GENDER, NETWORKS, AND ADAPTATION
AMONG AN INNER-CITY POPULATION
CARL I. COHEN
SUNY Downstate Medical Center
JAY SOKOLOVSKY
University of Maryland
JEANNE TERESI
New York State Psychiatric institute
DOUGLAS HOLMES
Community Research Applications
ABSTRACT:
In zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDC
varied cultural frameworks men and women in old age have shown
distinct differences in their ability to engage in social interaction. This article examines
the sex dtfferences in social interaction among 133 inner- city elderly living in SRO
hotels. Contrary to earlier reports of inner- city elderly women, there was no evidence
of pervasive isolation and longitudinal data indicated that SRO women had dynamic
networks that allowed for the replacement of lost contacts with new ones. In comparing the sexes there were similarities in the various social network dimensions and the
use of these networks to ful$ll needs and cope with physical illness. M oreover, the
similatities in life histories between the sexes would suggest that as women’s life- sty les
in the general population come to approximate those of men, the social interactions of
aging men and women may more closely resemble each other.
INTRODUCTION
In varied cultural frameworks men and women in old age have been shown to have
quite distinct adaptations to aging over the life cycle (Cool and McCabe 1983; Kerns
1983; Peace 198 1). One noted area of differentiation has been the ability to engage in
informal social relations beyond those rigidly ascribed by tradition or one’s place in
society. Some studies of non-Western societies, even those strongly dominated by
Direct ~11correspondence to Carl I. Cohen, Professor of Psychiatry, SUNY Downstate M edical Center, Box
1203, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, N. Y. I1 203.
JOURNAL OF AGING STUDIES, Volume 2, Number 1, pages 45-56.
Copyright @ 1988 by JAI Press, Inc.
All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
ISSN: 0890-4065.
46
JOURNAL OF AGING STUDIES
Vol. ~/NO. l/l 988
males, indicate that the greater ability of women to forge intense long-term personal
ties in both household and community domains is linked to greater life satisfaction and
support especially in the final stages of old age. (See especially Harrell [ 198 1] for the
case of Taiwan, and Cool and McCabe [ 1983 J for the cases of Corsica and Lebanon.)
In the United States, data for the aged on this subject appear to be situational to the
environmental
context. Studies of generalized
urban populations
point to a greater
capacity of older adult females versus males to not only develop more intimate friendships (especially among nonrelatives)
but also to be able to replace defunct relationships with new ones (Powers and Bultena 1976). However, various studies of poor,
inner-city aged populations have produced quite different findings. Here, older women
have been commonly depicted as not only lacking social resources compared to men
but having a diminished capacity to compensate
for lost relationships
or deal with
crises such as widowhood or health problems. Lopata (1975) in her study of aged
widows in Chicago’s inner-city,
describes these women as lacking “the ability to
voluntarily engage in supportive relations” (p. 35). Similarly dramatic statements have
emerged from the study of aged women living in single-room occupancy (SRO) hotels.
Lally, Black, Thronock, and Hawkins (1979) in studying several Seattle hotels found
that the elderly female respondents “consistently claimed to neither be friends with or
even know other women in the same hotel” (p. 70). In her well-known
study of a
downtown Detroit hotel Stephens (1976) stated that in general the older residents (90%
male) “have broken all ties to family, friends and for the most part do not attempt to
replenish what was already an impoverished
repertoire of social relations” (p. 91).
Amidst this dismal picture women residents are said to have a greater difficulty in
developing even the few utilitarian ties which the men generate. For the SRO elderly
this issue of social interaction is of singular importance as many needs are met on the
basis of informal mechanisms of social interaction.
Moreover, physical illness can diminish the elderly SRO resident’s prospects for
remaining in the community.
The availability
of social networks to help sustain the
person in the community is of paramount importance. In an earlier pilot study of SRO
aged using cross-sectional
data we postulated that the more unhealthy men tended to
lose their network members whereas the less healthy women tended to increase their
social ties (Cohen and Sokolovsky, 1979). We suggested that a longitudinal investigation was needed to confirm these findings and to assess what implications this might
have regarding gender differences in adaptive patterns among inner-city elderly.
Finally, with respect to aging in general, a study of SRO elderly may provide a
tentative rejoinder to several questions posed by Leavy (1983) in his recent review of
social network studies. He observed that although most investigations
have found
significant differences between the social networks of men and women (e.g., aging
women tend to have larger, more intimate, more stable ties), it would be interesting to
know whether feminists or androgynous
persons might differ from other women in
the support systems that they have and desire. Also, there may be cohort effects on
social network patterns that mirror the cultural changes in the options becoming
available to women. Midtown Manhattan SRO hotels can serve as an excellent laboratory in which to address these questions because many of the older women have
nontraditional
work and marital histories that parallel those of the elderly men living
in these hotels.
Gender, Networks, and Adaptation
47
Among an Inner-City Elderly Population
Operationally, we have addressed the issues outlined above through a large-scale,
longitudinal analysis of elderly residents living in SRO hotels in midtown Manhattan.
This will involve four separate analyses:
ANALYSIS 1: We will examine how closely the aging SRO men and
women resemble each other with respect to various demographic socioeconomic, health, and biographical data.
ANALYSIS 2: We will determine
whether there are any differences in
social network dimensions that distinguish between the male
and female residents.
ANALYSIS 3: Using need fulfillment as a measure of adaptation, we will
ascertain whether there are any differences between sexes in
their use of social networks to meet various needs.
ANALYSIS~: We will determine
whether there are any differences between the sexes in network size, network losses, and in
ability to compensate for network losses under varying states
of physical health.
METHOD
Sample
Using a single-stage clustering technique (Van Dalen 1973) interviews were conducted
in 2 1 single room occupancy (SRO) hotels in a midtown sector of Manhattan during the
TABLE 1
General Characteristics
of SRO Men and Women
Mean (Time 1)
Males
(n = 58)
Physical symptoms
Proportion dead on 2-year follow-up
Psychological
symptoms
Number of days in hospital in past year
Unfulfilled needs
Stressful events
Age
Previous occupational
level (SES)”
Current annual incomeb
Proportion married previously
Years in SRO hotel
Years in current hotel
‘SES: 1 = highest; 8 = lowest
b Income: $2600-3899
= 4; $3900-5
*p < .02
199 = 5
-Sl
.21
.32
5.14
4.85
2.50
12.66
2.69
4.90
.52
15.82
10.32
Females
(n = 75)
.23
.07
-.30
7.15
4.01
2.13
71.79
2.71
4.75
.48
16.46
12.19
t-values
(df = 737)
.82
2.41*
1.47
.36
1.35
.65
.5l
.06
.74
.45
.21
1.1 L
48
JOURNAL OF AGING STUDIES
Vol. ~/NO. 1 il988
period 1978-1980.
Within each selected hotel an effort was made to interview all
residents aged 60 and over listed on a roster furnished by the management.
Vigorous
attempts to recruit respondents were made by providing five dollars as remuneration,
initiating a series of letters and telephone calls, using flexible interview hours, and
working with neighborhood agencies and hotel personnel. The initial sample (Time 1)
consisted of 161 residents. On one-year follow-up (Time 2), 133 individuals were
reinterviewed.
The final sample consisted of 58 men and 75 women; 93% were white
and their mean age was 72.3 years (see Table 1).
In examining the representativeness
of the sample, we found that our sample in many
ways resembled that of a national census survey of 157,000 elderly SRO residents
(Haley, Pearson, and Hull 198 1). There were no differences between the two samples
with respect to age (72.3 years Manhattan, 72.8 years National) and percentage having
spent five years at their current address (53% Manhattan, 5 1% National), and there
were only minimal differences in percentages having completed eighth grade (52%
Manhattan, 42% National) and in median income ($3900 Manhattan, $4760 National).
There were greater differences in sex (56% female Manhattan, 38% female National)
and race 93% white Manhattan,
66% white National) that reflected the particular
section of Manhattan that we studied.
Instruments
Physical and mental health and social functioning were determined by the Comprehensive Assessment and Referral Evaluation (CARE) developed by Gurland and associates (1977). Internal consistency reliability was high for most of the scales comprising
this instrument. The alphas for the SRO sample ranged from .5 1 to .92 for 22 CARE
scales. The interrater reliability for all scales ranged from .56 to 1.0.
The outcome variable (Nee&) and moderator variable (Physical Health Symptoms)
used in the analyses were derived from the CARE.
Needs: .4 40-item scale based on Lawton’s taxonomy of needs list (1970) is used
here as a measure of adaptation. The scale comprises six major areas: physical health
needs, mental health needs, physical self-maintenance,
instrumental
self-maintenance
“effectance”
(e.g., recreation, creativity), and social
(e.g., finance, transportation),
needs. The higher the score, the fewer needs are being met. Items were based on
self-report rather than external objective criteria. Illustrative of the items that were used
are “Goes without bath because of lack of help”; “Essential shopping not done”;
“Cannot do leisure activity because of mobility problem.”
Physical Health Symptoms: This variable is the sum of respondent’s z-scores on 11
health scales that was derived from the CARE at Time 1. These scales are Somatic
Symptoms, Heart Disorder, Edema, Sleep Disorder, Arthritis, Stroke, Respiratory Problems, Hypertension, Cancer, Hearing Problems, and Visual Disorders. The sample was
divided into two groups: those in relatively good health and those in relatively poor
health. “Poor health” was defined as summed z-scores below the 33rd percentile. This
cut-off score is based on Gurland and associates’ (1983) finding that one-third of New
York City’s elderly had at least minimal physical impairments.
Gender, Networks,
and Adaptation
49
Among an zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPON
Inner- CityNderly Population
Two other variables derived from the CARE and used in the comparative analyses
were Psy chological Sy mptoms and Stress.
Psy chological Sy mptoms: This variable is the sum of an individual’s z-scores on four
mental health scales derived from the CARE (depression, organic brain syndrome, alcoholism, schizophrenia) at Time 1. The higher the score, the greater the number of symptoms.
Stress: A 15-item scale based on categories derived from Dohrenwend and coworkers’ life events list (1978). Events had to occur during the one-year period. Typical
items included “deterioration in the neighborhood,” “family illness,” “mugging in the
past year, ” “personal injury due to crime,” and “financial problems.” Items that were
redundant with social network variables were removed.
Various criteria have been used to examine the diverse features of social networks
(Barnes 1954: Boissevain 1974; Mitchell 1969). Earlier studies of inner-city populations have focused primarily on only a few social support measures of interaction at one
instance in time, e.g., number of contacts, frequency of interaction, intimates (Cantor
1979; Lopata 1975). The notion of social support tends to view “more as better.” We
have utilized a broader concept of social networks that encompasses social support
variables but includes variables that do not directly imply value, e.g., directional flow of
interaction, density, gender distribution of network. Moreover, we have developed a
longitudinal portrayal of social networks by assessing a representative number of these
variables on one-year follow up. Consequently, we can observe the more proximal
effects of network changes on physical health. Measures of social interaction were
obtained from the Network Analysis Profile (NAP), which was developed in our pre- zyxwvutsr
vio us work with inner-city populations (Sokolovsky and Cohen 198 1). The interrater
reliability ranged from .83 to .92 on various subsections of the profile. The NAP
comprised six sectors of interaction: self-hotel contact, self-outside non-kin, self-kin,
self-hotel staff, self-agency staff, self-social institution. The first three fields are termed
the “informal network.” Although the totality of the profile encompasses the respondent’s “activity field,” the present analysis excluded the self-social institution field, which
represented linkages to places (e.g., churches, stores) rather than individuals. Any
meaningful linkages to individuals in these places were recorded within the appropriate
field of interaction. Only those linkages with a minimal frequency of once every three
months for hotel contacts and once a year for nonhotel contacts were included.
Four dimensions of social interaction were identified that were comprised of 19
variables. The four dimensions examined various material and emotional aspects of
exchange (Interactional Data Set), quantitative and morphological features of the overall network (Structural Data Set), characteristics of the network member vis-a-vis the
respondent (Member Attribute Set), and those features of the environment which have
been found to influence network formation and composition (Environmental Attribute
Data Set). These sy nchronic network variables are described in Table 2.
Factor analysis of the 19 network variables revealed that, in general, the network
characteristics were statistically independent. Only seven of the variables loaded
together (numplex, very important, directionality, number of clusters, size, multiplex,
large clusters) with an alpha of .76. We did not use the scale in the main analyses
50
JOURNAL OF AGING STUDIES
Vol. ~/NO. 1 /1988
TABLE 2
Comparison
of Synchronic
Network Variables
Between Men and Women
Mean (Time 1)
Males
(n=58)
Variables
Description
Numplex
Mean number of transactions (e.g., food exchange,
advice-giving)
per person in respondent’s network.
Sustenance
Females t-values
(n= 75) (df= 131)
Interactional data set
2.43
2.33
.07
Proportion of network members providing at least
one basic support item to respondent viz. money,
food, medical aid.
.43
.42
.I1
Very Important
Total number of persons rated as very important or
most important by respondent; correlates highly
with sharing or intimate thoughts,
2.85
2.81
.25
Frequency
Mean frequency
7, weekly = I)
per week (e.g., daily =
2.89
3.00
.32
Directionality
Predominant
direction in which aid between respondent and others flow. Mean directionality
was
calculated
for hotel, non-kin, and kin contacts,
(Coding: dependent = 3, reciprocal = 2, helping = I)
2.31
2.48
I.43
Multiplex
Total number of persons having at least
exchanges of activities with respondent.
6.61
7.22
.59
Size
Total number of persons in respondent’s
7.03
8.43
I .48
Density
Ratio of actual number of linkages between persons in respondent’s
network to the potential
number of linkages
(excluding
linkages
with
respondent)
.25
.30
1.02
Degree
The average number of linkages each person has
with others in respondent’s
network (excluding
linkages with respondent)
I .42
1.55
.50
Clusters
Number of subunits of network with 100% density.
2.21
2.17
.I7
Large Clusters
Number of clusters
members.
.45
.29
1.41
Configuration
Graphic
measure of network
interconnectivity
(cluster = 1, no cluster = 2, various mixed forms = 3
or 4)
2.78
2.82
.32
Length of linkage
Mean number
respondent.
Geographic
density
Proportion of network
mal) from the hotel
members
Gender homogeneity
Proportion of network
sex as the respondent
Age homogeneity
Proportion
older
of contact
two
Structural data set
in network
network.
with 5 or more
Member attribute set
of years
of network
contacts
have
known
14.20
15.30
.5 I
(informal
or for-
.37
.41
.82
members
being of the same
.62
.73
2.50*
members
being 60 years or
.54
.64
1.97**
(continued)
Gender, Networks, and Adaptation
Among an Inner-City Elderly Population
51
TABLE 2 (continued)
Mean (Time 1)
Variables
Males
(n=58)
Description
Females t-values
/n=75)
(df=l31)
Environmental attribute set
Age density
Dichotomous
variable based on whether percentage of persons aged 60 and over living in respondent’s hotel is 20% or greater (yes = 1, no = 0)
.64
.68
.48
Welfare
Dichotomous
variable
dent’s hotel is primarily
not(yes=
l,no=O)
.38
.31
.48
hotel
Hotel size
Number
of rooms
based on whether
a public assistance
in respondent’s
hotel
responhotel or
339
336
.19
*p < .02
**p < .05
because it has not been cross-validated. Rather, we maintained the variables within the
separate data sets in accordance with the theoretical conceptualizations described in
the literature and discussed earlier.
In addition to the synchronic network variables, eight zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXW
network change vanizbles were
created. Five of the change variables (numplex, sustenance, very important, frequency,
directionality) comprised the Znteructionul Change Set. These variables were formed by
subtracting synchronic variable scores at Time 1 from those at Time 2. A Structurul
Change Set was also created consisting of three variables: (1) number of linkages lost in
past year, (2) number of new linkages in past year, (3) compensatory linkages (i.e.,
whether there was at least one new linkage to replace a lost linkage over the past year).
Analysis 7
In looking at the overall characteristics of the aged SRO men and women there was
little that could distinguish between the two sexes (Table 1). They were approximately
the same age, had the same income, lived as many years in hotels, had similar marital
histories, were equally successful at fulfilling approximately 90% of their material
needs, and experienced equal levels of stress. There were few gender differences in
previous occupational status. Only 2 1% of women had been housewives, whereas most
had worked in clerical, sales, or in semiskilled and unskilled jobs. Consistent with
actuarial data in the general population, the men were significantly more likely to die
on two-year follow-up despite reporting somewhat better physical health than the
women. Interestingly, men had more psychiatric symptoms than women, although this
was not statistically significant.
Analysis 2
There were also only meager differences between the two sexes with respect to
social network variables (Table 2). Women had 1.4 more linkages than did the men,
but men compensated by having slightly more material exchanges per linkage (numplex). Women had somewhat more dense networks and more dependent interactions,
but none of these differences attained statistical significance. Women exhibited a sig-
52
JOURNAL OF AGING STUDIES
Vol. ~/NO. 111988
nificantly greater number of informal linkages with persons of the same sex than did
the men. In part, this may have reflected the greater availability of women than men
within the hotels that we studied. Women also had a significantly higher percentage of
their informal networks composed of persons age 60 and over, although for both sexes
more than half of their linkages were age 60 or greater.
Analysis 3
Our aim was to determine to what extent social networks affect the ability of aging
men and women to fulfill their needs. Utilizing multiple regression as the analytic tool
of choice, we were able to examine the amount of variance in need fulfillment that was
explained by the social network variables taken as a whole as well as by individual
network variables.
Two hierarchical regression analyses were performed with need fulfillment at Time
2 as the dependent variable. For both analyses, the synchronic network data sets and
network change data were entered in the following order, respectively: (I) Need fulfillment Time 1, Interactional Data Set, Structural Data Set, Member Attribute Data Set,
Environmental Attribute Data Set; (2) Need Fulfillment Time 1, Interactional Change
Set, Structural Change Set.
After controlling the Needs at Time 1, the synchronic network variables (in toto)
were able to account for a greater percentage of variance in need fulfillment among the
males than among the females (Table 3). However, the differences in explained variance between the two sexes was not statistically significant (p < .21). It should be
underscored that the percentage of variance explained by the social networks was high
for both sexes: 36% for the women and 46% for the men. The latter attained statistical
TABLE 3
Comparison
Between Men and Women of Increments in
Explained Variance (R2) of Need Fulfillment at Time 2 in
Hierarchical Regression Analyses of Synchronic Network
and Network Change Variables
Me n
In = 58)
Variable Sets
(n = 75) zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcba
Synchronic Network Variables
.lO
.06
Need fulfillment (Time I)
.I1
.09
Interactional
data set (Time 1)
.I8
.I I
Structural data set (Time I)
.09
.ll
Member attribute data set (Time I)
.08
.04
Environmental
attribute data set (Time 1)
.4@
.35
Total variance explained by network sets zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQP
Network Change Variables
Need fulfillment (Time 1)
Interactional
data set (Time 2 minus Time 1)
Structural data set (Time 2 minus Time 1)
Total variance explained by network sets
Note: Variable
0009*p < .05
sets were entered in order listed in the table
.lO”
.16
.04
.20
.06*
.17*
.02
.19*
Gender, Networks, and Adaptation
53
Among an Inner-City Eider/y Population
signi~cance. In ~on~asting these groups with respect to inurements in variance
explained by each data set, the patterns were approximately the same. The men,
however, had somewhat greater increments in the structural and environmental sets.
Although we were primarily interested in the effects of the total network and the
larger data sets, we did find that several individual variables had significant F-values.
For women, having more long-term relationships was associated with greater ability to
fulfill needs. For men, more numplex linkages, a greater percentage of network
members outside the hotel, more diffuse network patterns, and living in a pubhc
assistance hotel were associated with greater need ful~llment. These findings suggest
that a broad, less concentrated network was helpful to these men.
In looking at the network change variables, we found virtually no differences between
the two sexes in the percentage of explained variance in need fulfillment accounted for by
the change variables (Table 3). The network change variables accounted for 20% of the
explained variance for men and 19% of the explained variance for women. The percentage of explained variance for the women attained statistical significance whereas the
percentage of explained variance for men nearly attained statistical signi~c~ce. There
were no differences between the sexes in the propo~ionate amounts of variance contributed by the interactional and structural data sets.
With regard to single network variables, for both men and women increases in the
frequency of interaction with contacts over the one-year study period were significantly
associated with ability to fulfill needs, For women, an increase in those linkages rated
“very important” was also associated with enhanced need fulfillment.
Ana/ysjs 4
In order to examine the relationship between physical health and social networks, we
dichotomized the male and female samples at Time 1 into persons in relatively good
health and poor health according to the cut-off scores described in the variable section.
An examination of the data indicated that those men and women in relatively poor
health had larger networks than their more healthy counterparts (Table 4). However,
TABLE
4
Comparison Between Men and women of Network Changes
Under Varying States of Physical Health
Females
Males
size (Time l)’
Number of linkages lost on 1-year follow-upb
Proportion having lost one or more linkages
Number of new linkages on l-year follow-up’
Proportion having at least one new linkage to
replace lost linkages
Network
Poorer
Health
(n=18)
Better
Health
(n=40)
8.1
1.9
.78
1.4
5.6
1.0
.5@
0.8
.43
.48
Poorer
Health
(n = 25)
Better
Health
(n = 50)
9.6
2.2
.88
0.7
7.8
2.0
.80
1.5
.41
.55
Note: zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
“F= 1.59,df=3,130,p=n.s.(1-way ANOVA)
bF=2.91,df=3,130,p<.05(l-wayANOVA)
‘F = 2.03, df = 3,130, p = ns. (l-way ANOVA)
‘Male Better Health vs. Ail Other Groups Combined, X2 = 7.46, df= l,p < .Ol
54
JOURNAL OF AGING STUDIES
Vol. ~/NO. l/l 988
the differences between health categories were not statistically significant. Although a
high percentage of individuals in all health categories lost at least one linkage, approximately one-half of the persons in each category were able to compensate with at least
one new linkage. Moreover, regardless of health status, all groups showed an ability to
forge new linkages over the one-year study period, with the less healthy men and the
more healthy women being relatively more successful at making new linkages. Also
noteworthy was that the group with the fewest overall linkages at Time 1 (the healthier
males) was considerably more adept at maintaining their network size than the other
groups, all of whom showed a diminution in network size over the follow-up period.
DISCUSSION
The findings contradict many of the earlier assumptions regarding the impaired sociability of women living in SRO hotels. There was no evidence of pervasive isolation
and the longitudinal data presented here suggested that these women had dynamic
network systems that allowed for the replacement of lost contacts with new ones.
Moreover, social networks were important in explaining how these women fulfilled
their daily needs. It should be noted that the SRO women were relatively isolated versus
a sample of middle-class elderly women; the SRO women having approximately half
the number of contacts as the community women (C. Cohen, unpublished data). Perhaps this may account for why researchers using normative notions of sociability may
have been predisposed to characterize SRO dwellers as isolates.
The results have important implications with respect to public policy that has been
replacing SRO hotels with office buildings or luxury residential towers. For instance, in
New york City more than 100,000 low rent SRO apartments have disappeared since
1971. One-third of homeless individuals in city shelters have listed an SRO hotel as
their last address (Hayes 1986). However, our data make it clear that SRO hotels do not
house human flotsam who can be shifted from hotel room to public shelter without
consequences. The hotels provide a viable social support system that cannot be easily
replaced.
A second striking finding was the similarities in the ways that the men and women
used their networks. For these men and women we found nearly identical proportionate
distribution of the explained variance in need fulfillment attributed to each of the four
synchronic network data sets and to the two network change data sets. Contrary to our
earlier cross-sectional study (Cohen and Sokolovsky 1979), we found no differences
between the men and women in poor health and their ability to maintain their social
network system. Thus, our data contrasted with earlier impressionistic reports that
depicted elderly SRO women as less socially adept than the SRO men (Lally et al.
1979; Stephens 1976).
The similarities in social adaptation styles between the sexes may be reflective of the
parallel life courses of these men and women. Unlike many of the women described in
Stephen’s SRO hotel in Detroit most of whom were more likely to have been married
previously and who were “more vulnerable, less successful at coping, and unreconciled
to their present status” (Stephens 1976, p. 280), a majority of the SRO women in
midtown Manhattan had never married, had been self-supportive, and had been living
in SRO hotels for over 16 years. Only one-fifth of SRO women had been housewives,
Gender, Networks, and Adaptation
55
Among an zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPON
Inner- City Etder/y Population
the rest had worked, most commonly as clerical, sales, or unskilled manual workers.
Many of the women had come to the hotels in search of a place with security (e.g.,
24-hour staff coverage), service (e.g., maids, desk clerks), and convenience to work and
shopping. For the unattached working women in the 1950s and early 1960s the SRO
was a reasonable choice of residence. The life histories of the aging women living in
midtown Manhattan SRO hotels mirrored those of the older women living in Seattle’s
SRO hotels. Lally and her coworkers (1979) reported that these women more closely
identified with their fathers, worked in trades dominated by men, and were fiercely
independent.
Paralleling the women’s histories, only one-half of the aged men in our sample had
married and most had worked in clerical, sales, and skilled or semiskilled occupations.
However, nearly one-fourth of the men had erratic work histories, possibly due to
alcohol abuse, mental dysfunctions, or wanderlust. Nonetheless, most had settled down
in recent years having spent an average of 10 years at their present address. Many of
the men had come to SRO hotels for the same reasons as the women, and they were
currently living on annual incomes that were comparable to those of the women.
Although it may be argued that the findings for an SRO sample cannot be easily
generalized to other populations, the data, nevertheless, strongly support the notion that
gender congruence in work roles and lifestyles result in gender congruence in the
utilization of social relationships. Consequently, the similarities found between the
aging SRO men and women in various network dimensions and in the role that networks play in adaptation and survival indeed provide tentative support to the contention that as the lifestyles of women in the general ~pulation come to approximate
those of men, the social interactions of aging men and women may more closely
resemble each other.
This is a revised version of a paper presented at the 39th Annual Meeting
of the Gerontological Society of America, Chicago, October 1986. The authors thank Henry
Rajkowski and Carole Lefkowitz for their assistance. This research was supported by the Center
for Studies of Mental Health of the Aging No. I-ROl-MH3 1745 and 1-KO7-MHOO523
(Dr. Cohen).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
Barnes, John A. 1954. “Class and Committees in Norwegian Island Parish.” Human Relations
7:39-58.
Boissevain, Jeremy. 1974. Friem!s of Frkmis. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Cantor, Marjorie. 1979. “Neighbors and Friends: An Overlooked Resource in the Informal
Support System.” Research on Aging 1:434- 463.
Cohen, Carl I., and Jay Sokolovsky. 1979. “Health-seeking Behavior and Social Networks of the
SRO Aged.” Journal of the American Geriatric Society 27:270- 278.
Cool, Linda, and Justin McCabe. 1983. “The ‘Scheming Hag’ and the Dear Old Thing: The
Anthropology of Aging Women.” Pp. 56-7 1 in Growing Qld in Difirenr Societies, edited by
J. Sokolovsky. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Dohrenwend, Bruce S., Larry Krasnoff, Alexander R. Askenasy, and Bruce P. Dohremvend.
1978. “Exemplification of a Method for Scaling Life Events: The PER1 Life Events Scale.”
Journal of Health and Social Behavior 19:205- 229.
56
JOURNAL OF AGING STUDIES
Vol. ~/NO. 1 il988
Gurland, Barry J., John Copeland, Judith Kuriansky, Michael Kelleher, Lawrence Sharpe, and
Laura L. Dean. 1983. 77~ Mood and Mind of Aging. New York: Haworth Press.
C&and, Barry J., Judith Kuriansky, Lawrence Sharpe, Robert Simon, Pamela Steller, and Peter
Berkett. 1977. “The Comprehensive Assessment and Referral Evaluation (CARE)Rationale, Development, and Reliability.” International Journal of Aging and Human Development 8~9-42.
Haley, Barbara A., Margaret Pearson, and Doris A. Hull. 1981. “Urban Elderly Residents of a
Single Room Occupancy Housing (SRO’s), 1976 and 1980.” Paper presented at the 34th
Annual Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Toronto.
Harrell, Steven. 1981. “Growing Old in Rural Taiwan.” Pp. 193-210 in Other Ways of Grow~g
Old, edited by P. Amoss and S. Harrell. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hayes, Robert M. 1986. “The Issue is Housing.” The New York Times (November 27), p. A2.S.
Kerns, Virginia. 1983. Women and the Ancestors. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Lally, Maureen, Eileen Black, Martha Thornock, and J. David Hawkins. 1979. “Older Women in
Single-room Occupancy (SRO) Hotels: A Seattle profile.” Gerontologist 19:67-73.
Lawton, M. Powell. 1970. “Assessment, Integration, and Environments for Older People.”
75, Geronto~g~t 10:38-46.
Leavy, Richard L. 1983. “Social Support and Psychological Disorder: A Review.” Joum~~ qf
Communes Psych&y 1113-2 1.
Lopata, Helena. 1975. “Support Systems of Elderly: Chicago of the 1970’s.” The Gerontologkt
15:35-41.
Mitchell, John S. 1969. “Concept and Use of Social Networks.” Pp. l-50 in Social Networks in
Urban Situations, edited by J. C. Mitchell. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Peace, Sheila. 198 1. An International Perspective on the Status of Older Women. Washington, DC:
International Federation on Aging.
Powers, Edward A., and Gordon L. Buitena. 1976. “Sex Differences in Intimate F~endships of
Old Age.” Journal of cadge
and the ~arni~ 38: 739-747.
Sokolovsky, Jay, and Carl I. Cohen. i 98 1. “Toward a Resolution of Methodological Dilemmas
in Network Mapping.” Schizophrenia Bulletin 7: 109- 116.
Stephens, Brenda J. 1976. Loners, Losers, Lovers: Elderly Tenants in a Slum Hotel. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Van Dalen, Diebold B. 1973. Understunding Educational Research. 3d ed. New York:
McGraw-Hill.