Avatar

I’m More Of A City Kitty, Ya Dig?

@lutece-mess / lutece-mess.tumblr.com

Summer | Rogue of Time | Bi and ready to cry

every piece of ""autistic representation"" in hollywood sucks not just because of the infantalization and inspiration porn but because movie executives always fail to realize the real universal autistic experience: spending your childhood slowly and unfalteringly realizing all of your friends not so secretly hated and/or merely tolerated you at best and you've missed every social signal about it ever

there is nothing quite as damaging as realizing you were the only one not invited to a classmate's birthday party. the only one left out of yearbook photos. the only one not told about an in-joke or groupchat or anything of the sort. once you experience it even once it fucks with your head for the rest of your days

the variation on this is being treated like you're everyone's weird and vaguely amusing autistic pet rather than a human person with independent agency and autonomy, which. is equally psychologically damaging but like in a different genre of way

everyone leaving personal anecdotes on this post is making me so sad. do you guys need, like, a hug? therapy? warm milk and cookies and a big stuffed animal, maybe??

Avatar
skiagraphe0-deactivated20250401

My eighth grade homeroom teacher once did something that permanently altered how I saw not just her, but all women whose personality was 'I'm well-meaning and nurturing and love kids uwu'. She knew an autistic boy in our class fixated on spoken word poetry and poetry jams and loved writing. She knew damn well everyone thought he was a loser. She found his attempts at sincerely conveying his emotions via poetry incredibly funny. He thought she supported his poetry writing and his aspirations of being a poet.

She had him perform in front of the entire homeroom, who burst into laughter and cackled at him like he was a comedian and not someone performing a piece about his ongoing struggles with depression. I sat there, too stunned to even process what was happening, as he performed at the request of a neurotypical adult he trusted and that adult as well as 19 of his peers laughed their asses off at him. Myself and 3 others at least didn't laugh, but I don't think that lessened the damage any.

Because, to be clear, it did hit him that people were laughing at him. Not 'laughing with him', as the teacher claimed later, no, people were laughing at the funny loser talking about serious things and trying to project his voice and do inflections and lmao lol what a loser what a freak lololol. He tried to tell himself the teacher didn't know that would happen. When I confronted her after class about that being messed up and bullying, however, she had said - with him in earshot - that it was funny and I needed to lighten up.

He spent the rest of the semester visibly depressed, withdrawn, not talking to anyone, angrily asserting that poetry was stupid, which expanded to literature being stupid. Our English Literature teacher was also our homeroom teacher, and she spent the next three months confused on why he was doing the absolute bare minimum to pass or alternately not doing anything at all. She could not wrap her mind around how having 20 people laugh at him to his face might be related to this. To this day, over a decade later, she will deny that she had any part in his unhappiness. Kids around school who weren't in our homeroom knew about what happened and quoted lines from his poem at him as a funny meme. Kids in the lunchroom would put on reenactments of it for their friends, to cackles and laughs. Bits of it ended up written in pen and pencil on a variety of surfaces.

I saw one line, which people meme'd to death, written on the wall in the bathroom at the local theater. (We were the rare small town with an old theater at all, an ancient family-owned one that inexplicably continues on to this day.) I tried scrubbing it off, but it didn't work. I took long enough trying to get to it that the theater manager came in. He asked me what was going on. The autistic kid's other major interest, I knew, was film. He came to this theater all the time. He was going to see this if it didn't get covered and he was already being heckled on a daily basis. So I told the theater manager about the whole thing. The performance, the mockery, all of it.

"Mrs. Johnson knew he was going to do it? And she didn't stop him?" he asked at one point, to which I replied, "Mrs. Johnson came up with the idea in the first place."

He stared at me, absolutely horrified. "That woman is a monster."

I think about that a lot. Mrs. Johnson was nice, blonde, blue-eyed, thin, white, had a normal marriage to her high school sweetheart, taught Sunday school at her church, allegedly became a teacher because she cared about kids so much, showed genuine empathy for other kids when they were going through something, dressed nicely, and was the ideal small town woman who hadn't left her small town she grew up in but instead accepted a teaching job there even when the pay was low. She was anti-bullying and anti-racism and stood up for me when another kid got mad one of my stories in English class mentioned gay people. I'm sure she thinks of herself as a very good person. She certainly does not fit the model of what most people think of when they imagine a bully.

She also deliberately orchestrated an autistic 13 year old being mocked by a group for her own entertainment and then let the mockery continue unabated without a word of objection for four months.

The theater manager, Ronnie, is not conventionally attractive, he's aroace and therefore single by choice, he's not extroverted, he moved to this small town from out of state - something people here hold against him as if he'd committed a crime as an unspoken 'you will never be one of us', and he is outwardly unexpressive a lot of the time, with a flat affect and lack of expressions.

He outright banned the next kid he caught writing that stupid meme'd line onto the bathroom stall. He drove across town to get paint and painted over the writing I'd been trying to get rid of that very night.

I'm not autistic, but I have ADHD. I have a lot of similar problems. I think, a lot, about Mrs. Johnson wanting my permission to show my writing to people. I'd told her beforehand not to and that if she did, I would be getting my parents involved. I think about how that could have gone down for me, how she said I was a good writer and she just wanted to help me. I think about how many other neurodivergent kids probably felt safe with her and the amount of damage she might've caused over her 43 years of teaching. To this day she denies she ever did anything wrong. It was a joke. Kids these days are so sensitive.

When the autistic kid she'd used like an animal performing a fun trick for her amusement became so depressed that he first stopped going to school, then tried to kill himself, that was the response: "He's too sensitive."

Not "maybe I was wrong", not "and from now on I promise to come down hard on bullying", nothing else. He was too sensitive.

Nothing gets me on guard now like very nice, sweet, loving neurotypical women who assure you that they're anti-bullying and they love kids and they're here to help. Having completely convinced themselves that they're always in the right and always good people, they are capable of astonishing cruelty, whose consequences they will not stop and whose victim they will never see as human. When I corrected her spelling once, she got visibly upset for a moment. When kids quoted lines at this kid to make fun of him, for months, she could not see why this might be upsetting, why having your poetry about your depression turned into a meme by kids you spent 8 hours a day with might hurt in any way.

He was 13. She was in her late 50's. Or, as my mom put it, she was old enough to know better. Many neurotypicals assured me at the time it wasn't bullying, it was just a joke. Ronnie, undiagnosed but likely neurodivergent, inarguably hit upon the actual problem here: "That woman is a monster."

It's just that when the monster looks 'normal', we call the monster's actions something else. Bullying is such an ugly word. Let's reframe it as comedy instead.

You'd think an English Literature teacher would know changing what something is called doesn't change what it is.

I was going to put this in the tags but it expanded.

Anyway this is like the most insidious part of being an autistic child. The adults you're supposed to be able to trust are the worst of your bullies every. single. time. And worse, unlike your schoolmate Brayden who's still thirteen or whatever, they have actual authority and power over you that they love to wield.

I was lucky enough to not really be the center of attention, because I have the 'good' autism that makes you succeed at academics and quietly read after you finish your homework. My best friend Tori was a flaming queer weaboo furry who was unable to hide those things about him self well enough to avoid scrutiny in our tiny, rural, conservative school.

In freshman gym class we had to run laps around our outdoor track in ninety degree (Fahrenheit) weather and ridiculous humidity because we live in a subtropical climate. I, having specced more into jock than nerd, finished before my friends and milled about the bleachers watching them finish. Above me, the substitute teacher, an absolutely miserable woman who loathed all of humanity, was openly and loudly mocking my best friend with a gaggle of volleyball girls who she'd let sit out of the lap running.

The next day I went to our actual teacher about this and she was just like "Well maybe he should try not being so weird."

also please note that this scientist is in fact the retired man who invented the xbox.

oh fuck i listened to a podcast that was interviewing him and the process he went through to make this bread, ologies with allie ward like he went through full on clean room levels of prep to ensure that this was 100% yeast from old egypt and had to bend over backwards to ensure everything involved was uncontaminated he then revealed that the original xbox logo...

is a sourdough boule

the sad thing about the episode where squidward teaches an art class is that spongebob receives greater recognition despite having no creative vision. his work is technically impressive, but his otherwise powerful imagination fails him, and thus he churns out derivative slop. the thomas kincaid of the sea.

perhaps it is inevitable that a young man who views minimum wage toil as A Calling would, without even realizing it, fall prey to reactionary narratives of what makes art "great." spongebob would be the perfect fascist subject - but a fascist state, ironically, could never accept him, since he is effeminate and physically weak

having the autism that isn't just obsession with one guy made me lose so much faith in other nds so quickly after realizing a lot of them love to throw other people under the bus to appeal to the neurotypicals

i relate to so few internet conversations abt autism that's when it clicked to me it got the ocd treatment where people talk abt the quirky funny things and not the ugly and now if people find out you exhibit the unappealing traits you're an insane freak including the people that should understand you

I miss when I would get Tumblr asks that actually said things and weren't just digital panhandling scams.

If I was a sociologist, I would definitely be doing a study on the methods and language of charity scammers. Especially the use of emojis, and identification by copied messages vs stock phrases.

For example, these four are all the same, with only slight variation in #1:

(I actually have duplicates from some of the "self-identified" anons above.)

But these two anons share the same new stock phrases:

"days are heavy" / "days that feel impossibly heavy."

Fascinated with the random person who commented on this post saying they've reported me for "genocide denialism."

Not to put too fine a tin foil hat on it, but:

  1. That is the kind of threat someone involved in these kinds of financial scams and the social engineering behind them *would* make! It's a threatening statement to the existence of my blog which usually means heightened fear/anxiety of the target, which makes people more likely to fall for a financial scam. Social shame and embarrassment are also heightened emotions! Bullying works! This would make an excellent social engineering counterpoint (if tugging on heartstrings doesn't work!) and might even be effective on many people!
  2. Sure, you can search the supposed connected usernames those anons claimed and find out specifics that way β€” but not a single one of those screenshots I showed specifies what they're referring to! The IDENTICAL messages from four "different people" never actually mention what their "family's struggle" even is! There's zero fucking context in the space of those messages. They're all IDENTICAL. I literally cannot be committing denialism about anything specific because those asks don't actually say anything I could be denying. How does this person know that these anons aren't a recently impoverished Nigerian prince?
  3. So now you're asking why don't I just click on the usernames and find out more details? Simple. Because they're fucking fraudsters who sent me the same message like, six times with 4 different usernames attached AS ANONS. Why as anons if they have their own blogs and could send the messages that way? SIMPLE AGAIN: because if they're not logged into the blog accounts, you could have whole teams of people copying and pasting these anon asks to various Tumblr users constantly, and you can probably just bypass the ask limits by changing VPNs or going incognito or something. This is a DEDICATED scam. Is it a bot? MAYBE! But that also would explain some of why it doesn't work *while logged in* to the blog accounts β€” because being anon probably makes it easier to focus on volume.

Anyways a fool and their money are soon parted.

While we're on the subject of the incredible gullibility some people display on these scams, I'd just like to remind everyone that most online scams these days are being run out of massive scam farms, which often employ human trafficking.

Falling for these isn't just an 'oopsy doopsy, you're out some money' sort of a thing. If you send money to obvious scammers and if you platform obvious scammers, you are very likely directly financially supporting modern day slavery. That's not an exaggeration, and I'm not being alarmist. Please read any of these articles on the subject if you don't believe me:

This is what you are supporting when you send these people money. It's not a neutral act to give to these scammers; it's a horrible, evil act, because in most cases, it directly supports horrific exploitation. And if you really were fooled? If you gave to one of these scammers and you really had no idea what you were probably supporting? Then I'm sorry, but digging your heels in and insisting that the lies you were fed are the truth helps no one. Take your blinders off and face reality, and start doing better.

This whole scenario is a really prime example of a phenomenon that probably has a proper name elsewhere, but I personally call Race to the Binary.

Step 1: an appalling atrocity happens, and victims of it ask for aid. We're all on board.

Step 2: Scammers pop up pretending to be those victims. A few users step forward to vet requests, to try to filter for genuine victims.

Step 3: the race begins. Some people, used to associating things like poor English and young accounts with scams, assume that most of these victims are therefore scammers, and the vetters are either incompetent or in on it.

Step 4: the race diverges. Other people recognise that these "tells" are just as easily symptoms of non-English speakers who are making hasty blogs under unimaginable circumstances, and so conclude that claiming a victim is a scammer on the basis of their English is actually racist.

Step 5: the race concludes. These two groups repeat their points so many times that they gallop in opposite directions until they reach the binary poles of this particular spectrum. Group 1: absolutely none of these accounts are genuine. It's all scams, and only stupid gullible babies would ever think otherwise. Group 2: saying a single one of these accounts is a scam is a racist denial of the very genocide itself that they're facing and only a simpering fascist would think so.

This happens all the time in all fields on all subjects and in every corner of humanity. But that's what's happening with the random accusation of genocide denial on this post. That is someone who reached their binary pole, and now even the suggestion that scammers might be posing as genuine victims - a thing that is literally, definitely happening, which is why we needed the vetting in the first place - is somehow twisted into a claim that there's no genocide.

Anyway - OP is right. And there's been a huge uptick in these, so for fucks sake, pay attention and learn the signs.

wait sorry can someone explain to me how those anon asks are scams? i assumed they weren't coming from the blogs they claimed to be, but the asks don't have donation links in them or anything-- i thought they were just trying to direct attention to those blogs, and some of the blogs they send you to are vetted.

No. These asks are not directing you to blogs that are vetted. These asks are directing you to blogs who are claiming to be vetted and are lying about it.

This is something that I wish more people understood. It is possible to vet donation requests, but it's not easy, and it takes real time and effort, especially if you are also doing the right thing and really being careful to do it well. People who do this are often overwhelmed with requests, and end up with a backlog a mile long. The most ethical vetters are not the most prolific vetters, basically by definition.

In contrast, it takes almost no time at all to spin up a fake vetting blog which simply lists hundreds and hundreds of scam accounts, or to claim that your post was verified "through being friends with" an existing, vetted account despite having zero connection to them, or to simply write the words "I have been vetted by @/90-ghost and @/gazavetters" without even bothering to fake it.

I've seen a lot of posts that claim to be "vetted" where, as far as I can tell, no one else in existence is even claiming to have vetted them. I've also seen a lot of posts claiming to be vetted by blogs with no history besides spinning up a single sketchy "vetted" list post of hundreds of other blogs, with absolutely no transparency as to their process.

By way of analogy, I have a personal anecdote, from a time that I was scammed myself:

Years ago, I needed a place to live for about three months while I worked at a fantastic internship in another city. It was an expensive place to live, and I didn't have a lot of money, so when I saw a fairly cheap sublet, I jumped at the opportunity.

Now, signing a lease and sending in first month + deposit without seeing a place is nuts. I knew that. Of course I knew that. But I also couldn't just randomly pop out to another city in order to tour it. So, I reached out to a friend in the area, who agreed to go tour the place for me, and then asked the landlord to set that up.

The landlord said sure, absolutely, here is a list of times that I can be available to show your friend around the place – "I have other interested people, but I can hold the room for one week max so your friend can come see it." So far, so good! We coordinated a time, and everything was ready to go.

Last minute, the friend who had agreed to see the place for me had a personal emergency, and had to cancel – honest to goodness unforeseen emergency, nothing whatsoever to do with the landlord. At this point, it was getting very close to the end of the week long hold. I didn't have time to set up another tour with the landlord and the friend, and I didn't have anyone else on standby who could pop out at the time we'd already arranged...

...And so I thought to myself, surely it's enough that they were willing to let me send someone to check out the room?

After all, they couldn't have known about my friend's unforeseen personal thing in advance. As far as they knew, he'd be coming out that day to check it out. Surely if they were a scammer, they never would have let it get that far?

I signed the sublet agreement, and sent the security deposit, along with the first month's rent.

When I got to the address in question, suitcase in hand, I learned that the room didn't exist.

You cannot simply trust things to be legit on the basis of "it would be easy to catch them red-handed if they weren't"

When incredibly obvious scam asks – which are clearly being sent from users who are block evading, and which feature literally copy/pasted language – link to blogs that say they are vetted, you can't just assume that they are actually vetted.

Yes, it would be wildly easy to get caught saying that your post was "vetted by @/gazavetters" if your post was not, in fact, vetted by gazavetters. No, that does not mean that no one would say that unless it is the truth.

If you are going to rely on the "vetted fundraiser" claim, you have to check that it's true. And to be clear, I mean that you:

  • have to check that the person seeking help is actually vetted by the person that their post is claiming to be vetted by
  • have to check that the blog in question is actually for the person seeking help, and is not an impersonator, using a similar url and a stolen profile pic
  • have to check that the vetter in question is also the account that it claims to be, and is not an impersonator account with a similar url and a stolen profile pic
  • have to check that the vetter has a legitimate and transparent vetting process
  • have to check that the vetter has also not been recently compromised or had their blog hacked

If you're not doing all of that, then any vetting that may or may not have been done is completely worthless. You're not relying on a vetting process; you're renting the room without actually seeing it simply because they offered to let you see it.

And if all that sounds like a lot of work, that's because it is! And this is exactly why people recommend avoiding gofundmes entirely unless you personally know the people asking, and instead donating to vetted charity organizations such as Anera:

Compare the checks I have to do in order to suss out scammers, even for vetted blogs, to what I need to do to be sure that Anera is legit:

It's a lot easier, isn't it?

Vetting random asks is really hard, and the human cost of not doing it properly and giving to scam farms is horrific. I know that I sleep a lot easier knowing that the money that I give for sure went to a real aid organization, instead of constantly worrying that maybe I didn't do enough, and maybe some blog that I thought was legit because I missed a check was part of a literal human trafficking organization, and I accidentally gave money to support literal slavery.

(The fact that real aid organizations can also make your money go tens of times farther than a gofundme can just sweetens the deal)

In almost every disaster I've wanted to send donations to, I've been able to use World Central Kitchen. They are almost always on the ground, trying to feed as many people as possible and helping set up ways for the people still in the disaster area to feed themselves and their neighbors.

Personal stories will always be heartbreaking, but I will reiterate what has been said above numerous times. Unless you, a family member, or a close friend knows the person asking, it's not a good bet that it's legitimate.

Reminder, analytical AI and generative AI aren't the same. While I loathe generative AI and feel there is no ethical way to use it at this time, analytical AI can serve valuable purposes in many fields.

That's the difference I've been trying to put my finger on.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.