2 National
2 National
2 National
1, WINTER 2023
I. I NTRODUCTION verters (μIs) have become more popular due to their benefits
such as modular architecture, improved reliability, ability
T HE photovoltaic (PV) technology is coming up as a
favorable electrification solution for rural/remote areas
due to technoeconomic benefits [1], [2]. However, return on
to ensure MPPT operation even under mismatching operat-
ing scenarios, plug-and-play approach for capacity expansion
investment (ROI) is still a major concern [3]. ROI can be along with the ease of use, and maintenance [5]. The single-
improved by ensuring: 1) maximum power point tracking phase microinverter (SPμI) with high-frequency (HF) ac-link
(MPPT) operation of PV modules; 2) increasing the utilization configurations could be divided into two categories: 1) phase-
of available PV power [4]; 3) optimal sizing and appropriate modulated dc/dc converter architecture [5] and 2) the series
selection of system components; and 4) matching inverter resonant dc/ac dual-active-bridge converter [6].
characteristics with PV panels. In the past few years, microin- SPμIs suffer from the problem of pulsations at the dc bus
and thus require a large capacitor across it [7]. A pulsewidth
Manuscript received 25 May 2022; revised 30 August 2022 and 7 October modulation (PWM)-based SPμI configuration aiming to avoid
2022; accepted 11 November 2022. Date of publication 27 February 2023;
date of current version 3 March 2023. the need for bulky, large electrolytic capacitors at the dc
The author is with the Department of Instrumentation and Control Engi- bus has been presented in [8]. Bulky capacitor size may be
neering, Netaji Subhas University of Technology, Delhi 110078, India (e-mail: considerably reduced by using integrated chips like MIN1072
anuradha.tomar@nsut.ac.in).
Associate Editor managing this article’s review: John Lam. [9]. A two-stage interleaved flyback μI comprising a two-
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/ICJECE.2022.3223294 phase interleaved flyback dc–dc converter and an H5 inverter
2694-1783 © 2023 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See https://www.ieee.org/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology. Downloaded on April 22,2024 at 13:56:14 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
TOMAR: EFFICIENT PV-BASED MICROINVERTER WITH ENHANCED ROI FOR LOWER ECONOMIC ZONE HABITANTS 25
Fig. 1. Schematic of the PV-based system configuration with the proposed SPμI and its control architecture.
processing are executed as per the concerned algorithms may be considered into two parts, namely, ON period and
simultaneously for MPPT, boost converter, and SPμI loading. OFF period for a switching period as shown in the following
Conventional perturb and observe (P&O) algorithm-based equations, considering a small voltage drop across MOSFET,
[19] MPPT control is included in this work considering its diode forward voltage, and voltage across resistive part of
advantages. inductor:
Vin
III. SPμI D ESIGN I L1 (+) = ∗ TON (1)
L
Aiming for a PV-based SPμI operating in standalone mode Vout− Vin
I L1 (−) = ∗TOFF (2)
at 230-V ac and 50-Hz frequency, an initial dc boosting L1
stage to accommodate the PV intermittency along with MPPT where I L1 is the change in current flowing through induc-
implementation is planned. Furthermore, considering human tor L 1 , Vin is the voltage across dc bus, Vout is the volt-
and equipment safety, a priority, isolated configuration; is a age across output terminals of interleaved boost converter
desirable feature at a little efficiency sacrifice. Considering the (see Fig. 1), and TON and TOFF depict ON and OFF time,
above requirements, a two-stage interleaved inductor configu- respectively.
ration with an HF transformer followed by rectification with Furthermore, as per energy conservation law, both energy
capacitive doublers voltage circuit is proposed as a boosting parts during switching on the period of the inductor and
stage. It includes interleaved inductor’s switching at HF by during discharge or transfer part, both (1) and (2) may be
opto-isolated gate drivers at more than 50% duty cycle, using equalized and considering switching duty D = TON /Ts , where
Si-GaN power devices to cancel 180◦ phase-shifted harmonics: Ts = (TON + TOFF ) and 1 − D = TOFF /Ts ; the equation may
while improving power density and reducing the volume of be solved as follows:
heat sinks. The application of the voltage doubler circuit in 1
the proposed SPμI results in a reduced turns ratio of the Vout = Vin . (3)
(1 − D)
transformer with low flux leakage and thus improved power
Considering various parameters as in [3], the output voltage
conversion operational efficiency at a reduced magnetic size.
in CCM is mentioned in the following equation:
The second design aspect is to make use of HF switching in
(Vin − I L1 ×R L1 ) D
the range from 10 to 35 kHz for the leg one and 50/60 Hz Vout = − Vd − Vds × . (4)
for the second one, as needed in the user’s zone. It helps to (1 − D) 1− D
minimize the switching losses over wide loading conditions To ensure ≥50% duty cycle for specified input–output voltage
and thus achieves higher overall operational efficiency. ratio, the duty cycle factor D value range could be chosen
as 0.65–0.7 for reducing flux leakage, and taking N as
A. Design of Interleaved Boost DC–DC Converter high-frequency transformer’s turn ratio is estimated as follows:
As per Fig. 1, under a steady-state condition in continuous Vout (1 − D)
N= . (5)
conduction mode (CCM), the total inductor switching period 2 ∗ V in
Authorized licensed use limited to: Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology. Downloaded on April 22,2024 at 13:56:14 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
TOMAR: EFFICIENT PV-BASED MICROINVERTER WITH ENHANCED ROI FOR LOWER ECONOMIC ZONE HABITANTS 27
The input power is found by rated output power by dividing The output electrolytic capacitor value and its ripples can be
it by a reasonable efficiency factor as follows: calculated as per the following equations:
Pout Iout ∗ D ∗ Ts
Pin = (6) Cout ≥ (17)
η Vmax
I L1 _ max
where Pin and Pout represent input and output power, respec- Icout = (18)
2∗N
tively, and η is the considered efficiency factor. where Icout is the current through capacitance Cout .
For ensuring power supply at 100% loading, the input The equivalent series resistance (ESR) is calculated by the
current and its corresponding rms value can be found as per following equation:
the following equations: Vmax
ESR = . (19)
Pin Iout
I L1_max = (7)
V Additional ripples due to ESR are added as per the following
in_min
2− D equation:
I L1_rms_max = I in_max . (8)
2 Iout I L1
VoutESR = ESR × + . (20)
1− D 2
The average current of a switching cycle in the inductor can
be written as in the following equation: The breakdown voltage of the capacitor considering a 30%
margin may be found by the following equation:
TOFF Vout
I L1_average ∗ = I L1_average ∗ (1 − D) = Iout . (9) Vbrkdn ≥ 1.3 ∗ . (21)
Ts 2∗ N
It is observed that the average inductor current is propor- The rms value of the ripple current flowing to the capacitor is
tional to the output current at a given duty cycle. The given by the following equation:
maximum value of the output current can be calculated as D
follows: Icout_rms = Iout × . (22)
1− D
Pin The choice of low impedance aluminum capacitor is the cheap-
Ioutmax = . (10)
Vin_min est but offers higher ESR compared to tantalum and organic
semiconductor capacitor, which offers both low ESR and
To ensure CCM, the average inductor current at any time
higher capacitance. The inductor power losses are calculated
in the switching cycle should be given as in the following
by knowing the average inductor current, winding resistance,
equation:
and core losses as shown in the following equation:
I L1 2
I L1_min_average = . (11) I0
2 Pind = Rind + Pcore (23)
1− D
To ensure the CCM mode in all operating scenarios, 10% where Pind and Pcore represent inductor and core power losses,
is considered as the minimum loading, the corresponding respectively.
minimum power transfer is depicted in (12), and the limiting The diode conducts when the MOSFET switch is switched
load current is given in (13) OFF carrying the inductor current. It should be a low for-
ward voltage drop with fast switching time, sufficient current
Plimit = 10% ∗ Pin = 0.1 ∗ 250 = 25 W (12) carrying capability, and margin for breakdown voltage. The
1 Plimit
Ilimit = . (13) diode current should be at least two times the rms value of
2 Vin_max the output current. A Schottky diode is preferred until the
Another way of finding ripples current is by estimat- cost and complexity of the synchronous rectifier are justified.
ing 20%–40% of output current as in the following Diode power rating and junction temperature are important in
equation: the selection process. The diode breakdown voltage may be
considered as shown in the following equation:
Vout
I L1 = (0.2 to 0.4) × Io × . (14) Vdiode_brkdn ≥ 1.3 ∗ Vout . (24)
Vin_min
The N channel MOSFET is preferable due to its simplicity in
This shows that if a higher ripple current is considered, then gate driving circuitry. The power dissipation is given by the
the inductor value will be reduced following equation:
Vin_min ∗ D
L1 = . (15) PD_MOSFET
I L1 ∗ fmin
Iout 2 1
= × RDS_ON × D + × Vout
The related diode current is given by the following equation: 1− D 2
√ Iin_max Iout 2
ID = 2− D∗ . (16) × (TON + TOFF ) × f s + Q g × Vgs × f s . (25)
2∗ N 1− D
Authorized licensed use limited to: Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology. Downloaded on April 22,2024 at 13:56:14 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
28 IEEE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING, VOL. 46, NO. 1, WINTER 2023
TABLE II TABLE IV
C OMPONENTS FOR DC–DC C ONVERTER AS AN P ROPERTIES OF S ELECTED F ERRITE C ORE M ATERIAL
I NTEGRAL PART OF THE SPμI FOR C OMPARATIVE S TUDY
Authorized licensed use limited to: Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology. Downloaded on April 22,2024 at 13:56:14 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
TOMAR: EFFICIENT PV-BASED MICROINVERTER WITH ENHANCED ROI FOR LOWER ECONOMIC ZONE HABITANTS 29
TABLE VI
IV. D ESIGN C HECKS FOR E XPECTED P ERFORMANCE
M AGNETIC C ORE P ROPERTIES U NDER C ONSIDERATION FOR HF
T RANSFORMER
It is necessary to ensure the operation with thermal stability,
and therefore, design checks for projected temperature rise,
core losses, copper losses, and overall efficiency are important
for the design process. The following considerations are made.
1) Winding Factor: Low fill factor (30% single layer) has
lessened the utilization but provides ease in manufactur-
ing with less capacitance. The normal fill factor value
is between 35% and 45%. High fill factor winding-core
utilization of up to 65% is achievable.
2) Mean Length Per Turn (MLT) and DC Resistance Ver-
ification: The wire gauge, MLT, number of turns, and
winding factor should be verified from the data table
manufacturer’s data considering frequency–flux plots. Based for resistance value.
on the above Wa Ac value in (30), the following cores with 3) Copper Losses: The copper loss for dc resistance and
power handling capability as shown in Table V may be ac impedance should be estimated.
considered and compared for selection. 4) Core Losses: If the ac losses are too high and heating
Based on the above core properties, Wa Ac is studied in is involved, then the use of a larger core and/or low
Table VI for further refinement. The values corresponding permeability should be considered to reduce ac flux
to the EE core shape 280 W depict an optimized design density.
solution, and however, toroid (at S.no. 3) would be a safer
The chart fit-based core loss is governed as follows:
choice considering less saturation possibility, performance, and
light in weight. Furthermore, another alternative could be the Ploss = a × Bpeak
b
× f c mW/cm3 (38)
third EE core with the round shape at the center (at S.no. 3)
will hold winding with a lower fill factor. Other important where Ploss is core losses in mW/cm3 ; a, b, and c are the
considerations are resulting cost and ease of availability. curve fitting constants as per manufacturer; Bpeak is the flux
The next step is to find a primary number of turns using density at ac flux swing at peak location (Tesla); and f is the
the following equations: frequency in kilohertz.
Furthermore, Bpeak may be expressed as follows:
V p × 108 ×D max
Np = (34) B Bac_max−Bac_min
4 × B × Ac× × f Bpeak = = . (39)
Ns = N × N p Turns. (35) 2 2
The value of flux density from field intensity H (A.T/cm),
Considering the skin effect impact, the current penetration which involves winding variables, is expressed as follows:
depth is calculated as follows:
N I
66.2 66.2 Hac_max = Idc + (40)
δ= √ = √ = 0.3822 mm. (36) l 2
f 30 000 e
N I
To avoid skin effect, the maximum wire diameter is given by Hac_min = Idc − . (41)
le 2
d = 2δ = 0.76 mm. (37) Therefore, the field H may be worked out from variable values
2
Considering 5 A/mm current density, the primary wire area and using (8), (14), (40), and (41) in (39)
and the wire diameter result as 2.9 mm2 and 1.92 mm,
Ploss_txr = Ploss × le × Ae mW. (42)
respectively. The primary-side wire gauge is 13 AWG with
2.84 mm2 and the resistance value is 0.00656 /m in length. The MLT is 50 mm; the primary number of turns is 10,
Similarly, the secondary wire cross-sectional area is calculated the resistance value is 0.00656 /m (for 13-gauge wire), the
as 0.172 mm2 and the diameter as 0.46 mm corresponds to primary current is 14.3 A, and the primary copper losses work
24 gauge with 0.25-mm2 cross-sectional area and the corre- out to be 0.67 W. Similarly, the secondary turns is 25, the
sponding current carrying capacity as 1.02 A, with a resistance resistance value is 0.08422 , and the secondary-side copper
value of 0.08422 /m. losses are 0.0467 W. The total copper losses are 0.7167 W. The
With the amalgamation of the voltage doubler scheme just estimated core losses and copper losses are 2.37% and 0.277%,
after interleaved dc–dc stage, the ratio of output/input voltage respectively. The total losses are 6.8467 W, which is 2.3727%
Authorized licensed use limited to: Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology. Downloaded on April 22,2024 at 13:56:14 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
30 IEEE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING, VOL. 46, NO. 1, WINTER 2023
Authorized licensed use limited to: Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology. Downloaded on April 22,2024 at 13:56:14 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
TOMAR: EFFICIENT PV-BASED MICROINVERTER WITH ENHANCED ROI FOR LOWER ECONOMIC ZONE HABITANTS 31
TABLE VII
L IST OF D ESIGNED H ARDWARE C OMPONENTS OF μI
Authorized licensed use limited to: Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology. Downloaded on April 22,2024 at 13:56:14 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
32 IEEE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING, VOL. 46, NO. 1, WINTER 2023
TABLE VIII
P ERFORMANCE D URING D AYTIME AND SPμI E FFICIENCY
D ETERMINATION
TABLE IX
I NTERLEAVED B OOST DC–DC C ONVERTER AS P RESTAGE OF THE SPμI
AT 30 K H Z
Authorized licensed use limited to: Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology. Downloaded on April 22,2024 at 13:56:14 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
TOMAR: EFFICIENT PV-BASED MICROINVERTER WITH ENHANCED ROI FOR LOWER ECONOMIC ZONE HABITANTS 33
Authorized licensed use limited to: Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology. Downloaded on April 22,2024 at 13:56:14 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
34 IEEE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING, VOL. 46, NO. 1, WINTER 2023
The cost of the proposed system would get reduced upon [12] W. Qi, M. Wang, and S. Li, “Transformerless three-level flying-capacitor
the large/mass-scale production of the proposed SPμI and thus step-up PV micro-inverter without electrolytic capacitors,” IEEE J.
Emerg. Sel. Topics Circuits Syst., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 49–58, Mar. 2021.
will result in a further increase of ROI. [13] J. Umuhoza, Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, J. Moquin, C. Farnell, and
H. A. Mantooth, “Interleaved flyback based micro-inverter for residen-
VIII. C ONCLUSION tial photovoltaic application in remote areas,” in Proc. IEEE 16th
Workshop Control Modeling Power Electron. (COMPEL), Jul. 2015,
For rural/remote locations, a PV panel interfaced setup pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/COMPEL.2015.7236498.
with a dedicated 250-W compact SPμI is proposed, which [14] S. Chakraborty and S. Chattopadhyay, “A dual-active-bridge-based novel
single-stage low device count DC–AC converter,” IEEE Trans. Power
is economical and may work even in outdoor environmental Electron., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 2339–2354, Mar. 2019.
conditions efficiently: instead of the general-purpose inverter. [15] S. Kurm and V. Agarwal, “Dual active bridge based micro-inverter for
It is compact due to minimized magnetics used for a two- standalone renewable energy systems with low DC link capacitance,” in
Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Power Electron., Drives Energy Syst. (PEDES),
stage interleaved dc boost converter interfaced to low turn ratio Dec. 2020, pp. 1–6.
HF transformer resulting in 180◦ harmonic mitigation. Such [16] E. Karimi, B. M. Tehrani, and E. Adib, “A soft-switching double-
boosted HF voltage is rectified with a capacitor-diode voltage input micro-inverter,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 68, no. 8,
pp. 6721–6728, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2020.3000124.
doubler bridge, as a prestage dc input to dc/ac inversion block. [17] J. L. P. Tomé, V. F. Pires, and J. M. Pina, “Development of an off-grid
The prestage block efficiency is achieved at 96.35%. The micro-inverter for a scalable photovoltaic kit,” in Proc. IEEE 30th Int.
whole unit is managed with a microcontroller, ADC, sensors, Symp. Ind. Electron. (ISIE), Jun. 2021, pp. 1–6.
[18] A. Tomar, P. H. Nguyen, and S. Mishra, “Design & real-time field
and effective MPPT algorithm under CCM mode with varying implementation of micro-inverter for rural applications,” in Proc. IEEE
duty cycles from 10% to 100% load variation: achieving 17th India Council Int. Conf. (INDICON), Dec. 2020, pp. 1–6.
corresponding SPμI efficiency of 66.68%–92.73%. From an [19] R. B. Bollipo, S. Mikkili, and P. K. Bonthagorla, “Hybrid, optimal,
intelligent and classical PV MPPT techniques: A review,” CSEE J.
economic viewpoint, the proposed SPμI design achieves an Power Energy Syst., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 9–33, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.17775/
ROI of 12.23% with a per watt cost reduction of 9.33%. CSEEJPES.2019.02720.
Such a 250-W SPμI model is objectively meant for the low [20] Accessed: Aug. 25, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.mag-
Inc.com/Design/Design-Tools/Ferrite-Core-Loss-Calculator
economy profile zones at rural/remote locations deprived of [21] Y. Chen and D. Xu, “Review of soft-switching topologies for single-
the electricity utility grid. phase photovoltaic inverters,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 37,
no. 2, pp. 1926–1944, Feb. 2022.
[22] Accessed: Oct. 6, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.meanwell.
A PPENDIX com/Upload/PDF/TS-400/TS-400-SPEC.PDF
The experimental setup and the developed prototype for the
proposed work are shown in Fig. 14.
R EFERENCES
[1] A. Tomar and S. Mishra, “Multi-input single-output DC-DC converter
based PV water pumping system,” in Proc. IEEE 1st Int. Conf. Power
Electron., Intell. Control Energy Syst. (ICPEICES), Jul. 2016, pp. 1–5.
[2] Y. Chen et al., “From laboratory to production: Learning models of
efficiency and manufacturing cost of industrial crystalline silicon and
thin-film photovoltaic technologies,” IEEE J. Photovolt., vol. 8, no. 6,
pp. 1531–1538, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2871858.
[3] A. Tomar and S. Mishra, “CMPVI-based MIDO scheme under SSE
for optimum energy balance and reduced ROI,” IEEE Trans. Sustain.
Energy, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1318–1327, Jul. 2018.
[4] A. Tomar, S. Mishra, and C. N. Bhende, “AOMH–MISO based PV–VCI Anuradha Tomar (Senior Member, IEEE) received
irrigation system using ASCIM pump,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 54, the B.E. (Hons.) degree in electronics instrumenta-
no. 5, pp. 4813–4824, Sep. 2018. tion and control from the University of Rajasthan,
[5] J. A. Sabate, V. Vlatkovic, R. B. Ridley, F. C. Lee, and B. H. Cho, Jaipur, India, 2007, the M.Tech. (Hons.) degree in
“Design considerations for high-voltage high-power full-bridge zero- power system from the National Institute of Tech-
voltage-switched PWM converter,” in Proc. 5th Annu. Appl. Power Elec- nology Hamirpur, Hamirpur, India, and the Ph.D.
tron. Conf. Expo., 1990, pp. 275–284, doi: 10.1109/APEC.1990.66420. degree in electrical engineering from the Indian
[6] D. R. Nayanasiri, D. M. Vilathgamuwa, and D. L. Maskell, “Half-wave Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD), Delhi¸ India.
cycloconverter-based photovoltaic microinverter topology with phase- She is currently working as an Assistant Professor
shift power modulation,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 28, no. 6, with the Instrumentation and Control Engineering
pp. 2700–2710, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2012.2227502. Division of Netaji Subhas University of Technology,
[7] T. Shimizu and S. Suzuki, “A single-phase grid-connected inverter with Delhi, India. She has completed her post-doctoral research at the Electri-
power decoupling function,” in Proc. Int. Power Electron. Conf. (ECCE cal Energy Systems Group, Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e),
ASIA), Jun. 2010, pp. 2918–2923. Eindhoven, The Netherlands, and has completed European Commission’s
[8] S. Jana and S. Srinivas, “An approach to mitigate line frequency Horizon 2020, UNITED GRID, and UNICORN TKI Urban Research projects.
harmonics in a single-phase PV-microinverter system,” IEEE Trans. She has committed her research work efforts toward the development of
Power Electron., vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 11521–11525, Dec. 2019. sustainable, energy-efficient solutions for the empowerment of society, and
[9] Accessed: Aug. 25, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.power.com/ humankind. She has authored or coauthored research/review papers in various
products/mine-cap/mine-cap/min1072m reputed international, national journals, and conferences. She has granted and
[10] E. Kabalci and A. Boyar, “An interleaved flyback micro inverter with filled Indian patents in her name. She is an Editor of books with international
H5 topology for photovoltaic applications,” in Proc. 2nd Global Power, publications such as Springer and Elsevier. Her areas of research interest
Energy Commun. Conf. (GPECOM), Oct. 2020, pp. 12–17. are the operation and control of microgrids, photovoltaic systems, renewable
[11] A. R. Paul, A. Bhattacharya, and K. Chatterjee, “A novel single energy-based rural electrification, congestion management in low voltage (LV)
phase grid connected transformer-less solar micro-inverter topology with distribution systems, artificial intelligence and machine learning applications
power decoupling capability,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Power Electron., in power systems, energy conservation, and automation.
Drives Energy Syst. (PEDES), Dec. 2020, pp. 1–6. Dr. Tomar is a Life Member of ISTE, IETE, IEI, and IAENG.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology. Downloaded on April 22,2024 at 13:56:14 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.