Alireza Hejazi

Regent University, Graduate School of Business and Leadership, Graduate Student

Followers

568

Following

Mentions

Public Views

Alireza Hejazi is an analyst, author, and peer reviewer in the fields of Leadership and Futures Studies. With over a decade of experience, he researches Organizational Leadership and Strategic Foresight, focusing on individual and collective decision-making, management mechanisms, and the cognitive development of leaders.

He is the author of several books including “The Strategic Foresight Workshop Handbook”, “The Art of Selling Foresight”, “Leadership for a Higher Purpose”, “Responsible Foresight”, “Cognitively Adaptive Leaders”, “Revisiting Leadership”, and “Becoming a Professional Futurist”.

Alireza helps organizations stay ahead of the curve by providing insightful analysis and practical tools for developing future-ready leadership and strategic foresight capabilities.
Supervisors: Dr. Bruce Winston

less

Petra Drenth

Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences

Julie Arteza

Ivana Ilijašić Veršić

Jacek Jania

Hervé L'Hours

Alexandros Kostopoulos

Athens University of Economics and Business

Angus Whyte

University of Edinburgh

Libby Bishop

University of Essex

Javier Vitale

National Institute of de Agricultural Technology (INTA)

Tina Dohna

Universität Bremen

Interests

Uploads

Papers by Alireza Hejazi

Futures Methods Compass

Nuts About Leadership, 2024

Futures Methods Compass (FMC) is a research tool designed to assist researchers in the selection ... more Futures Methods Compass (FMC) is a research tool designed to assist researchers in the selection and application of appropriate futures methods. It provides a structured approach to determining which foresight methods to utilize by addressing the questions of when, why, and how to implement them effectively. It guides users through the complexities of futures studies and facilitates the informed choice of a diverse array of research methods—either individually or in combination—tailored to specific variables and research objectives. The tool embraces various methods such as backcasting, cross-impact analysis, environmental scanning, the futures wheel, the Delphi method, scenario plan-ning, and trend analysis. This versatility is particularly beneficial for researchers who may feel overwhelmed by the extensive variety of available futures methods. FMC serves as a diagnostic instrument that leads users through intricate methodological decisions. It aligns with the overarching goals of futures studies: envisioning possible futures and striving toward shaping preferable outcomes. Clari-fying the selection process enhances decision-making clarity and enables users to concentrate on relevant methods aligned with their study objectives. Its applicability across different contexts within futures studies makes FMC a useful resource for a wide range of users, from novice researchers to professional futurists. This paper contains the FMC matrix and contributes to the methodological advancement of futures studies.

Futurist-Job Fit Measure

Nuts About Leadership, 2024

The Futurist-Job Fit Measure (FJFM) is a comprehensive self-assessment tool designed to evaluate ... more The Futurist-Job Fit Measure (FJFM) is a comprehensive self-assessment tool designed to evaluate the qualifications and suitability of futurists for various roles. By categorizing futurists into six distinct types, the measure provides valuable insights into areas for professional development and alignment with desired roles. The FJFM enhances futurists’ self-awareness through 45 indicators. It also serves as a strategic tool for organizations seeking to optimize their workforce in strategic foresight. This paper outlines the development and validation of the FJFM. It demonstrates the tools’ reliability and validity based on a pilot study with a sample size of 150 candidates applying for futurist jobs. The pilot study employed rigorous statistical methods to assess the measure’s psychometric properties. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed a clear factor structure aligning with the nine determining factors of the FJFM, yielding a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of 0.88, indicating adequate sampling adequacy, and a significant Bartlett’s test of sphericity (p < 0.001). Reliability analysis revealed high internal consistency across all factors, with Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from 0.84 to 0.92. Moreover, test-retest reliability demonstrated stability over time, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.85 (p < 0.01) between initial and follow-up assessments. The findings suggest that the FJFM is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing person-job fit among futurists.

Leadership Impact Matrix

Nuts About Leadership, 2024

Leadership Impact Matrix (LIM) is a two-dimensional assessment tool. It is designed to evaluate l... more Leadership Impact Matrix (LIM) is a two-dimensional assessment tool. It is designed to evaluate leadership effectiveness through the perceptions of subordinates. This instrument focuses on two dimensions, grounded in established leadership theories such as Path-Goal and Transformational Leadership. The primary dimension assesses how leaders guide and empower their teams. The secondary dimension evaluates leaders’ motivational influence on team dynamics and individual behaviors. Through a rigorous process of item generation, expert review, and statistical validation, LIM demonstrates strong reliability and validity as a tested assessment tool. It utilizes a structured questionnaire format that allows respondents to rate their leaders across various items. The questionnaire contains 21 items that provide valuable insights into leadership effectiveness. The scoring system categorizes results into high, medium, or low impact. It facilitates targeted feedback for individual development and organizational assessment. The statistical tests have demon-strated internal consistency, test-retest and split-half reliabilities, and content and construct va-lidities. This instrument is a vital resource for organizational leaders who seek to enhance their leadership practices, improve team performance, and develop a culture of continuous growth through a guided evaluation. By leveraging the insights gained from LIM, organizational leaders can better align their leadership strategies with the needs of their teams.

Corporate Foresight Index

Nuts About Leadership, 2024

The Corporate Foresight Index (CFI) is a comprehensive measure aggregating various data points to... more The Corporate Foresight Index (CFI) is a comprehensive measure aggregating various data points to assess corporate foresight. It provides a robust systematic approach for evaluating foresight capabilities at the corporate level. It serves as a standardized measure that assesses corporate foresight capabilities quantifiably. The CFI evaluates corporate foresight by assessing nine strategic achievements that may be gained through foresight. This assessment is conducted through a scoring system validated by a 36-item questionnaire. It enables practitioners and auditors to measure corporate foresight capabilities using a five-point Likert scale. The scoring results help identify the corporation’s orientation toward one of the three modes of preparedness for the future. This paper details the research process that led to the development and validation of the CFI. It includes a standardized questionnaire and a guide to evaluation. It instructs how to provide corporations with recommendations to enhance their foresight capabilities. These recommendations are categorized into three groups based on the score ranges achieved in the assessments. This study contributes to the field by providing foresight practitioners and auditors with a measurement tool that assists them in evaluating corporate foresight capabilities reliably.

The Impact of Double Standards on the Effectiveness of U.S. Global Leadership

Nuts About Leadership, 2024

This study examines the concept of double standards in the United States (U.S.) foreign policy. I... more This study examines the concept of double standards in the United States (U.S.) foreign policy. It discovers how such standards undermine the effectiveness of U.S. global leadership. The analysis begins with a historical overview and theoretical framework, followed by case studies illustrating how double standards manifest in practice. They are traced particularly in the U.S. response to human rights violations, military interventions, and trade policies. The study explores the consequences of double standards on U.S. credibility and trust among allies and adversaries. It argues that perceived hypocrisy complicates efforts to reach multilateral agreements and fosters domestic backlash. It concludes with policy recommendations that emphasize the need for consistent application of principles, transparent decision-making, and strengthening of multilateral engagement.

Alireza Hejazi

Uploads

Papers by Alireza Hejazi

Log In