Discussing About LV and HV Electrical Cables: Edvard
Discussing About LV and HV Electrical Cables: Edvard
Discussing About LV and HV Electrical Cables: Edvard
http://electrical- engineering- portal.com/discussing- about- lv- and- hv- electrical- cables May 13, 2013
Edvard
Figure 2 - In high-voltage cables the insulating material makes up a greater f raction of the total cross-sectional area than the conductor material
Space is really a critical criterion when discussing elect rical cables and wires. In a low-voltage (LV) plastic-sheathed cable with conductor cross-sections of up to 10 mm2 per conductor or in high-voltage (HV) cables (Figure 2), the lions share of the cross-sectional area is occupied by the insulating material. If aluminium rather than copper is used as the conductor material, the additional crosssectional area required is more or less negligible in comparison.
At
Lef t: Figure 3 - Mineral-insulated cables; Right: Figure 4 - T he structure of f ireproof plasticcoated cable and mineral-insulated cable
least that is the situation for conventional plastic-coated cables. Mineral-insulated cables and wires (Figure 3) are not only absolutely fireproof, they also take up much less space (Figure 4) than conventional plastic-sheathed cables. For a time, these mineral-insulated cables were even equipped with an aluminium sheath, but this never became established and copper sheathing remains the norm. And in most European countries, copper is still used predominantly, if not exclusively, for elect rical inst allat ion work in buildings. So why is it that most European standards do not permit the use of aluminium conductors with cross-sections up to 16 mm2 (or in some cases) up to 10 mm2?
3 Aluminium has a propensity to undergo slow material creep. When subjected to high pressures, the material will yield over time. One result of this is that originally tight connections may gradually become loose. Connection technology is available that can deal with this problem and it is worth investing the extra cost and ef ort involved for installations involving relatively few connection points (e.g. HV overhead transmission lines), but not for more complex branched networks such as those found inside buildings. Top
Concluding
Because of the second of the three problems listed above, connections involving the ends of aluminium conductors should always be made as tight screw-fastened contacts. Unfortunately, the third problem discussed above means that these joints are often not permanent. Spring con tacts can be helpful, but they tend to suf er from the problems associated with the insulating aluminium oxide layers. In both cases, the result is a slow rise in the contact resistance at the connection point and thus to an increased risk of fire. Grandfathering regulations continue to protect older aluminium installations in Eastern Germany and in most countries in Eastern Europe, but the only real protection being provided by this sort of regulation is protection from the threat of improvement! Fortunately, methods are now available for ensuring proper electrical contact between these older protected installations and newer electrical systems. These connectors combine springloaded contacts with a special contact paste made from grease and sharp metal particles. When the connection is made the particles penetrate the existing aluminium oxide layer while the grease protects the contact area from renewed corrosion.
Copper is also the preferred conductor material in high-voltage cables. Although the use of aluminium would result in only a slight increase in the overall conductor cross section, the insulating materials and the exterior shielding required for HV cables are expensive and the greater total crosssectional area of the cable would cancel out the savings made by using the cheaper conductor material in contrast to the situation with low-voltage power cables (Figure 6).
Figure 6 - Only in low-voltage high-current cables does the conductor material make up most of the cable's total cross-sectional area
It is also worth remembering that the cable shielding is always made from copper, because it is the only material suitable for the job. If aluminium is chosen as the conductor material, then processing the scrap cable at the end of its (admittedly long) service life will involve the additional step of separating the two materials. As a material, pure copper has a practically inifnite lifetime. It can be reprocessed an indefinite number of times without sufering any loss of quality. About 45 % of the copper required today is generated from scrap, and the products for which it is used (cables, transformers, water pipes or rooi ng) will remain in use for a long time, on average around forty years. However, forty years ago, the demand for copper was only about half of what it is today. It follows that about 90 % of the copper used at that time is still in use today. This applies equally to aluminium and other metals. Metals are not consumed, they are used. SOURCE: Practical applications of electrical conductors Stefan Fassbinder
EEP recommends