 of 20
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
ED
spliced amphI isoform was identified in synaptosomes as
being constitutively phosphorylated because it did not incorporate 32P during the 1-h labeling period. Multiple
phosphosites from amphIco- migrating synaptosomal proteins were also identified, including SGIP (Src homology 3
domain growth factor receptor bound 2 (Grb2)-like
(endophilin)-interacting protein 1), AAK1, eps15R, MAP6,
α/β-adducin,and HCN1. Their results revealed two sets of
amphI phosphosites that are either dynamically turning
over or constitutively phosphorylated in nerve terminals
and they improve the understanding of the role of individual amphI sites or phosphosite clusters in synaptic SVE.
• IMAC (SIMAC) Sequential elution Sequential elution from IMAC is useful for purifying, detecting and
characterising phosphorylated peptides from complex
biological samples [72]. It makes use of the observation
that monophosphorylated peptides tend to elute from
IMAC (Fe3+) under acidic conditions whereas multiphosphorylated peptides elute at high basic pH. TiO2 is
used to capture and purify the unbound monophosphorylated peptides in the combined IMAC
flowthrough and washings. SIMAC has been used successfully in the study of human stem cells (~300 μg)
with more than 300 phosphopeptides, including the
identification of mono and multiply phosphorylated peptides [74].
This technology was developed by Tine E. Thingholm
and co-workers (2007) [74]. They reported a simple and
rapid strategy, SIMAC (sequential elution from IMAC),
using stem cells as a sample to be studied, for sequential
separation of monophosphorylated peptides and multiply phosphorylated peptides from highly complex biological samples. This research study, allowed individual
analysis of different pools of phosphorylated peptides
using mass spectrometric parameters differentially optimized due to their unique properties. They compared
the phosphoproteome identified from 120 μg of human
mesenchymal stem cells using SIMAC and an optimized
titanium dioxide chromatographic method. More than
double the total number of identified phosphorylation
sites was obtained with SIMAC, primarily from a 3-fold
increase in recovery of multiply phosphorylated peptides.
RE
TR
AC
T
• Titanium dioxide metal-based chromatography
(TiO2) TiO2 is also capable of binding negatively
charged phosphate groups from aqueous solutions
[65,69,70]. TiO2, like IMAC, experiences the problem of
binding acidic non-phosphorylated peptides (negatively
charged peptides). Heck and co-workers [65] observed a
number of non-phosphorylated peptides in their analysis
and recommended esterification of the acidic residues
prior to the MS analysis. Larsen et al. [41,45,71] used
2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) with TiO2 and
achieved higher specificity and yield compared to IMAC
(Fe3+) for the selective enrichment of phosphorylated
peptides from model proteins. It was also demonstrated
that by the use of glycolic acid in the loading buffer,
more phosphopeptides are bound to the metal ions and
more phosphopeptides can be eluted by using ammonium hydroxide as the eluent. TiO2 binds multiphosphorylated peptides in a strong way, thus their elution is difficult. However, this is a very effective method
for the isolation of singly phosphorylated peptides [72].
The research work of Craft and co-workers (2007) [73]
is an interesting example of the application of TiO2 technique coupled to other proteomic tools. Amphiphysin I
(amphI) is dephosphorylated by calcineurin during nerve
terminal depolarization and synaptic vesicle endocytosis
(SVE). Some amphI phosphorylation sites (phosphosites)
have been identified with in vitro studies or phosphoproteomics screens. A multifaceted strategy including
32P tracking to identify all in vivo amphI phosphosites
and determine their relative abundance and potential relevance to SVE was used. AmphI was extracted from
32Plabeled synaptosomes; phosphopeptides were isolated
from proteolytic digests using TiO2 chromatography, and
mass spectrometry revealed 13 sites: serines 250, 252, 262,
268, 272, 276, 285, 293, 496, 514, 539, and 626 and Thr310. These were distributed into two clusters around the
proline-rich domain and the C-terminal Src homology 3
domain. Hierarchical phosphorylation of Ser- 262 preceded phosphorylation of Ser-268, -272, -276, and −285.
Off-line HPLC (High-performance liquid chromatography
or high-pressure liquid chromatography separation and
two-dimensional tryptic mapping of 32P-labeled amphI
revealed that Thr-310, Ser-293, Ser-285, Ser-272, Ser-276,
and Ser-268 contained the highest 32P incorporation and
were the most stimulus-sensitive. Individually Thr-310
and Ser-293 were the most abundant phosphosites,
incorporating 16 and 23% of the 32P. The multiple
phosphopeptides containing Ser-268, Ser-276, Ser-272,
and Ser-285 had 27% of the 32P. Evidence for a role for at
least one proline-directed protein kinase and one nonproline-directed kinase was obtained. Four phosphosites
predicted for non-prolinedirected kinases, Ser-626, -250,
-252, and −539, contained low amounts of 32P and were
not depolarization-responsive. At least one alternatively
Page 7 of 20
• Zirconium dioxide (ZrO2) The utility of ZrO2 for
phosphopeptide isolation prior to mass spectrometric
analysis has been demonstrated [75]. When compared
with TiO2 using is α and ß casein as protein models,
ZrO2 was capable of isolating singly phosphorylated peptides more selectively than TiO2. An interesting research
study was carried out by Houjiang Zhou et al. (2007)
[76] where the high specificity of this approach was also
demonstrated by the isolation of phosphopeptides from
the digests of model phosphoproteins. The strong
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
RE
TR
AC
T
• Calcium phosphate precipitation This is a strategy
providing a useful pre-fractionation step to simplify and
enrich phosphopeptides from complex samples. Zhang
and co workers [77] have demonstrated that phosphopeptide precipitation by calcium phosphate combined
with a two step IMAC (Fe3+) procedure resulted in the
observation of an increased number of phosphopeptides.
This method consists of precipitating phosphopeptides
by adding 0.5 M NaHPO4 and 2 M NH3OH to the
peptidemixture followed by 2 M CaCl2. The sample is
vortexed and centrifuged, and, subsequently, the supernatant is removed before washing the pellet with 80 mM
CaCl2. The washed pellet is dissolved in 5% of formic
acid and the resulting peptide mixture is desalted
through reversed phase chromatography before isolating
the phosphopeptides by IMAC (Fe3+).
Zhang and co workers [77] point out that even with
very complex biological samples such as the total enzymatic digest of rice embryo proteins, high enrichment
of the phosphopeptides can be achieved with minimal
contamination with non-phosphopeptides. In addition, it
could be possible to reduce the complexity of the samples by successive IMAC enrichments using a limited
amount of IMAC material at each step. This technique
demonstrates that serial phosphopeptide enrichment initiated by a precipitation step improves the selectivity of
phosphopeptide enrichment and allows identification of
more phosphopeptides. In addition, Zhang and co
workers say that further analyses to examine the rice
phosphoproteome in detail are now underway. Moreover, it can be applied for clinical phosphoproteomics
clinical research.
a positively charged analyte is attracted to a negatively
charged solid-support; whilst in anion exchange chromatography negatively charged molecules are attracted to a
positively charged solid-support. SAX has previously been
successfully combined with IMAC [66] and has resulted
in greater recovery and identification by MS of monophosphorylated peptides originating from membrane proteins. In a similar way, SCX has been combined with
IMAC (Fe3+) and MS analysis, allowing the identification
of thousands of phosphorylated residues from complex
biological samples [78]. Moreover, Gruhler and coworkers [78] demonstrated that use of the SCX/IMAC
combination is consistent with their previous study where
strong anion exchange chromatography/IMAC was used.
Thus, either strong anion exchange chromatography
(SAX) or SCX can be used to reduce the sample complexity prior to IMAC enrichment of phosphopeptides in large
scale phosphoproteomics.
As practical issues, Nuhse et al., 2003 [66], investigated and presented a scheme for two-dimensional peptide separation using SAX chromatography prior to
IMAC (Fe3+) in order to decrease the complexity of
IMAC-purified phosphopeptides, obtaining a wide
coverage of monophosphorylated peptides. Nuhse and
co-workers did, in fact, obtain a high yield in identifying
phosphopeptides from membrane proteins. SCX has also
been successfully used coupled to IMAC (Fe3+) and MS
analysis allowing the identification of thousands of phosphorylated residues from biological complex samples
[78,79]. Gruhler and co-workers showed that performing
SCX at low pH (2.7-3.0), phosphorylated peptides are
separated from nonphosphorylated species according to
the charge difference associated with the negatively
charged phosphate group. Therefore, net charged peptides (+1) were collected in the first fractions of the SCX
prefraction step containing mainly single phosphorylated
peptides. These first fractions were then loaded onto
IMAC (Fe3+) micro tips in order to recover a large
number of phosphopeptides from biologically complex
samples.
ED
affinity of ZrO2 nanoparticles to phosphopeptides enables the specific enrichment of phosphopeptides from a
complex peptide mixture in which the abundance of
phosphopeptides is two orders of magnitude lower than
that of nonphosphopeptides. ZrO2 nanoparticles were
further applied to selectively isolate phosphopeptides
from the tryptic digestion of mouse liver lysate for
phosphoproteome analysis by nanoliter LC MS/MS
(nano-LC-MS/MS) and MS/MS/MS. Manual validation,
using a series of rigid criteria, identified a total of 248
defining phosphorylation sites and 140 phosphorylated
peptides. Therefore, ZrO2 has been successfully used in
the large-scale characterisation of phosphoproteins from
mouse liver samples (~1 mg) [76]. A total of 248 phosphorylation sites and 140 phosphorylated peptides were
identified in this study.
Page 8 of 20
• Strong cation and anion exchange (SCX and SAX)
The principle of SCX/SAX phosphopeptide enrichment is
based on the negative charged phosphate group (PO-4) of
the phosphopeptides. In cation exchange chromatography,
• Hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC)
Hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) is a
less commonly used method for peptide fractionation
despite the fact that it is often used to fractionate small
metabolites. HILIC is commonly described as partition
chromatography or liquid/liquid extraction system between the mobile and stationary phase. A water-poor
layer of mobile phase versus a water-rich layer on the
surface of the polar stationary phase is formed. Thus, a
distribution of the analytes between these two layers will
occur. In addition, HILIC includes weak electrostatic
mechanisms as well as hydrogen donor interactions between neutral polar molecules under high organic
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
ED
Disks and graphite powder are materials containing long
hydrocarbon chains, proven to be effective for the
desalting and cleaning of very hydrophilic peptides, including phosphopeptides [71,85]. In 1999, Gobom and
co-workers [82] introduced a micro column purification
method in which a chromatographic resin was packed in
the tip of a small constricted GELoader tip, creating a
micro-column. With GELoader tips packed with R3,
C18 or graphite material, contaminants like salts can be
separated from the phosphopeptides using a chromatographic approach. In fact, using RP chromatography,
molecules such as proteins, peptides and nucleic acids
are separated according to their hydrophobicity. In
addition to the removal of salts, these techniques also facilitate a concentration of the sample by the use of a low
elution volume. This is an additional improvement for
the sensitivity and quality of the subsequent mass spectrometric analysis. RP chromatography is usually
coupled to all the phosphoproteins and phosphopeptides
enrichment-methods previously described.
RE
TR
AC
T
elution conditions. This distinguishes HILIC from ion
exchange chromatography - the main principle for
HILIC separation is based on the compound’s polarity
and degree of salvation. More polar compounds will
have stronger interaction with the stationary aqueous
layer than less polar compounds - resulting in a stronger
retention. In addition, HILIC shows a very good separation and peak shape for critical compounds like adenosine and its phosphate derivatives.
It is of interest to note that Alburquerque and coworkers (2008) [80] carried out a study related to the
separation of unphosphorylated peptides using SCX,
HILIC, and RP-HPLC, indicating that a better orthogonal separation could occur between HILIC and RPHPLC for unphosphorylated peptides. The observed orthogonal separation between HILIC and RP-HPLC is
probably a reflection of their different mechanisms of
separation. Although RP-HPLC depends on interaction
with the hydrophobic amino acid side chains, HILIC depends on interaction with those hydrophilic and possibly
charged amino acid residues via hydrogen bonding and
ionic interactions. Moreover, because phosphopeptides are
generally hydrophilic and charged, one would expect that
phosphopeptides should interact more strongly with
HILIC than do unphosphorylated peptides. Thus, it should
be possible to separate phosphopeptides using HILIC.
Dean E. McNulty and Roland S. Annan (2008) [81]
reported the use of hydrophilic interaction chromatography
(HILIC) as part of a multidimensional chromatography
strategy for proteomics. Analysis of tryptic digests from
HeLa cells yielded numbers of protein identifications comparable to those obtained using strong cation exchange.
They also demonstrate that HILIC represents a significant
advance in phosphoproteomics analysis. In fact, they
exploited the strong hydrophilicity of the phosphate group
to selectively enrich and fractionate phosphopeptides based
on their increased retention under HILIC conditions.
In addition, in this study IMAC enrichment of
phosphopeptides from HILIC fractions showed more than
99% selectivity. This was achieved without the use of derivatization or chemical modifiers. In a 300 μg equivalent of
HeLa cell lysate over 1000 unique phosphorylation sites
were identified. More than 700 novel sites were added to
the HeLa phosphoproteome.
Page 9 of 20
• Reverse phase chromatography All the phosphorylated proteins and phosphopeptides isolations can be
coupled to reverse phase chromatography. Subsequently,
most phosphoprotein-phosphopeptide analyses are
performed nowadays by MS. As the MS technique is
sensitive to contaminants such as salts, it is necessary to
clean the samples prior to analysis, generally by reversed
phase chromatography combining POROs R3 with C18
Disks and also graphite powder [82-84]. Poros R3, C18
• Current methodologies for the detection of phosphorylated proteins - advantages and limitations
There are several analytical techniques for the analysis
of phosphorylation, i.e., Edman sequencing and 32P-phosphopeptide mapping for localization of phosphorylation
sites; however, these methods do not allow highthroughput analysis or imply very high- labour operations [86], whereas with the use of Mass Spectrometry
(MS) high-throughput analysis of phosphorylated protein residues can be developed [67,78]. On the other
hand, phosphospecific antibodies are routinely used to
immunoprecipitate and therefore enrich in phosphorylated proteins from complex mixtures [87], but, currently, no commercial antibodies are available which are
suitable for enriching all proteins that are phosphorylated, and thus, these proteins must be purified or
enriched from complex mixtures using alternative
methods [88]. By carrying out in-gel or in-solution trypsin digestion of protein complex mixtures, the resulted
phosphopeptides and non-phosphopeptides can be
loaded into different metal ion chromatographies (i.e.
Immobilized Metal ion Affinity Chromatography IMAC
(Fe3+), and Titanium Dioxide TiO2 [71] in order to enrich in phosphopeptides. The enriched solution can also
be submitted into different reverse-phase chromatographies (i.e. Graphite powder [89], POROS R3 [88] in
order to clean and desalt those phosphopeptides previously eluted. In addition these kinds of chromatographies will reduce the suppression of phosphorylated
peptides in the mass spectra.
Using IMAC (Fe3+) and also (TiO2) [71] and (ZrO2)
[1], the negatively charged phosphopeptides are purified
by their affinity to positively charged metal ions, but
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
ED
Dioxide (TiO2) [45], which are based on the high affinity
of positively charged metal ions. However, conversion of
carboxylate groups to esters effectively eliminates
nonspecific retention of non-phosphorylated peptides,
although this constitutes a drawback due to increased
complexity in the subsequent MS analysis.
During the last five years, titanium dioxide (TiO2) has
emerged as the most common of the metal oxide affinity
chromatography (MOAC) based phosphopeptide enrichment methods. This technique offers increased capacity
compared to IMAC resins in order to bind and elute
mono-phosphorylated peptides. TiO2 exploits the same
principle as IMAC, and is similarly prone to nonspecific
retention of acidic nonphosphorylated peptides. However, when loading peptides in 2, 5-dihydroxybenzoic
acid (DHB) [71], glycolic and phthalic acids, nonspecific
binding to TiO2 is reduced, thereby improving phosphopeptide enrichment without a chemical modification of
the sample. In addition, TiO2 is often considered to be
interchangeable with IMAC. It works on similar levels of
sample amounts (e.g., micrograms of protein) for the
identification of phospho-sites by MS analysis. Recently,
SIMAC [72,74] appeared as a phosphopeptide enrichment tool which exploits the properties of IMAC
coupled to TiO2, making it possible to carry out more
refined studies. Another phosphopeptide enrichment
prior to mass spectrometric analysis is ZrO2 [75] and
its principle is based on metal affinity chromatography
like IMAC and TiO2. ZrO2 permits the isolation of
single phosphorylated peptides in a more selective
manner than TiO2. It has, in fact, been successfully used
in the large-scale characterization of phosphoproteins
[66,78-80]. Furthermore, strategies which consist of fractionating and subsequently enriching phosphopeptides
on a proteome wide scale are based on strong cation/
anion exchange (SCX and SAX) chromatography and
HILIC interaction chromatography. Calcium phosphate
precipitation is also a useful pre-fractionation step to
simplify and enrich phosphopeptides from complex samples which can be coupled to IMAC [77].
RE
TR
AC
T
some of these methods experience the problem of binding acidic, non-phosphorylated peptides. Ficarro and coworkers [67] bypased this problem on IMAC (Fe3+) by
converting acidic peptides to methyl esters but increased
the spectra complexity and requiring lyophilization of the
sample, which causes adsorptive losses of phosphopeptides
in particular [90]. Ficarro et al., were able to sequence
hundreds of phosphopeptides from yeast, including Slt2p
kinase, but the level of phosphorylated residues identified
from kinases were low compared to those from phosphoproteins highly expressed within the cell. Recently, TiO2
chromatography using 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB)
was introduced as a promising strategy by Larsen et al.,
[71]. TiO2/DHB resulted in a higher specificity and yield
as compared to IMAC (Fe3+) for the selective enrichment
of phosphorylated peptides from model proteins (i.e. lactoglobulin bovine, casein bovine). Moreover, SIMAC has
been developed in order to get a higher efficiency than
IMAC and TiO2 for the isolation of as many
phosphopeptides as possible [74].
The fact that mainly phosphopeptides from highly
expressed proteins within cells can be purified, while
those from phosphorylated proteins with low level
expression (i.e. kinases) do not bind so well to those
resins, constitutes another important limitation
concerning phosphoenrichment methods This is due to
the low proportion of this kind of protein, or, on the
other hand, their available amount binds to metal ions
although it is not sufficient to be detected by MS. The
combination of SCX with IMAC (Fe3+) has been proven
on yeast, resulting in a huge number of phosphorylated
residues identified (over 700 including Fus3p kinase)
[78]. Although more than 100 signalling proteins and
functional phosphorylation sites, including receptors, kinases and transcription factors, were identified, it was
clear that only a fraction of the phosphoproteome was
revealed [78]. In addition, recent combinations of HILIC
with IMAC (Fe3+) have been proven in clinical studies
(HeLa samples), with the result of the identification of a
large number of phosphorylated residues (1000) [81].
Improvement in methodologies to enrich for phosphorylated residues from kinases is clearly necessary.
However, this is not straightforward for several reasons:
(a) The low abundance of those signalling molecules
within cells, (b) The stress/stimulation time-duration, as
only a small fraction of phosphorylated kinases are available at any given time as a result of a stimulus. The time
adaptation over signalling pathways is also a relevant
and fast factor for kinases phosphorylation [91].
Page 10 of 20
• Summary - phosphoprotein and phosphopeptide
enrichments based on electrostatic interactions The
most common techniques for enrichment for individual
and/or global phosphorylation are IMAC and Titanium
B.3. Phosphopeptides isolated by proteomic techniques -MS analysis Phosphorylation on serine and
threonine residues are labile and conventional fragmentation CID (Collision Induced Dissociation) typically results in the partial neutral loss of phosphoric acid
(H3PO4, 98/z) in MS2 mode, due to the gas phase βelimination of the phosphor-ester bond. Therefore,
dehydroalanine and dehydroaminobutyric acid are generated. When peptide ions are fragmented by CID, series
of y- and b- ions are formed [92,93]. By correlating mass
difference between peaks in the y-ion series or between
peaks in the b- ion series with amino acid residue
masses the peptide sequence is obtained. The CID
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
ED
fragmentations to CID are ECD (electron capture Dissociation) and ETD (Electron transfer dissociation). By ECD,
radical peptide ions are obtained when multiplycharged
peptide ions are rationed with low-energy thermalelectrons.
In addition, this fragmentation occurs in the peptide between the backbone amide and the alpha carbon, generating c-and z-ions [97]. An advantage of ECD is that it only
occurs on the peptide backbone, and labile phosphate
groups remain intact on the resulting c- and z- fragment
ions, thus enabling the identification of the specific phosphorylation sites. Therefore, it is extremely useful for the
analysis of multiply-phosphorylated peptides. A disadvantage of ECD is its selectivity for disulfide bonds, due to the
high radical affinity of the bond [98,99]. The main drawback of ECD is that it is solely used in the Fourier
transform-Ion Cyclotron Resonance (FT-ICR) instruments
due to the requirement of a static magnetic field for the
thermal electrons, meaning high costs and high
specialization. c- and z- ions are also generated by ETD.
This fragmentation was actually developed in order to carry
out ECD-like dissociation experiments, in a Quadrupole
Linear Ion Trap [96,100]. ETD is a chemical process in
which reaction with fluoranthene radical anions disrupts
the peptide backbone at regular intervals. ETD preserves
the intact information about labile modifications, which are
not observed directly when using CID. For instance, phosphate groups are good leaving groups, which mean that
they are easily lost in the excitation process. However, by
using ETD one can directly observe fragments that contain
the intact phosphopeptides. The drawback of ETD is that it
is less sensitive compared to CID, because of lower
ionization efficiency. As a result, we recommend using CID
to start with, and would recommend switching to ETD in
case you are not able to determine the phosphorylation
site.
RE
TR
AC
T
fragmentation occurs on the peptide backbone, and only
limited sequence information is obtained. This event can
also compromise the identification of phosphorylation
sites. In relation to phosphotyrosine residues, partial
neutral loss is also observed (HPO3, 80/z) in MS2 mode,
but the phosphate group on tyrosine residues is more
stable than on serine and threonine residues. In addition,
the phospho-fingerprint characteristic of phosphotyrosine,
is the phosphotyrosine immonium ion (~216 Da), this being a positive indicator for the presence of a peptide phosphorylated on tyrosine [94,95]. The ion originating from
neutral loss of phosphoric acid (H3PO4) can be selected for
further fragmentation by MS3 mode. After neutral loss
fragmentation, the selected ion is automatically selected for
further fragmentation. This makes it possible to add extra
energy for the fragmentation of peptide backbone. However, the MS3 mode requires that the phosphorylation on
serine and threonine residues are labile and conventional
fragmentation CID (Collision Induced Dissociation) typically results in the partial neutral loss of phosphoric acid
(H3PO4, 98/z) in MS2 mode, due to the gas phase βelimination of the phosphor-ester bond. Therefore,
dehydroalanine and dehydroaminobutyric acid are generated. When peptide ions are fragmented by CID, series of
y- and b- ions are formed [92,93]. The peptide sequence is
obtained by correlating mass difference between peaks in
the y-ion series or between peaks in the b-ion series with
amino acid residue masses. The CID fragmentation occurs
on the peptide backbone, and only limited sequence information is obtained. This event can also compromise the
identification of phosphorylation sites. In relation to
phosphotyrosine residues, partial neutral loss is also observed (HPO3, 80/z) in MS2 mode, but the phosphate
group on tyrosine residues is more stable than on serine
and threonine residues. In addition, the phosphofinger-print characteristic of phosphotyrosine, is the
phosphotyrosine immonium ion (~216 Da), which is a
positive indicator for the presence of a peptide phosphorylated on tyrosine [94,95]. The ion originating from neutral
loss of phosphoric acid (H3PO4) can be selected for further
fragmentation by MS3 mode. The selected ion, after neutral loss fragmentation, is automatically selected for further
fragmentation. This makes it possible to add extra energy
for the fragmentation of peptide backbone. However, the
MS3 mode requires that the selected ion is abundant in
order to observe the fragmented ions. A pseudo-MS3 development is MultiStage Activation (MSA) [96], which was
implemented on quadrupole-IT and linear IT-orbitrap. In
MSA, the fragmentation of the precursor ion occurs simultaneously with the fragmentation of the ion originating
from the neutral loss. The MS2 and MS3 massdata are
then combined in a hybrid spectrum, resulting in improved
sequence information and also in an improvement of reliance for the phosphorylation site assignment. Alternative
Page 11 of 20
(C) Quantitative proteomic methodologies used in clinical
research; examples of relevant phosphorylated proteins
studied
For phosphopeptides proteins containing amino acids
with one or more of the stable isotopes of 2H, 13C, 15 N
or 18O can be used as internal standards by addition, at
an early stage of the analysis, of a complex protein sample. There are two approaches for introducing a stable
isotope into proteins or peptides: metabolic labelling
using whole cells grown in culture (e.g. SILAC) or
chemical labelling (e.g. iTRAQ, ICAT). Since protein
phosphorylation is very dynamic and constantly changing throughout the life of a cell, measuring the changes
in phosphorylation is critical for understanding the biology of a phosphorylation event, We restrict the discussion here to four MS based quantitation strategies which
have direct utility towards measuring changes in protein
phosphorylation extensively: SILAC, iTRAQ, AQUA and
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
RE
TR
AC
T
C.1. Stable Isotope Labelling with Amino acid in cell
Culture (SILAC) Stable isotope labelling by amino acids
in cell culture (SILAC) is a quantitative method based
on in vivo labelling of proteins in cell cultures with
amino acids that contain stable isotopes (non radioactive, e.g. 2H, 13C and 15 N) [57,101]. In its simplest
form, two separated cell cultures are grown in a pairwise fashion; for example, culture A might be yeast cells
grown under “normal” conditions (light conditions)
while culture B might be yeast cells grown in the presence of a stress condition. The growth conditions of the
cells are identical (except for the presence of the stress
stimuli), but the growth media of culture B has an essential amino acid (one not synthesized by the cell) replaced
with an isotopically “heavy” form of that amino acid (e.g.
13
C6-arginine). A number of cell lines have been used
for SILAC experiments, and the growth and morphology
of the cells have not been affected by the isotopically labelled amino acid [78,101,102].
After approximately five rounds of doubling, cellular
proteins are essentially 100% labelled with the selected
amino acid. After culturing, the light and heavy cell populations are combined (1:1) into one pool and the proteins are isolated. The protein pool is then digested with
a protease, typically trypsin, to form a peptide pool that
is analyzed by MS. Each peptide analyzed will be present
in two forms: the light and the heavy form. They are distinguishable based on the mass difference due to the
heavy isotope incorporation in the selected amino acid.
The SILAC method is compatible with the above mentioned enrichment of phosphoproteins/phosphopeptides
including the immunoprecipitation of a target protein
[103]. One of the first research studies which carryied
out this technology was provided by Gruhler and coworkers (2005) [78]. In this study, more than 700
phosphopeptides from Sacharomyces cerevisiae were
identified, 139 were differentially regulated at least 2fold in response to mating pheromone. Components belonging to the mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling pathway and to downstream processes including
transcriptional regulation, the establishment of polarized
growth, and the regulation of the cell cycle were among
these regulated proteins.
C.2. Isobaric Tag for Relative and Absolute (iTRAQ)
The second method for the global quantification of proteins and protein modifications is an in vitro chemical
labelling procedure called iTRAQ. The iTRAQ reagent
consists of two to eight isobaric tags that can be used to
label two to eight separate protein samples. The iTRAQ
tags contain three regions: a peptide reactive region, a
reporter region, and a balance region [104]. The peptide
reactive region of the tag consists of an NHS ester and is
designed to react with the N-termini and lysines of peptides after protease digestions. In the case of 4-plex
iTRAQ, the four reporter groups appear in the tandem
mass spectrum at m/z 114, 115, 116, and 117. The attached balance groups are designed to make the total
mass of the balance and reporter group 145 Da for each
tag, which results in balance groups of 31 Da, 30 Da,
29 Da, and 28 Da, respectively. Protein samples for
quantification are separately isolated and digested proteolytically, and each sample is chemically labelled with
one of the iTRAQ reagents. After labelling, the samples
are combined and subsequently analyzed by MS. Identical peptides from each sample will have identical masses
as the iTRAQ reagents are isobaric The iTRAQ reagent
labels phosphopeptides to the same degree as
nonphosphorylated peptides and it does not affect the
stability of phosphopeptides. Enrichment strategies, such
as IMAC [44,105] or immunoprecipitation with antiphosphotyrosine antibodies [44], have been used to remove non-phosphorylated peptides to focus the analysis
on site-specific phosphorylation. Since iTRAQ is an
in vitro labelling procedure it can also be applied to clinical samples such as tumour tissues and fluids (e.g.
serum, urine, blood). iTRAQ has been described as a
very powerful method for the quantification of phosphorylation on a proteomic scale. As a relevant example
we mention that Boja and co-workers (2009) [106] successfully monitored phosphorylation sites of mitochondrial proteins including adenine nucleotide translocase,
malate dehydrogenase and mitochondrial creatine kinase, etc. Among them, four proteins exhibited phosphorylation changes with these physiological stimuli: (a)
BCKDH-E1α subunit increased phosphorylation at
Ser337 with DCA and de-energization; (b) apoptosisinducing factor phosphorylation was elevated at Ser345
with calcium; (c) ATP synthase F1 complex α subunit
and (d) mitofilin dephosphorylated at Ser65 and Ser264
upon de-energization. This screening validated the
iTRAQ/HCD technology as a method for functional
quantitation of mitochondrial protein phosphorylation
as well as providing insights into the regulation of mitochondria via phosphorylation.
ED
MRM. Other chemical labelling techniques which rely
on stable isotope incorporation using e.g. 18O labelled
water during trypsin digestions and stable isotope incorporation ICAT can also be considered to contain
relevant information, but will not be described here. In
addition, we will also include the explanation and examples of 2-D Fluorescence Difference Gel Electrophoresis
(2D_DIGE) quantification methodology, which nowadays
also provides interesting research studies.
Page 12 of 20
C.3. Absolute Quantitation (AQUA) The AQUA strategy provides an absolute quantification of a protein of
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
ED
translational modifications in proteins. MRM has recently been used by White and co-workers [112,113] to
identify and quantify tyrosine phosphorylated kinases for
hundreds of nodes within a signalling network and
across multiple experimental conditions. Moreover,
White and co-workers [112,113] applied iTRAQ combined with MRM for phospho quantitative analysis of
signalling networks, identifying and quantifying 222 tyrosine phosphorylated peptides, obtaining an extremely
high percentage of signalling nodes covered. They defined the mechanisms by which EGFRvIII protein alters
cell physiology, as it is one of the most commonly mutated proteins in GBM and has been linked to radiation
and chemotherapeutic resistance. They performed a
phosphoproteomic analysis of EGFRvIII signalling networks in GBM cells. The results of this study provided
important insights into the biology of this mutated receptor, including oncogene dose effects and differential
utilization of signalling pathways. In addition, clustering
of the phosphoproteomic data set revealed a previously
undescribed crosstalk between EGFRvIII and the c-Met
receptor. Treatment of the cells with a combination
using both EGFR and c-Met kinase inhibitors dramatically decreased cell viability in vitro.
RE
TR
AC
T
interest [107]. In the AQUA method, a peptide from the
protein of interest is constructed synthetically containing
stable isotopes, and the isotopically labelled synthetic
peptide is called AQUA peptide. The synthetic peptides
can be synthesized with modifications such as phosphorylation to allow for the direct, quantitative analysis of
posttranslationally modified proteins. The stable isotopes
are incorporated into the AQUA peptide by using isotopically “heavy” amino acids during the synthesis
process of the interesting peptide (native peptide). In
this way, the synthetic peptide has a mass increase of
e.g. 10 Daltons, due to the incorporation of a 13C6 and
15 N4-arginine into the synthetic peptide, compared to
the native peptide. Although the mass difference between the native and the synthetic peptide allows the
mass spectrometer to differentiate between the two
forms, both forms have the same chemical properties,
resulting in the same chromatographic retention,
ionization efficiency, and fragmentation distribution.
In AQUA experiments, a known amount of the isotopically labelled peptide is added to a protein mixture,
which is proteolytically digested, and later analyzed by
MS. Since the native peptide and its synthetic counterpart have the same chemical properties, the MS signal
from the quantified synthetic peptide can be compared
to the signal of the native peptide. The absolute quantification of the peptide to be determined [108] is thus finally permitted. Multiple AQUA peptides can be used
to quantify multiple proteins in a single experiment.
Ziwei Yu and co-workers (2007) [109] using AQUA as
a novel system of in situ quantitative protein expression
analysis, studied the protein expression levels of phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt). Activation of Akt in tumours is
mediated via several mechanisms, including activation of
cell membrane receptor tyrosine kinases such as EGFR
and loss of phosphatase PTEN with dephosphorylation
of phosphoinositol triphosphate. Ziwei and co-workers
(2007) discovered that Akt activation in oropharyngeal
squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is associated with
adverse patient outcome, indicating that Akt is a promising molecular target in oropharyngeal squamous cell
carcinoma.
Page 13 of 20
C.4. Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) MRM is a
very sensitive method for detecting phosphorylated peptides on a hybrid triple quadrupole linear ion trap mass
spectrometer (qTRAP). This method requires that the sequence of the protein be known in order to calculate precursor and fragment ion values, which can be used to
trigger dependent ion scans in a qTRAP instrument
[110,111]. This technique can also be used to perform a
precursor ion and neutral loss scan, to identify unknown
phosphopeptides from a complex mixture, and is a powerful method for the identification and quantification of post-
C.5. 2-D Fluorescence Difference Gel Electrophoresis
(DIGE) In DiGE, proteins extracted from a control extract are labelled with one CyDye (Cy3 or Cy5 conjugated), and proteins isolated from a test extract labelled
with the other colour of CyDye fluorophore, which are
size and charge matched. These labelled protein extracts
are mixed and co-resolved (often with the addition of an
internal standard, which can be labelled with Cy2) on
large-format two-dimensional gels for analysis of expression changes in the resulting pattern of spots (’spot
maps’) [114]. In comparison with two-dimensional gel
electrophoresis, DiGE offers the advantage that multiple
samples could be compared on a single gel
(’multiplexing’), and made it possible to stain control
and test samples with different fluorescent dyes prior to
electrophoresis. This advance alleviated issues of gel-to
-gel comparison and decreased the number of gels required. The capability to include an internal standard,
composed of an equal fraction of all the samples in an
experiment, also improved intergel matching and facilitated normalization of matched spots in replicate samples on multiple gels. The use of CyDyes to label
proteins, in place of non-fluorescent post-stains, can give
a large enhancement of sensitivity for protein detection
[115] and constitutes the crucial advantage of the DiGE
approach for biomaterial applications. This enables
analysis of even very scarce protein samples, including
small areas of laser-microdissected tissue [116,117].
Twodimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
(D) Phosphorylated proteins related to different diseases
and the benefits of proteomic strategies in such clinical
studies
ED
In a recent study Steen et al. examined the role of phosphorylation in the dynamics of the anaphase promoting
complex (APC) [121]. Some drugs that bind to microtubules and block mitosis are ineffective in cancer treatment; others show inexplicable focal efficacy. For
example, the vinca alkaloids are useful for treating
lymphoma, neuroblastoma and nephroblastomas,
whereas taxol is useful for advanced breast cancer and
ovarian cancer. It is not known why these drugs are not
all equally effective, nor why they have different therapeutic value against different cancers. The authors observed distinct phosphorylation states of the APC in
response to different antimitotic drugs and suggest they
may explain some of these differences. They also
propose it is possible that cells from different tissues, or
cells harbouring different mutations, or cells under different physiological stresses, such as hypoxia, may differ
in their response to spindle poisons and would thus reflect those differences in different sites of phosphorylation. Differences in spindle checkpoint phosphorylation
may reveal new features of the mitotic state. The categorisation of drugs, the discrimination of the response
of tumours to drugs and the identification of new means
of checkpoint control may be facilitated by the ability to
characterise drug candidates based on the spectrum of
APC phosphorylations The authors further suggest that
the results of the study indicate that the term mitotic arrest is a misnomer: arrest is a dynamic state in which
some cells enter apoptosis and other cells revert to interphase. The ability to observe biochemical events during
arrest could be very important for understanding
antiproliferative treatments. The exploration of the dynamics of phosphorylation, however, makes great demands on the accuracy of quantitation. Most mass
spectrometric based quantitative approaches, including
stable isotope labelling with amino acids in cell culture
(SILAC) and isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ), give relative data, meaning that one
state of phosphorylation is determined relative to another phosphorylation state [122-124]; these data can
help to establish the kinetics of a pathway. The method
used in this work offers a significant advance over earlier
techniques. It allowed the measurement of specific
quantitative changes in APC phosphorylation in cells
arrested in nocodazole for varying periods. If these dynamics can be correlated with the process by which the
arrested state is resolved, we may be provided with new
tools to understand the mitotic process and to find more
effective drug targets in cancer.
The long-held belief in the cancer research community
that a precise molecular understanding of cancer can
RE
TR
AC
T
DIGE) with novel ultra high sensitive fluorescent dyes
(CyDye DIGE Fluor saturation dye) enables the efficient
protein expression profiling of laser-microdissected tissue samples. The combined use of laser microdissection
allows accurate proteomic profiling of specific cells including tumour tissues [118].
As an example, differential protein analysis was
performed using 2-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) by Yefei Rong and co-workers
(2010) [119]. They found that 16 protein spots were
differently expressed between the two mixtures (a comparison was made with serum samples from five individuals with pancreatic cancer and five individuals
without cancer). Yefei Rong and co-workers [119] demonstrated that eight proteins from these fluids were upregulated and 8 were down-regulated in cancer. Mass
spectrometry and database searching allowed the identification of the proteins corresponding to the gel
spots. Up-regulation of mannosebinding lectin 2 and
myosin light chain kinase 2, which had not previously
been implicated in pancreatic cancer, were observed.
In an independent series of serum samples from 16
patients with pancreatic cancer and 16 noncancerbearing controls, increased levels of mannosebinding lectin 2 and myosin light chain kinase 2 were
confirmed by western blot.
Moreover, Nagano (2010) [120] has recently developed
the technology named “antibody proteomics technology”. This technology can screen for biomarker proteins
by isolating antibodies against each candidate in a rapid
and comprehensive manner. He applied “antibody proteomics technology” to breast cancer-related biomarker
discovery and evaluated the utility of this novel technology. Cell extracts derived from breast tumour cells
(SKBR3) and normal cells were analyzed by twodimensional differential gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE)
in order to identify proteins over-expressed in the
tumour cells. Candidate proteins were extracted from
the gel pieces, immobilized onto a nitrocellulose membrane using a dot blot apparatus and then used as target
antigens in scFv-phage enrichment and selection. scFvs
binding to 21 different over-expressed proteins in tumor
cells were successfully isolated within several weeks following this in vitro phage selection procedure. The expression profiles of the identified proteins were then
determined by tissue microarray analysis using the scFvphages. Consequently, three breast tumour-specific proteins were identified. His data demonstrated the utility
of an antibody proteomics system for discovering and
validating tumour-related proteins in pharmaceutical
proteomics. Currently, he and other related groups are
analyzing the functions of these proteins in order to be
able to confirm and use them as diagnostic markers or
therapeutic targets.
Page 14 of 20
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
ED
tumours and illustrates the importance of understanding
protein phosphorylation.
A central role is played by mitochondria in energy metabolism and cellular survival, and consequently mitochondrial dysfunction is associated with a number of
human pathologies. Moreover, mitochondrial dysfunction is linked to insulin resistance in humans with obesity and type 2 diabetes. Recently, Zhao and co-workers
(2011) [125], studied the phosphoproteome of the mitochondria isolated from human skeletal muscle. Zhao and
coworkers revealed extensive phosphorylation of inner
membrane protein complexes and enzymes combining
titanium dioxide (TiO2) protocols with reverse phase
chromatography coupled to MS analysis. 155 distinct
phosphorylation sites in 77 mitochondrial phosphoproteins,including 116 phosphoserine, 23 phosphothreonine,
and 16 phosphotyrosine residues were identified. Phosphorylation sites in mitochondrial proteins involved in
amino acid degradation, importers and transporters,calcium homeostasis, and apoptosis were also assigned.
Furthermore, many of these mitochondrial phosphoproteins are substrates for protein kinase A, protein kinase
C, casein kinase II and DNA-dependent protein kinase.
RE
TR
AC
T
result in cancer therapy is validated by the development
of drugs for specific biological pathways with increased
specificity and reduced toxicity. The development of
Herceptin, a monoclonal antibody against the HER2
receptor for breast cancer therapy is one of the most
successful recent examples of cancer-specific drugs.
HER2 is an important target in cancer because its
overexpression increases tumour cell proliferation, vessel
formation and invasiveness, and predicts poor prognosis.
Wolf-Yadlin and other scientists [111,112,121-124] have
used phosphoproteomics and MS to investigate the role
of phosphorylation in the effects of HER2 overexpression on EGF- and HRG-mediated signalling of
erbB receptors. Identification was possible of specific
combinations of phosphorylation sites that correlate with
cell proliferation and migration and that potentially represent targets for therapeutic intervention. Unfortunately,
owing to sensitivity limitations, only 68 out of 322 phosphorylation sites could be analysed kinetically, so the
study does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the
multitude of effects produced by HER2 overexpression. It
does, however, mark an important breakthrough in the
characterisation of the erbB receptor signalling network in
Page 15 of 20
Figure 3 A prototypical proteomics pipe-line useful for clinical research. Depending on the application, different samples processed and
fed into the proteomics pipeline yield different results. The pipeline’s several steps are listed in the different panels: (1) proteolytic digest, (2) the
separation and ionization of peptides, (3) their analysis by MS, (4) fragmentation of selected peptides and analysis of the resulting MS/MS spectra
and, (5) (6) data-computer analysis, which includes identification and quantification of proteins from several detected peptides.
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
ED
seen tremendous advances. For example, MS/MS product ion scanning, multistage activation and precursor
ion scanning are effective methods for identifying serine
(Ser), threonine (Thr) and tyrosine (Tyr) phosphorylated peptides.
The current phosphoproteomic goals imply the identification of phosphoproteins, mapping of phosphorylation
sites, quantitation of phosphorylation under different
conditions, and the determination of the stoichiometry
of the phosphorylation. In addition, knowing when a
protein is phosphorylated, which kinase/s is-are involved, and how each phosphorylation fits into the signalling network, are also important challenges for
researchers in order to understand the significance of
different biological events. The new MS technologies are
fundamental for cataloguing all this information, and it
is heading towards the collection of accurate data on
phosphopeptides on a global scale. In addition, the possible difficulties to get sufficient amount of specific
phosphorylated proteins of specific low abundant
protein-kinases in vivo which might limit the usability of
the phosphoproteome analysis, must be pointed out.
Finally, it is important to state that to develop clinical
proteomic applications using the identified proteins and
phosphoproteins, collaboration between research scientists, clinicians and diagnostic companies, and proteomic
experts is essential, particularly in the early phases of the
biomarker development projects. The proteomics modalities currently available have the potential to lead to
the development of clinical applications, and channelling
the wealth of the information produced towards concrete and specific clinical purposes is urgent.
TR
AC
T
The high number of phosphotyrosine residues suggests
that tyrosine phosphorylation has an important role in
mitochondrial signalling. Many of the mitochondrial
phosphoproteins are involved oxidative phosphorylation,
tricarboxylic acid cycle, and lipid metabolism, i.e. processes proposed to be involved in insulin resistance. It is
well known that mitochondria dysfunction is centrally
involved in a number of human pathologies, such as
type 2 diabetes, parkinson’s disease and cancer [126]. In
this study, the most prevalent form of cellular protein
posttranslational modifications (PTMs), reversible phosphorylation [127-134][135–139], emerges as a central
mechanism in the regulation of mitochondrial functions
[130,131]. The steadily increasing numbers of reported
mitochondrial kinases, phosphatases and phosphoproteins also imply the important role of protein phosphorylation in different mitochondrial processes [132-134].
The prototypical proteomics pipe-line useful for clinical
research is illustrated (Figure 3).
Page 16 of 20
(E) Observations and future needs
RE
Cancer and immune disorders are still among the leading causes of death worldwide. Therefore, there is still a
need for the identification of useful biomarkers and the
improvement of the understanding of the development
of these diseases. The immune system is readily affected
by the existence of cancer in the body, even at a preclinical stage, and these studies should be expanded and extended in the future to answer the numerous questions
concerning (a) the roles of immune cells in cancer surveillance (b) the characteristics of inflammation in association with cancer development, (c) the effects of
environment/lifestyle factors on the immune system,
and (d) the interaction between aging diseases. The importance of protein kinase-regulated signal transduction
pathways in immunology disorders and cancer has led
to the development of drugs that inhibit protein kinases
at the apex or intermediary levels of these pathways.
Protein phosphorylation assignment studies of these
signalling pathways will provide important insights into
the operation and connectivity of these pathways that
will facilitate the identification of the best targets for
cancer therapies and immunology diseases (e.g. the
identification of a phosphate group on a specific serine,
threonine or tyrosine by phosphoenrichments combined with MS). Phosphoproteomic analysis of individual tumours, blood, sera, tissues will also help match
targeted therapeutic drugs to the appropriate patients.
It is now generally accepted that no single proteomic
method is comprehensive, but combinations of different
enrichment methods produce distinct overlapping
phosphopeptide datasets to enhance the overall results
in phosphoproteome analysis. During the last decade,
phosphopeptide sequencing by mass spectrometry has
Abbreviations
Note: These abbreviations are useful proteomic abbreviations some of them
are mentioned and described in this Review and they are also described in
the References of this article.; AQUA: Absolute Quantitation; CID: CollisionInduced Dissociation; Da: Dalton (molecular mass); DIGE 2-D: Fluorescence
Difference Gel Electrophoresis; ECD: Electron Capture Dissociation;
ESI: Electron Spray Ionization; ETD: Electron Transfer Dissociation; FTICR: Fourier transform-Ion Cyclotron Resonance; HILIC: Hydrophilic interaction
chromatography; HPLC: High-performance liquid chromatography or highpressure liquid chromatography; H3PO4: Phosphoric acid; ICR: Ion Cyclotron
Resonance; IMAC: Immobilized Metal Affinity Capture; IT: Ion Trap;
iTRAQ: Isobaric Tag for Relative and Absolute Quantitation; kDa: kilodalton
(molecular mass); LC: Liquid Chromatography; MALDI: Matrix-Assisted Laser
Desorption/Ionization; MOAC: Metal Oxide Affinity Chromatography;
Mr: Relative molecular mass (dimensionless); MRM: Multiple reaction
monitoring; MS: Mass Spectrometry; MSA: MultiStage Activation; MS/
MS: tandem mass spectrometry; m/z: Mass to charge ratio; PID: Primary
Immunodeficiencies; PTM: Post-Translational Modification; SILAC: Stable
Isotope Labelling with Amino acid in cell Culture; SIMAC: Sequential Elution
from IMAC; TiO2: Titanium dioxide; TOF: Time of Flight; ZrO2: Zirconium
dioxide.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
EL carried out the proteomics, phosphoproteomics and mass spectrometry
studies for this review. IL, AF, JS carried out the clinical studies for this
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
Acknowledgements
EL PhD was a recipient of a Post-doctoral fellowship of Ministerio de Ciencia
e Innovación de España. IL PhD was a recipient of a FLL (Fundación
Leucemia y Linfoma) grant. AF and JL are M.D. PhD with permanent
positions from Spanish National Hospitals La Paz and Carlos III respectively.
Author details
1
Inflammatory core, Centro de Investigación i + 12 del Hospital Universitario
12 de Octubre, Avda de Córdoba s/n, 28041, Madrid, Spain. 2Hematology
Department, Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Avda de Córdoba s/n, 28041,
Madrid, Spain. 3Immunology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, P° de
la Castellana, 261-28046, Madrid, Spain. 4Immunology Department, Hospital
Carlos III, Sinesio Delgado, 28029, Madrid, Spain.
Received: 31 January 2011 Accepted: 2 June 2011
Published: 2 June 2011
RE
TR
AC
T
References
1. Ashman K, Villar EL: Phosphoproteomics and cancer research. Clin Transl
Oncol 2009, 11(6):356–362.
2. Dolado I, Nebreda AR: AKT and oxidative stress team up to kill cancer
cells. Cancer Cell 2008, 14(6):427–429.
3. Malumbres M, Barbacid M: To cycle or not to cycle: a critical decision in
cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2001, 1(3):222–231. Review.
4. Swat A, Dolado I, Rojas JM, Nebreda AR: Cell density-dependent inhibition
of epidermal growth factor receptor signalling by p38alpha
mitogenactivated protein kinase via Sprouty2 downregulation. Mol Cell
Biol 2009, 29(12):3332–3343.
5. Ventura JJ, Tenbaum S, Perdiguero E, Huth M, Guerra C, Barbacid M,
Pasparakis M, Nebreda AR: p38alpha MAP kinase is essential in lung stem
and progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation. Nat Genet 2007,
39(6):750–758.
6. Hulit J, Suyama K, Chung S, Keren R, Agiostratidou G, Shan W, Dong X,
Williams TM, Lisanti MP, Knudsen K, Hazan RB: N-cadherin signalling
potentiates mammary tumor metastasis via enhanced extracellular
signal-regulated kinase activation. Cancer Res 2007, 67(7):3106–3116.
7. Chen LL, Ji Y, Xu JF, Lu SH, Hou YY, Hou J, Sujie A, Zeng HY, Tan YS: Focal
nodular hyperplasia of liver: a clinicopathologic study of 238 patients.
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 2011, 40(1):17–22. Chinese.
8. Moro L, Arbini AA, Marra E, Greco M: Constitutive activation of MAPK/ERK
inhibits prostate cancer cell proliferation through upregulation of
BRCA2. Int J Oncol 2007, 30(1):217–224.
9. Zebisch A, Czernilofsky AP, Keri G, Smigelskaite J, Sill H, Troppmair J:
Signalling through RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK: from basics to bedside. Curr Med
Chem 2007, 14(5):601–623.
10. Matsuura K, Nohno Y, Hijiya N, Uchida T, Tsukamoto Y, Moriyama M:
Extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase is activated in cervical
intraepithelial neoplasms but inactivated in invasive cervical carcinoma.
Pathol Int 2006, 56(7):368–374.
11. Gerke V, Moss SE: Annexins: from structure to function. Physiol Rev 2002,
82(2):331–371.
12. Alldridge LC, Harris HJ, Plevin R, Hannon R, Bryant CE: The annexin protein
lipocortin 1 regulates the MAPK/ERK pathway. J Biol Chem 1999, 274(53):
37620–37628.
13. Sudo T, Hidaka H: Regulation of calcyclin (S100A6) binding by alternative
splicing in the N-terminal regulatory domain of annexin XI isoforms. J
Biol Chem 1998, 273(11):6351–6357.
14. Araki R, Fukumura R, Fujimori A, Taya Y, Shiloh Y, Kurimasa A, Burma S, Li
GC, Chen DJ, Sato K, Hoki Y, Tatsumi K, Abe M: Enhanced phosphorylation
of p53 serine 18 following DNA damage in DNAdependent protein
kinase catalytic subunit-deficient cells. Cancer Res 1999, 59(15):3543–3546.
15. Boutros R, Lobjois V, Ducommun B: CDC25 phosphatases in cancer cells:
key players? Good targets? Nat Rev Cancer 2007, 7(7):495–507. Review.
16. Galaktionov K, Lee AK, Eckstein J, Draetta G, Meckler J, Loda M, Beach D:
CDC25 phosphatases as potential human oncogenes. Science 1995,
269(5230):1575–1577.
17. Chen Y, Lu B, Yang Q, Fearns C, Yates JR, Lee JD: Combined integrin
phosphoproteomic analyses and small interfering RNA–based functional
screening identify key regulators for cancer cell adhesion and migration.
Cancer Res 2009, 69(8):3713–3720.
18. Tsukada S, Saffran DC, Rawlings DJ, Parolini O, Allen RC, Klisak I, Sparkes RS,
Kubagawa H, Mohandas T, Quan S, Belmont JW, Cooper MD, Conley EM,
Witte NO: Deficient expression of a B cell cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase in
human X-linked agammaglobulinemia. Cell 1993, 72(2):279–290.
19. Vetrie D, Vorechovský I, Sideras P, Holland J, Davies A, Flinter F,
Hammarström L, Kinnon C, Levinsky R, Bobrow M, Edvard Smith CI, Bentley
RD: The gene involved in X-linked agammaglobulinaemia is a member
of the src family of protein-tyrosine kinases. Nature 1993, 364(6435):362.
20. Futatani T, Miyawaki T, Tsukada S, Hashimoto S, Kunikata T, Arai S, Kurimoto
M, Niida Y, Matsuoka H, Sakiyama Y, Iwata T, Tsuchiya S, Tatsuzawa O,
Yoshizaki K, Kishimoto T: Deficient expression of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase
in monocytes from X-linked agammaglobulinemia as evaluated by a
flow cytometric analysis and its clinical application to carrier detection.
Blood 1998, 91(2):595–602.
21. Smith CI, Baskin B, Humire-Greiff P, Zhou JN, Olsson PG, Maniar HS, Kjellén P,
Lambris JD, Christensson B, Hammarström L, et al: Expression of Bruton’s
agammaglobulinemia tyrosine kinase gene, BTK, is selectively downregulated in T lymphocytes and plasma cells. J Immunol 1994, 152(2):557–
565.
22. Smith CIE, Satterthwaite AB, Witte ON: In Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases
a Molecular and Genetic Approach. Edited by Ochs HD, Smith CIE. New York:
Oxford University Press; 2007:279–303.
23. Mohamed AJ, Yu L, Bäckesjö CM, Vargas L, Faryal R, Aints A, Christensson B,
Berglöf A, Vihinen M, Nore BF, Smith CI: Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (Btk):
function, regulation, and transformation with special emphasis on the
PH domain. Immunol Rev 2009, 228(1):58–73.
24. Chapel H, Cunningham-Rundles C: Update in understanding common
variable immunodeficiency disorders (CVIDs) and the management of
patients with these conditions. Br J Haematol 2009, 145(6):709–727.
25. Cunningham-Rundles C, Bodian C: Common variable immunodefiency:
clinical and immunological features of 248 patients. Clin Immunol 1999,
92(1):34–48.
26. Wehr C, Kivioja T, Schmitt C, Ferry B, Witte T, Eren E, Vlkova M, Hernandez
M, Detkova D, Bos PR, Poerksen G, von Bernuth H, Baumann U, Goldacker S,
Gutenberger S, Schlesier M, Bergeron-van der Cruyssen F, Le Garff M, Debré
P, Jacobs R, Jones J, Bateman E, Litzman J, van Hagen PM, Plebani A,
Schmidt RE, Thon V, Quinti I, Espanol T, Webster AD, Chapel H, Vihinen M,
Oksenhendler E, Peter HH, Warnatz K: The EURO class trial: defining
subgroups in common variable immunodeficiency. Blood 2008,
111(1):77–85.
27. Bacchelli C, Buckridge S, Thrasher AJ, Gaspar HB: Translational mini-review
series on immunodeficiency: molecular defects in common variable
immunodeficiency. Clin Exp Immunol 2007, 149(3):401–409.
28. Salzer U, Chapel HM, Webster AD, Pan-Hammarström Q, Schmitt-Graeff A,
Schlesier M, Peter HH, Rockstroh JK, Schneider P, Schäffer AA, Hammarström
L, Grimbacher B: Mutations in TNFRSF13B encoding TACI are associated
with common variable immunodeficiency in humans. Nat Genet 2005,
37(8):820–828.
29. Castigli E, Wilson SA, Garibyan L, Rachid R, Bonilla F, Schneider L, Geha RS:
TACI is mutant in common variable immunodeficiency and IgA
deficiency. Nat Genet 2005, 37(8):829–834.
30. Pan-Hammarström Q, Salzer U, Du L, Björkander J, Cunningham-Rundles C,
Nelson DL, Bacchelli C, Gaspar HB, Offer S, Behrens TW, Grimbacher B,
Hammarström L: Reexamining the role of TACI coding variants in
common variable immunodeficiency and selective IgA deficiency. Nat
Genet 2007, 39(4):429–430.
31. Volanakis JE, Zhu ZB, Schaffer FM, Macon KJ, Palermos J, Barger BO, Go R,
Campbell RD, Schroeder HW Jr, Cooper MD: Major histocompatibility
complex class III genes and susceptibility to immunoglobulin A
deficiency and common variable immunodeficiency. J Clin Invest 1992,
89(6):1914–1922.
32. Olerup O, Smith CI, Bjorkander J, Hammarstrom L: Shared HLA class II
associated genetic susceptibility and resistance, related to the HLA–
DQB1 gene, in IgA deficiency and common variable immunodeficiency.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992, 89(22):10653–10657.
33. Grimbacher B, Hutloff A, Schlesier M, Glocker E, Warnatz K, Dräger R, Eibel H,
Fischer B, Schäffer AA, Mages HW, Kroczek RA, Peter HH: Homozygous loss
ED
review. EL, IL, AF and JS carried out these complementary studies in order to
develop clinical phosphoproteomics research and publish this article. All
authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Page 17 of 20
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
ED
36.
56. Wyttenbach A, Tolkovsky AM: Differential phosphoprotein labeling
(DIPPL), a method for comparing live cell phosphoproteomes using
simultaneous analysis of (33)P- and (32)P-labeled proteins. Mol Cell
Proteomics 2006, 5(3):553–559.
57. Ong SE, Mann M: Mass spectrometry based proteomics turns
quantitative. Nat Chem Biol 2005, 1(5):252–262.
58. Blaukat A: Identification of G-protein-coupled receptor phosphorylation
sites by 2D phosphopeptide mapping. Methods Mol Biol 2004, 259:283–297.
59. Gafken PR, Lampe PD: Methodologies for characterizing phosphoproteins
by mass spectrometry. Cell Commun Adhes 2006, 13(5–6):249–262.
60. Andersson L, Porath J: Isolation of phosphoproteins by immobilized metal
(Fe3+) affinity chromatography. Anal Biochem 1986, 154(1):250–254.
61. Neville DC, Rozanas CR, Price EM, Gruis DB, Verkman AS, Townsend RR:
Evidence for phosphorylation of serine 753 in CFTR using a novel
metalion affinity resin and matrix-assisted laser desorption mass
spectrometry. Protein Sci 1997, 6(11):2436–2445.
62. Figeys D, Gygi SP, McKinnon G, Aebersold R: An integrated
microfluidicstandem mass spectrometry system for automated protein
analysis. Anal Chem 1998, 70(18):3728–3734.
63. Li S, Dass C: Iron (III)-immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography and
mass spectrometry for the purification and characterization of synthetic
phosphopeptides. Anal Biochem 1999, 270(1):9–14.
64. Posewitz MC, Tempst P: Immobilized gallium(III) affinity chromatography
of phosphopeptides. Anal Chem 1999, 71(14):2883–2892.
65. Pinkse MW, Uitto PM, Hilhorst MJ, Ooms B, Heck AJ: Selective isolation at
the femtomole level of phosphopeptides from proteolytic digests using
2D-NanoLC-ESI-MS/MS and titanium oxide precolumns. Anal Chem 2004,
76(14):3935–3943.
66. Nuhse TS, Stensballe A, Jensen ON, Peck SC: Large-scale analysis of in vivo
phosphorylated membrane proteins by immobilized metal ion affinity
chromatography and mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 2003,
2(11):1234–1243.
67. Ficarro SB, McCleland ML, Stukenberg PT, Burke DJ, Ross MM, Shabanowitz
J, Hunt DF, White FM: Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry
and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Biotechnol 2002,
20(3):301–305.
68. Collins MO, Yu L, Campuzano I, Grant SG, Choudhary JS: Phosphoproteomic
analysis of the mouse brain cytosol reveals a predominance of protein
phosphorylation in regions of intrinsic sequence disorder. Mol Cell
Proteomics 2008, 7(7):1331–1348. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
69. Connor PA, Dobson KD, McQuillan J: Infrared Spectroscopy of the TiO2/
Aqueous Solution Interface. Langmuir 1999, 15:2402.
70. Connor PA, McQuillan A: Phosphate adsorption onto TiO2 from aqueous
solutions: an in situ internal reflection infrared spectroscopic study.
Langmuir 1999, 15:2916.
71. Larsen MR, Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Roepstorff P, Jørgensen TJ: Highly
selective enrichment of phosphorylated peptides from peptide mixtures
using titanium dioxide microcolumns. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005,
4(7):873–886.
72. Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Larsen MR: Enrichment and separation of
mono- and multiply phosphorylated peptides using sequential elution
from IMAC prior to mass spectrometric analysis. Methods Mol Biol 2009,
527:67–78.
73. Craft GE, Graham ME, Bache N, Larsen MR, Robinson PJ: The in vivo
phosphorylation sites in multiple isoforms of amphiphysin I from rat
brain nerve terminals. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008, 7(6):1146–1161.
74. Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Robinson PJ, Larsen MR: SIMAC (sequential
elution from IMAC), a phosphoproteomics strategy for the rapid
separation of monophosphorylated from multiply phosphorylated
peptides. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008, 7(4):661–671.
75. Kweon HK, Hakansson K: Selective zirconium dioxide-based enrichment of
phosphorylated peptides for mass spectrometric analysis. Anal Chem
2006, 78(6):1743–1749.
76. Zhou H, Tian R, Ye M, Xu S, Feng S, Pan C, Jiang X, Li X, Zou H: Highly
specific enrichment of phosphopeptides by zirconium dioxide
nanoparticles for phosphoproteome analysis. Electrophoresis 2007,
28(13):2201–2215.
77. Zhang X, Ye J, Jensen ON, Roepstorff P: Highly Efficient
Phosphopeptide Enrichment by Calcium Phosphate Precipitation
Combined with Subsequent IMAC Enrichment. Mol Cell Proteomics
2007, 6(11):2032–2042.
TR
AC
T
35.
RE
34.
of ICOS is associated with adult-onset common variable
immunodeficiency. Nat Immunol 2003, 4(3):261–268.
Salzer U, Maul-Pavicic A, Cunningham-Rundles C, Urschel S, Belohradsky BH,
Litzman J, Holm A, Franco JL, Plebani A, Hammarstrom L, Skrabl A,
Schwinger W, Grimbacher B: ICOS deficiency in patients with common
variable immunodeficiency. Clin Immunol 2004, 113(3):234–240.
van Zelm MC, Smet J, Adams B, Mascart F, Schandené L, Janssen F, Ferster
A, Kuo CC, Levy S, van Dongen JJ, van der Burg M: CD81 gene defect in
humans disrupts CD19 complex formation and leads to antibody
deficiency. J Clin Invest 2010, 120(4):1265–1274.
van Zelm MC, Reisli I, van der Burg M, Castaño D, van Noesel CJ, van Tol
MJ, Woellner C, Grimbacher B, Patiño PJ, van Dongen JJ, Franco JL: An
antibody-deficiency syndrome due to mutations in the CD19 gene. N
Engl J Med 2006, 354(18):1901–1912.
Kanegane H, Agematsu K, Futatani T, Sira MM, Suga K, Sekiguchi T, van
Zelm MC, Miyawaki T: Novel mutations in a Japanese patient with CD19
deficiency. Genes Immun 2007, 8(8):663–670.
Kuijpers TW, Bende RJ, Baars PA, Grummels A, Derks IA, Dolman KM,
Beaumont T, Tedder TF, van Noesel CJ, Eldering E, van Lier RA: CD20
deficiency in humans results in impaired T cell-independent antibody
responses. J Clin Invest 2010, 120(1):214–222.
Conley ME, Notarangelo LD, Etzioni A: Diagnostic criteria for primary
immunodeficiencies. Representing PAGID (Pan-American Group for
Immunodeficiency and ESID (European Society for Immunodeficiencies).
Clin Immunol 1999, 93(3):190–197.
Radojkovic M, Ristic S, Divac A, Tomic B, Nestorovic A, Radojkovic D: Novel
ORC4L gene mutation in B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Am J Med
Sci 2009, 338(6):527–529.
López E, Matthiesen R, López I, Ashman K, Mendieta J, Wesselink JJ, GómezPuertas P, Ferreira A: Functional phosphoproteomics tools for current
immunological disorders research. J Integrated Omics 2011, 1(1):1–16
[http://www.jiomics.com].
Virshup DM, Shenolikar S: From promiscuity to precision: protein
phosphatases get a makeover. Mol Cell 2009, 33(5):537–545.
Grønborg M, Kristiansen TZ, Stensballe A, Andersen JS, Ohara O, Mann M,
Jensen ON, Pandey A: A mass spectrometry-based proteomic approach
for identification of serine/threonine-phosphorylated proteins by
enrichment with phospho-specific antibodies: identification of a novel
protein, Frigg, as a protein kinase A substrate. Mol Cell Proteomics 2002,
1(7):517–527.
Zhang ZY: Functional studies of protein tyrosine phosphatases with
chemical on different phosphopeptide enrichment techniques. Biochim
Biophys Acta 2005, 1754(1–2):100–107.
Jensen SS, Larsen MR: Evaluation of the impact of some experimental
procedures on different phosphopeptide enrichment techniques. Rapid
Commun Mass Spectrom 2007, 21(22):3635–3645.
Gafken PR, Lampe PD: Methodologies for characterizing phosphoproteins
by mass spectrometry. Cell Commun Adhes 2006, 13(5–6):249–262.
Zhang H, Zha X, Tan Y, Hornbeck PV, Mastrangelo AJ, Alessi DR, Polakiewicz
RD, Comb MJ: Phosphoprotein analysis using antibodies broadly reactive
against phosphorylated motifs. J Biol Chem 2002, 277(42):39379–39387.
Rush J, Moritz A, Lee KA, Guo A, Goss VL, Spek EJ, Zhang H, Zha XM,
Polakiewicz RD, Comb MJ: Immunoaffinity profiling of tyrosine
phosphorylation in cancer cells. Nat Biotechnol 2005, 23(1):94–101.
Di Vizio D, Solomon KR, Freeman MR: Cholesterol and cholesterol-rich
membranes in prostate cancer: an update. Tumori 2008, 94(5):633–639.
Dietz A, Boehm A, Mozet C, Wichmann G, Giannis A: Current aspects of
targeted therapy in head and neck tumors. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
2008, 265(Suppl 1):S3–S12.
Huang F, Gu H: Negative regulation of lymphocyte development and
function by the Cbl family of proteins. Immunol Rev 2008, 224:229–238.
Shah NP: Advanced CML: therapeutic options for patients in accelerated
and blast phases. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2008, 6(Suppl 2):S31–S36.
Kemna EH, Tjalsma H, Podust VN, Swinkels DW: Mass spectrometry-based
hepcidin measurements in serum and urine: analytical aspects and
clinical implications. Clin Chem 2007, 53(4):620–628.
Barbey C, Budin-Verneuil A, Cauchard S, Hartke A, Laugier C, Pichereau V, Petry
S: Proteomic analysis and immunogenicity of secreted proteins from
Rhodococcus equi ATCC 33701. Vet Microbiol 2009, 135(3–4):334–345.
Springer WR: A method for quantifying radioactivity associated with protein
in silverstained polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 1991, 195(1):172–176.
Page 18 of 20
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
ED
100. Syka JE, Coon JJ, Schroeder MJ, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF: Peptide and
protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass
spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101(26):9528–9533.
101. Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Kristensen DB, Steen H, Pandey A, Mann
M: Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a
simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell
Proteomics 2002, 1(5):376–386.
102. Gruhler S, Kratchmarova I: Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell
culture (SILAC). Methods Mol Biol 2008, 424:101–111.
103. Ballif BA, Roux PP, Gerber SA, MacKeigan JP, Blenis J, Gygi SP: Quantitative
phosphorylation profiling of the ERK/p90 ribosomal S6 kinase-signalling
cassette and its targets, the tuberous sclerosis tumor suppressors. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102(3):667–672.
104. Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN, Williamson B, Parker K, Hattan S,
Khainovski N, Pillai S, Dey S, Daniels S, Purkayastha S, Juhasz P, Martin S,
Bartlet-Jones M, He F, Jacobson A, Pappin DJ: Multiplexed protein
quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric
tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004, 3(12):1154–1169.
105. Sachon E, Mohammed S, Bache N, Jensen ON: Phosphopeptide
quantitation using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents and tandem
mass spectrometry: application to proteins isolated by gel
electrophoresis. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2006, 20(7):1127–1134.
106. Boja ES, Phillips D, French SA, Harris RA, Balaban RS: Quantitative
mitochondrial phosphoproteomics using iTRAQ on an LTQ-Orbitrap
with high energy collision dissociation. J Proteome Res 2009,
8(10):4665–4675.
107. Kirkpatrick DS, Gerber SA, Gygi SP: The absolute quantification strategy: a
general procedure for the quantification of proteins and
posttranslational modifications. Methods 2005, 35(3):265–273.
108. Wang G, Wu WW, Zeng W, Chou CL, Shen RF: Label-free protein
quantification using LC-coupled ion trap or FT mass spectrometry:
Reproducibility, linearity, and application with complex proteomes.
J Proteome Res 2006, 5(5):1214–1223.
109. Yu Z, Weinberger PM, Sasaki C, Egleston BL, Speier WF, Haffty B, Kowalski D,
Camp R, Rimm D, Vairaktaris E, Burtness B, Psyrri A: Phosphorylation of Akt
(Ser473) predicts poor clinical outcome in oropharyngeal squamous cell
cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007, 16(3):553–558.
110. Cox DM, Zhong F, Du M, Duchoslav E, Sakuma T, McDermott JC: Multiple
reaction monitoring as a method for identifying protein
posttranslational modifications. J Biomol Tech 2005, 16(2):83–90.
111. Williamson BL, Marchese J, Morrice NA: Automated identification and
quantification of protein phosphorylation sites by LC/MS on a hybrid
triple quadrupole linear ion trap mass spectrometer. Mol Cell Proteomics
2006, 5(2):337–346.
112. Zhang Y, Wolf-Yadlin A, White FM: Quantitative proteomic analysis of
phosphotyrosinemediated cellular signalling networks. Methods Mol Biol
2007, 359:203–212.
113. Wolf-Yadlin A, Hautaniemi S, Lauffenburger DA, White FM: Multiple
reaction monitoring for robust quantitative proteomic analysis of cellular
signalling networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104(14):5860–5865.
114. McNamara LE, Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Burchmore R: Fluorescence
twodimensional difference gel electrophoresis for biomaterial
applications. J R Soc Interface 2010, 7(Suppl 1):S107–S118.
115. Shaw J, Rowlinson R, Nickson J, Stone T, Sweet A, Williams K, Tonge R:
Evaluation of saturation labelling two-dimensional difference gel
electrophoresis fluorescent dyes. Proteomics 2003, 3(7):1181–1195.
116. Greengauz-Roberts O, Stöppler H, Nomura S, Yamaguchi H, Goldenring JR,
Podolsky RH, Lee JR, Dynan WS: Saturation labeling with cysteine-reactive
cyanine fluorescent dyes provides increased sensitivity for protein
expression profiling of laser-microdissected clinical specimens.
Proteomics 2005, 5(7):1746–1757.
117. Kondo T, Hirohashi S: Application of highly sensitive fluorescent dyes
(CyDye DIGE Fluor saturation dyes) to laser microdissection and
twodimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) for cancer
proteomics. Nat Protoc 2006, 1(6):2940–2956.
118. Kondo T, Seike M, Mori Y, Fujii K, Yamada T, Hirohashi S: Application of
sensitive fluorescent dyes in linkage of laser microdissection and
twodimensional gel electrophoresis as a cancer proteomic study tool.
Proteomics 2003, 3(9):1758–1766.
119. Rong Y, Jin D, Hou C, Hu J, Wu W, Ni X, Wang D, Lou W: Proteomics
analysis of serum protein profiling in pancreatic cancer patients by DIGE:
RE
TR
AC
T
78. Gruhler A, Olsen JV, Mohammed S, Mortensen P, Faergeman NJ, Mann M,
Jensen ON: Quantitative phosphoproteomics applied to the yeast
pheromone signalling pathway. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005, 4(3):310–327.
79. Li X, Gerber SA, Rudner AD, Beausoleil SA, Haas W, Villén J, Elias JE, Gygi SP:
Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of alpha-factor-arrested
Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Proteome Res 2007, 6(3):1190–1197.
80. Albuquerque CP, Smolka MB, Payne SH, Bafna V, Eng J, Zhou H: A
multidimensional chromatography technology for in-depth
phosphoproteome analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008, 7(7):1389–1396.
81. McNulty DE, Annan RS: Hydrophilic interaction chromatography reduces
the complexity of the phosphoproteome and improves global
phosphopeptide isolation and detection. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008,
7(5):971–980.
82. Gobom J, Nordhoff E, Mirgorodskaya E, Ekman R, Roepstorff P: Sample
purification and preparation technique based on nano-scale
reversedphase columns for the sensitive analysis of complex peptide
mixtures by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass
spectrometry. J Mass Spectrom 1999, 34(2):105–116.
83. Larsen MR, Graham ME, Robinson PJ, Roepstorff P: Improved detection of
hydrophilic phosphopeptides using graphite powder microcolumns and
mass spectrometry: evidence for in vivo doubly phosphorylated
dynamin I and dynamin III. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004, 3(5):456–465.
84. Shevchenko A, Wilm M, Vorm O, Mann M: Mass spectrometric sequencing
of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal Chem 1996,
68(5):850–858.
85. Larsen MR: Mass spectrometric characterization of posttranslationally
modified proteins–phosphorylation. Methods Mol Biol 2004, 251:245–262.
86. McLachlin DT, Chait BT: Analysis of phosphorylated proteins and peptides
by mass spectrometry. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2001, 5(5):591–602.
87. Pandey A, Fernandez MM, Steen H, Blagoev B, Nielsen MM, Roche S, Mann
M, Lodish HF: Identification of a novel immunoreceptor tyrosinebased
activation motif-containing molecule, STAM2, by mass spectrometry and
its involvement in growth factor and cytokine receptor signalling
pathways. J Biol Chem 2000, 275(49):38633–38639.
88. Mann M, Ong SE, Gronborg M, Steen H, Jensen ON, Pandey A: Analysis of
protein phosphorylation using mass spectrometry: deciphering the
phosphoproteome. Trends Biotechnol 2002, 20(6):261–268.
89. Larsen MR, Cordwell SJ, Roepstorff P: Graphite powder as an alternative or
supplement to reversed-phase material for desalting and concentration
of peptide mixtures prior to matrix-assisted laser desorption/
ionizationmass spectrometry. Proteomics 2002, 2(9):1277–1287.
90. Speicher K, Kolbas O, Harper S, Speicher DW: Systemic analysis of peptide
recoveries from in gel digestion for protein identifications in proteome
studies. Journal of Biomolecular Techniques 2000, 11:74–86.
91. Martin H, Flandez M, Nombela C, Molina M: Protein phosphatases in MAPK
signalling: we keep learning from yeast. Mol Microbiol 2005, 58(1):6–16.
92. Biemann K: Contributions of mass spectrometry to peptide and protein
structure. Biomed Environ Mass Spectrom 1988, 16(1–12):99–111.
93. Roepstorff P, Fohlman J: Proposal for a common nomenclature for
sequence ions in mass spectra of peptides. Biomed Mass Spectrom 1984,
11(11):601.
94. Steen H, Küster B, Mann M: Quadrupole time-of-flight versus
triplequadrupole mass spectrometry for the determination of
phosphopeptides by precursor ion scanning. J Mass Spectrom 2001,
36(7):782–790.
95. Steen H, Mann M: A new derivatization strategy for the analysis of
phosphopeptides by precursor ion scanning in positive ion mode. J Am
Soc Mass Spectrom 2002, 13(8):996–1003.
96. Schroeder MJ, Webb DJ, Shabanowitz J, Horwitz AF, Hunt DF: Methods for
the detection of paxillin post-translational modifications and interacting
proteins by mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 2005, 4(5):1832–1841.
97. Zubarev RA, Horn DM, Fridriksson EK, Kelleher NL, Kruger NA, Lewis MA,
Carpenter BK, McLafferty FW: Electron capture dissociation for structural
characterization of multiply charged protein cations. Anal Chem 2000,
72(3):563–573.
98. Kleinnijenhuis AJ, Kjeldsen F, Kallipolitis B, Haselmann KF, Jensen ON:
Analysis of histidine phosphorylation using tandem MS and ion-electron
reactions. Anal Chem 2007, 79(19):7450–7456.
99. Stensballe A, Andersen S, Jensen ON: Characterization of phosphoproteins
from electrophoretic gels by nanoscale Fe(III) affinity chromatography
with off-line mass spectrometry analysis. Proteomics 2001, 1(2):207–222.
Page 19 of 20
121.
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
129.
130.
131.
132.
133.
134.
TR
AC
T
120.
up-regulation of mannose-binding lectin 2 and myosin light chain
kinase 2. BMC Gastroenterol 2010, 10:68.
Nagano K: Search for breast cancer-related biomarker proteins for drug
discovery. Yakugaku Zasshi 2010, 130(12):1701–1706.
Steen JA, Steen H, Georgi A, Parker K, Springer M, Kirchner M, Hamprecht F,
Kirschner MW: Different phosphorylation states of the anaphase
promoting complex in response to antimitotic drugs: a quantitative
proteomic analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105(16):6069–6074.
Zhang Y, Wolf-Yadlin A, Ross PL, Pappin DJ, Rush J, Lauffenburger DA, White
FM: Time-resolved mass spectrometry of tyrosine phosphorylation sites
in the epidermal growth factor receptor signalling network reveals
dynamic modules. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005, 4(9):1240–1250.
Olsen JV, Blagoev B, Gnad F, Macek B, Kumar C, Mortensen P, Mann M:
Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signalling
networks. Cell 2006, 127(3):635–648.
Wolf-Yadlin A, Kumar N, Zhang Y, Hautaniemi S, Zaman M, Kim HD,
Grantcharova V, Lauffenburger DA, White FM: Effects of HER2
overexpression on cell signalling networks governing proliferation and
migration. Mol Syst Biol 2006, 2:54.
Zhao X, León IR, Bak S, Mogensen M, Wrzesinski K, Højlund K, Jensen ON:
Phosphoproteome analysis of functional mitochondria isolated from
resting human muscle reveals extensive phosphorylation of inner
membrane protein complexes and enzymes. Mol Cell Proteomics 2011, 10(1).
Green DR, Kroemer G: The pathophysiology of mitochondrial cell death.
Science 2004, 305(5684):626–629.
Cohen P: The origins of protein phosphorylation. Nat Cell Biol 2002,
4(5):E127–E130.
Boneh A: Regulation of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation by
second messenger-mediated signal transduction mechanisms. Cell Mol
Life Sci 2006, 63(11):1236–1248.
Hunter T: Signalling–2000 and beyond. Cell 2000, 100(1):113–127.
Pagliarini DJ, Dixon JE: Mitochondrial modulation: reversible
phosphorylation takes center stage? Trends Biochem Sci 2006, 31(1):26–34.
Hüttemann M, Lee I, Samavati L, Yu H, Doan JW: Regulation of
mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation through cell signalling. Biochim
Biophys Acta 2007, 1773(12):1701–1720.
Goldenthal MJ, Marín-García J: Mitochondrial signalling pathways: a
receiver/integrator organelle. Mol Cell Biochem 2004, 262(1–2):1–16.
Horbinski C, Chu CT: Kinase signalling cascades in the mitochondrion: a
matter of life or death. Free Radic Biol Med 2005, 38(1):2–11.
Thomson M: Evidence of undiscovered cell regulatory mechanisms:
phosphoproteins and protein kinases in mitochondria. Cell Mol Life Sci
2002, 59(2):213–219.
Page 20 of 20
ED
López et al. Proteome Science 2011, 9:27
http://www.proteomesci.com/content/9/1/27
RE
doi:10.1186/1477-5956-9-27
Cite this article as: López et al.: Retracted: Clinical and technical
phosphoproteomic research. Proteome Science 2011 9:27.
Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central
and take full advantage of:
• Convenient online submission
• Thorough peer review
• No space constraints or color figure charges
• Immediate publication on acceptance
• Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar
• Research which is freely available for redistribution
Submit your manuscript at
www.biomedcentral.com/submit