Scribd
Upload
104 views3 pages

Feed Oversize Product Undersize Screen Mesh

Uploaded by

Sam Denielle Tugaoen

The document summarizes the results of screening salt at various mesh sizes. It shows the feed rate of 3000 kg/hr with desired product between 48-65 mesh. The screen analysis results are presented in a table showing the proportion of oversize, product, and undersize for each screen. It then shows the calculations of screen effectiveness for the 35 mesh and 100 mesh screens, which are 46.1457% and 78.6107% respectively. This indicates the 100 mesh screen is more effective at separating the desired fraction.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt

Feed Oversize Product Undersize Screen Mesh

Uploaded by

Sam Denielle Tugaoen
104 views3 pages
The document summarizes the results of screening salt at various mesh sizes. It shows the feed rate of 3000 kg/hr with desired product between 48-65 mesh. The screen analysis results are presented in a table showing the proportion of oversize, product, and undersize for each screen. It then shows the calculations of screen effectiveness for the 35 mesh and 100 mesh screens, which are 46.1457% and 78.6107% respectively. This indicates the 100 mesh screen is more effective at separating the desired fraction.

Original Description:

problems

Original Title

Prob Set

Copyright

© © All Rights Reserved

Available Formats

XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

The document summarizes the results of screening salt at various mesh sizes. It shows the feed rate of 3000 kg/hr with desired product between 48-65 mesh. The screen analysis results are presented in a table showing the proportion of oversize, product, and undersize for each screen. It then shows the calculations of screen effectiveness for the 35 mesh and 100 mesh screens, which are 46.1457% and 78.6107% respectively. This indicates the 100 mesh screen is more effective at separating the desired fraction.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
104 views3 pages

Feed Oversize Product Undersize Screen Mesh

Uploaded by

Sam Denielle Tugaoen
The document summarizes the results of screening salt at various mesh sizes. It shows the feed rate of 3000 kg/hr with desired product between 48-65 mesh. The screen analysis results are presented in a table showing the proportion of oversize, product, and undersize for each screen. It then shows the calculations of screen effectiveness for the 35 mesh and 100 mesh screens, which are 46.1457% and 78.6107% respectively. This indicates the 100 mesh screen is more effective at separating the desired fraction.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 3

#2 and #5

Table salt is being fed to a vibrating screen at the rate of 3000 kg/hr. The
desired product is the 48/65 mesh fraction. A -48 + 65-mesh screen are
therefore used, the feed being introduced on the 48 mesh screen, the
product being discharged from the 65-mesh screen. During the
operation it was observed that the average proportion of the oversize:
product: undersize was 2:1 ½:1. Calculate the effectiveness of the
screens. What conclusions can you draw from the values computed
versus the given proportion?

Screen
Mesh Feed Oversize Product Undersize
-10+14 0.0003 0.0008
-14+20 0.0037 0.0082 0.0005
-20+28 0.089 0.0189 0.0155 0.00003
-28+35 0.186 0.389 0.039 0.00012
-35+48 0.258 0.377 0.322 0.0009
-48+65 0.285 0.176 0.526 0.0136
-65+100 0.091 0.025 0.075 0.34935
-100+150 0.062 0.004 0.02 0.299
-150+200 0.025 0.0011 0.002 0.337
1 1 1 1
F1= 837
F2= 1902
F3= 261

O1= 797.5218
O2= 1105.703
S1= 39.4782 O3= 9.756203
S2= 796.2969 35
S3= 251.2438

P1= 39.42266
P2= 661.5839
100 P3= 15.76906

U1= 0.055536
U2= 134.713
U3= 235.4747

E35 = 0.461457

E 100 = 0.786107
Feed= 3000

UNDESIRED DESIRED UNDESIRED


Streams +35(1) -35+100(2) -100(3) TOTAL
x kg x kg x kg
P 0.055 39.42266 0.923 661.5839 0.022 15.76906 716.7757
O 0.4169 797.5218 0.578 1105.703 0.0051 9.756203 1912.981
U 0.00015 0.055536 0.36385 134.713 0.636 235.4747 370.2433
F 0.279 837 0.634 1902 0.087 261 3000

837 1902 261

O P U F
1 1 1 3000
0.4169 0.055 0.00015 837
0.578 0.923 0.36385 1902
0.0051 0.022 0.636 261

0.089811 2.526893 -0.24788 1912.981 O


-0.68512 -0.96778 1.883364 716.7757 P
1.595306 -1.55911 -1.63549 370.2433 U

You might also like