0% found this document useful (0 votes)
65 views13 pages

Traffic Flow Wrap Up

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 13

1.

225J (ESD 225) Transportation Flow


Systems

Operational Problems in Traffic Systems


(Continued)

Prof. Ismail Chabini and Prof. Amedeo Odoni

1.225, 11/28/02
Operational Problems
Part 1: Air Traffic Flow Management

• Introduction and conceptual definition of operational problems


• Ground-holding strategies
• Results from case study

Part 2: Road Traffic Flow Management

• Conceptual organization of road traffic management problems


• Integrated dynamic traffic control and assignment
• Results from case study

1.225, 11/28/02
Information Technology and Transportation
Systems Management

Traffic Management Center

User Services Traffic Control


• traffic information • signal settings
• routing advice • ramp meeting

Traffic
Travel Network
Surveillance
Demand Supply
System

Transportation Network

1.225, 11/28/02
Desirable Properties of an ATMS/ATIS

• ATMS/ATIS should be responsive to:


– “future” demand
– potential adjustments in travel patterns due to information
– variations in network capacity due to traffic control actions
• ATMS/ATIS should be based on “projected” traffic
conditions to:
– anticipate downstream traffic conditions
– improve credibility

1.225, 11/28/02
Traffic Prediction Approaches

• Statistical Methods
– require no explicit assignment
– are suitable for short intervals
• Dynamic Traffic Assignment Methods
– incorporate driver behavior
– require network performance
– require time-dependent O-D flows
– have high computational requirements

1.225, 11/28/02
A Framework for (Analytical) Dynamic Traffic
Assignment

Dynamic new paths


O-D Trips Subset of Paths

Time-Dependent
path costs
Users’ Behavior Models Paths
Generation
path flows
Link-Based
Network Loading Model Time-Dependent
Network Conditions

Link Performance Models

1.225, 11/28/02
Time-Dependent Shortest Paths Computation

• Realistic networks: 20k road segments, 7k intersections, 700


destinations, 100 time intervals
• Time of known methods:
– Can be of quadratic as a function of the number of time intervals
– May take up to 25 minutes for one destination
• Algorithm DOT:
– 0.8 seconds for one destination
– Theoretically, this is the best one can do!
• Other avenues:
– High performance computing implementations (10 to 20 times faster)
– Exploit hierarchy of transportation networks (5 to 10 times faster)
• Combined effect: 100*10*5=5000
1.225, 11/28/02
Types of DTA Models
• Microscopic traffic models (MITSIM):
– Traffic is represented at the vehicle level
– Vehicles are moved using car-following and lane changing models
• Mesoscopic traffic models (MesoTS/DynaMIT):
– Traffic is represented at the vehicle level
– Speed is obtained using models that relate macroscopic traffic flow
variables
• Macroscopic (or flow-based) traffic models:
– Traffic is represented as continuous variables
– Speed is obtained using models that relate macroscopic traffic flow
variables
• Analytical (flow-based) traffic models
1.225, 11/28/02
Amsterdam Test Network

• 196 nodes, 310 links, 1134 O-D pairs and 1443 paths
• Morning peak: 2 hours and 20 minutes
• Discretization intervals: 2357 (3.50 sec each)
• Various types of users:
– Fixed routes
– Minimum perceived cost routes
– Minimum experienced cost routes

1.225, 11/28/02
Computer Resources Used

• Link variables: 25 Mbytes


• Path variables: 34 Mbytes
• Average time for one loading: about 3 minutes
• Saving ratio compared to known analytical methods: 1000
• Results are encouraging for real-time deployment

• MITSIM: 1.5 times slower than real time


• MesoTS: 16 times faster than real time
• Analytical approach: 45 times faster than real time

1.225, 11/28/02
Interdependence of Control and Assignment

Dynamic Traffic
Control
Dynamic Dynamic
Traffic Signal
Flow Setting

Dynamic Traffic
Assignment

• Consequences of the conventional approach:


– Sub-optimal signal settings;
– Inconsistent traffic flow predictions.
1.225, 11/28/02
A Case Study (cont.)

• Controls
– current existing pre-timed control
– Webster equal-saturation control
– Smith P0 Control
– One-level Cournot control
– Bi-level Stackelberg control
– System-optimal Monopoly control
• Route Choices
– A set of pre-determined paths (4 paths) for each O-D pair
– Total of 400 paths
– Demand is model using C-Logit
1.225, 11/28/02
Results from Back Bay Case Study:
Total Travel Time

Controls Total Travel Time Gap from System-Optimum


(mins) (%)
Existing 11784 14.12

Webster 11781 14.1

Smith P0 11566 12.02

Cournot 10642 3.07

Stackelberg 10504 1.73

Monopoly 10325 0

1.225, 11/28/02

You might also like