The Trump administration accidentally included the conservative editor of The Atlantic in a group chat where they were discussing, in great detail, the US bombing campaign in Yemen
In all, 18 individuals were listed as members of this group, including various National Security Council officials; Steve Witkoff, President Trumpโs Middle East and Ukraine negotiator; Susie Wiles, the White House chief of staff; and someone identified only as โS M,โ which I took to stand for Stephen Miller. I appeared on my own screen only as โJG.โ
...I had very strong doubts that this text group was real, because I could not believe that the national-security leadership of the United States would communicate on Signal about imminent war plans. I also could not believe that the national security adviser to the president would be so reckless as to include the editor in chief of The Atlantic in such discussions with senior U.S. officials, up to and including the vice president...
At this point, a fascinating policy discussion commenced. The account labeled โJD Vanceโ responded at 8:16: โTeam, I am out for the day doing an economic event in Michigan. But I think we are making a mistake.โ (Vance was indeed in Michigan that day.) The Vance account goes on to state, โ3 percent of US trade runs through the suez. 40 percent of European trade does. There is a real risk that the public doesnโt understand this or why itโs necessary. The strongest reason to do this is, as POTUS said, to send a message.โ
The Vance account then goes on to make a noteworthy statement, considering that the vice president has not deviated publicly from Trumpโs position on virtually any issue. โI am not sure the president is aware how inconsistent this is with his message on Europe right now. Thereโs a further risk that we see a moderate to severe spike in oil prices. I am willing to support the consensus of the team and keep these concerns to myself. But there is a strong argument for delaying this a month, doing the messaging work on why this matters, seeing where the economy is, etc.โ...
At 8:27, a message arrived from the โPete Hegsethโ account. โVP: I understand your concerns โ and fully support you raising w/ POTUS. Important considerations, most of which are tough to know how they play out (economy, Ukraine peace, Gaza, etc). I think messaging is going to be tough no matter what โ nobody knows who the Houthis are โ which is why we would need to stay focused on: 1) Biden failed & 2) Iran funded.โ
The Hegseth message goes on to state, โWaiting a few weeks or a month does not fundamentally change the calculus. 2 immediate risks on waiting: 1) this leaks, and we look indecisive; 2) Israel takes an action first โ or Gaza cease fire falls apart โ and we donโt get to start this on our own terms. We can manage both. We are prepared to execute, and if I had final go or no go vote, I believe we should. This [is] not about the Houthis. I see it as two things: 1) Restoring Freedom of Navigation, a core national interest; and 2) Reestablish deterrence, which Biden cratered. But, we can easily pause. And if we do, I will do all we can to enforce 100% OPSECโโoperations security. โI welcome other thoughts.โ...
The account identified as โJD Vanceโ addressed a message at 8:45 to @Pete Hegseth: โif you think we should do it letโs go. I just hate bailing Europe out again.โ (The administration has argued that Americaโs European allies benefit economically from the U.S. Navyโs protection of international shipping lanes.)
It was the next morning, Saturday, March 15, when this story became truly bizarre.
At 11:44 a.m., the account labeled โPete Hegsethโ posted in Signal a โTEAM UPDATE.โ I will not quote from this update, or from certain other subsequent texts. The information contained in them, if they had been read by an adversary of the United States, could conceivably have been used to harm American military and intelligence personnel, particularly in the broader Middle East, Central Commandโs area of responsibility. What I will say, in order to illustrate the shocking recklessness of this Signal conversation, is that the Hegseth post contained operational details of forthcoming strikes on Yemen, including information about targets, weapons the U.S. would be deploying, and attack sequencing.
The only person to reply to the update from Hegseth was the person identified as the vice president. โI will say a prayer for victory,โ Vance wrote. (Two other users subsequently added prayer emoji.)
According to the lengthy Hegseth text, the first detonations in Yemen would be felt two hours hence, at 1:45 p.m. eastern time. So I waited in my car in a supermarket parking lot. If this Signal chat was real, I reasoned, Houthi targets would soon be bombed. At about 1:55, I checked X and searched Yemen. Explosions were then being heard across Sanaa, the capital city.