Pinned
Reblogged
maybe you wonder where you are, i don't care
Reblogged rpfofficial
Bruce Springsteen and Clarence Clemons, London, 1975. Photo by Michael Putland.
Reblogged greatcomets
applying papier mache to the homie who fell asleep on the floor during the party and then using it as a mold to make a 1-to-1 perfect silicone sculpture of him which we place on the floor and gently interlace with him so it looks like he is sleeping restfully with the yin yang of his own somnolent form lol
Reblogged frankiefellinlove
Excerpts from Bruce's autobiography, Born to Run. Chapter 51. Photo from the filming of the music video for Brilliant Disguise, 1987.
Reblogged smithcollegegirls2004
ok. here are my pitches for the beatles biopics
john: directed by david lynch. focused on the conflict between celebrity, identity and "real" life. the typical worms and maggots wriggling under the picture perfect roses type shit. mulholland drive levels of psychosexual tension + a single but extremely graphic mclennon sex scene. kyle maclachlan plays george. masturbation scenes are mandatory
paul: directed by luca guadagnino. oriented around themes of loss and desire - very bones and all but with the cut throat ferocity of suspiria combined with the expressions of sensuality in i am love. tilda swinton plays paul and it makes no sense but it works perfectly. mclennon sexual tension is mandatory but doesnt need to be acted upon in any graphic way. demands vivid colour palette.
george: directed by david cronenberg. interested in how celebrity demands the objectification of the body. cancer is a reoccuring metaphor. bob and george are the movie's central relationship. religion (hare krishna) is used as a way to further elaborate on the whole body horror thing idk i lost my train of thought
ringo: popstar never stop never stopping 2
Reblogged milo-is-queer
Milton Charles was the accomplished designer and artist behind the cover of Flowers in the Attic. Charles’s idea was to create a die-cut window that would show a single character on the front cover at first glance, and then would reveal a cast of characters behind the ‘house’ when the reader turned the page to what is sometimes called the ‘stepback’. The contrast in the cover between the stark, graphic, almost secessionist-style house – resplendent in foil – and the almost photo-realistic portrait of the family (illustrated by Gillian Hills) is both queasy and intriguing. It also cleverly evokes the narrative without being too explicit – had he shown the whole family in the attic on the cover in the first place, the magic would have been completely lost. The books that followed directly after Flowers employed Charles’s established template – stark imagery with foil and a die-cut revealing photo-realistic illustration of the book’s characters. (x)
Source: abda.com.au
Reblogged antiquesintheattic
paul mccartney lies are like john and i werent gay bob dylan lies are like i used to be a male prostitute and slept in a wet cardboard box all alone
Reblogged rivertigo
4/1/2025
The fags of the day are everyone except Paul McCartney!
signs of life (fifi come back to bed) (the kids are asking questions) x
Reblogged rathockey
Jerking Off: a poob™ original
Reblogged ullybug
rpf is mandatory