Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
3 pages
1 file
AI-generated Abstract
The paper explores the interplay of puns between Virgil's Aeneid and earlier works by Catullus and Callimachus. It illustrates how Dido's speech echoes Catullus' lines while invoking Callimachus' imagery, highlighting the contrast between the fates of Dido and Berenice. The author argues that this wordplay not only signifies literary indebtedness but also serves a political allegory, particularly in the context of Augustus' relationship with Ptolemaic Egypt.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Classical Philology, 2002
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This content downloaded from 140.254.87.149 on Sat, EW HELLENISTIC TEXTS have been read as often, and from as many angles, as the opening of Callimachus' Aetia. 1 The bibliography on these lines is enormous.2 Scholars, however, have shown less interest in sustained readings of the fragment than in textual restoration, in Callimachus' supposed position on elegy versus epic, in the establishment of an artistic program for the Hellenistic period, or in finding a model for the aesthetics of Augustan and post-Augustan Roman poetry.3 Such selective readings may well reflect the apparent privileging of discontinuity of the opening, but we have concluded that there is much to be gained from viewing this fragment as "one continuous poem." Our intent, therefore, is to outline the broader issues that emerge from the opening as a whole in order to reopen discussion of the many enigmatic moments in these lines. Our analysis falls into two parts: the initial reading explicates the text to make clear the basis for our subsequent argument; our rereading focuses on the ways in which Callimachus both selects and misreads his poetic predecessors as he sets out his own poetic program. THE FRAGMENT Our text is taken from R. Pfeiffer's 1949 edition, with a few variations discussed as they occur:4 7nokacK]t5 p[ot TeXiv?5 EMtTp6Uouotv dtot6l, viet6j; di Mo6orl OUK g7yVOVTO (piXot, ?iVEKEjV o?UX v aEo1iCa 5Ir)VEK?S q fi aotl,[r 1. Sometimes with innovative and controversial results, most notably Cameron 1995. 2. See Massimilla 1996 and Lehnus 2000a for a summary of scholarship. 3. An exception is Schmitz 1999. 4. Pfeiffer's text is derived from P Oxy. 2079, frag. 1, with some additions to lines 14-21 supplied by P Oxy. 2167, frag. 1. P Oxy. 2079 was originally edited by A. S. Hunt (The Oxyrhynchus Papyri XVII [1927], 45-55). For recent treatments of the fragment see D'57-59) has made a strong case, based on the scholium in Marc. gr. 613 ad Od. 2.50 (prlTTpt pkv c S nokkdict TekXives), that Lobel's conjecture nokkdK]t for the first word of the poem is correct. Certainly the number of times Callimachus uses nokkKdit as a line opening is significant: cf. frag. 263.3, Hymn 4.41, Hymn 5.22, Epigr. 41.4 (Gow-Page, HE), frag. 202.60 (nokx]dKict), Hymn 5.65 (nokkxdKct). Cameron (1995, 339) provides further parallels. The supplement is an important one, as it introduces the first of many distinctions in the poem between frequentative and simple utterance. Note that the sentence opens with i7okkdK]t, which tokka; Xiktdoatv in the exact center picks up and OUK 6kiyr closes out (the paronomasia in frag. 23.20 ... 7nokkaKit nokd is similar). Classical Philology 97 (2002): 238-55 [?
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Transactions of the American Philological Association, 2001
Illinois Classical Studies, 2012
Peregrinations: Journal of Medieval Art and Architecture, 2018
Documentos Escuela de Economía, 2022
Transform Italia- 3 gennaio 2024, 2024
Educational Research Review
Johannes Ockeghem. Actes du XLe Colloque international d'études humanistes, ed. by Philippe Vendrix (Tours: CESR), 1998
Mirabilia. Electronic Journal of Antiquity & Middle Ages, 2013
Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2013
L. Capponi (ed.), Tra politica e religione, Milano: Jouvence, 179-203, 2019
MBio, 2012
Education Sciences, 2012
International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 2022
Frontiers in public health, 2024