Basic Physics

A superluminal quantum-vortex model of the electron and the positron is produced from a superluminal double-helix model of the photon during electron-positron pair production. The two oppositely-charged (with Q = ±e sqrt (2/α) = 16.6e) open-helix spin-½ half-photons compose the double-helix photon. These half-photons separate and curl up their separated superluminal single-helical trajectories to form an electrically-charged superluminal closed-helix spin-½ quantum-vortex electron model and a corresponding positron model. The helical radius and the Dirac equation's zitterbewegung angular frequency of the quantum vortex electron and positron models equal the helical radius and zitterbewegung angular frequency of the two spin-½ half-photons, each of energy E = mc^2 , that composed the double-helix photon model of energy E = 2mc^2 from which the electron and positron models were produced. The photon and electron models are also compatible when a photon of energy E > 2mc^2 produces a relativistic electron-positron pair. Implications of the quantum vortex electron model for electron stability are discussed.

Abstract
- The rate 1.0725 is found frequently between many solar planets orbital and internal distances (a constant rate)
- I suggest this rate is found because of Lorentz Contraction Phenomenon
i.e.
- There's a difference in velocities = "light velocity" between 2 motions in the solar group (even if we can't measure or notice this velocities difference)
i.e.
There's More Than One Frame In The Solar Group

This paper suggests a clear argument as following:
1. The solar group is created by light beams, but we see these light beams in different forms (as matters and distances)

2. We see the light as matter (Specifically, bright fringes produced by light coherence we see as matters, where dark fringes we see as distances)

3. We see bright fringes as matters because our mind works by light velocity (Mind Thinking Process), so the whole matter around us is found because of the human mind effect.

4. to enable us to see the sun rays, Earth has to move with light velocity relative to the sun, to create a difference in velocities = c velocity

5. So, the sun creation depends on the difference in Earth and Sun motions = c velocity.

6. That's why Lorentz contraction phenomenon is seen in the solar orbital and internal distances, specifically with the constant rate = 1.0725, (which equals 7.25%), where the sun obliquity to ecliptic (7.25 degrees).

7. means, the sun creation process contains Lorentz Phenomenon Effect on the solar orbital and internal distances (and on many other values) 
8. The Distance can be defined as "A Form Of Energy", which is proved by the moon orbit regression yearly 19 degrees (Metonic Cycle) (otherwise how distance can move?) (that supports the claim that, distances are dark fringes produced by light coherence)

This Paper Consists Of 2 Parts
1st Part    : Theory Of Matter Creation
2nd Part    : Application on the theory (the solar group creation from the light) 
 Starting From The Solar Group First Energy
 Explaining The Energy Coherence (light coherence)
 Discovering The Matter Creation
 Providing The Solar Group Motions Harmony Reasons

Science from History to Future CONTENTS 1. INERTIA 2. Form of Intensity of the Moving Charge Electric Field is Asymmetrical. 3. Form of the Interference Field is Non-Linear 4. CORRECTED Maswell's equations 5. Corrected Newton´s Laws of Motion 6. Kinetic energy of a charge moving at the velocity of v has two different values: Kinetic energy against direction of motion as wave Tkin ad = mc2 [ln |1+v/c|- (v/c)/(1+v/c)] Kinetic energy in direction of motion as particle Tkin id = mc2 [ln|1-v/c|+ (v/c)/(1-v/c)] 7. Physics is Easy 8. Particles, Waves and Trends in Physics 9. Physics is Beautiful 10. Great Table of Elementary Particles 11. Movement Principles of the Fast-Spinning Bodies 12. Nuclear Fusion Video https://youtu.be/iAjYkRyMw5Y Science from History to Future Nobel laureates in physics are mostly physicists, who mainly create and defend physics. Einstein never received a Nobel prize for relativity... For nearly 100 years ago have been Nobel Prize winners said: "- The theory of relativity is a mathematical and not a physical theory. - The theory is far from being confirmed experimentally, the results of the solar eclipse expeditions allow other interpretations - The principle of relativity is only valid for mass-dependent movements - The theory of relativity contradicts the fundamental ideas about space and time: the Euclidean space and the usual ideas of time must remain binding. " I strongly demand: The events of 1905-1920, we can not replace by the events of 1938-1945. We would be making a big mistake with this. Because other future generations will hate us for it. Crimes of earlier periods lead to war. They are the cause of the wars. The war is very bad. Change QUALITY 1905 A.E. : Einstein ´s theory Tkin =mc^2 – mo c^2 1996: Tkin id =mc^2 [ln |1-v/c|+ (v/c) / (1-v/c) ] Tkin ad = mc^2 [ln |1+v/c|- (v/c) / (1+v/c) ] Einstein's theory works only for v < 0.1c.  Einstein´s Relativity Theory Can not Explain ... 1. Movement principles of the fast-spinning pulsars, 2. Nuclear Fusion , 3. Wave - Particle Duality as Kinetic Energy Against and In Direction of Motion 4. the 4th Maxwell's equation, 5. Lorentz equals without the help of Space-Time, 6.Confinement of quarks 7. Great Table of Elementary Particles 8. Spectral line Hα ( http://vixra.org/pdf/1404.0248v1.pdf ) 9. Neutrino Oscillations ( http://vixra.org/pdf/1404.0369v1.pdf ) 10. Form of the interference field must be non-linear. ( http://vixra.org/pdf/1411.0531v1.pdf ) 11.Form of Intensity of the Moving Charge Electric Field must be asymmetrical. ( http://vixra.org/pdf/1411.0533v1.pdf ) 12.Kinetic energy of a charge moving at the velocity of v has two different values: Kinetic energy against direction of motion as wave Tkin ad = mc^2 [ln |1+v/c|- (v/c)/(1+v/c)] Kinetic energy in direction of motion as particle Tkin id = mc^2 [ln|1-v/c|+ (v/c)/(1-v/c)] ( http://vixra.org/pdf/1411.0530v1.pdf , http://vixra.org/pdf/1405.0334v1.pdf , http://vixra.org/pdf/1409.0090v1.pdf Three Objections to Modern Physics ) 13. Yukawa potential  .... Relativists were ridiculed in Germany 27 years (1905 - 1931). Relativists were persecuted in Hitler's Germany 14 years (1932 - 1945). Relativists were ridiculed in America 50 (?) years. Glorification of relativists 101 years (1918 - 2018). Why? Begins of glorification: FACTS to 1918: 6 he has stolen the work of others and has mathematized physics to such an extent that fellow physicists have been left clueless. Furthermore, the article continued, Einstein had undertaken a propaganda campaign by which he had cast a spell both over the public and over academic circles--but in reality relativity was nothing but fraud and fantasy.  nt and creating an deceitful picture of Albert Einstein by his glorification: 12 In 1919 it had carried an article [13 autor Alexander Moszkowski (1851-1934), 15 editor-in-chief was Arnold Berliner (1862-1942)] announcing the results of the British solar eclipse expedition that rose to laudatory hyperbole, not shying away from declaring that “a highest truth, beyond Galileo and Newton, beyond Kant” had been unveiled by “an oracular saying from the depth of the skies.” 16 on December 14, 1919, the front page of the Berliner Illustrirte Zeitung [17 This newspaper had been founded by Leopold Ullstein (1826-1899)] carried a large close-up portrait of Einstein whose caption read: “A new eminence in the history of the world: Albert Einstein, whose researches signify a complete revolution of our understanding of Nature and whose insights equal in importance those of a Copernicus, Kepler, and Newton.” 2 The huge public acclaim that was accorded Einstein. It also vexed conservative academics (e.g. the Nobel Laureate Philipp Lenard have felt that the theoretical physicist Einstein had captured too much of the limelight, while other, experimental physicists were not appreciated enough.) FACTS Then followed (1920): Reactionaries and Einstein's Fame: “German Scientists for the Preservation of Pure Science,” Relativity, and the Bad Nauheim Meeting Jeroen van Dongen Einstein Papers Project California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA 91125, USA Institute for History and Foundations of Science Utrecht University P.O. Box 80.000 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands Two important and unpleasant events occurred in Albert Einstein’s life in 1920: That August an antirelativity rally was held in the large auditorium of the Berlin Philharmonic, and a few weeks later Einstein was drawn into a tense and highly publicized debate with Philipp Lenard on the merits of relativity at a meeting in Bad Nauheim, Germany. 73 Nonetheless, tensions had been mounting. Max Planck was firmly in the chair, but prior to the debate--because he was still not certain whether Einstein would remain in Berlin--he appeared to be quite agitated.  Change QUALITY 1905 A.E. : Einstein ´s theory Tkin =mc^2 – mo c^2 1996: Tkin id =mc^2 [ln |1-v/c|+ (v/c) / (1-v/c) ] Tkin ad = mc^2 [ln |1+v/c|- (v/c) / (1+v/c) ] Einstein's theory works only for v < 0.1c.
https://www.trendsinphysics.info/data/New-Trends-in-Physics-Extraordinary-proofs.pdf

The most original and shocking interpretation of Lucretius in the last 40 years.

Thomas Nail argues convincingly and systematically that Lucretius was not an atomist, but a thinker of kinetic flux. In doing so, he completely overthrows the interpretive foundations of modern scientific materialism, whose philosophical origins lie in the atomic reading of Lucretius' immensely influential book De Rerum Natura.

This means that Lucretius was not the revolutionary harbinger of modern science as Greenblatt and others have argued; he was its greatest victim. Nail re-reads De Rerum Natura to offer us a new Lucretius--a Lucretius for today.

We still discuss the question " Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?"
Let's summarize the main idea:
-I suppose the solar system is one building and each planet is a part of this same building – based on this vision – each planet data is created relative and complementary to the other planets data – i.e. the solar system is Not Separated Planets From Each Other but one building connecting together-
This is my vision I have explained in (Part I) clearly –
But
-Suppose the respectful reader doesn't believe me – suppose he finds the one building vision is an illogical idea and can't be acceptable practically – how can I provide a logical question concerning the solar system vision?

-In these 2 papers I try to prove a clear claim which is "The Earth Moon Is Created By An Effect From Jupiter" – that means – the Earth moon diameter (3475km) should be changed if Jupiter didn't effect on the Earth Moon Creation process – Similar to that the Earth Moon Mass, Orbital Distance.......etc
i.e.
-I provide in both papers (Data Analysis) Only – and try to prove that – this (moon) data is created because of Jupiter Effect on the moon creation process – How this effect is done? This question is out of our papers scope – my basic job to prove that – this Data (The Earth Moon Data) can never be created Unless Jupiter effected on the Moon Creation process.
Now
-If the respectful reader refuses my conclusion – what will happen? Someone should answer the question "Can This Data Be Created Without Jupiter Effect?" If Not – So we have a point in our progress to prove that the solar system is one machine – where Jupiter Effect on the Earth Moon Data proves that the solar system can't be separated planets from each other.
References
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon? (I)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

Buku "Diktat Kuliah Fisika Dasar II Tahap Persiapan Bersama ITB" merupakan buku karangan Bpk. Dr.Eng. Mikrajudin Abdullah, M.Si. Buku ini merupakan salah satu buku utama yang akan saya gunakan dalam mata kuliah Fisika Dasar II dan Fisika Teknik Lanjut di Universitas Bangka Belitung. Sengaja saya muat di account academia ini, untuk mempermudah mahasiswa dalam mendownload buku tersebut. Terima Kasih

Bentuk grafik hubungan antara kecepatan dan waktu adalah seperti persamaan garis lurus. Grafik tersebut memiliki kemiringan (gradien) tertentu. Coba sobat amati grafik di atas. Grafik hubungan V dan t jika kecepatan awal(Vo) adalah nol ditunjukkan oleh grafik a dan jika kecepatannya adalah Vo maka grafiknya seperti tampak pada grafik b.

This study investigated the practices of candidates preparing for the IELTS examination in Adelaide, South Australia. The main aim of the study was to describe candidates' activities as they prepared to sit for an IELTS Test. Adopting primarily ethnographic procedures for data collection, the focus was on candidates' preparation practices and experiences. The study was carried out in two stages. In Stage 1, candidates leaving an IELTS test centre were surveyed to find out general biographical and test preparation information. This information was used to create target profiles for case study participants in Stage 2. Data collected for the study included interviews, observations, diary studies, and document collection. The case study methodology enabled documentation of individuals' practices in preparation for IELTS Tests.

Dalam cabang ilmu fisika kita mengenal MEKANIKA. Mekanika ini dibagi dalam 3 cabang ilmu yaitu : a. KINEMATIKA = Ilmu gerak Ilmu yang mempelajari gerak tanpa mengindahkan penyebabnya. b. DINAMIKA = Ilmu gaya Ilmu yang mempelajari gerak dan gaya-gaya penyebabnya. c. STATIKA = Ilmu keseimbangan Ilmu yang mempelajari tentang keseimbangan benda. Untuk cabang kinematika dan dinamika sudah dipelajari dikelas satu dan dua. Pada bab ini kita akan membahas mengenai STATIKA. dan benda-benda yang ditinjau pada bab ini dianggap sebagai benda tegar.

Percobaan yang berjudul Jembatan Wheatstone dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh tahanan geser terhadap kesetimbangan jembatan wheatstone serta membandingkan nilai hambatan yang dihitung secara langsung dan yang ditentukan dengan prinsip Jembatan Wheatstone. Pada percobaan ini digunakan tahanan geser sebagai variabel manipulasi, jenis resistor dan tegangan sebagai variabel kontrol dan panjang kawat l1 dan l2 sebagai variabel respon. Berdasarkan percobaan didapatkan nilai hambatan yang diukur dengan metode jembatan wheatstone sebesar (57,75 ± 1,44) Ω dengan taraf ketelitian sebesar 97,5%. Nilai tersebut berbeda dengan yang diukur secara langsung melalui kode warna yaitu sebesar (50 ± 5%) Ω. Perbedaan nilai tersebut disebabkan oleh faktor suhu dari kawat dan adanya hambatan yang berasal dari kabel penghubung yang digunakan dalam faktor tersebut. Kedua faktor tersebut dapat memperbesar nilai hambatan secara keseluruhan pada rangkaian jembatan wheatstone. Dari percobaan ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa semakin besar niai hambatan pada tahanan geser maka perbandingan panjang kawat pertama dan kedua semakin kecil dan nilai hambatan yang diukur dengan metode jembatan wheatstone lebih besar dari yang diukur secara langsung dengan membaca kode warna resistor. Kata Kunci : jembatan wheatstone, kesetimbangan jembatan wheatstone, kode warna resistor

Periskop merupakan alat optik untuk mengamati suatu objek dari posisi tersembunyi. Periskop adalah alat optik yang digunakan pada kapal selam untuk melihhat permukaan laut. Kapal selam perlu melihat keadaan permukaan laut sebelum kapal selam tersebut muncul mengapung di permukaan. Periskop terdiri atas dua buah lensa cembung dan dua buah prisma siku-siku sama kaki (Novitasari,2013:43). Periskop sederhana dapat dibuat dengan menggunakan tabung yang diberikan cermin paralel yang saling berhadapan dengan sudut 45° pada setiap sisinya. Periskop sederhana sering digunakan sebagai alat untuk melihat ketika dihalangi kerumuhan orang. Periskop yang canggih biasa ditemukan pada kendaraan tempur lapis baja dan kapal selam. Periskop kapal selam mempunyai diameter 10 sampai 15 cm.

Fases son los estados de la materia que pueden existir en equilibrio y en contacto térmicos simultáneamente. Los cambios de fase ocurren cuando algunas de las variables utilizadas en la descripción macroscópica cambian bajo ciertas condiciones de equilibrio; ya sea por agentes externos o internos.

This work presents, for the first time in history, a coherent and correct concept for stellar aberration based on the wave nature of light and classical physics. Considering the spherical propagation of the light wavefront and the motion of the observer relative to the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) leads to a physically meaningful formula that, unlike the classical formulas, relates to the squares of the velocities for light and the CMB. Moreover, stellar aberration is explained by the entire light path from the star to the observer, with significant consequences for the concept of a dragged ether and the reinterpretation of a large number of experiments. It is demonstrated that all relevant experiments can be consistently explained within the framework of an ether fully dragged by gravity. The anisotropy of light is presented from a new perspective, and time dilation and length contraction become obsolete.

Why there's No velocity higher than Light Velocity C =300000 km/sec? Because • The Matter is created from light beams coherence (according to Young Experiment-The Main Hypothesis) • The Time is created as the Matter Changing measurement • Our body (matter) is produced by the same method, from this light beams coherence • Our bodies are connected with specific Light velocity and specific time rate because our bodies are produced by specific Light Beams coherence

Paper Question
Is A Life Found On Mars In Its Ancient Time?
Paper Hypothesis
The Life Is Originated Regardless The Sun Existence And Effect

The Paper Theory (Mars Migration Theory) 
- Mars had a life on its ancient time
Because
- The solar planets were created before the sun creation and because of that – all planets had lives in this period
- Mars Orbital Distance (before The sun Creation) was 84 mkm
Also
- Pluto was The Mercury Moon

Based on that – The Planets Ancient Order Was As Following – relative to the current sun position before the sun creation

- Mercury with Pluto (its Moon) with orbital distance (57.9 mkm) - Then Mars with orbital distance (84 mkm) – Then Venus with orbital distance (108.2 mkm) then Earth with orbital distance (149.6 mkm*) –Then Uranus – Then Neptune – Then Jupiter with orbital distance (5906 mkm)
(Note Please Earth orbital distance almost was 153 mkm and Venus orbital distance almost was 105 mkm)

Then The Sun Was Created (Causing Many Changes)
So
- Mars was migrated from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its current one (227.9 mkm)
- Through Mars Migration Motion – Mars had collided with Venus (at First) and then with Earth at second..
This Theory (Mars migration theory) is in consistency with The Giant-Impact Hypothesis
But
Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties: 

I. Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)?  Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%). 

IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI. Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect

Conclusions
- The was a life on Mars before its Migration from its original point (84 mkm) to its current one (227.9 mkm)
- This life is perished because of Mars Migration
- The Sun Creation Had Created A Selection For The Available Places For Life Which Was Not Found Before The Sun Creation. 


Paper Contents
(1) A List Of Changes Done By The Sun Creation
(2) Mars Migration Theory Proves.

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

We demonstrate that Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), a method which was originally developed for depth-resolved imaging of biological tissue, is suited to adequately respond to different problems posed in the field of contactless material characterisation and non-destructive testing and evaluation. In detail, the potential of advanced OCT techniques like ultrahigh-resolution OCT, polarisation-sensitive OCT or spectral-domain OCT is evaluated and exemplified for the imaging and characterisation of different polymer and ceramic materials, as well as of whole components, like polymer coated medical metal stents.

How long scientists will give credit of work of Aristotle’s and Galileo’s work  to Newton as his First Law of Motion?
How long scientists will give credit of Euler’s F=ma to Newton as his Second Law Of Motion?
How long scientists will teach Newton’s Third law which neglects many factors, and is incomplete?

A superluminal quantum-vortex model of the electron and the positron is produced from a superluminal double-helix model of the photon during electron-positron pair production. The two oppositely-charged (with Q = ±e sqrt(2/α) = 16.6e) open-helix spin-½ half-photons compose the double-helix photon. These half-photons separate and curl up their separated superluminal single-helical trajectories to form an electrically-charged superluminal closed-helix spin-½ quantum-vortex electron model and a corresponding positron model. The helical radius and the Dirac equation's zitterbewegung angular frequency of the quantum vortex electron and positron models equal the helical radius and zitterbewegung angular frequency of the two spin-½ half-photons, each of energy E = mc^2, that composed the double-helix photon model of energy E = 2mc^2 from which the electron and positron models were produced. The photon and electron models are also compatible when a photon of energy E > 2mc 2 produces a relativistic electron-positron pair. Implications of the quantum vortex electron model for electron stability are discussed.

How long scientists will give credit of work of Aristotle’s and Galileo’s work  to Newton as his First Law of Motion?
How long scientists will give credit of Euler’s F=ma to Newton as his Second Law Of Motion?
How long scientists will teach Newton’s Third law which neglects many factors, and is incomplete?

Prof. Keshk General Relativity and the Cosmology of the Qur"an " Behind it all is surely an idea so simple, so beautiful, that when we grasp itin a decade, a century, or a millennium-we will all say to each other, how could it have been otherwise?" ~ John Archibald Wheeler Theoretical physicist who was a public proponent of the general theory of relativity 1 Modern Western theories of cosmology have developed through the dual fields of mathematics and physics. Through theorizing, experimentation, mathematical calculation and the process of scientific observation, Modern day cosmologists have been able to confidently build theoretical frameworks with which they purport to explain the true nature of existence and the laws governing creation. Some, like Abbe Georges Lemaitre and George Gamow have even gone so far as to posit an origin to the Universe in a Hot Big Bang, which they evidence with Quantum Theory measurements of ancient cosmic radiation. Quantum theory holds that all physical phenomenon occur randomly because there can be no observationally proven causation between individual actions and reactions. The Qur"an"s cosmology holds that the search for a beginning to the universe is superfluous and such an arbitrary nature of creation is blasphemous. Man can never 1 Tarok 94 perceive a complete union with God and God"s Laws are perfectly proportioned 2 . The General theory of Relativity, begun by Einstein and built upon by his contemporaries, informs every aspect of cosmology that scientists study today. It also offers workable analogies to the Qur"an"s cosmological assertions. This is especially true with regard to General Relativity"s methodology of deductive reasoning, its emphasis on natural observations, its understanding of the balance of opposite energies, and its rigid faith in a natural, unchanging order to the Universe.