Scribd
Upload
76 views3 pages

If Undesired Is The Middle Fraction If Desired Is Middle Fraction

Uploaded by

Sam Denielle Tugaoen

This document summarizes the separation of a 1000kg mixture of crushed solids into three fractions using two screens with mesh sizes of 20 and 65. The screen analysis provides the percentage of the feed, product, and reject streams for each screen. Based on the analysis, the effectiveness of the 20 mesh screen is 72.99% if the middle fraction is undesired or 69.47% if the middle fraction is desired. The effectiveness of the 65 mesh screen is 89.97% if the middle fraction is undesired or 18.87% if the middle fraction is desired.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt

If Undesired Is The Middle Fraction If Desired Is Middle Fraction

Uploaded by

Sam Denielle Tugaoen
76 views3 pages
This document summarizes the separation of a 1000kg mixture of crushed solids into three fractions using two screens with mesh sizes of 20 and 65. The screen analysis provides the percentage of the feed, product, and reject streams for each screen. Based on the analysis, the effectiveness of the 20 mesh screen is 72.99% if the middle fraction is undesired or 69.47% if the middle fraction is desired. The effectiveness of the 65 mesh screen is 89.97% if the middle fraction is undesired or 18.87% if the middle fraction is desired.

Original Description:

Partech

Original Title

Excel Exer 1

Copyright

© © All Rights Reserved

Available Formats

XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

This document summarizes the separation of a 1000kg mixture of crushed solids into three fractions using two screens with mesh sizes of 20 and 65. The screen analysis provides the percentage of the feed, product, and reject streams for each screen. Based on the analysis, the effectiveness of the 20 mesh screen is 72.99% if the middle fraction is undesired or 69.47% if the middle fraction is desired. The effectiveness of the 65 mesh screen is 89.97% if the middle fraction is undesired or 18.87% if the middle fraction is desired.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
76 views3 pages

If Undesired Is The Middle Fraction If Desired Is Middle Fraction

Uploaded by

Sam Denielle Tugaoen
This document summarizes the separation of a 1000kg mixture of crushed solids into three fractions using two screens with mesh sizes of 20 and 65. The screen analysis provides the percentage of the feed, product, and reject streams for each screen. Based on the analysis, the effectiveness of the 20 mesh screen is 72.99% if the middle fraction is undesired or 69.47% if the middle fraction is desired. The effectiveness of the 65 mesh screen is 89.97% if the middle fraction is undesired or 18.87% if the middle fraction is desired.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 3

Ex.

2 It is desired to separate 1000kg of a mixture of crushed solids into three fractions a coarse fraction
retained on a 20 mesh screen; a middle fraction passing through a 20 mesh screen and retained on a 65 mesh
screen. Two Tyler Std Screens are used to remove particles 20/65. Screen analysis of the feed, coarse, medium
and fine fractions are given. What are the effectiveness of the 20 & 65 screens, given the ff. screen analysis

F= 1000 kg

F P R Q Streams +20 (1) -20+65 (2)


Screen Mesh % Feed %P %M % Fine x kg x
-4+6 2.51 3.26 0.5 0 P 0.9836 724.0042 0.0163
-6+8 12.5 13.59 11.27 0 R 0.6585 146.1304 0.3407
- 8 + 10 32.07 38.04 18.03 1.66 Q 0.3967 16.6654 0.1213
- 10 + 14 25.7 27.17 22.53 16.63 F 0.8868 886.8 0.0927
-14 + 20 15.9 16.3 13.52 21.38
-20 + 28 5.38 1.36 18.03 9.03 Check 886.8
-28+35 2.1 0.27 8.11 2.38
-35 + 48 1.02 0 4.51 0.48 Simultaneous Equations
-48 + 65 0.77 0 3.42 0.24 P R Q F
-65 + 100 0.58 0 0.09 13.3 1 1 1 1000
-100 + 150 0.41 0 0 9.74 0.9836 0.6585 0.3967 886.8
-150 + 200 0.31 0 0 7.36 0.0163 0.3407 0.1213 92.7
pan 0.75 0 0 17.81 0 0.0009 0.4821 20.5

100 99.99 100.01 100.01 -0.35378 1.404116 -1.67547 736.07579


-0.72218 0.671979 3.756043 221.91412
P 736.0758 2.075961 -2.0761 -2.08058 42.010085
R 221.9141
Q 42.01009

if undesired is the middle fraction If desired is middle fraction


Effectiveness of screen 20 Effectiveness of screen 20
E20 0.729891 E20 0.694696
Effectiveness of screen 65 Effectiveness of screen 65
E65 0.899661 E65 0.188697
-20+65 (2) -65 (3) Total
kg x kg Computed, kg
11.99804 0 0 736.0757930985
75.60614 0.0009 0.199723 221.9141215832
5.095823 0.4821 20.25306 42.0100853183
92.7 0.0205 20.5 1000

92.7 20.45278 1000

S1 162.7958499083
S2 80.7019645725
S3 20.5

`
P
Q
R

You might also like