THIS PICTURE JUST MADE MY LIFE.
Reblogged punkitt-is-here
hold on i need to engineer an image that will cast 20 psychic damage on a niche group of people
how are we feelin
Reblogged animar-seal-of-elephants
it's not natural for candy to be $3.49. candy is supposed to be one dollar
Reblogged leg-stealing-bee
she cries if I dont hold her, so I have to use my exercise bike like this
Reblogged unholyverse
*tsk* Gotta hate it when you chip a nail.
Yall are cowards for deleting this caption.
[I.D.: nails painted to look like computer chips, a green background with gold wires. End I.D.]
Graphics card identified: 3DFX VOODOO5 5500 64MB 210-0413-001 AGP
Approximate Value: $900.00 US, $1400.00 US with original packaging
Approximate performance: Effectively none. This card is just a collector’s item. I’m willing to bet it couldn’t run coolmathgames.
damn ok
Reblogged
Source: twitter.com
Reblogged trans-peridot
Wage slave markiplier considered nsfw
Reblogged infectiouspiss
blackheartbiohazards
➡️ Content warnings on fiction are a courtesy.
➡️ Not every medium of fiction and storytelling has or is expected to have content warnings or extensive tagging.
➡️ Print novels do not traditionally warn for content in any way.
➡️ Until AO3 came along, fanfiction did not traditionally warn for content in any significant way.
➡️ An author is only obligated to warn for content to the degree mandated by the format they publish their fiction on.
➡️ Content warnings beyond the minimum are a courtesy, not an obligation.
➡️ ‘Creator chose not to warn’ is a valid tag that authors are allowed to use on AO3. It means there could be anything in there and you have accepted the risk. ‘May contain peanuts!’
➡️ Writers are allowed to use ‘Creator chose not to warn’ for any reason, including to maintain surprise and avoid spoilers.
➡️ ‘Creator chose not to warn’ is not the same thing as ‘no archive warnings apply’.
➡️ It is your responsibility to protect yourself and close a book, or hit the back button if you find something in fiction that you’re reading that upsets you.
➡️ You are responsible for protecting yourself from fiction that causes you discomfort.
-> you are allowed to decide you don’t want to read anything from someone who doesn’t use tags/warnings
-> you are not allowed to harass them/be a jerk about it
-> (I mean this is the internet you are allowed but it’s not great behavior and contributes to the internet being a hostile place)
“Don’t like don’t read” absolutely applies to “I don’t like that this doesn’t come with labels, therefore I will not read”
Reblogged infectiouspiss
who up detoxing just to retox
who up showing the world the thunder
who up having troubled thoughts with the self esteem to match
who up doing lines of dust and sweat off of last night’s stage
Reblogged infectiouspiss
vampires… save me…
vampires
save me vampires……
Reblogged infectiouspiss
help me
Reblogged
Not feminist as in "women should be included in the draft" but feminist as in "being drafted is a violation of bodily autonomy for any gender".
The draft should not exist. Drafting people into the military is a violation of human rights. You should not be able to force someone to risk their life. If you can't find enough people who care about a conflict to keep it going then it simply shouldn't keep going. You can't even force someone to donate a kidney using government power, why the fuck can you force them to donate their whole body and life to a cause they don't agree with or don't care about?