This document discusses the concepts of whistleblowing and employee loyalty. It presents differing views on whether employees owe loyalty to their employer or company, or if they have greater obligations to report misconduct. Some key points made include: companies are not proper objects of loyalty as they are mental fictions and have no moral status; loyalty is owed to individuals, not abstract groups; whistleblowing may be expected and permissible when a company is harming society, rather than being disloyal; and individuals have obligations first to society over private organizations if blowing the whistle prevents harm.
This document discusses the concepts of whistleblowing and employee loyalty. It presents differing views on whether employees owe loyalty to their employer or company, or if they have greater obligations to report misconduct. Some key points made include: companies are not proper objects of loyalty as they are mental fictions and have no moral status; loyalty is owed to individuals, not abstract groups; whistleblowing may be expected and permissible when a company is harming society, rather than being disloyal; and individuals have obligations first to society over private organizations if blowing the whistle prevents harm.
This document discusses the concepts of whistleblowing and employee loyalty. It presents differing views on whether employees owe loyalty to their employer or company, or if they have greater obligations to report misconduct. Some key points made include: companies are not proper objects of loyalty as they are mental fictions and have no moral status; loyalty is owed to individuals, not abstract groups; whistleblowing may be expected and permissible when a company is harming society, rather than being disloyal; and individuals have obligations first to society over private organizations if blowing the whistle prevents harm.
This document discusses the concepts of whistleblowing and employee loyalty. It presents differing views on whether employees owe loyalty to their employer or company, or if they have greater obligations to report misconduct. Some key points made include: companies are not proper objects of loyalty as they are mental fictions and have no moral status; loyalty is owed to individuals, not abstract groups; whistleblowing may be expected and permissible when a company is harming society, rather than being disloyal; and individuals have obligations first to society over private organizations if blowing the whistle prevents harm.
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 25
Whistleblowing and
Employee Loyalty An employee, former employee, or member of an organization, especially a business or government agency, who reports misconduct to people or entities that have the power and presumed willingness to take corrective action. The misconduct may be a violation of a law, rule, regulation and/or a direct threat to public interest, such as fraud, health/safety violations, and corruption. “Whistleblowing… violate(s) a prima facie duty of loyalty to one’s employer.”
Norman Bowie – Business Ethics
One does not have an obligation of loyalty to a company, even a prima facie one, because companies are not the kind of things that are properly objects of loyalty To make them [companies] objects of loyalty gives them a moral status they do not deserve and in raising their status, one lowers the status of the individuals who work for the companies What is loyalty? Idealists - Loyalty is devotion to something more than persons, to some cause or abstract entity “Social atomists” – At most one can only be loyal to individuals and that loyalty can ultimately be explained away as some other obligation that holds between two people Moderate position – Although loyalty for super-personal entity is crucial, loyalty is still an important and real relation that holds between people, one that cannot be dismissed by reducing it to some other relation In being loyal to the group, am I being loyal to the whole group or to its members? A group is nothing more that the individuals who comprise it, nothing other than a mental fiction by which we refer to a group of individuals No loyalty would be owed to a company because a company is a mere mental fiction
One would have obligations to the
individual members but not “for the sake of the group”
A company has no moral status
except in terms of the individual members who comprise it A business does two things
It produces a good or service
It makes a profit If a worker does not produce in a company or if cheaper laborers are available, the company – in order to fulfill its purpose – should get rid of the worker Money is what ties the group together Not only is loyalty to a corporation not required, it more than likely is misguided Competition leads not only to victory but to losers. One can lose at sport with precious few consequences… While the consequences of losing at business are much larger… The activities of business affect the lives of everyone, not just the game players Whistleblowing is not only permissible but expected when a company is harming society The issue is not one of disloyalty to the company, but of whether the whistleblower has an obligation to society if blowing the whistle will bring him retaliation Deontology Alexander Litvinenko (1962 – 2006)
Former staff of KGB
In November 1998, Litvinenko publicly
accused his superiors of ordering the assassination of Russian tycoon and oligarch, Boris Berezovsky.
Polonium-210 “You may succeed in silencing one man but the howl of protest from around the world will reverberate, Mr. Putin, in your ears for the rest of your life. May God forgive you for what you have done, not only to me but to beloved Russia and its people.”
