NgoTanHau 1812137
NgoTanHau 1812137
NgoTanHau 1812137
LOAD DIAGRAM
The mechanical transmission system consists of: 1- Asynchronous three-phase motor; 2- Coupling; 3-
Two-stage spur gears – helical gears reducer; 4- Chain drive; 5- Mixer (one-way rotation, light impact
load, 8 hours per working shift)
Design Parameters
𝑡1 , seconds 31
𝑡2 , seconds 20
T1 T
T2 0,8T
Chapter 1: Selecting electric motor and speed
ratio distribution
In which, the transmission efficiency of each element are selected from table 2.3[1]:
c = 1 : Coupling efficiency.
= 1 × 0,99 4
× 0,96 × 0,95 × 0,92= 0,81
Since the workload is not static, so it is necessary to calculate the equivalent working power of
the mixer
𝑇1 2 𝑇 2
( ) 𝑡1 +( 2 ) 𝑡2 12 ×31+0,82 ×20
𝑃𝑒 = 𝑃√ 𝑇 𝑇
𝑡1 +𝑡2
= 5,2 × √ 31+20
= 4,82 (𝑘𝑊)
From table 3.2 [2], we choose the two-stage spur gear – helical gear reducer transmission ratio
𝑢𝑔 = 16
Preliminary bevel gear transmission ratio in order to assure lubricating condition: 𝑢𝑏𝑔 =
(0,22 ÷ 0,28)𝑢𝑔 = (0,22 ÷ 0,28) × 12 = (3,52 ÷ 4,48)
So we choose 𝑢𝑏𝑔 = 4
𝑢𝑔 16
Spur gear transmission ratio: 𝑢𝑠𝑔 = 𝑢 = 4
=4
𝑏𝑔
Selected motor must have power Pdc and synchronizing revolution ndb satishfy these condition:
𝑃 ≥ 𝑃𝑠
{ 𝑑𝑐
𝑛𝑑𝑏 ≈ 𝑛𝑠𝑏
Thus, from table P1.3[1], we choose motor 4A132S4Y3 which operates at 7,5 kW and 1455 rpm
which these following technical properties:
Table 1: Chosen motor properties
𝑃3 5,71
Power transmitted to shaft 2: 𝑃2 = 𝜂 = 0,99×0,95 = 6,07 (𝑘𝑊)
𝑏 𝜂𝑠𝑔
𝑃2 6,07
Power transmitted to shaft 1: 𝑃1 = 𝜂 = 0,99×0,96 = 6,39 (𝑘𝑊)
𝑏 𝜂𝑏𝑔
𝑃 6,39
Power transmitted to motor shaft: 𝑃𝑚 = 𝜂1 = 0,99 = 6,45 (𝑘𝑊)
𝑏
𝑛 730,5
Shaft 3: 𝑛3 = 𝑢 2 = 4
= 182,63 (𝑟𝑝𝑚)
𝑠𝑔
𝑛 182,63
Working shaft: 𝑛 = 𝑢 3 = 3,65
= 50 (𝑟𝑝𝑚)
𝑐ℎ
1.1.3 Torque
9,55×106 ×𝑃𝑚 9,55×106 ×6,45
Motor shaft: 𝑇𝑚 = 𝑛𝑚
= 2922
= 21080,6 (𝑁𝑚𝑚)
𝑧01 25
• Number of teeth factor: 𝑘𝑧 = 𝑧1
= 21 = 1,19
𝑛01 200
• Rotational speed factor: 𝑘𝑛 = = = 1,1. 𝑛01 is based on table 5.5[1].
𝑛1 182,63
From table 5.4[1], we obtain these parameters for the chain drive:
𝑧2 −𝑧1 2
𝑎∗ = 0,25𝑝 {𝑥𝑐 − 0,5(𝑧2 + 𝑧1 ) + √[𝑥𝑐 − 0,5(𝑧2 + 𝑧1 )]2 − 2[ 𝜋
] } = 0,25 × 25,4 {130 −
77−21 2
0,5(77 + 21) + √[130 − 0,5(77 + 32)]2 − 2[ 𝜋
] } = 1003,16 (𝑚𝑚)
In order to alleviate tension on the chain drive, we reduce center distance a an amount of ∆𝑎 =
0,002𝑎 ÷ 0,004𝑎 = 2,01 ÷ 4,01 (𝑚𝑚). So we choose 𝑎 = 1000 (𝑚𝑚)
𝑧1 𝑛1 21×182,63
Chain impact times per second: 𝑖 = 15𝑥
= 15×130
= 1,97 < [𝑖] = 30 Based on table 5.9[1].
1 𝑛𝑧 𝑝 182,63×21×25,4 𝑚
Chain drive velocity: 𝑣 = 60000 = 60000
= 1,62 ( 𝑠 )
𝑃 5,71
Effective peripheral force 𝐹𝑡 = 1000 𝑣 = 1000 × 1,62 = 3524,69 (𝑁)
𝑝 25,4
Diameter of driven sprocket: 𝑑2 = 𝜋 = 𝜋 = 622,72 (𝑚𝑚)
sin ( ) sin ( )
𝑧2 77
Technical specification
Validating calculation
• 𝑜
Allowable contact stress corresponding to working cycle 𝜎𝐻𝑙𝑖𝑚 = 2𝐻𝐵 + 70 (𝑀𝑃𝑎)
• Safety factor of contact stress 𝑆𝐻 = 1,1
• 𝑜
Allowable bending stress corresponding to working cycle 𝜎𝐹𝑙𝑖𝑚 = 1,8𝐻𝐵 (𝑀𝑃𝑎)
• Safety factor of bending stress 𝑆𝐹 = 1,75
Choose the hardness for all pinions 𝐻𝐵1 = 230 and the hardness for all driven gears 𝐻𝐵2 = 240.
Allowable contact stress corresponding to working cycle of all pinions:
𝑜
𝜎𝐻𝑙𝑖𝑚1 = 2𝐻𝐵1 + 70 = 2 × 230 + 70 = 530 (𝑀𝑃𝑎)
From table 6.21[1], we choose the inequivalent distribution on teeth face width factor 𝐾𝐻𝛽 = 1,13.
Outer pitch diameter of pinion:
Cone length:
= 101,97 (𝑚𝑚)
3.3.2 Meshing parameter
From table 6.22[1], we obtain 𝑧1𝑝 = 16.
Pinion’s number of teeth 𝑧1 = 1,6𝑧1𝑝 = 1,6 × 16 = 25,6. Choose 𝑧1 = 26.
Average diameter 𝑑𝑚𝑙 = (1 − 0,5𝐾𝑏𝑒 )𝑑𝑒𝑙 = (1 − 0,5 × 0,3) × 49,46 = 42,04 (𝑚𝑚)
𝑑𝑚𝑙 42,04
Average module 𝑚𝑡𝑚 = 𝑧1
= 26
= 1,62(𝑚𝑚)
𝑡𝑚 𝑚 1,62
Module 𝑚𝑡𝑒 = 1−0,5𝐾 = 1−0,5×0,3 = 1,91 (𝑚𝑚)
𝑏𝑒
𝑧 26
𝛿1 = 𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑡𝑔 (𝑧1 ) = 𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑡𝑔 (104) = 14,04𝑜
Cone angle: { 2
𝛿2 = 90𝑜 − 𝛿1 = 90𝑜 − 14,04𝑜 = 75,96𝑜
1 𝑧 26
Calculate 𝑧𝑣𝑛1 = 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛿 = cos (14,04) = 26,8 > 17. Thus, 𝑧1 satisfy condition that there is no
1
intersection between the root of one gear with the tip of another.
Face width 𝑏 = 𝐾𝑏𝑒 𝑅𝑒 = 0,3 × 101,97 = 30,59 (𝑚𝑚).
𝑏 30,59
We have 10 = 10
= 3,06 < 𝑚𝑡𝑒 = 3,5. The bending endurance of the teeth are assured.
4−𝜀𝛼 4−1,73
Meshing factor 𝑍𝜀 = √ 3
=√ 3
= 0,87.
𝑚
From table 6.17[1], we obtain 𝑣𝐻𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 160 ( 𝑠 ). Thus 𝑣𝐻 satisfy the condition.
Contact load factor 𝐾𝐻 = 𝐾𝐻𝛽 𝐾𝐻𝛼 𝐾𝐻𝑣 = 1,13 × 1,04 × 2,28 = 2,68
Contact stress
𝑣𝐹 𝑏𝑑𝑚𝑙 70,9×30,59×77,48
Dynamic load in meshing area factor 𝐾𝐹𝑣 = 1 + =1+ = 4,22
2𝑇1 𝐾𝐹𝛽𝐾𝐹𝛼 2×20884,5×1,25×1
Load factor corresponding to bending stress 𝐾𝐹 = 𝐾𝐹𝛽 𝐾𝐹𝛼 𝐾𝐹𝑣 = 1,25 × 1 × 4,22 = 5,28
1 1
Meshing factor 𝑌𝜖 = = = 0,58
𝜖𝛼 1,73
𝜎𝐻𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝜎𝐻 √𝐾𝑞𝑡 = 360,72 × √2,2 = 535,03 (𝑀𝑃𝑎) < [𝜎𝐻𝑚𝑎𝑥 ] = 1260 (𝑀𝑃𝑎)
Face width
𝑏 = 𝐾𝑏𝑒 𝑅𝑒 = 0,3 × 187,6 = 56,28 (𝑚𝑚)
Average cone length
𝑅𝑚 = 𝑅𝑒 − 0,5𝑏 = 187,6 − 0,5 × 56,28 = 159,46 (𝑚𝑚)
Outer pitch diameter of pinion
𝑑𝑒1 = 𝑚𝑡𝑒 𝑧1 = 3,5 × 26 = 91 (𝑚𝑚)
Outer pitch diameter of driven gear
𝑑𝑒2 = 𝑚𝑡𝑒 𝑧2 = 3,5 × 104 = 364 (𝑚𝑚)
Pitch cone angle of pinion
𝑧 26
𝛿1 = 𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑡𝑔 ( 1 ) = 𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑡𝑔 ( ) = 14,04𝑜
𝑧2 104
arctan(ℎ𝑓𝑒1 ) arctan(2,87)
𝜃𝑓1 = = = 0,37𝑜
𝑅𝑒 187,6
Root angle of driven gear:
arctan(ℎ𝑓𝑒2 ) arctan(5,53)
𝜃𝑓2 = = = 0,43 𝑜
𝑅𝑒 187,6
Addendum cone angle of pinion
𝛿𝑎1 = 𝛿1 + 𝜃𝑓2 = 14,04 + 0,43 = 14,47𝑜
Technical specification
Average normal
3,07 Material Steel 45
module 𝑚𝑛𝑚 , mm
Validating calculation
Bending Stress on
236,57 143,27 Satisfy
Pinion, MPa
Bending Stress on
246,56 132,25 Satisfy
Driven Gear, MPa
Maximum Contact
1260 535,03 Satisfy
Stress, MPa
Maximum Bending
387 315,19 Satisfy
Stress on Pinion, MPa
Maximum Bending
Stress on Driven Gear, 387 290,95 Satisfy
MPa
Center distance
1 𝐻𝛽 (𝑢 + 1)
3 𝑇 𝐾 3 79354,55 × 1,07 × (4 + 1)
𝑎𝑤 = 𝐾𝑎 (𝑢 + 1) √ 2
= 49,5 × (4 + 1) √
[𝜎𝐻 ] 𝑢𝜓𝑏𝑎 481,822 × 4 × 0,4
= 258,77 (𝑚𝑚)
Pinion nominal diameter
3 𝑇1 𝐾𝐻𝛽 (𝑢+1) 3 79354,55×1,07×(4+1)
𝑑𝑤1 = 𝐾𝑑 √ [𝜎 2 = 77 × √ 481,822 ×4×1,06
= 58,18 (mm)
𝐻 ] 𝑢𝜓𝑏𝑑
𝑧1 > 𝑧𝑚𝑖𝑛 + 2
Since { 𝑢 > 3,5 . So, displacement factor of pinion 𝑥1 = 0,3 and displacement factor of
𝑧1 > 10
driven gear 𝑥2 = −0,3.
Total displacement factor 𝑥𝑡 = 𝑥1 + 𝑥2 = 0,3 − 0,3 = 0
1000𝑥𝑡
Horizontal meshing advancement factor 𝑘𝑥 = 𝑧𝑡
=0
From table 6.10b[1], vertical meshing advancement factor 𝑘𝑦 = 0
𝑦 𝑡 𝑘 𝑧
Teeth addendum reducing factor ∆𝑦 = 1000 =0
𝑚𝑧𝑡 4×110
Recalculate 𝑎𝑤 = 2𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛽 = 2×𝑐𝑜𝑠31,77 = 258,77 (𝑚𝑚)
𝑚𝑧 4×88
Nominal diameter of driven gear 𝑑2 = 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛽2 = 0,85
= 414,12 (𝑚𝑚)
𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼𝑡 258,82×𝑐𝑜𝑠23,18
Meshing angle 𝛼𝑡𝑤 = arccos ( 𝑎𝑤
) = arccos ( 297,58
) = 36,91𝑜
2𝐶𝑂𝑆𝛽𝑏 2×𝐶𝑂𝑆29,65
Contact surface geometry factor 𝑍𝐻 = √𝑠𝑖𝑛2𝛼 = √sin (2×36,91) = 1,35
𝑡𝑤
𝑏𝑤 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽 61,67×sin(31,77)
Vertical meshing factor 𝜀𝛽 = 𝑚𝜋
= 4𝜋
= 2,58 > 1.
1 1
Meshing factor 𝑍𝜀 = √𝜀 = √1,44 = 0,83
𝛼
From table 6.7[1], inequivalent contact load distribution on teeth width factor 𝐾𝐻𝛽 = 1,19
𝜋𝑑𝑤1 𝑛1 𝜋×103,53×730,5 𝑚
Longitudinal speed of transmission 𝑣 = = = 3,96 ( )
60000 60000 𝑠
Contact stress
𝛽 31,77
Helical factor 𝑌𝛽 = 1 − =1− = 0,77
140 140
𝑧 22
Equivalent teeth of pinion 𝑧𝑣1 = 𝑐𝑜𝑠13 𝛽 = 𝑐𝑜𝑠3 (31,77) = 35,8
𝑧 88
Equivalent teeth of driven gear 𝑧𝑣2 = 𝑐𝑜𝑠23 𝛽 = 𝑐𝑜𝑠3 (31,77) = 143,21
𝑌𝐹1 = 3,53
From table 6.18[1], teeth type factor of pinion and driven gear {
𝑌𝐹2 = 3,63
From P2.3[1], inequivalent bending load distribution factor 𝐾𝐹𝛽 = 1,04
From table 6.14[1], inequivalent bending load distribution in meshing area 𝐾𝐹𝛼 = 1,4
From table 6.15[1], meshing error corresponding to bending stress 𝛿𝐹 = 0,016
From table 6.16[1], module error factor 𝑔𝑜 = 82
𝑎 258,77
Calculate 𝑣𝐹 = 𝛿𝐹 𝑔𝑜 𝑣√ 𝑢𝑤 = 0,016 × 82 × 3,96 × √ 4
= 41,79
𝑣𝐹 𝑏𝑤 𝑑𝑤1 41,79×61,67×103,53
Dynamic load in meshing area factor 𝐾𝐹𝑣 = 1 + =1+ = 1,15
2𝑇1 𝐾𝐹𝛽 𝐾𝐹𝛼 2×79354,55×1,04×1,4
Load factor corresponding to bending stress 𝐾𝐹 = 𝐾𝐹𝛽 𝐾𝐹𝛼 𝐾𝐹𝑣 = 1,04 × 1,4 × 1,15 = 1,67
2𝑇1 𝐾𝐹 𝑌𝜀 𝑌𝛽 𝑌𝐹1 2×79354,55×1,67×0,69×0,77×3,53
Bending stress on pinion 𝜎𝐹1 = 𝑏𝑤 𝑑𝑤1 𝑚
= 61,67×103,53×4
= 19,46 (𝑀𝑃𝑎)
Meanwhile, [ 𝜎𝐹1 ] = 236,57 (𝑀𝑃𝑎) and [ 𝜎𝐹2 ] = 246,86 (𝑀𝑃𝑎). So, the gear transmission
satisfy the bending stress analysis.
3.4.5 Overload Analysis
Maximum contact stress 𝜎𝐻𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝜎𝐻 √𝐾𝑞𝑡 = 202,53 × √2,2 = 300,4 (𝑀𝑃𝑎)
Maximum bending stress on pinion 𝜎𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥1 = 𝜎𝐹1 𝐾𝑞𝑡 = 19,46 × 2,2 = 42,81 (𝑀𝑃𝑎)
Maximum bending stress on driven gear 𝜎𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥2 = 𝜎𝐹2 𝐾𝑞𝑡 = 20,01 × 2,2 = 44,02(𝑀𝑃𝑎)
Meanwhile [𝜎𝐻𝑚𝑎𝑥 ] = 1260 (𝑀𝑃𝑎) and [𝜎𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥 ] = 387 (𝑀𝑃𝑎). So, the gear transmission
satishfy the overload analysis.
3.4.6 Summary
Table 5: Technical Parameter of Spur Gear Transmission System
Technical specification
Horizontal coincident
Helical angle 𝛽 31,77𝑜 19,15
factor 𝜀𝛼
Validating calculation
Bending Stress on
236,57 19,46 Satisfy
Pinion, MPa
Bending Stress on
246,56 20,01 Satisfy
Driven Gear, MPa
Maximum Contact
1260 300,4 Satisfy
Stress, MPa
Maximum Bending
387 42,81 Satisfy
Stress on Pinion, MPa
Maximum Bending
Stress on Driven Gear, 387 44,02 Satisfy
MPa
Distance between highest and lowest oil level ℎ𝑚𝑎𝑥 − ℎ𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 10 ÷ 15 (𝑚𝑚)
3.5.1 Consider driven bevel gear
Smallest teeth height that must be dipped into oil
ℎ2𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 2,25𝑚 = 2,25 × 3,5 = 7,88 < 10 (𝑚𝑚)
1 1
Allowable height [𝐻] = 𝑑𝑎4 = × 419,72 =139,91 (mm)
3 3
1 1
𝐻1 = 𝑑𝑎𝑒2 − 10 − 15 = × 365,05 − 10 − 15 = 157,53 (𝑚𝑚) > [𝐻]
2 2
3.5.2 Consider driven spur gear
Smallest teeth height that must be dipped into oil
ℎ4𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 2,25𝑚 = 2,25 × 4 = 10 ≤ 10 (𝑚𝑚)
1 1
𝐻2 = 2 𝑑𝑎4 − 10 − 15 = 2 × 419,72 − 10 − 15 = 184,86(𝑚𝑚) > [𝐻].