Comparison in Writing Module Old Vs

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
REGION III – CENTRAL LUZON
SCHOOL DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
TINAJERO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL – MAIN
San Fernando Avenue, Madapdap Rest., Mabalacat City, Pampanga

Comparison in Writing (Old vs. New Module)


Since the beginning of the implementation of the new learning delivery modalities, our school,
Tinajero National High School-Main, has been employing the modular distance learning modality in
order to cater to the students’ needs in their academic growth and development despite the challenges
brought about by Covid-19.
Following the learnings from the LDM2 courses, the teachers prepared the modules to ensure that
these would reach the students at home. On the start of Quarter 1, after distributing the first few modules,
the teachers received feedbacks from the students and their parents/guardians that the number of tasks and
activities to be accomplished by the students was too overwhelming. Some parents stated that they do not
have ample time to guide their children in studying and answering the modules for all the subjects. This
also stemmed to students’ inability to submit their works on time and/or completely.
Considering these challenges at hand, the teachers thought of strategies to still be able to
accomplish the set goal. With the goal of focusing on the Most Essential Learning Competencies, the
teachers decided to downscale the number of activities that would be given to the students per subject.
Other tasks in the SLMs that were not included in the list provided by the teacher may be answered by the
student in his/her free will to gain additional learning. This change made Quarter 2 more manageable for
the students, parents, and teachers.
One of the problems that was also encountered by the school is the lack of resources to be able to
reproduce the all the SLMs. The aforementioned strategy somehow helped in this as some pages that had
activities that were similar in nature were excluded. Furthermore, in MAPEH, the modules in Quarter 1
resembled the contents of the book lent to them. This is why on Quarter 2, reproduction of modules for
this specific subject was discontinued. The students were then given tasks using the book. In English,
there was improvement on the quantity of SLMs on Q2-Q4 since lots of topics that were not in the
MELCS were given on Q1. With regard the other subjects, activities were meticulously selected so
objectives would be more achievable.
Modification in the number of activities per module clearly helped the students to understand the
lesson more effectively and efficiently and answer the activities with more confidence. These resulted to
better outputs from the students and stronger assessment processes from the teachers.

Prepared by:
MARY JOY R. SAWAL
Grade 7 English Teacher

Noted by:
REMEDIOS G. RIVERA
School Head

You might also like