INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I – III

Name of Employee: MILLIE M. LAGONILLA Name of Rater: Gina G. Sapuay

Position: T-III Position: Master Teacher I
Beaureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd, Division of Tarlac City Date of Review:
Rating Period: JUNE 2018-MARCH 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicator RATING

S
Weight c
Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Actual A
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Poor Results Q E T
KRA (4) (2) v o
e r
. e
Basic Education 1. CONTENT 1.Applied June Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed No
Services KNOWLEDGE knowledge of 2018 - knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of acceptabl
AND content within and March content and its content and its content and its content and its e
PEDAGOGY across curriculum 2019 integration integration integration integration evidence
teaching areas within and within and within and within and across was
across subject across subject across subject subject areas as shown
areas as shown areas as shown areas as shown shown in MOV 1
in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 w in MOV 1 with a with a rating o 4
rating of 7 ith a rating o 6 rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at 3 Submitted at 2 Submitted any No

least 4 lessons lessons using lessons using one af the given applicabl
using MOV 1 MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV e
and supported supported by supported by evidence
by any one of any one of the any one of the was
Timeliness the other given other given other given shown
MOV MOV MOV
 Timeliness
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory Poor
per Satisfactory (4) (2) S
KRA Actual A c
QET Results Q E T v o
e r
. e
Basic Education 2. Used a range of Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No
Services teaching strategies different different different different teaching applicabl
that enhance teaching teaching teaching strategy that e
learner strategy that strategy that strategy that promote reading, evidence
achievement in promote promote promote writing and/or was
literacy and reading, writing reading, writing reading, writing numeracy skills shown
numeracy skills and/or and/or and/or as shown in MOV
numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills 1 with rating of 7
as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with
rating of 7 rating of 7 rating of 7

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted 1 No

least 4 learner- least 3 learner- least 2 learner- learner- applicabl
centered centered centered centered e
lessons as lessons as lessons as lessons as evidence
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown was
in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in any of the shown
supported by supported by supported by given MOV.
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other MOV other MOV other MOV
given given given
 Timeliness

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory Poor
per Satisfactory (4) (2) S
KRA Actual A c
QET Results Q E T
v o
e r
. e
Basic 3. Applied a range Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No
Education of teaching teaching teaching teaching acceptabl
Services teaching strategies strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that e
to develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical evidence
and creative and creative and creative and creative and creative was
thinking, as well as thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or shown
other higher-order other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
thinking skills. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
with a rating of 7 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
of 6 of 5 of 4

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No

least 4 lessons lessons as lessons as lesson as acceptabl
as evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by e
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the evidence
supported by supported by supported by given MOV was
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the shown
other given other given other given
MOV MOV MOV
 Timeliness

MFOs KRAs Objectives

Weight S
Very Unsatisfactory Actual
Timeline per QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory Ave. c
(4) Satisfactory (3) Poor Results Q E T
(2) o
KRA
r
e
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed June Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No
Education Environment classroom 2018 - management management management management acceptabl
Services and structure to March strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that e
Diversity of engage learners, 2019 engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners evidence
Learners individually or in in in in in was
groups, in activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks shown
meaningful as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
exploration, MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
discovery rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
and hands-on
activities within a
range of physical
learning
environments.

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No

least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson acceptabl
supported by supported by supported by supported by e
MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any any of the evidence
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other acceptable was
acceptable acceptable acceptable MOV shown
MOV MOV MOV
 Timeliness

MFOs KRAs Objectives

S
A c
Weight Very Poor
Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Actual v
Timeline per QET (5) Satisfactory (3) (2) Results Q E T e o
KRA (4) (1) r
.
e
Basic 5. Managed June Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No
Education learner 2018 - management management management management acceptabl
Services behavior March strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of e
constructively by 2019 learner behavior learner learner behavior learner behavior evidence
applying positive that promote behavior that promote that promote was
and positive and that promote positive and positive and shown
non-violent non-violent positive and non-violent non-violent
discipline discipline as non-violent discipline as discipline as
to ensure learning- shown in MOV discipline as shown in MOV shown in MOV
focused submitted with a shown in MOV submitted with a submitted with a
environments. rating of 7 submitted with rating of 5 rating of 4
a rating of 6

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No

least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the acceptabl
given strategies given strategies given strategies given strategies e
as observed in at as observed in as observed in at as observed in at evidence
least 4 lessons at least 3 least 2 lessons least 1 lesson. was
lessons shown
 Timeliness `

MFOs KRAs Objectives

A S
Weight Very Poor
Timeline per QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Actual Q E T v c
KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Results e o
. r
e
6. Used June Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No
differentiated, 2018 - differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated acceptabl
developmentally March teaching teaching teaching teaching e
appropriate 2019 strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to evidence
learning address learner address learner address learner address learner was
experiences to diversity as diversity as diversity as diversity as shown
address learners’ shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
gender, needs, 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
strengths, interests of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
and experiences.
 Efficiency Submitted any 1 No
differentiated acceptabl
teaching e
strategy in only evidence
1 lesson as was
Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at evidently shown shown
least 4 least 3 least 2 in any 1 of the
differentiated differentiated differentiated acceptable
teaching teaching teaching MOV
strategies in at strategies in at strategies in at
least 2 lessons least 2 lessons least 2 lessons
as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by supported by supported by
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other other other
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

MFOs KRAs Objectives

Weight Very Poor S
Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Actual A c
Timeline per QET Satisfactory Results Q E T
(5) (3) (2) v o
KRA (4) (1)
e r
. e
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, June Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No
Education and Planning managed 2018- implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptabl
Services and implemented March developmental- developmental- developmental- developmental- e
developmentally 2019 ly sequenced ly sequenced ly sequenced ly sequenced evidence
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and was
teaching learning learning learning learning shown
and learning process as process as process as process as
processes to meet shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
curriculum 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
requirements and of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
varied teaching
contexts.
 Efficiency No
acceptabl
e
evidence
was
shown
Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at
least 4 least 3 least 2 least 1
developmental- developmental- developmental- developmental-
ly sequenced ly sequenced ly sequenced ly sequenced
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning learning learning learning
process as process as process as process as
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and
supported by supported by supported by supported by
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other given other given other given other given
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicator Rating

MFOs KRAs Objectives

S
A c
Weight Poor
Very Unsatisfactory Actual v
Timeline per QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) (2) Results Q E T e o
KRA (1) r
.
e
 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
collegial participated in participated in participated in participated in acceptabl
discussions LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ e
that use teacher meetings to meetings to meetings to meetings to evidence
and learner discuss discuss discuss discuss was
feedback to teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner shown
enrich teaching feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to
practice. enrich enrich enrich enrich instruction
instruction as instruction as instruction as as shown in the
shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Participated in 4 Participated in 4 Participated in 4 Participated in 4 No

LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ acceptabl
meetings as meetings as meetings as meetings as e
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown evidence
in any 1 of the in any 1 of the in any 1 of the in any 1 of the was
given MOV given MOV given MOV given MOV shown

Timeliness

S
Weight Poor c
Very Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory Actual Q
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per QET Outstanding (5)
Satisfactory (4) (2) Results
E T Ave. o
KRA (1) r
e
 9. Selected, June Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No
developed, 2018 - used varied used varied used varied used varied acceptabl
organized March teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and e
and used 2019 learning learning learning learning evidence
appropriate resources, resources, resources, resources, was
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to shown
learning address address address address
resources, learning goals learning goals learning goals learning goals
including as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
ICT, to address MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
learning goals. rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any No

least 4 varied least 3 varied least 2 varied teaching and acceptabl
teaching and teaching and teaching and learning e
learning learning learning resources, evidence
resources, resources, resources, including ICT, was
including ICT, including ICT, including ICT, as evidently shown
as evidently as evidently as evidently shown in MOV
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV 1 and supported
1 and 1 and 1 and by any 1 of the
supported supported supported acceptable
by any 1 of the by any 1 of the by any 1 of the MOV
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

A S
Weight Poor
Very Unsatisfactory Actual v c
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) (2) Results Q E T e
KRA (1) . o
r
e
Basic 4.Assessmen 10. Designed, June Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed,
Education t and selected, organized 2018 - selected, selected, selected, selected,
Services Planning and used March organized and organized and organized and organized and
diagnostic, 2019 used used used used
formative and diagnostic,forma diagnostic,form diagnostic,forma diagnostic,forma
summative tive and ative and tive and tive and
assessment summative summative summative summative
strategies assessment assessment assessment assessment
consistent strategies strategies strategies strategies
with curriculum consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
requirements. curri-culum curri-culum curri-culum curri-culum
requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating 1 with a rating with a rating with a rating
of 7 of 7 of 7 of 7

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted 1 No

least 4 varied least 3 varied least 2 varied assessment acceptabl
assessment assessment assessment tools as e
tools as tools as tools as evidently shown evidence
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown in any of the was
in any 1 of the in any 1 of the in any 1 of the acceptable shown
acceptable acceptable acceptable MOV
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Weight Poor A S
Very Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory Actual Q v c
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per QET Outstanding (5)
Satisfactory (4) (2) Results
E T
e
KRA (1) o
. r
e
Basic 11. Monitored and June Quality Consistently Consistently Consistently Consistently No
Education evaluated learner 2018 - monitored and monitored and monitored and monitored and acceptabl
Services progress and March evaluated evaluated evaluated evaluated e
achievement using 2019 learner progress learner progress learner progress learner progress evidence
learner attainment and and and and was
data. achievement achievement achievement achievement shown
using learner using learner using learner using learner
attainment data attainment data attainment data attainment data
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a No

combination of combination of combination of 1 acceptable acceptabl
at least 4 of the at least 3 of the at least 2 of the MOV e
acceptable acceptable acceptable evidence
MOV MOV MOV was
shown

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No

were distributed were were distributed was completed in acceptabl
across 4 distributed across 2 only 1 quarter e
quarters across 3 quarters evidence
quarters was
shown

S
A
Weight c
Very Unsatisfactory Actual v
KRAs Objectives Timeline per QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Poor Results Q
MFOs E T o
(2) e
KRA r
. e
Basic 12.Communicated June Quality Consistently Frequently Ocasionally Rarely No
Education promptly and 2018 - showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt acceptabl
Services clearly the March and clear and clear and clear and clear e
learners’ needs, 2019 communication communi-cation communi-cation communication evidence
progress and of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’ was
achievement to key needs,progress needs, progress needs, progress needs,progress shown
stakeholders, and and achieve- and and achievement
including achievement to ment to key achievement to to
parents /guardians. key stake- stake-holders, key stake- key stake-
holders, including holders, holders, including
including parents/ including parents/
parents/ guardians as parents/ guardians as
guardians as shown in the guardians as shown in the
shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 No

combination of combination of combination of of the given acceptabl
at least 4 of the at least 3 of the at least 2 of the MOV e
acceptable acceptable acceptable evidence
MOV MOV MOV was
shown

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No

were distributed were were distributed was competed in acceptabl
across 4 distributed across 2 only 1 quarter e
quarters across 3 quarters evidence
quarters was
shown
 S
Weight c
Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Actual
Results Q
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per QET Outstanding (5) (4) Satisfactory (3) (2) Poor E T Ave. o
KRA r
e
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed June Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
Education various 2018 - performed performed performed performed acceptabl
Services related March various related various related various related various related e
works/activities 2019 work/activities work/ activities work/activities work/activities evidence
that that contribute that contribute that contribute that contribute was
contribute to the to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching shown
learning learning learning learning
process as process as process as process as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted any 1 No

least 4 different of acceptabl
kinds of acceptable e
acceptable MOV evidence
MOV Submitted at Submitted at was
least 3 different least 2 different shown
kinds of kinds of
acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV

Timeliness
RATING
FOR
OVERALL
ACCOMPL
ISHMENT

GINA G, SAPUAY MILLIE M.LAGONILLA LUZVIMINDA Y. PANLILIO

Rater Ratee Approving Authority